Spicer Says Hitler Didn't "Use Chemical Weapons"

TOP 5 JOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO HATERS OF USMB
  1. Penelope
  2. louie888
  3. fanger
  4. P F Tinmore
  5. Coyote
Leftists, each and every last one.

Lie all you want Fawn, but the Antisemites are the democrats, and we ALL know it.
LOLOL

Yeah, let's leave out:

Steve_McGarrett
ShootSpeeders
novasteve
KokomoJojo
Sunni Man

Oh, and from your list, P F Tinmore is conservative ....

I donno. I am a conservative Christian. I am out of that loop.

.... and Coyote is not a Holocaust denier ...

In the event that came to be known as "The Holocaust" - somewhere around 11 million Jews, Gypsies, Slavs, communists, 7th Day Adventists, homosexuals, mentally and physically disabled and others were methodically murdered in what is without question the largest and most thoroughly documented genocide of the 20th century. Of those 11 million, one million were children.

Out of approsimately nine million Jews who in Europe before the Holocaust, approximately two-thirds were killed.

That's called a Reality Check.

I agree with the topic title: No Holocaust in Gaza.

Tinhorn is a Hamas liar, there is nothing remotely "conservative" about him.

mcGarrett is not a holocaust denier.

Shitshisspeedos I pay no attention to, but have never seen anything from. The others I have not seen post on the subject, save Sunni who if you don't grasp is pure satire, well...
 
No wonder you voted for "the gropenfuherer" , you are a bit illiterate.
Did the Nazi's use gas during the war?
Simple yes or no.

Uh, yes -- he did you Trump ball gurgling clown.

They were never used in combat, only in the programmed killings of the holocaust. Hitler was a gas casualty during World War I, so it has always been assumed that his reluctance to use said weapons on enemy formations stemmed from his experience with them.

It's not that simple. They only used it in the death camps, not at the front.

It couldn't be used at the front. It was not a chemical weapon, it was specifically designed to kill people in gas chambers, then become inert. To call it a "chemical weapon" is utterly stupid, not that the fascist democrats care, they seek to smear and slander the enemy, never was reason even considered by them
What a dumb fucking argument. :cuckoo:

Different weapons have different applications. Zyklon B was not an outdoor weapon, so of course it wasn't used on front lines. For the purposes of committing mass murdered, it was designed as an indoor weapon.
 
TOP 5 JOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO HATERS OF USMB
  1. Penelope
  2. Loui888
  3. Fanger
  4. P.F. Tinamore
  5. Coyote
Leftists, each and every last one.

Lie all you want Fawn, but the Antisemites are the democrats, and we ALL know it.
This asshole must have never read my posts. I am a Jew and have posted multiple times how fake Jews who call themselves Jewish commit atrocities in our name and have no more right to use the name "Israel" for their stolen land than they do to call themselves Jewish.
 
No wonder you voted for "the gropenfuherer" , you are a bit illiterate.
Did the Nazi's use gas during the war?
Simple yes or no.

Uh, yes -- he did you Trump ball gurgling clown.

They were never used in combat, only in the programmed killings of the holocaust. Hitler was a gas casualty during World War I, so it has always been assumed that his reluctance to use said weapons on enemy formations stemmed from his experience with them.

It's not that simple. They only used it in the death camps, not at the front.

It couldn't be used at the front. It was not a chemical weapon, it was specifically designed to kill people in gas chambers, then become inert. To call it a "chemical weapon" is utterly stupid, not that the fascist democrats care, they seek to smear and slander the enemy, never was reason even considered by them
What a dumb fucking argument. :cuckoo:

Different weapons have different applications. Zyklon B was not an outdoor weapon, so of course it wasn't used on front lines. For the purposes of committing mass murdered, it was designed as an indoor weapon.

Translation: WAHHHHHH - WE HATE, WE HATE, WE HATE. Facts don't matter, we HATE and must attack Trump or anyone associated with him.

Zyklon B ain't Mustard gas, in fact the whole POINT is that it was safe for the Nazis to use in the death chambers. You fascists are just so filled to the brim with hate that you won't let little things like facts and reason interfere with your endless rage.

Try this; does Switzerland have Chemical and Biological weapons? Do they possess chlorine and hydrochloric acid? Can Chlorine and hydrochloric acid kill people locked in a room where it it introduced?

And yet everyone from the UN to the USA agree that Switzerland doesn't have chemical weapons. Why? Because the phrase "chemical weapon" has a specific meaning, the ability to use it in battle.
 
And there is actually ZERO credible evidence that people were gassed to death.

51 page thread here alone and that elusive evidence has still not been posted.
 
TOP 5 JOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO HATERS OF USMB
  1. Penelope
  2. Loui888
  3. Fanger
  4. P.F. Tinamore
  5. Coyote
Leftists, each and every last one.

Lie all you want Fawn, but the Antisemites are the democrats, and we ALL know it.
This asshole must have never read my posts. I am a Jew and have posted multiple times how fake Jews who call themselves Jewish commit atrocities in our name and have no more right to use the name "Israel" for their stolen land than they do to call themselves Jewish.

I've read more of your Nazi shit than I care to. You are a vile creature.
 
TOP 5 JOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO HATERS OF USMB
  1. Penelope
  2. Loui888
  3. Fanger
  4. P.F. Tinamore
  5. Coyote
Leftists, each and every last one.

Lie all you want Fawn, but the Antisemites are the democrats, and we ALL know it.
This asshole must have never read my posts. I am a Jew and have posted multiple times how fake Jews who call themselves Jewish commit atrocities in our name and have no more right to use the name "Israel" for their stolen land than they do to call themselves Jewish.

I've read more of your Nazi shit than I care to. You are a vile creature.
I have never posted "nazi shit," asshole and only a vile creature would falsely accuse someone of that. The same vile creature I suppose that has no proof that anyone was gassed to death in WWII, but still claims that millions were marched offf to gas chambers.
 
TOP 5 JOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO HATERS OF USMB
  1. Penelope
  2. louie888
  3. fanger
  4. P F Tinmore
  5. Coyote
Leftists, each and every last one.

Lie all you want Fawn, but the Antisemites are the democrats, and we ALL know it.
LOLOL

Yeah, let's leave out:

Steve_McGarrett
ShootSpeeders
novasteve
KokomoJojo
Sunni Man

Oh, and from your list, P F Tinmore is conservative ....

I donno. I am a conservative Christian. I am out of that loop.

.... and Coyote is not a Holocaust denier ...

In the event that came to be known as "The Holocaust" - somewhere around 11 million Jews, Gypsies, Slavs, communists, 7th Day Adventists, homosexuals, mentally and physically disabled and others were methodically murdered in what is without question the largest and most thoroughly documented genocide of the 20th century. Of those 11 million, one million were children.

Out of approsimately nine million Jews who in Europe before the Holocaust, approximately two-thirds were killed.

That's called a Reality Check.

I agree with the topic title: No Holocaust in Gaza.

Tinhorn is a Hamas liar, there is nothing remotely "conservative" about him.

mcGarrett is not a holocaust denier.

Shitshisspeedos I pay no attention to, but have never seen anything from. The others I have not seen post on the subject, save Sunni who if you don't grasp is pure satire, well...
Dumbfuck...
Hitler didn't use them in death camps to kill millions?
Nope!
 
TOP 5 JOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO HATERS OF USMB
  1. Penelope
  2. Loui888
  3. Fanger
  4. P.F. Tinamore
  5. Coyote
Leftists, each and every last one.

Lie all you want Fawn, but the Antisemites are the democrats, and we ALL know it.
This asshole must have never read my posts. I am a Jew and have posted multiple times how fake Jews who call themselves Jewish commit atrocities in our name and have no more right to use the name "Israel" for their stolen land than they do to call themselves Jewish.

I've read more of your Nazi shit than I care to. You are a vile creature.
I have never posted "nazi shit," asshole and only a vile creature would falsely accuse someone of that. The same vile creature I suppose that has no proof that anyone was gassed to death in WWII, but still claims that millions were marched offf to gas chambers.

Iggy time for you, Nazi boi. Congratulations, you are only my second ignored poster.
 
TOP 5 JOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO HATERS OF USMB
  1. Penelope
  2. Loui888
  3. Fanger
  4. P.F. Tinamore
  5. Coyote
Leftists, each and every last one.

Lie all you want Fawn, but the Antisemites are the democrats, and we ALL know it.
This asshole must have never read my posts. I am a Jew and have posted multiple times how fake Jews who call themselves Jewish commit atrocities in our name and have no more right to use the name "Israel" for their stolen land than they do to call themselves Jewish.
That one's not only an asshole, he's also completely fucking deranged. Batshit insane.

latest
 
No wonder you voted for "the gropenfuherer" , you are a bit illiterate.
Did the Nazi's use gas during the war?
Simple yes or no.

They were never used in combat, only in the programmed killings of the holocaust. Hitler was a gas casualty during World War I, so it has always been assumed that his reluctance to use said weapons on enemy formations stemmed from his experience with them.

It's not that simple. They only used it in the death camps, not at the front.

It couldn't be used at the front. It was not a chemical weapon, it was specifically designed to kill people in gas chambers, then become inert. To call it a "chemical weapon" is utterly stupid, not that the fascist democrats care, they seek to smear and slander the enemy, never was reason even considered by them
What a dumb fucking argument. :cuckoo:

Different weapons have different applications. Zyklon B was not an outdoor weapon, so of course it wasn't used on front lines. For the purposes of committing mass murdered, it was designed as an indoor weapon.

Translation: WAHHHHHH - WE HATE, WE HATE, WE HATE. Facts don't matter, we HATE and must attack Trump or anyone associated with him.

Zyklon B ain't Mustard gas, in fact the whole POINT is that it was safe for the Nazis to use in the death chambers. You fascists are just so filled to the brim with hate that you won't let little things like facts and reason interfere with your endless rage.

Try this; does Switzerland have Chemical and Biological weapons? Do they possess chlorine and hydrochloric acid? Can Chlorine and hydrochloric acid kill people locked in a room where it it introduced?

And yet everyone from the UN to the USA agree that Switzerland doesn't have chemical weapons. Why? Because the phrase "chemical weapon" has a specific meaning, the ability to use it in battle.
WTF is wrong with you? So what if zyklon B is not mustard gas? It's not a firearm either; but Hitler still used it as a weapon to kill millions of people.
 
TOP 5 JOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO HATERS OF USMB
  1. Penelope
  2. Loui888
  3. Fanger
  4. P.F. Tinamore
  5. Coyote
Leftists, each and every last one.

Lie all you want Fawn, but the Antisemites are the democrats, and we ALL know it.
This asshole must have never read my posts. I am a Jew and have posted multiple times how fake Jews who call themselves Jewish commit atrocities in our name and have no more right to use the name "Israel" for their stolen land than they do to call themselves Jewish.
That one's not only an asshole, he's also completely fucking deranged. Batshit insane.

latest

That you and the Nazi became instant "besties" surprises no one, Fawn.
 
No wonder you voted for "the gropenfuherer" , you are a bit illiterate.
Did the Nazi's use gas during the war?
Simple yes or no.

It's not that simple. They only used it in the death camps, not at the front.

It couldn't be used at the front. It was not a chemical weapon, it was specifically designed to kill people in gas chambers, then become inert. To call it a "chemical weapon" is utterly stupid, not that the fascist democrats care, they seek to smear and slander the enemy, never was reason even considered by them
What a dumb fucking argument. :cuckoo:

Different weapons have different applications. Zyklon B was not an outdoor weapon, so of course it wasn't used on front lines. For the purposes of committing mass murdered, it was designed as an indoor weapon.

Translation: WAHHHHHH - WE HATE, WE HATE, WE HATE. Facts don't matter, we HATE and must attack Trump or anyone associated with him.

Zyklon B ain't Mustard gas, in fact the whole POINT is that it was safe for the Nazis to use in the death chambers. You fascists are just so filled to the brim with hate that you won't let little things like facts and reason interfere with your endless rage.

Try this; does Switzerland have Chemical and Biological weapons? Do they possess chlorine and hydrochloric acid? Can Chlorine and hydrochloric acid kill people locked in a room where it it introduced?

And yet everyone from the UN to the USA agree that Switzerland doesn't have chemical weapons. Why? Because the phrase "chemical weapon" has a specific meaning, the ability to use it in battle.
WTF is wrong with you? So what if zyklon B is not mustard gas? It's not a firearm either; but Hitler still used it as a weapon to kill millions of people.

Try again stupid fuck.


Try this; does Switzerland have Chemical and Biological weapons? Do they possess chlorine and hydrochloric acid? Can Chlorine and hydrochloric acid kill people locked in a room where it it introduced?

And yet everyone from the UN to the USA agree that Switzerland doesn't have chemical weapons. Why? Because the phrase "chemical weapon" has a specific meaning, the ability to use it in battle

Yeah, you have no brain, you have your Fuhrer and that's all you need.
 
TOP 5 JOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO HATERS OF USMB
  1. Penelope
  2. Loui888
  3. Fanger
  4. P.F. Tinamore
  5. Coyote
Leftists, each and every last one.

Lie all you want Fawn, but the Antisemites are the democrats, and we ALL know it.
This asshole must have never read my posts. I am a Jew and have posted multiple times how fake Jews who call themselves Jewish commit atrocities in our name and have no more right to use the name "Israel" for their stolen land than they do to call themselves Jewish.
That one's not only an asshole, he's also completely fucking deranged. Batshit insane.

latest

That you and the Nazi became instant "besties" surprises no one, Fawn.
"besties??"

Do you think the forum really needed more evidence of how senile you are, ya fruit-loop dingus?
 
It's not that simple. They only used it in the death camps, not at the front.

It couldn't be used at the front. It was not a chemical weapon, it was specifically designed to kill people in gas chambers, then become inert. To call it a "chemical weapon" is utterly stupid, not that the fascist democrats care, they seek to smear and slander the enemy, never was reason even considered by them
What a dumb fucking argument. :cuckoo:

Different weapons have different applications. Zyklon B was not an outdoor weapon, so of course it wasn't used on front lines. For the purposes of committing mass murdered, it was designed as an indoor weapon.

Translation: WAHHHHHH - WE HATE, WE HATE, WE HATE. Facts don't matter, we HATE and must attack Trump or anyone associated with him.

Zyklon B ain't Mustard gas, in fact the whole POINT is that it was safe for the Nazis to use in the death chambers. You fascists are just so filled to the brim with hate that you won't let little things like facts and reason interfere with your endless rage.

Try this; does Switzerland have Chemical and Biological weapons? Do they possess chlorine and hydrochloric acid? Can Chlorine and hydrochloric acid kill people locked in a room where it it introduced?

And yet everyone from the UN to the USA agree that Switzerland doesn't have chemical weapons. Why? Because the phrase "chemical weapon" has a specific meaning, the ability to use it in battle.
WTF is wrong with you? So what if zyklon B is not mustard gas? It's not a firearm either; but Hitler still used it as a weapon to kill millions of people.

Try again stupid fuck.


Try this; does Switzerland have Chemical and Biological weapons? Do they possess chlorine and hydrochloric acid? Can Chlorine and hydrochloric acid kill people locked in a room where it it introduced?

And yet everyone from the UN to the USA agree that Switzerland doesn't have chemical weapons. Why? Because the phrase "chemical weapon" has a specific meaning, the ability to use it in battle

Yeah, you have no brain, you have your Fuhrer and that's all you need.
You're too fucking demented. :cuckoo:

They don't have chemical weapons because they haven't used them to kill people. Just like I own a set of golf clubs. They're golf clubs, not weapons. But if I use one to kill someone, it's a weapon.
 
It couldn't be used at the front. It was not a chemical weapon, it was specifically designed to kill people in gas chambers, then become inert. To call it a "chemical weapon" is utterly stupid, not that the fascist democrats care, they seek to smear and slander the enemy, never was reason even considered by them
What a dumb fucking argument. :cuckoo:

Different weapons have different applications. Zyklon B was not an outdoor weapon, so of course it wasn't used on front lines. For the purposes of committing mass murdered, it was designed as an indoor weapon.

Translation: WAHHHHHH - WE HATE, WE HATE, WE HATE. Facts don't matter, we HATE and must attack Trump or anyone associated with him.

Zyklon B ain't Mustard gas, in fact the whole POINT is that it was safe for the Nazis to use in the death chambers. You fascists are just so filled to the brim with hate that you won't let little things like facts and reason interfere with your endless rage.

Try this; does Switzerland have Chemical and Biological weapons? Do they possess chlorine and hydrochloric acid? Can Chlorine and hydrochloric acid kill people locked in a room where it it introduced?

And yet everyone from the UN to the USA agree that Switzerland doesn't have chemical weapons. Why? Because the phrase "chemical weapon" has a specific meaning, the ability to use it in battle.
WTF is wrong with you? So what if zyklon B is not mustard gas? It's not a firearm either; but Hitler still used it as a weapon to kill millions of people.

Try again stupid fuck.


Try this; does Switzerland have Chemical and Biological weapons? Do they possess chlorine and hydrochloric acid? Can Chlorine and hydrochloric acid kill people locked in a room where it it introduced?

And yet everyone from the UN to the USA agree that Switzerland doesn't have chemical weapons. Why? Because the phrase "chemical weapon" has a specific meaning, the ability to use it in battle

Yeah, you have no brain, you have your Fuhrer and that's all you need.
You're too fucking demented. :cuckoo:

They don't have chemical weapons because they haven't used them to kill people. Just like I own a set of golf clubs. They're golf clubs, not weapons. But if I use one to kill someone, it's a weapon.


Yep, you're just too fucking stupid to grasp a concept regardless of how far it is broken down.

Look Fawn, just say "socialists good, Republicans bad, BAHHH BAHHHH BAHHHHH" and be done with it. It's all you ever post anyway.
 
What a dumb fucking argument. :cuckoo:

Different weapons have different applications. Zyklon B was not an outdoor weapon, so of course it wasn't used on front lines. For the purposes of committing mass murdered, it was designed as an indoor weapon.

Translation: WAHHHHHH - WE HATE, WE HATE, WE HATE. Facts don't matter, we HATE and must attack Trump or anyone associated with him.

Zyklon B ain't Mustard gas, in fact the whole POINT is that it was safe for the Nazis to use in the death chambers. You fascists are just so filled to the brim with hate that you won't let little things like facts and reason interfere with your endless rage.

Try this; does Switzerland have Chemical and Biological weapons? Do they possess chlorine and hydrochloric acid? Can Chlorine and hydrochloric acid kill people locked in a room where it it introduced?

And yet everyone from the UN to the USA agree that Switzerland doesn't have chemical weapons. Why? Because the phrase "chemical weapon" has a specific meaning, the ability to use it in battle.
WTF is wrong with you? So what if zyklon B is not mustard gas? It's not a firearm either; but Hitler still used it as a weapon to kill millions of people.

Try again stupid fuck.


Try this; does Switzerland have Chemical and Biological weapons? Do they possess chlorine and hydrochloric acid? Can Chlorine and hydrochloric acid kill people locked in a room where it it introduced?

And yet everyone from the UN to the USA agree that Switzerland doesn't have chemical weapons. Why? Because the phrase "chemical weapon" has a specific meaning, the ability to use it in battle

Yeah, you have no brain, you have your Fuhrer and that's all you need.
You're too fucking demented. :cuckoo:

They don't have chemical weapons because they haven't used them to kill people. Just like I own a set of golf clubs. They're golf clubs, not weapons. But if I use one to kill someone, it's a weapon.


Yep, you're just too fucking stupid to grasp a concept regardless of how far it is broken down.

Look Fawn, just say "socialists good, Republicans bad, BAHHH BAHHHH BAHHHHH" and be done with it. It's all you ever post anyway.
:eusa_boohoo:
 
No wonder you voted for "the gropenfuherer" , you are a bit illiterate.
Did the Nazi's use gas during the war?
Simple yes or no.

It's not that simple. They only used it in the death camps, not at the front.

It couldn't be used at the front. It was not a chemical weapon, it was specifically designed to kill people in gas chambers, then become inert. To call it a "chemical weapon" is utterly stupid, not that the fascist democrats care, they seek to smear and slander the enemy, never was reason even considered by them
What a dumb fucking argument. :cuckoo:

Different weapons have different applications. Zyklon B was not an outdoor weapon, so of course it wasn't used on front lines. For the purposes of committing mass murdered, it was designed as an indoor weapon.

Translation: WAHHHHHH - WE HATE, WE HATE, WE HATE. Facts don't matter, we HATE and must attack Trump or anyone associated with him.

Zyklon B ain't Mustard gas, in fact the whole POINT is that it was safe for the Nazis to use in the death chambers. You fascists are just so filled to the brim with hate that you won't let little things like facts and reason interfere with your endless rage.

Try this; does Switzerland have Chemical and Biological weapons? Do they possess chlorine and hydrochloric acid? Can Chlorine and hydrochloric acid kill people locked in a room where it it introduced?

And yet everyone from the UN to the USA agree that Switzerland doesn't have chemical weapons. Why? Because the phrase "chemical weapon" has a specific meaning, the ability to use it in battle.
WTF is wrong with you? So what if zyklon B is not mustard gas? It's not a firearm either; but Hitler still used it as a weapon to kill millions of people.

Nope. He worked them to death and rapid gun fired would of been quicker. They were work camps and people starved and died.
 
a. No one is denying the historical facts. It's a minor matter of opinion on semantics.

b. It is not offensive to Jews to say that a canister is not a weapon. Nothing about Spicer or my opinion on chemical weapons/not chemical weapons in any way diminishes the scale or horror of the Holocaust. If a jew chooses to have a hissy fit about that, that is them being drama queens.

c. He apologized because this type of manufactured outrage is a trap, where defending your self creates the illusion that vile propagandists have a point. It is poison, and people like you are tearing this nation apart. YOu should be ashamed.
No, it's not a mere difference of opinion over semantics. Words have meaning, even though you don't understand them. Hitler used chemical weapons. Zyklon B was used as a chemical weapon. That's not just my opinion but also the classification by organizations like he OPCW I linked earlier. So when he initially idiotically claimed that Hitler didn't use chemical weapons, that was the same as saying Hitler didn't use chemicals, a common position taken by Holocaust deniers. That's why he was called on it during that same interview; which he then fumbled his way through an explanation that included "Holocaust centers," of which, there is no such thing.

And of course he apologized, it was a moronic comment to make and it was incredibly unfortunate timing.



When you smear someone with the term Holocaust Denier for partisan purposes, as you are, you are the one disrespecting the millions of dead of the Holocaust.


YOU. Not him.
They were his words. Bad enough he had to apologize for saying them.



What were his words? Holocaust denial? That's a vile lie.


It is bad enough that he had to apologize. It shows the power of the big lie is still unchecked.


Time is going to come when this vile behavior bites you on the ass, lefty.

Holocaust deniers say that Hitler didn't use chemical weapons, just like Spicey Spice did. That deserves an apology because Hitler, of course, used chemical weapons on his own people. He also rightfully apologized for calling them "Holocaust Centers". If you say something that is not only ridiculous, but minimizes what went on at concentration clubs camps, you should apologize, even if it wasn't what you meant to say.

What he really should have been apologizing for is trying to equate anything with Hitler. Just stop.


1. You lefties have been equating Trump and his supporters to HItler since the primaries. Your outrage is as convincing as a Bill Clinton promise.

2. Holocaust deniers deny that the Holocaust happened. Spicer did nothing of that sort. YOu are a filthy liar.
 

Forum List

Back
Top