ColonelAngus
Diamond Member
- Feb 25, 2015
- 53,529
- 54,318
- 3,615
Assad is bad.
That was Spicer's point.
Who disagrees?
That was Spicer's point.
Who disagrees?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Sure, I agree with that. Though I don't get the sense that Spicer would agree with that.So? I never said there was an outcry from the right. That's your strawman. In fact, my position is that his idiocy went largely ignored because no one really cares what Chris Mathews has to say.LOLWND? A right wing web site? Wow.
Compared to,
CNN
Spicer apologizes for Hitler comparison: 'It was a mistake to do that' - CNNPolitics.com
tIME.
Sean Spicer: Hitler 'Didn't Even Sink to Using Chemical Weapons'
The new york times.
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/04/12/...tler-sarin-chemical-weapons-world-war-ii.html
washington post.
Spicer: Hitler ‘didn’t even sink to using chemical weapons,’ although he sent Jews to ‘the Holocaust center’
I could go on.
and on.
and on.
Matthews's comment was ignored by republicans because most of the agree with him and those that don't realize that he was not minimizing or denying the Holocaust, and they are not complete dicks.
Liberals ignored it, because it did not serve the agenda to attack and smear Matthews.
This is a minor difference of opinion on semantics.
Let's clarify something.
In my opinion, the Holocaust was one of the worst, and most horrific atrocities in human history.
Are we in complete agreement on that?
(this is not a rhetorical question. YOu are acting as though you think we are NOT.)
Who cares if you can go on?
Again...
You asked...
"Got something on the Right slamming Mathews over his HItler not using chemical weapons comment?"
I found something and now you're howling like a bitch over it.
And what you found demonstrated that there was NOT an outcry from the right, in any way similar to the one you claim would have happened if the situation was reversed.
Regardless, you asked who on the right did and I showed you.
I also asked you,
In my opinion, the Holocaust was one of the worst, and most horrific atrocities in human history.
Are we in complete agreement on that?
(this is not a rhetorical question. YOu are acting as though you think we are NOT.)
Assad is bad.
That was Spicer's point.
Who disagrees?
No one.Assad is bad.
That was Spicer's point.
Who disagrees?
No one.Assad is bad.
That was Spicer's point.
Who disagrees?
Uh, yes -- he did you Trump ball gurgling clown.
It's a) about being historically correct; and b) it was highly offensive to Jews for the White House to suggest their family members were rounded up in "Holocaust centers," where they were murdered with gas, and to idiotically state Hitler didn't use chemical weapons. Even worse, to utter such nonsense during Passover.No one.Assad is bad.
That was Spicer's point.
Who disagrees?
So, you agree with his point.
That's good.
So what's all the fuss about a disagreement on semantics?
Actually, the point is that Spicer is an ignorant drooling idiot.Assad is bad.
That was Spicer's point.
Who disagrees?
WTF?Uh, yes -- he did you Trump ball gurgling clown.
To people who retain this meme. Hitler never used chemical weapons in warfare, which is certainly different than using them non combatants. He could have really messed the Russian advancers up with chemical warfare, but never did. Chemical weapons are no joke, which he never used on the battlefield, even when it was prudent for someone like him to do so.
What I'm saying it's it's surprising that with all the WAR CRIMES (operating word being war crimes) hitler never resorted to using chemical weapons against the soviet or American advancers. Which is what spicer was saying. Those who want to split that hair, go ahed and defend hezbollah for what they do. If you are a defender of hezbollah, you have zero shit to say about what spicer said.?
Rubbish!WTF?Uh, yes -- he did you Trump ball gurgling clown.
To people who retain this meme. Hitler never used chemical weapons in warfare, which is certainly different than using them non combatants. He could have really messed the Russian advancers up with chemical warfare, but never did. Chemical weapons are no joke, which he never used on the battlefield, even when it was prudent for someone like him to do so.
What I'm saying it's it's surprising that with all the WAR CRIMES (operating word being war crimes) hitler never resorted to using chemical weapons against the soviet or American advancers. Which is what spicer was saying. Those who want to split that hair, go ahed and defend hezbollah for what they do. If you are a defender of hezbollah, you have zero shit to say about what spicer said.?
So what that he never used them in battle? He used them in death camps to kill millions of people.
Izzat the title of your autobiography?Rubbish!WTF?Uh, yes -- he did you Trump ball gurgling clown.
To people who retain this meme. Hitler never used chemical weapons in warfare, which is certainly different than using them non combatants. He could have really messed the Russian advancers up with chemical warfare, but never did. Chemical weapons are no joke, which he never used on the battlefield, even when it was prudent for someone like him to do so.
What I'm saying it's it's surprising that with all the WAR CRIMES (operating word being war crimes) hitler never resorted to using chemical weapons against the soviet or American advancers. Which is what spicer was saying. Those who want to split that hair, go ahed and defend hezbollah for what they do. If you are a defender of hezbollah, you have zero shit to say about what spicer said.?
So what that he never used them in battle? He used them in death camps to kill millions of people.
No! It's the descriptions of your posts.Izzat the title of your autobiography?Rubbish!WTF?Uh, yes -- he did you Trump ball gurgling clown.
To people who retain this meme. Hitler never used chemical weapons in warfare, which is certainly different than using them non combatants. He could have really messed the Russian advancers up with chemical warfare, but never did. Chemical weapons are no joke, which he never used on the battlefield, even when it was prudent for someone like him to do so.
What I'm saying it's it's surprising that with all the WAR CRIMES (operating word being war crimes) hitler never resorted to using chemical weapons against the soviet or American advancers. Which is what spicer was saying. Those who want to split that hair, go ahed and defend hezbollah for what they do. If you are a defender of hezbollah, you have zero shit to say about what spicer said.?
So what that he never used them in battle? He used them in death camps to kill millions of people.
How sad.He is apologizing for you liberals making what he said into something he did not say. hitler did not use chemical weapons of any kind on the civilian people of Germany. The fact is that the gas used in the gas chambers was not a weapons grade chemical agent. They were killed with carbon monoxide and-or cyanide gas mixtures in most cases Zyklon B. The latter was used at Auschwitz but it was more expensive and not used as often as Carbon Monoxide. CBR's were not used against political opponents by hitler. They were used as genocidal tools against a religious group much as liberals would like to do to Christians. As you say Sunni man no dead for autopsy, but most of the bodies were burned, just the scientific records of the amounts ZB used are more than the amount to kill roaches. The vast majority of them were killed with carbon mono.
Hitler used chemicals and he used them as a weapon to kill millions of people. It sure didn't take long for you sick fucks to sink to the lowest depths imaginable just to defend this administration.
Congrats.
WTF?Uh, yes -- he did you Trump ball gurgling clown.
To people who retain this meme. Hitler never used chemical weapons in warfare, which is certainly different than using them non combatants. He could have really messed the Russian advancers up with chemical warfare, but never did. Chemical weapons are no joke, which he never used on the battlefield, even when it was prudent for someone like him to do so.
What I'm saying it's it's surprising that with all the WAR CRIMES (operating word being war crimes) hitler never resorted to using chemical weapons against the soviet or American advancers. Which is what spicer was saying. Those who want to split that hair, go ahed and defend hezbollah for what they do. If you are a defender of hezbollah, you have zero shit to say about what spicer said.?
So what that he never used them in battle? He used them in death camps to kill millions of people.
Sorry, but you're too fucking retarded to bother with. Suffice it to say, what he said was so outrageous, he had to apologize for it.How sad.He is apologizing for you liberals making what he said into something he did not say. hitler did not use chemical weapons of any kind on the civilian people of Germany. The fact is that the gas used in the gas chambers was not a weapons grade chemical agent. They were killed with carbon monoxide and-or cyanide gas mixtures in most cases Zyklon B. The latter was used at Auschwitz but it was more expensive and not used as often as Carbon Monoxide. CBR's were not used against political opponents by hitler. They were used as genocidal tools against a religious group much as liberals would like to do to Christians. As you say Sunni man no dead for autopsy, but most of the bodies were burned, just the scientific records of the amounts ZB used are more than the amount to kill roaches. The vast majority of them were killed with carbon mono.
Hitler used chemicals and he used them as a weapon to kill millions of people. It sure didn't take long for you sick fucks to sink to the lowest depths imaginable just to defend this administration.
Congrats.
What exactly did Spicer say? He did not discount the Murder of the Jews in the German concentration camps. He said that even HITLER did not use chemical weapons on his people. HE DID NOT! They executed Jews by the millions with a common pesticide very rarely and with exhaust fumes almost all of the time. Not nerve gas or mustard gas. If you are too stupid to realize the difference it proves your liberal education is as all of them incomplete and lacking all you need to make any statement about reality. hitler was one of if not the most vile person to draw a breath, but reaching for a lie does not bolster a point. make a point. So you either are stupid or lying once again to attack someone for the sake of attacking ANYTHING they say that you can misconstrue. So if anyone is sick it is you liberal shit. Would you consider the act less heinous if they were just set on fire and burned with gasoline. C mono puts you to sleep and you asphyxiate. Sarin gas makes your entire body jerk violently and causes you to lose al control over all bodily functions tremors are the first signs, then you convulse and your muscles contract and can even break you bones. you vomit defecate, and asphyxiate all at the same time. Mustard Gas unlike what one of your typical liberal superintelligent (HAHAHAHA) news persons on msnbc said a while back burns the skin off of you and blisters the inside of your trachea, lungs and esophageal lining causing them to blister and fill your lungs with fluid that causes your alveoli to stop absorbing O2 and passing it to your Hemoglobin. You also lose any affected skin just as any deep chemical burn would. I would much rather be killed with the co than either, But as to the roach killer, cyanide is a horrible death to endure. So if they were using it they used a chemical poison to kill them. Even though it was not a weapon. You may get you little stab by on that basis, but not on factual chemical grade weapons use.
Hitler didn't use them in death camps to kill millions?WTF?Uh, yes -- he did you Trump ball gurgling clown.
To people who retain this meme. Hitler never used chemical weapons in warfare, which is certainly different than using them non combatants. He could have really messed the Russian advancers up with chemical warfare, but never did. Chemical weapons are no joke, which he never used on the battlefield, even when it was prudent for someone like him to do so.
What I'm saying it's it's surprising that with all the WAR CRIMES (operating word being war crimes) hitler never resorted to using chemical weapons against the soviet or American advancers. Which is what spicer was saying. Those who want to split that hair, go ahed and defend hezbollah for what they do. If you are a defender of hezbollah, you have zero shit to say about what spicer said.?
So what that he never used them in battle? He used them in death camps to kill millions of people.
No he did not!!!
Nope!Hitler didn't use them in death camps to kill millions?WTF?Uh, yes -- he did you Trump ball gurgling clown.
To people who retain this meme. Hitler never used chemical weapons in warfare, which is certainly different than using them non combatants. He could have really messed the Russian advancers up with chemical warfare, but never did. Chemical weapons are no joke, which he never used on the battlefield, even when it was prudent for someone like him to do so.
What I'm saying it's it's surprising that with all the WAR CRIMES (operating word being war crimes) hitler never resorted to using chemical weapons against the soviet or American advancers. Which is what spicer was saying. Those who want to split that hair, go ahed and defend hezbollah for what they do. If you are a defender of hezbollah, you have zero shit to say about what spicer said.?
So what that he never used them in battle? He used them in death camps to kill millions of people.
No he did not!!!
LOLNope!Hitler didn't use them in death camps to kill millions?WTF?Uh, yes -- he did you Trump ball gurgling clown.
To people who retain this meme. Hitler never used chemical weapons in warfare, which is certainly different than using them non combatants. He could have really messed the Russian advancers up with chemical warfare, but never did. Chemical weapons are no joke, which he never used on the battlefield, even when it was prudent for someone like him to do so.
What I'm saying it's it's surprising that with all the WAR CRIMES (operating word being war crimes) hitler never resorted to using chemical weapons against the soviet or American advancers. Which is what spicer was saying. Those who want to split that hair, go ahed and defend hezbollah for what they do. If you are a defender of hezbollah, you have zero shit to say about what spicer said.?
So what that he never used them in battle? He used them in death camps to kill millions of people.
No he did not!!!
It's a) about being historically correct; and b) it was highly offensive to Jews for the White House to suggest their family members were rounded up in "Holocaust centers," where they were murdered with gas, and to idiotically state Hitler didn't use chemical weapons. Even worse, to utter such nonsense during Passover.No one.Assad is bad.
That was Spicer's point.
Who disagrees?
So, you agree with his point.
That's good.
So what's all the fuss about a disagreement on semantics?
He was rightfully called on it and he rightfully apologized.