Speaker Mike Johnson: 'We have to blur' Jan. 6 vids to shield rioters from DOJ

[Chillicothe]

and dems were enraged about it

So, it wasn't withheld after all, eh?
----------------------------------------------------------

Why were the vids held back in the first place TARD!

They weren't. See above.
-------------------------------------------------------------

i dont care if faces are blurred to the video released to the public

Well, the problem with that is ----- patriotic Americans outraged by the World Economic Forum operatives attacking us.....patriotic Americans like SeditionHunters may struggle a bit in identifying those secret FBI operatives.
Here poster Yidnar, contact 'em here: Perp Sheet

if only the thousands of leftwing nazi antsemites

Oh boy! It's bigger than I thought.
So, poster Yidnar are those thousands of nazi antisemites....are they World Economic Forum operatives too? After all, poster Great Satan, seems to fear they are embedded everywhere?

I love this bar.
We've got winners.
We've got ___________.

You all in with the Satan guy?

 

[Lakhota]

It boggles my mind that MAGA Mike is so stupid. He's a complete moron!

 

[TheGreatSatan]

WEF/Democrats hella gaslight.

WEF/Democrats be like... The videos were never held back, they've always been available... DERP

 

[Faun]

Why didn't they release them years ago?

Because it's a security risk.

 

[Chillicothe]

Man, even on the scale of retards, you take the cake. .......You are giving a bad name to all the other retards.

Notably, and this cannot be encouraging to poor poster Great Satan, but.....but despite an invitation for other QAnon Fringies to join or support his personal jihad against World Economic Forum secret operatives beating up police at the Capitol, well, none of the other fringies here are willing to paddle in his crazyboat. Only fellow QAnoner's Yidnar and CrazyCatBreath seemingly wanna join his crusade,

Gotta be disheartening to see that one can be nutsocrazo ... all alone.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------

WEF/Democrats MALISHILY (sic) gaslight Americans!
..........................he'd tell you $10 Mao (sic) is a good buy.

On the other hand, Satan can be comforted to realize that the rest of the forum has not snickered at spelling issues.
I think that is a good thing, and speaks to the courtesy and civility of the rest of the chatroom.
---------------------------------------------------------

The democrats want terrorist gangs attacking......

But then, EvilCatBreath goes all in with Satan on Fringie-think.
Ultimately then, Satan can take heart to have a buddy and confidante at the Bizarro Desk.

 

[dudmuck]

View attachment 868448

The House speaker offered a remarkable statement in support of those who rioted at the Capitol in 2021.

WASHINGTON ― House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) said Tuesday that Republicans are blurring faces in security footage from inside the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021, to protect rioters from prosecution.

“We have to blur some of the faces of persons who participated in the events of that day because we don’t want them to be retaliated against and to be charged by the DOJ,” Johnson said at a press conference.

The Department of Justice has long had access to the footage and has used it in some of the roughly 1,200 criminal cases against people linked to the riot, which saw participants fight police and storm the Capitol building.

Johnson’s comment is a remarkable statement of sympathy for supporters of then-President Donald Trump who illegally entered a restricted federal building as part of a violent attack on Congress.

Though prosecutors already have the video, blurring people’s faces could prevent amateur investigators from sending tips to the FBI. Online sleuths have previously used social media and facial recognition software to help the government track down a number of suspects.

Shortly after becoming speaker in October, Johnson announced that Republicans would release thousands of hours of footage from security cameras, fulfilling a pledge he made to the far-right flank of the House GOP conference. The video has previously been available to criminal defendants and reporters by request.

More at the link below...

MAGA MIKE: 'WE HAVE TO BLUR' JAN. 6 VIDS TO SHIELD RIOTERS FROM DOJ

Protect rioters from DOJ? Why is he trying to protect the rioters from identification, investigation and prosecution? What do you think?

Why would he blur out Antifa from being prosecuted by DOJ??

 

[sartre play]

LAW & DISORDER REPUBLICANS PROTECTING CRIMINALS IN A CROWD

“We have to blur some of the faces of persons who participated in the events of that day because we don’t want them to be retaliated against and to be charged by the DOJ,” Johnson said at a press conference.

THATS BACKWARDS, YOU CANT SAY YOUR LETTING THE TRUTH OUT, & WHEN ITS NOT WORKING FOR YOU DO A COVER UP.

 

[WEATHER53]

Don’t need to help them round up more innocents for more endless persecution of protest prosecutions

 

[Procrustes Stretched]

THATS BACKWARDS, YOU CANT SAY YOUR LETTING THE TRUTH OUT, & WHEN ITS NOT WORKING FOR YOU DO A COVER UP.

Right, Speaker Johnson and the MAGA Republicans in the House are attempting a cover up, by protecting people who may have broken laws.

Facts Matter:

Nobody who has been arrested and prosecuted has proof they broke no laws. People who were there who broke no laws have not been targeted for arrest and prosecution.

Repeat: People who were there and who broke no laws have not been targeted for arrest and prosecution.

 

[Procrustes Stretched]

Don’t need to help them round up more innocents for more endless persecution of protest prosecutions

Again:
Right, Speaker Johnson and the MAGA Republicans in the House are attempting a cover up, by protecting people who may have broken laws.

Facts Matter:

Nobody who has been arrested and prosecuted has proof they broke no laws. People who were there who broke no laws have not been targeted for arrest and prosecution.

Repeat: People who were there and who broke no laws have not been targeted for arrest and prosecution.

and__________________________________

Most of the people who were at the rally did not riot. So, they have nothing to fear.

 

[WEATHER53]

Right, Speaker Johnson and the MAGA Republicans in the House are attempting a cover up, by protecting people who may have broken laws.
V
Facts Matter:

Nobody who has been arrested and prosecuted has proof they broke no laws. People who were there who broke no laws have not been targeted for arrest and prosecution.

Repeat: People who were there and who broke no laws have not been targeted for arrest and prosecution.

They have no obligation to reveal faces for the Gestapo. . That not the purpose of the video release

 

[WEATHER53]

Again:
Right, Speaker Johnson and the MAGA Republicans in the House are attempting a cover up, by protecting people who may have broken laws.

Facts Matter:

Nobody who has been arrested and prosecuted has proof they broke no laws. People who were there who broke no laws have not been targeted for arrest and prosecution.

Repeat: People who were there and who broke no laws have not been targeted for arrest and prosecution.

and__________________________________

Most of the people who were at the rally did not riot. So, they have nothing to fear.

The video release is for the purpose they stated it was and not for your feelings that it could be assistive for more arrests.

 

[Leviticus]

Mike Johnson is blurring people's faces. Simply because he doesn't want anyone to get in trouble for an insurrection that he helped plan. Johnson was in league with the proud boys and other white supremacist groups. That planned the attack. He knew the attack was going to happen before. It happened in a been months afterwards trying to cover it up and blame others.

He was in on the entire thing. He had prior knowledge of the attack.

 

[WEATHER53]

Mike Johnson is blurring people's faces. Simply because he doesn't want anyone to get in trouble for an insurrection that he helped plan. Johnson was in league with the proud boys and other white supremacist groups. That planned the attack. He knew the attack was going to happen before. It happened in a been months afterwards trying to cover it up and blame others.

He was in on the entire thing. He had prior knowledge of the attack.

No insurrection occurred and Johnson does not need to assist political persecution arrests

 

[Procrustes Stretched]

They have no obligation to reveal faces for the Gestapo. . That not the purpose of the video release

The government has all the tapes. wtf r u yappin bout? It's about hiding from the public and it's a publicity stunt for dopes like you who fall for bs over and over again.

 

[Foolardi]

View attachment 868448

The House speaker offered a remarkable statement in support of those who rioted at the Capitol in 2021.

WASHINGTON ― House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) said Tuesday that Republicans are blurring faces in security footage from inside the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021, to protect rioters from prosecution.

“We have to blur some of the faces of persons who participated in the events of that day because we don’t want them to be retaliated against and to be charged by the DOJ,” Johnson said at a press conference.

The Department of Justice has long had access to the footage and has used it in some of the roughly 1,200 criminal cases against people linked to the riot, which saw participants fight police and storm the Capitol building.

Johnson’s comment is a remarkable statement of sympathy for supporters of then-President Donald Trump who illegally entered a restricted federal building as part of a violent attack on Congress.

Though prosecutors already have the video, blurring people’s faces could prevent amateur investigators from sending tips to the FBI. Online sleuths have previously used social media and facial recognition software to help the government track down a number of suspects.

Shortly after becoming speaker in October, Johnson announced that Republicans would release thousands of hours of footage from security cameras, fulfilling a pledge he made to the far-right flank of the House GOP conference. The video has previously been available to criminal defendants and reporters by request.

More at the link below...

MAGA MIKE: 'WE HAVE TO BLUR' JAN. 6 VIDS TO SHIELD RIOTERS FROM DOJ

Protect rioters from DOJ? Why is he trying to protect the rioters from identification, investigation and prosecution? What do you think?

January 6th was a Plot.With a definite agenda.The more we learn about
it the worse it gets for Democrats.No Firearm was used or collected
on that day.Turns out it was participated by undercover FBI agents
trained in the use of how to Provocateur.Does the name Ray Epps
hold water.No finer firsthand example of how to " provocateur " than
Ray Epps.Not only on January but also the day before.
Turns out Epps was handed a complete pass.No Jail time.
Treated as if failing to obey a traffic violation.
The DC judges overhearing the court decisions regarding
the trials of those { over 1,000 } January 6th defendants are
as Unamerican and Stalinistic as ever used in this country.
The Democrats used it to Prove how they could change
DUE PROCESS and forced America to see things their
way or the highway.Like the way the FBI and DOJ have been
used to shock decent Americans into complying to their
Command and Control.I mean,talk about being Castro.
Locking down the Capitol with steel barriers and
concertina wire to make sure Joe American cannot
visit or voice concern with their representative.
Franz Kafka would be inebribrated with guilt just
reading about.But that's the thingy ... The Truth is not
being heard or read.It was a Plot.To take over the United
States.The way Journalism was hijacked.

 

[Faun]

They have no obligation to reveal faces for the Gestapo. . That not the purpose of the video release

Actually, it may be a crime...

18 U.S.C. § 2

(a) Whoever commits an offense against the United States or aids, abets, counsels, commands, induces or procures its commission, is punishable as a principal.​

 

[Faun]

No insurrection occurred and Johnson does not need to assist political persecution arrests

Sure it did.

Colorado Supreme Court justices question whether the state can bar Trump from the 2024 ballot

Colorado Supreme Court justices have sharply questioned whether they could exclude former President Donald Trump from the state's 2024 ballot

www.sandiegouniontribune.com

A district court judge in Denver last month ruled that while Trump engaged in insurrection by inciting the violent attack​

 

[WEATHER53]

The benefit of the release of tapes is very frightening for liberals so they divert the purpose of the release into some “wrongdoing” to benefit them

 

[WEATHER53]

Sure it did.

Colorado Supreme Court justices question whether the state can bar Trump from the 2024 ballot

Colorado Supreme Court justices have sharply questioned whether they could exclude former President Donald Trump from the state's 2024 ballot

www.sandiegouniontribune.com

​

A district court judge in Denver last month ruled that while Trump engaged in insurrection by inciting the violent attack​

Piss ass in Co trying to get chesty about federal affairs in DC