Quantum Windbag
Gold Member
- May 9, 2010
- 58,308
- 5,100
- Thread starter
- #481
Republicans must be freaking out over Hillary's popularity! They've now switched their aim at Hillary. Before Nov 6, they were aiming at Obama, trying to put the Benghazi blame on him, but since that didn't work, he got re-elected, now they're freaking out over Hillary and have turned their aim at her.
What they have failed to provide is a motive for her to deceive Americans about what happened. What was she trying to "cover up"? So far all they can say is she was trying to cover up something, but they can't figure out what it was! Rep Schiff hit the nail on the head.
This is the same political exercise as before, with just a different target in mind, said Rep. Adam B. Schiff (D-Calif.), a senior member of the Select Committee on Intelligence. Theyre no longer going after the White House, perhaps because the presidents not running for reelection, and theyre going after the former secretary of state, perhaps because she will be.
Republican probe of Benghazi attacks turns to Hillary Clinton - Washington Post
Maybe we should have investigated Condi when embassies were attacked under her watch!
13 Benghazis Happened Under President Bush and Fox News Said Nothing
Gee, Representative Schiff...maybe they are trying to find out why so many people felt the need to lie to the American people about what really took place in Libya that day? The list of Obama Administration folks that DID lie range from Barack Obama himself...to his Secretary of State, Hilary Clinton...to his UN Ambassador, Susan Rice...to his Press Secretary Jay Carney. At this point it would be nice to know who IS trustworthy in this Administration. Between Timmy Geithner blaming his failure to pay the proper tax on not understanding TurboTax to Eric Holder declaring that he knew nothing about Fast & Furious? Is there ANYONE in this gang that can't shoot straight that isn't a bald faced liar?
You all keep saying they are lying, but you all can't come up with any evidence that they are. The truth is, we know that Bush/Cheney lied about WMDs, more than 4 people died, and how come Republicans aren't investigating that?
You want to know the difference?
The CIA said Saddam had WMDs, Bush relied on their briefings, the CIA was wrong.
The CIA said this was a terrorist attack by Al Qeda sympathizers, Obama rejected their briefings, the CIA was right.
By the way, since you like to quote Petreaus, you might want to quote where he rejected the idea that this was a movie review, and said it was terrorism. In fact, he called them useless the day before Rice went on the air and claimed the CIA thought it was a protest over a video.
KARL: That was never true. And then they went on and took out all of the al Qaeda references
RADDATZ: But they would say they didnt know that at the time.
KARL: Right.
RADDATZ: About those. How about CIA Director David Petraeus? How did he respond to these talking points? And I know you have new information on that.
KARL: Yeah, this is fascinating. Because Mike Morrell, who was the deputy director, was the one that ultimately signed off on this one. Petraeus finally saw the final version of the talking points. This is the Saturday afternoon before Susan Rices appearances on the Sundayshows. He looks at these and says theyre essentially useless. And direct quote from his e-mail. He says, I would just as soon not use them. But its their call, meaning the White Houses call.
RADDATZ: And they got the talking points out there.
'This Week' Transcript: Sen. John McCain and Sen. Jack Reed - ABC News
I wonder, who in the administration could possibly override the director of the CIA on what his agency was going to say?