Billy000
Democratic Socialist
- Nov 10, 2011
- 32,545
- 13,215
The president was not answering to the people when there were questions that need to be answered, not by his press officer, but by him. He chose to have Jay Carney answer thise questions while he continued to campaign for president.
Questions arose where was the president when the people needed him and mostly while the Middle East was see uprising against the US and our own citizens were in harms way. Again, we didn't hear from the president , but from his spokesman while he toured the US to garner votes for the upcoming election.
Four people died and speculation became facts that protection was denied to them while the president failed to have face to face daily intelligence briefings that may have uncovered the need and the requests from Libya for more protection. This came to light during the investigations that followed the murder of four men in Benghazi.
That is the purpose of Jay Carney. That is his job. If Obama had done it, how would the answers have been different?
You don't seem to understand. Benghazi was under attack and our Ambassador and his men were killed. Triipoli was under attack and several other US sites were experiencing anti US demonstrations. It was a time to hear from OUR LEADER, not an underling. If Winston Churchill's press secretary would have said, "We have nothing to fear, but fear itself," would that have put calm into the Brits in a time of crisis?
People ask, "Just where is our leader when things are falling apart?" Sometimes there is a time to put down the re election banner and tend to governing. Obama failed the test.
That is a subjective point. It is just an opinion. Hardly enough to contribute to the controversy.