Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I’ve not made any excuses. You’re making excuses for why Trump couldn’t sue before the election. He can and did. Your excuses don't hold water. They’re not accurate.And you are excusing anything that got you the result you wanted.
And you will encourage and support trying it again.
The case in Connecticut shows its possible. Once that is shown, any denials lose the certainty you pretend to claim.
Bullshit. The system won't override the system.
Whoever extended mail voting without changing the law first, and whoever cheated.
Ignored and dismissed, not settled.
Having the courts ignore any evidence of fraud or shenanigans is the coup.
I’ve not made any excuses. You’re making excuses for why Trump couldn’t sue before the election. He can and did. Your excuses don't hold water. They’re not accurate.
You asked for a court mandated coup by throwing out millions of votes from legitimate voters because they didn’t vote for Trump.
That’s a coup. How is it not?
The bullshit is yours as there's already a case that was adjudicated which resulted in ad hoc changes to election rules being reversed.
Which would be both parties.
There was no evidence of fraud brought into court.
You don’t know what you’re talking about. Some suits were turned away but not all. The ones that were dismissed on standing weren’t dismissed for the reasons you say.The suits were turned away for standing, regardless of source.
Coup Coup Coup, Coup Coup Coup.
That's all you sound like.
Cite the court case and what evidence was offered.There was evidence, it was just ignored and rejected.
You don’t know what you’re talking about. Some suits were turned away but not all. The ones that were dismissed on standing weren’t dismissed for the reasons you say.
Your excuses are excuses because they’re based on lies.
You literally wanted to change the rules of the election AFTER the election so Trump could win. How is that not a coup?
Cite the court case and what evidence was offered.
Back it up, or run away like a little bitch. We both know which you’ll choose.
Cite the court case and what evidence was offered.
Back it up, or run away like a little bitch. We both know which you’ll choose.
Yet again, that lawsuit didn’t allege fraud. It made complaints about the process, but not fraud.
So was OJ's murder case. So was Dred Scott and Plessey. All adjudicated.
Then the Republicans who allowed it are idiots.
Yet again, that lawsuit didn’t allege fraud. It made complaints about the process, but not fraud.
The court absolutely listened to the “evidence” presented which was mostly just feelings and baseless accusations.
So you look like a moron for taking Kari Lake at her word and also because the court case disproves the point you’re trying to make.
Case was appealed and reversed based on standing.
There was evidence, it was just ignored and rejected.
The Connecticut case shows it's possible.
Red states often have problems at polling places in democratic areas. People are used to standing in line sometimes for hours. It’s routine.If the parties were reversed, you'd be having an aneurism the Democrat fraud was so obvious, Bevis
