Sorry Kids, No New Laws For You Until You Can Name the Ones You've Already Got

[Weatherman2020]

Jeff Flake on Twitter

Hey, Senator: See 18 U.S.C. 922(g)(9) which bans firearm possession by anyone “who has been convicted in any court of a misdemeanor crime of domestic violence.

 

[LordBrownTrout]

This is how stupid they are in DC. You can't wrap your head around it. Its astounding.

 

[iceberg]

Jeff Flake on Twitter

Hey, Senator: See 18 U.S.C. 922(g)(9) which bans firearm possession by anyone “who has been convicted in any court of a misdemeanor crime of domestic violence.

and this is why a big part of my own plan is only people on the committee should be able to talk about gun and gun laws and to be on this committee to create / manage said laws, you have to prove you understand them.

THIS is why the right doesn't trust the Gov. they just spout off shit and do zero research yet we're supposed to believe what they say in "we don't want your guns" when in truth they don't understand them nor the laws.

 

[DrLove]

Obviously the military needs a little help

The Defense Department has reported only one domestic violence case to the federal gun database

 

[Auld Phart]

Jeff Flake on Twitter

Hey, Senator: See 18 U.S.C. 922(g)(9) which bans firearm possession by anyone “who has been convicted in any court of a misdemeanor crime of domestic violence.

and if the military doesn't report it?

 

[DrLove]

and if the military doesn't report it?

Exactly - they reported one case out of most likely THOUSANDS.

Obviously the current law needs additional teeth - that is all Flake is after.

 

[LordBrownTrout]

What good is a law if the govt can't even enforce what IT passed? And so the solution is to go back and ask the govt to pass another law saying the same thing? This is full retardville.

 

[Auld Phart]

What good is a law if the govt can't even enforce what IT passed? And so the solution is to go back and ask the govt to pass another law saying the same thing? This is full retardville.

the new law, as I see it, is forcing the military to follow the current law.

Doesn't make sense, but....

it makes sense, considering the recent shooter.

(wonder how many other assholes with BCDs are out there with firearms bought legally?)

 

[EvilCat Breath]

and if the military doesn't report it?

Exactly - they reported one case out of most likely THOUSANDS.

Obviously the current law needs additional teeth - that is all Flake is after.

Teeth? Like prosecuting the people who fail to make those data base entries? Yes. It's negligence.

 

[LordBrownTrout]

What good is a law if the govt can't even enforce what IT passed? And so the solution is to go back and ask the govt to pass another law saying the same thing? This is full retardville.

the new law, as I see it, is forcing the military to follow the current law.

Doesn't make sense, but....

it makes sense, considering the recent shooter.

(wonder how many other assholes with BCDs are out there with firearms bought legally?)

Oh I agree with that but I don't see the need for additional laws. This seems like data entry error.

 

[Weatherman2020]

Obviously the military needs a little help

The Defense Department has reported only one domestic violence case to the federal gun database

As Ronnie said - scariest words are I’m from the government here to help.

 

[Weatherman2020]

What good is a law if the govt can't even enforce what IT passed? And so the solution is to go back and ask the govt to pass another law saying the same thing? This is full retardville.

the new law, as I see it, is forcing the military to follow the current law.

Doesn't make sense, but....

it makes sense, considering the recent shooter.

(wonder how many other assholes with BCDs are out there with firearms bought legally?)

Laws for laws, brilliant!

 

[Weatherman2020]

Jeff Flake on Twitter

Hey, Senator: See 18 U.S.C. 922(g)(9) which bans firearm possession by anyone “who has been convicted in any court of a misdemeanor crime of domestic violence.

and if the military doesn't report it?

And?

 

[jon_berzerk]

What good is a law if the govt can't even enforce what IT passed? And so the solution is to go back and ask the govt to pass another law saying the same thing? This is full retardville.

the new law, as I see it, is forcing the military to follow the current law.

Doesn't make sense, but....

it makes sense, considering the recent shooter.

(wonder how many other assholes with BCDs are out there with firearms bought legally?)

Laws for laws, brilliant!

getting to be a little like a Monty Python act

--LOL

 

[Auld Phart]

Jeff Flake on Twitter

Hey, Senator: See 18 U.S.C. 922(g)(9) which bans firearm possession by anyone “who has been convicted in any court of a misdemeanor crime of domestic violence.

and if the military doesn't report it?

And?

and things like the church shooting happen

 

[Weatherman2020]

Jeff Flake on Twitter

Hey, Senator: See 18 U.S.C. 922(g)(9) which bans firearm possession by anyone “who has been convicted in any court of a misdemeanor crime of domestic violence.

and if the military doesn't report it?

And?

and things like the church shooting happen

Government is never accountable. The VA execs who let vets die so they could get a bonus are still working at the VA.

 

[Toro]

If they pass two laws, it will show that they’re really serious this time.

 

[Weatherman2020]

If they pass two laws, it will show that they’re really serious this time.

And if they attach a letter from the UN we know the line has been drawn and no more counting to 3.

 

[iceberg]

and if the military doesn't report it?

Exactly - they reported one case out of most likely THOUSANDS.

Obviously the current law needs additional teeth - that is all Flake is after.

that is NOT what he said he was after, now is it?