The T
George S. Patton Party
- May 24, 2009
- 48,111
- 5,582
You got that exactly right, but I would go farther and say that he deliberately put a bad link up precisely because he KNEW Hillary never verified WMDs in Syria as his lying title says. I actually took the time to find his story and posted what Clinton actually said earlier in this thread. Here it is again from the working link to his source in the OP.Translation:" I am not going to find fact...I am more interested in looking as stupid as I am portrayed...and I won't lift a finger to defend it..."
YES you are a fucking idiot. I did correct his link. YOU are too fucking lazy to find it.
The EXIT out of this thread is that way===>
Use it before you hurt yourself.
Look, dipshit:
I don't have the patience to do Eddie Boy's scut work. His sorry ass made the claim, now it's his job to support it.
I can only guess that, since you have been blasted for 10 pages, it didn't say what his dumbass thought it did.
How in the can are you? Because if you are sauced enough to start tossing threats around, I might find this banality entertaining enough to stick around and watch.
Exclusive: State Department quietly warning region on Syrian WMDs | The Cable
In her prepared remarks in Tunis, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton said she supported more sanctions on the Assad regime but she declined to endorse any direct help to the Syrian opposition without the consent of the Syrian government, saying only, "We all need to look hard at what more we can do."
But FAILED to address that Assad HAS in his possession Saddam's WMD's.
Great JOB.