Still No Evidence Against Trump...But There Is Against Hillary

[bripat9643]

Gregg Jarrett: Still no evidence of Trump-Russia 'collusion' - but Hillary is a different matter

"To put it plainly, Mueller is tasked with finding a crime that does not exist in the law. It is a legal impossibility. He is being asked to do something that is manifestly unattainable".

Zero evidence, and the Indictnents against Manafort equate to a tax fraud xase, nothing to do with Trump or non-existent Trump Collusion...

Billary Clinton and the case that can be made against her, however, is something different altogether:

"Hillary Clinton

It is against the law for the Clinton campaign and the Democratic National Committee to funnel millions of dollars to a British spy and to Russian sources in order to obtain the infamous and discredited Trump “dossier.” The Federal Election Campaign Act (52 USC 30101) prohibits foreign nationals and governments from giving or receiving money in U.S. campaigns. It also prohibits the filing of false or misleading campaign reports to hide the true purpose of the money (52 USC 30121). This is what Clinton and the DNC appear to have done.

Most often the penalty for violating this law is a fine, but in egregious cases, like this one, criminal prosecutions have been sought and convictions obtained. In this sense, it could be said that Hillary Clinton is the one who was conspiring with the Russians by breaking campaign finance laws with impunity."

This is called the 'tip of the iceberg'.

"But that’s not all. Damning new evidenceappears to show that Clinton used her office as Secretary of State to confer benefits to Russia in exchange for millions of dollars in donations to her foundation and cash to her husband. Secret recordings, intercepted emails, financial records, and eyewitness accounts allegedly show that Russian nuclear officials enriched the Clintons at the very time Hillary presided over a governing body which unanimously approved the sale of one-fifth of America’s uranium supply to Russia.

If this proves to be a corrupt “pay-to-play” scheme, it would constitute a myriad of crimes, including bribery (18 USC 201-b), mail fraud (18 USC 1341), and wire fraud (18 USC 1343). It might also qualify for racketeering charges (18 USC 1961-1968), if her foundation is determined to have been used as a criminal enterprise."

Having Trump minions around is a bit like when your plumber installed the garbage disposal upside down. Whatever you had for dinner the night before keeps backing up into the sink no matter what you do. Not only does it defy logic, it defies gravity.

Is there Fox News Firefox add-on that automatically changes Trump advisors indicted and plead not guilt to Hillary Did It!?

It's impossible to install a garbage disposal upside down, dumbass.

It appears that all the snowflakes in here have had a lobotomy. They are all incapable of committing logic.

It's a joke, dumbass.

That's right, it is a joke. It's certainly not a credible argument.

Not all things have to be, idiot. And we now return to Trump folks face the judge and plead not guilty. Happy days for the lawyers.

What are you blathering about? You seem to be admitting that you're an imbecile.

 

[TheDude]

There's plenty of evidence snowflakes are cause and effect challenged. Their run-away emotions insist there was collusion, which to them means there was collusion, whether it's supported or not.

 

[busybee01]

Clinton? Based on what? Manafort didn't manage the Clinton campaign, he managed the Trump campaign. Righto?

and yet it was podesta who had to resign...righto?...more to come

Who cares about Podesta?

If he committed a crime, he can share a cell with Manafort and Gates.

Podesta was working for the KGB bank, the primary financier for the Russian effort to buy the uranium, and the Russian spy agency.

His brother, Hillary's campaign manager, was paid off in thousands of shares of unreported Russian stocks.

Bill was paid half a million per speech by the ssne KGB Bank Tony Podesta worked for.

Who cares about Podesta and the huge proven Russian connection / collusion? Obviously not snowflakes. "P

Podesta was tied in with Manafort. If he broke the law, that is not binding on Hillary Clinton. You are trying to prove guilt by association.

For the record, I voted for neither Trump or Clinton. However I am obsessed with Hillary Clinton like Trump supporters. They are desperately seeking a fall guy to deflect blame for what the Trump campaign did.

this was bad news for hillary

It doesn't mean anything for Clinton at this time.

 

[easyt65]

It doesn't mean anything for Clinton at this time.

Hillary is awol again, remaining silent as a mouse, hoping the 'cat' will walk on past her 'whole in the wall'.

'Fat Tony P' being investigated IS bad news...as his Russia Connection leads straight to her and bill's doorstep.

 

[KatieK]

It doesn't mean anything for Clinton at this time.

Hillary is awol again, remaining silent as a mouse, hoping the 'cat' will walk on past her 'whole in the wall'.

'Fat Tony P' being investigated IS bad news...as his Russia Connection leads straight to her and bill's doorstep.

When the Grand Jury goes after Tony like Manafort and what's his name, you let us all know, okay?

 

[KatieK]

It's not Easy being Easy when Trump folks get indicted.

 

[easyt65]

When the Grand Jury goes after Tony like Manafort and what's his name, you let us all know, okay?

When you EVER have any evidence against Trump, as there is against the Podestas, the Clintons, Mueller, Holder, and Obama you let us know, troll.

 

[KatieK]

When the Grand Jury goes after Tony like Manafort and what's his name, you let us all know, okay?

When you EVER have any evidence against Trump, as there is against the Podestas, the Clintons, Mueller, Holder, and Obama you let us know, troll.

The Grand Jury will be only too happy to make that known to you.

 

[Steve_McGarrett]

and yet it was podesta who had to resign...righto?...more to come

Who cares about Podesta?

If he committed a crime, he can share a cell with Manafort and Gates.

Podesta was working for the KGB bank, the primary financier for the Russian effort to buy the uranium, and the Russian spy agency.

His brother, Hillary's campaign manager, was paid off in thousands of shares of unreported Russian stocks.

Bill was paid half a million per speech by the ssne KGB Bank Tony Podesta worked for.

Who cares about Podesta and the huge proven Russian connection / collusion? Obviously not snowflakes. "P

Podesta was tied in with Manafort. If he broke the law, that is not binding on Hillary Clinton. You are trying to prove guilt by association.

For the record, I voted for neither Trump or Clinton. However I am obsessed with Hillary Clinton like Trump supporters. They are desperately seeking a fall guy to deflect blame for what the Trump campaign did.

this was bad news for hillary

It doesn't mean anything for Clinton at this time.

Is that your foreign half or American half thinking that?

 

[sealybobo]

Gregg Jarrett: Still no evidence of Trump-Russia 'collusion' - but Hillary is a different matter

"To put it plainly, Mueller is tasked with finding a crime that does not exist in the law. It is a legal impossibility. He is being asked to do something that is manifestly unattainable".

Zero evidence, and the Indictnents against Manafort equate to a tax fraud xase, nothing to do with Trump or non-existent Trump Collusion...

Billary Clinton and the case that can be made against her, however, is something different altogether:

"Hillary Clinton

It is against the law for the Clinton campaign and the Democratic National Committee to funnel millions of dollars to a British spy and to Russian sources in order to obtain the infamous and discredited Trump “dossier.” The Federal Election Campaign Act (52 USC 30101) prohibits foreign nationals and governments from giving or receiving money in U.S. campaigns. It also prohibits the filing of false or misleading campaign reports to hide the true purpose of the money (52 USC 30121). This is what Clinton and the DNC appear to have done.

Most often the penalty for violating this law is a fine, but in egregious cases, like this one, criminal prosecutions have been sought and convictions obtained. In this sense, it could be said that Hillary Clinton is the one who was conspiring with the Russians by breaking campaign finance laws with impunity."

This is called the 'tip of the iceberg'.

"But that’s not all. Damning new evidence appears to show that Clinton used her office as Secretary of State to confer benefits to Russia in exchange for millions of dollars in donations to her foundation and cash to her husband. Secret recordings, intercepted emails, financial records, and eyewitness accounts allegedly show that Russian nuclear officials enriched the Clintons at the very time Hillary presided over a governing body which unanimously approved the sale of one-fifth of America’s uranium supply to Russia.

If this proves to be a corrupt “pay-to-play” scheme, it would constitute a myriad of crimes, including bribery (18 USC 201-b), mail fraud (18 USC 1341), and wire fraud (18 USC 1343). It might also qualify for racketeering charges (18 USC 1961-1968), if her foundation is determined to have been used as a criminal enterprise."

What we know so far

• Trump’s former campaign manager, Paul Manafort, and a business associate, Rick Gates, on Monday pleaded not guilty to an indictment for money laundering, tax evasion, failure to register as agents for foreign interests and conspiracy to defraud the US government.
• Documents unsealed on Monday also revealed that George Papadopoulos, a former foreign policy adviser to the Trump campaign, pleaded guilty on 5 October to lying to FBI agents over contact with people he believed to be senior Russian government officials. He has since acted as a “proactive cooperator” with the inquiry.
• The indictments were the first issued by special counsel Robert Mueller, who is investigating Russian interference in the 2016 election and possible collusion by members of the Trump campaign.
• Donald Trump tweeted furiously after news broke of the indictments against Manafort and Gates:

Sorry, but this is years ago, before Paul Manafort was part of the Trump campaign. But why aren’t Crooked Hillary & the Dems the focus????? … Also, there is NO COLLUSION!

• The president has not tweeted since the announcement of Papadopoulos’ guilty plea.
• Manafort and Gates spent Monday night under house arrest, with bail set at $10m and $5m respectively.
• White House chief of staff John Kelly kept to the official administration line that the offences in the indictments relate to a period before the men were connected to the Trump campaign (this fact check rates that claim as “mostly false”),

Trump finds Russia investigation 'very distracting', says John Kelly – as it happened

Busted liar!!!

 

[easyt65]

Gregg Jarrett: Still no evidence of Trump-Russia 'collusion' - but Hillary is a different matter

"To put it plainly, Mueller is tasked with finding a crime that does not exist in the law. It is a legal impossibility. He is being asked to do something that is manifestly unattainable".

Zero evidence, and the Indictnents against Manafort equate to a tax fraud xase, nothing to do with Trump or non-existent Trump Collusion...

Billary Clinton and the case that can be made against her, however, is something different altogether:

"Hillary Clinton

It is against the law for the Clinton campaign and the Democratic National Committee to funnel millions of dollars to a British spy and to Russian sources in order to obtain the infamous and discredited Trump “dossier.” The Federal Election Campaign Act (52 USC 30101) prohibits foreign nationals and governments from giving or receiving money in U.S. campaigns. It also prohibits the filing of false or misleading campaign reports to hide the true purpose of the money (52 USC 30121). This is what Clinton and the DNC appear to have done.

Most often the penalty for violating this law is a fine, but in egregious cases, like this one, criminal prosecutions have been sought and convictions obtained. In this sense, it could be said that Hillary Clinton is the one who was conspiring with the Russians by breaking campaign finance laws with impunity."

This is called the 'tip of the iceberg'.

"But that’s not all. Damning new evidence appears to show that Clinton used her office as Secretary of State to confer benefits to Russia in exchange for millions of dollars in donations to her foundation and cash to her husband. Secret recordings, intercepted emails, financial records, and eyewitness accounts allegedly show that Russian nuclear officials enriched the Clintons at the very time Hillary presided over a governing body which unanimously approved the sale of one-fifth of America’s uranium supply to Russia.

If this proves to be a corrupt “pay-to-play” scheme, it would constitute a myriad of crimes, including bribery (18 USC 201-b), mail fraud (18 USC 1341), and wire fraud (18 USC 1343). It might also qualify for racketeering charges (18 USC 1961-1968), if her foundation is determined to have been used as a criminal enterprise."

What we know so far

• Trump’s former campaign manager, Paul Manafort, and a business associate, Rick Gates, on Monday pleaded not guilty to an indictment for money laundering, tax evasion, failure to register as agents for foreign interests and conspiracy to defraud the US government.
• Documents unsealed on Monday also revealed that George Papadopoulos, a former foreign policy adviser to the Trump campaign, pleaded guilty on 5 October to lying to FBI agents over contact with people he believed to be senior Russian government officials. He has since acted as a “proactive cooperator” with the inquiry.
• The indictments were the first issued by special counsel Robert Mueller, who is investigating Russian interference in the 2016 election and possible collusion by members of the Trump campaign.
• Donald Trump tweeted furiously after news broke of the indictments against Manafort and Gates:

Sorry, but this is years ago, before Paul Manafort was part of the Trump campaign. But why aren’t Crooked Hillary & the Dems the focus????? … Also, there is NO COLLUSION!

• The president has not tweeted since the announcement of Papadopoulos’ guilty plea.
• Manafort and Gates spent Monday night under house arrest, with bail set at $10m and $5m respectively.
• White House chief of staff John Kelly kept to the official administration line that the offences in the indictments relate to a period before the men were connected to the Trump campaign (this fact check rates that claim as “mostly false”),

Trump finds Russia investigation 'very distracting', says John Kelly – as it happened

Busted liar!!!

Nothing you just posted proves me to be a liar.

Manafort was indicted for Tax Evasion charges dating back to 2006.
- No evidence against Trump. No collusion.
- If Manafort was guilty of tax evasion in 2006 then why didn't Mueller take him down then?
- Mueller's indictment of Manafort is his 'Scooter Libby', a desperate attempt to justify spending $20 MILLION dollars on an investigation that has come up with NO evidence or indictments of Trump but a lame-ass indictment against Manafort for Tax Evasion dating back to 2006.

Papadopoulos pleaded guilty to lying, not for anything to do with Tump, no evidence against Trump. The guy was also wearing a wire and shopping a book deal 3 weeks ago - he is an obvious Mueller 'plant'.

There is still no evidence against Trump, none to support the Collusion Lie. There IS evidence to prove criminal activity against the Podestas, the Clintons, Holder, Mueller, and Obama.


Nice try...you still lose.

 

[busybee01]

It doesn't mean anything for Clinton at this time.

Hillary is awol again, remaining silent as a mouse, hoping the 'cat' will walk on past her 'whole in the wall'.

'Fat Tony P' being investigated IS bad news...as his Russia Connection leads straight to her and bill's doorstep.

Then explain why Russia was working against Clinton in the 2016 elections. You are relying on a guilt by association theory. If we use that then we should examine the business deals that Trump has made with various Russia linked entities.

 

[busybee01]

Who cares about Podesta?

If he committed a crime, he can share a cell with Manafort and Gates.

Podesta was working for the KGB bank, the primary financier for the Russian effort to buy the uranium, and the Russian spy agency.

His brother, Hillary's campaign manager, was paid off in thousands of shares of unreported Russian stocks.

Bill was paid half a million per speech by the ssne KGB Bank Tony Podesta worked for.

Who cares about Podesta and the huge proven Russian connection / collusion? Obviously not snowflakes. "P

Podesta was tied in with Manafort. If he broke the law, that is not binding on Hillary Clinton. You are trying to prove guilt by association.

For the record, I voted for neither Trump or Clinton. However I am obsessed with Hillary Clinton like Trump supporters. They are desperately seeking a fall guy to deflect blame for what the Trump campaign did.

this was bad news for hillary

It doesn't mean anything for Clinton at this time.

Is that your foreign half or American half thinking that?

Actually it is something called evidence. I can understand why a fascist like you would say that. You clearly are un-American.

 

[easyt65]

Then explain why Russia was working against Clinton in the 2016 elections. You are relying on a guilt by association theory. If we use that then we should examine the business deals that Trump has made with various Russia linked entities.

1. How exactly did the Russians work against Hillary?
- You mean how Hillary paid several million for a fake dossier filled with Russian Propaganda from a foreign agent from Fusion GPS and then used it illegally against Trump?

- Are you talking about how the Russians were paying Leftist organizations like The Black Fist, Black Lies matter, and Antifa to incite racial violence and discord?

- Please tell me you are not talking about hacking the DNC e-mails, especially after DWS gave the Pakistanis access to all of those e-mails complete with usernames and passwords...and after they refused to allow the server to be examined to prove it was hacked.
-- A later analysis found the DNC e-mails were hacked from the inside onto a USB, so that is debunked.


2. Guilt by Association?
The Podesta trail leads DIRECTLY to the KGB Bank that leads DIRECLY to Bill and Hillary Clinton. There was no 'association'. The KGB Bank paid the Podestas, paid Bill Clinton for the speeches, and the money donated to the Clintons was backed / provided by the KGB bank.

Good grief

 

[busybee01]

Gregg Jarrett: Still no evidence of Trump-Russia 'collusion' - but Hillary is a different matter

"To put it plainly, Mueller is tasked with finding a crime that does not exist in the law. It is a legal impossibility. He is being asked to do something that is manifestly unattainable".

Zero evidence, and the Indictnents against Manafort equate to a tax fraud xase, nothing to do with Trump or non-existent Trump Collusion...

Billary Clinton and the case that can be made against her, however, is something different altogether:

"Hillary Clinton

It is against the law for the Clinton campaign and the Democratic National Committee to funnel millions of dollars to a British spy and to Russian sources in order to obtain the infamous and discredited Trump “dossier.” The Federal Election Campaign Act (52 USC 30101) prohibits foreign nationals and governments from giving or receiving money in U.S. campaigns. It also prohibits the filing of false or misleading campaign reports to hide the true purpose of the money (52 USC 30121). This is what Clinton and the DNC appear to have done.

Most often the penalty for violating this law is a fine, but in egregious cases, like this one, criminal prosecutions have been sought and convictions obtained. In this sense, it could be said that Hillary Clinton is the one who was conspiring with the Russians by breaking campaign finance laws with impunity."

This is called the 'tip of the iceberg'.

"But that’s not all. Damning new evidence appears to show that Clinton used her office as Secretary of State to confer benefits to Russia in exchange for millions of dollars in donations to her foundation and cash to her husband. Secret recordings, intercepted emails, financial records, and eyewitness accounts allegedly show that Russian nuclear officials enriched the Clintons at the very time Hillary presided over a governing body which unanimously approved the sale of one-fifth of America’s uranium supply to Russia.

If this proves to be a corrupt “pay-to-play” scheme, it would constitute a myriad of crimes, including bribery (18 USC 201-b), mail fraud (18 USC 1341), and wire fraud (18 USC 1343). It might also qualify for racketeering charges (18 USC 1961-1968), if her foundation is determined to have been used as a criminal enterprise."

What we know so far

• Trump’s former campaign manager, Paul Manafort, and a business associate, Rick Gates, on Monday pleaded not guilty to an indictment for money laundering, tax evasion, failure to register as agents for foreign interests and conspiracy to defraud the US government.
• Documents unsealed on Monday also revealed that George Papadopoulos, a former foreign policy adviser to the Trump campaign, pleaded guilty on 5 October to lying to FBI agents over contact with people he believed to be senior Russian government officials. He has since acted as a “proactive cooperator” with the inquiry.
• The indictments were the first issued by special counsel Robert Mueller, who is investigating Russian interference in the 2016 election and possible collusion by members of the Trump campaign.
• Donald Trump tweeted furiously after news broke of the indictments against Manafort and Gates:

Sorry, but this is years ago, before Paul Manafort was part of the Trump campaign. But why aren’t Crooked Hillary & the Dems the focus????? … Also, there is NO COLLUSION!

• The president has not tweeted since the announcement of Papadopoulos’ guilty plea.
• Manafort and Gates spent Monday night under house arrest, with bail set at $10m and $5m respectively.
• White House chief of staff John Kelly kept to the official administration line that the offences in the indictments relate to a period before the men were connected to the Trump campaign (this fact check rates that claim as “mostly false”),

Trump finds Russia investigation 'very distracting', says John Kelly – as it happened

Busted liar!!!

Nothing you just posted proves me to be a liar.

Manafort was indicted for Tax Evasion charges dating back to 2006.
- No evidence against Trump. No collusion.
- If Manafort was guilty of tax evasion in 2006 then why didn't Mueller take him down then?
- Mueller's indictment of Manafort is his 'Scooter Libby', a desperate attempt to justify spending $20 MILLION dollars on an investigation that has come up with NO evidence or indictments of Trump but a lame-ass indictment against Manafort for Tax Evasion dating back to 2006.

Papadopoulos pleaded guilty to lying, not for anything to do with Tump, no evidence against Trump. The guy was also wearing a wire and shopping a book deal 3 weeks ago - he is an obvious Mueller 'plant'.

There is still no evidence against Trump, none to support the Collusion Lie. There IS evidence to prove criminal activity against the Podestas, the Clintons, Holder, Mueller, and Obama.


Nice try...you still lose.

If trump's goal was to drain the swamp then why hire a guy like that. The fact is that Trump's talk about draining the swamp was talk. He is just restocking it. The fact is that Manafort was under investigation by the Justice Department and that investigation was handed to Mueller when he was appointed special counsel. That is why Manafort was forced to register as a foreign agent earlier this year.

You don't know what Papadoupoulos is doing. It is not unusual for witnesses who provide relevant information to plead guilty on a lesser charge. We have no clue what it is all about.

There is evidence that links the Trump campaign to collusion. Donald Trump Jr met with a Russian National to get dirt on Clinton. His e-mail is proof of at least 1 case of collusion. There is no evidence of crimes against the Clintons or even Podesta at this point. You sound just like another crazy conspiracy theorist.

 

[busybee01]

Then explain why Russia was working against Clinton in the 2016 elections. You are relying on a guilt by association theory. If we use that then we should examine the business deals that Trump has made with various Russia linked entities.

1. How exactly did the Russians work against Hillary?
- You mean how Hillary paid several million for a fake dossier filled with Russian Propaganda from a foreign agent from Fusion GPS and then used it illegally against Trump?

- Are you talking about how the Russians were paying Leftist organizations like The Black Fist, Black Lies matter, and Antifa to incite racial violence and discord?

- Please tell me you are not talking about hacking the DNC e-mails, especially after DWS gave the Pakistanis access to all of those e-mails complete with usernames and passwords...and after they refused to allow the server to be examined to prove it was hacked.
-- A later analysis found the DNC e-mails were hacked from the inside onto a USB, so that is debunked.


2. Guilt by Association?
The Podesta trail leads DIRECTLY to the KGB Bank that leads DIRECLY to Bill and Hillary Clinton. There was no 'association'. The KGB Bank paid the Podestas, paid Bill Clinton for the speeches, and the money donated to the Clintons was backed / provided by the KGB bank.

Good grief

1. The fact is that our intelligence agencies, Trump's CIA Director, VP Mike Pence and Trump's Chief of Staff have all stated that Russia hacked the DNC servers. Russian bots as well as Facebook ads were placed in key states with pro-Trump ads.

2. The Clintons were clients of Podesta. That does not mean that they knew anything about what Podesta was doing. You are using guilt by association. Let's look at Trump's dealings with entities liked to Russia in his business dealings.

 

[Steve_McGarrett]

Gregg Jarrett: Still no evidence of Trump-Russia 'collusion' - but Hillary is a different matter

"To put it plainly, Mueller is tasked with finding a crime that does not exist in the law. It is a legal impossibility. He is being asked to do something that is manifestly unattainable".

Zero evidence, and the Indictnents against Manafort equate to a tax fraud xase, nothing to do with Trump or non-existent Trump Collusion...

Billary Clinton and the case that can be made against her, however, is something different altogether:

"Hillary Clinton

It is against the law for the Clinton campaign and the Democratic National Committee to funnel millions of dollars to a British spy and to Russian sources in order to obtain the infamous and discredited Trump “dossier.” The Federal Election Campaign Act (52 USC 30101) prohibits foreign nationals and governments from giving or receiving money in U.S. campaigns. It also prohibits the filing of false or misleading campaign reports to hide the true purpose of the money (52 USC 30121). This is what Clinton and the DNC appear to have done.

Most often the penalty for violating this law is a fine, but in egregious cases, like this one, criminal prosecutions have been sought and convictions obtained. In this sense, it could be said that Hillary Clinton is the one who was conspiring with the Russians by breaking campaign finance laws with impunity."

This is called the 'tip of the iceberg'.

"But that’s not all. Damning new evidence appears to show that Clinton used her office as Secretary of State to confer benefits to Russia in exchange for millions of dollars in donations to her foundation and cash to her husband. Secret recordings, intercepted emails, financial records, and eyewitness accounts allegedly show that Russian nuclear officials enriched the Clintons at the very time Hillary presided over a governing body which unanimously approved the sale of one-fifth of America’s uranium supply to Russia.

If this proves to be a corrupt “pay-to-play” scheme, it would constitute a myriad of crimes, including bribery (18 USC 201-b), mail fraud (18 USC 1341), and wire fraud (18 USC 1343). It might also qualify for racketeering charges (18 USC 1961-1968), if her foundation is determined to have been used as a criminal enterprise."

What we know so far

• Trump’s former campaign manager, Paul Manafort, and a business associate, Rick Gates, on Monday pleaded not guilty to an indictment for money laundering, tax evasion, failure to register as agents for foreign interests and conspiracy to defraud the US government.
• Documents unsealed on Monday also revealed that George Papadopoulos, a former foreign policy adviser to the Trump campaign, pleaded guilty on 5 October to lying to FBI agents over contact with people he believed to be senior Russian government officials. He has since acted as a “proactive cooperator” with the inquiry.
• The indictments were the first issued by special counsel Robert Mueller, who is investigating Russian interference in the 2016 election and possible collusion by members of the Trump campaign.
• Donald Trump tweeted furiously after news broke of the indictments against Manafort and Gates:

Sorry, but this is years ago, before Paul Manafort was part of the Trump campaign. But why aren’t Crooked Hillary & the Dems the focus????? … Also, there is NO COLLUSION!

• The president has not tweeted since the announcement of Papadopoulos’ guilty plea.
• Manafort and Gates spent Monday night under house arrest, with bail set at $10m and $5m respectively.
• White House chief of staff John Kelly kept to the official administration line that the offences in the indictments relate to a period before the men were connected to the Trump campaign (this fact check rates that claim as “mostly false”),

Trump finds Russia investigation 'very distracting', says John Kelly – as it happened

Busted liar!!!

Nothing you just posted proves me to be a liar.

Manafort was indicted for Tax Evasion charges dating back to 2006.
- No evidence against Trump. No collusion.
- If Manafort was guilty of tax evasion in 2006 then why didn't Mueller take him down then?
- Mueller's indictment of Manafort is his 'Scooter Libby', a desperate attempt to justify spending $20 MILLION dollars on an investigation that has come up with NO evidence or indictments of Trump but a lame-ass indictment against Manafort for Tax Evasion dating back to 2006.

Papadopoulos pleaded guilty to lying, not for anything to do with Tump, no evidence against Trump. The guy was also wearing a wire and shopping a book deal 3 weeks ago - he is an obvious Mueller 'plant'.

There is still no evidence against Trump, none to support the Collusion Lie. There IS evidence to prove criminal activity against the Podestas, the Clintons, Holder, Mueller, and Obama.


Nice try...you still lose.

If trump's goal was to drain the swamp then why hire a guy like that. The fact is that Trump's talk about draining the swamp was talk. He is just restocking it. The fact is that Manafort was under investigation by the Justice Department and that investigation was handed to Mueller when he was appointed special counsel. That is why Manafort was forced to register as a foreign agent earlier this year.

You don't know what Papadoupoulos is doing. It is not unusual for witnesses who provide relevant information to plead guilty on a lesser charge. We have no clue what it is all about.

There is evidence that links the Trump campaign to collusion. Donald Trump Jr met with a Russian National to get dirt on Clinton. His e-mail is proof of at least 1 case of collusion. There is no evidence of crimes against the Clintons or even Podesta at this point. You sound just like another crazy conspiracy theorist.

Trump wasn't responsible for letting Papadopoulos in his campaign. He was just a low level volunteer without pay. Now he's been tied to Fusion GPS and the dossier source and oh, there is no Russian collusion directly linked to Trump.

Papadopoulos Is Connected to Fusion Dossier: Was in Contact with Sergie Millian, the Steele Source for the Dossier

 

[Reasonable]

If this proves to be a corrupt “pay-to-play” scheme, it would constitute a myriad of crimes, including bribery (18 USC 201-b), mail fraud (18 USC 1341), and wire fraud (18 USC 1343). It might also qualify for racketeering charges (18 USC 1961-1968), if her foundation is determined to have been used as a criminal enterprise."

She's a gonna get Bernied!!!

Greg

The Clinton Foundation has a four star charity rating.

Meanwhile the Trump foundation is under criminal investigation.

Inconvenient information. Facts are like kryptonite to them.

 

[Reasonable]

Gregg Jarrett: Still no evidence of Trump-Russia 'collusion' - but Hillary is a different matter

"To put it plainly, Mueller is tasked with finding a crime that does not exist in the law. It is a legal impossibility. He is being asked to do something that is manifestly unattainable".

Zero evidence, and the Indictnents against Manafort equate to a tax fraud xase, nothing to do with Trump or non-existent Trump Collusion...

Billary Clinton and the case that can be made against her, however, is something different altogether:

"Hillary Clinton

It is against the law for the Clinton campaign and the Democratic National Committee to funnel millions of dollars to a British spy and to Russian sources in order to obtain the infamous and discredited Trump “dossier.” The Federal Election Campaign Act (52 USC 30101) prohibits foreign nationals and governments from giving or receiving money in U.S. campaigns. It also prohibits the filing of false or misleading campaign reports to hide the true purpose of the money (52 USC 30121). This is what Clinton and the DNC appear to have done.

Most often the penalty for violating this law is a fine, but in egregious cases, like this one, criminal prosecutions have been sought and convictions obtained. In this sense, it could be said that Hillary Clinton is the one who was conspiring with the Russians by breaking campaign finance laws with impunity."

This is called the 'tip of the iceberg'.

"But that’s not all. Damning new evidence appears to show that Clinton used her office as Secretary of State to confer benefits to Russia in exchange for millions of dollars in donations to her foundation and cash to her husband. Secret recordings, intercepted emails, financial records, and eyewitness accounts allegedly show that Russian nuclear officials enriched the Clintons at the very time Hillary presided over a governing body which unanimously approved the sale of one-fifth of America’s uranium supply to Russia.

If this proves to be a corrupt “pay-to-play” scheme, it would constitute a myriad of crimes, including bribery (18 USC 201-b), mail fraud (18 USC 1341), and wire fraud (18 USC 1343). It might also qualify for racketeering charges (18 USC 1961-1968), if her foundation is determined to have been used as a criminal enterprise."

What we know so far

• Trump’s former campaign manager, Paul Manafort, and a business associate, Rick Gates, on Monday pleaded not guilty to an indictment for money laundering, tax evasion, failure to register as agents for foreign interests and conspiracy to defraud the US government.
• Documents unsealed on Monday also revealed that George Papadopoulos, a former foreign policy adviser to the Trump campaign, pleaded guilty on 5 October to lying to FBI agents over contact with people he believed to be senior Russian government officials. He has since acted as a “proactive cooperator” with the inquiry.
• The indictments were the first issued by special counsel Robert Mueller, who is investigating Russian interference in the 2016 election and possible collusion by members of the Trump campaign.
• Donald Trump tweeted furiously after news broke of the indictments against Manafort and Gates:

Sorry, but this is years ago, before Paul Manafort was part of the Trump campaign. But why aren’t Crooked Hillary & the Dems the focus????? … Also, there is NO COLLUSION!

• The president has not tweeted since the announcement of Papadopoulos’ guilty plea.
• Manafort and Gates spent Monday night under house arrest, with bail set at $10m and $5m respectively.
• White House chief of staff John Kelly kept to the official administration line that the offences in the indictments relate to a period before the men were connected to the Trump campaign (this fact check rates that claim as “mostly false”),

Trump finds Russia investigation 'very distracting', says John Kelly – as it happened

Busted liar!!!

Nothing you just posted proves me to be a liar.

Manafort was indicted for Tax Evasion charges dating back to 2006.
- No evidence against Trump. No collusion.
- If Manafort was guilty of tax evasion in 2006 then why didn't Mueller take him down then?
- Mueller's indictment of Manafort is his 'Scooter Libby', a desperate attempt to justify spending $20 MILLION dollars on an investigation that has come up with NO evidence or indictments of Trump but a lame-ass indictment against Manafort for Tax Evasion dating back to 2006.

Papadopoulos pleaded guilty to lying, not for anything to do with Tump, no evidence against Trump. The guy was also wearing a wire and shopping a book deal 3 weeks ago - he is an obvious Mueller 'plant'.

There is still no evidence against Trump, none to support the Collusion Lie. There IS evidence to prove criminal activity against the Podestas, the Clintons, Holder, Mueller, and Obama.


Nice try...you still lose.

If trump's goal was to drain the swamp then why hire a guy like that. The fact is that Trump's talk about draining the swamp was talk. He is just restocking it. The fact is that Manafort was under investigation by the Justice Department and that investigation was handed to Mueller when he was appointed special counsel. That is why Manafort was forced to register as a foreign agent earlier this year.

You don't know what Papadoupoulos is doing. It is not unusual for witnesses who provide relevant information to plead guilty on a lesser charge. We have no clue what it is all about.

There is evidence that links the Trump campaign to collusion. Donald Trump Jr met with a Russian National to get dirt on Clinton. His e-mail is proof of at least 1 case of collusion. There is no evidence of crimes against the Clintons or even Podesta at this point. You sound just like another crazy conspiracy theorist.

Trump wasn't responsible for letting Papadopoulos in his campaign. He was just a low level volunteer without pay. Now he's been tied to Fusion GPS and the dossier source and oh, there is no Russian collusion directly linked to Trump.

Papadopoulos Is Connected to Fusion Dossier: Was in Contact with Sergie Millian, the Steele Source for the Dossier

Do low level volunteers attend national security meetings?
Trump admitted inHIS instagram picture Papadopolous is part of his national security team.
When you believe Trump ( low level volunteer) prepared to get screwed.

 

[Reasonable]

Gregg Jarrett: Still no evidence of Trump-Russia 'collusion' - but Hillary is a different matter

"To put it plainly, Mueller is tasked with finding a crime that does not exist in the law. It is a legal impossibility. He is being asked to do something that is manifestly unattainable".

Zero evidence, and the Indictnents against Manafort equate to a tax fraud xase, nothing to do with Trump or non-existent Trump Collusion...

Billary Clinton and the case that can be made against her, however, is something different altogether:

"Hillary Clinton

It is against the law for the Clinton campaign and the Democratic National Committee to funnel millions of dollars to a British spy and to Russian sources in order to obtain the infamous and discredited Trump “dossier.” The Federal Election Campaign Act (52 USC 30101) prohibits foreign nationals and governments from giving or receiving money in U.S. campaigns. It also prohibits the filing of false or misleading campaign reports to hide the true purpose of the money (52 USC 30121). This is what Clinton and the DNC appear to have done.

Most often the penalty for violating this law is a fine, but in egregious cases, like this one, criminal prosecutions have been sought and convictions obtained. In this sense, it could be said that Hillary Clinton is the one who was conspiring with the Russians by breaking campaign finance laws with impunity."

This is called the 'tip of the iceberg'.

"But that’s not all. Damning new evidence appears to show that Clinton used her office as Secretary of State to confer benefits to Russia in exchange for millions of dollars in donations to her foundation and cash to her husband. Secret recordings, intercepted emails, financial records, and eyewitness accounts allegedly show that Russian nuclear officials enriched the Clintons at the very time Hillary presided over a governing body which unanimously approved the sale of one-fifth of America’s uranium supply to Russia.

If this proves to be a corrupt “pay-to-play” scheme, it would constitute a myriad of crimes, including bribery (18 USC 201-b), mail fraud (18 USC 1341), and wire fraud (18 USC 1343). It might also qualify for racketeering charges (18 USC 1961-1968), if her foundation is determined to have been used as a criminal enterprise."

What we know so far

• Trump’s former campaign manager, Paul Manafort, and a business associate, Rick Gates, on Monday pleaded not guilty to an indictment for money laundering, tax evasion, failure to register as agents for foreign interests and conspiracy to defraud the US government.
• Documents unsealed on Monday also revealed that George Papadopoulos, a former foreign policy adviser to the Trump campaign, pleaded guilty on 5 October to lying to FBI agents over contact with people he believed to be senior Russian government officials. He has since acted as a “proactive cooperator” with the inquiry.
• The indictments were the first issued by special counsel Robert Mueller, who is investigating Russian interference in the 2016 election and possible collusion by members of the Trump campaign.
• Donald Trump tweeted furiously after news broke of the indictments against Manafort and Gates:

Sorry, but this is years ago, before Paul Manafort was part of the Trump campaign. But why aren’t Crooked Hillary & the Dems the focus????? … Also, there is NO COLLUSION!

• The president has not tweeted since the announcement of Papadopoulos’ guilty plea.
• Manafort and Gates spent Monday night under house arrest, with bail set at $10m and $5m respectively.
• White House chief of staff John Kelly kept to the official administration line that the offences in the indictments relate to a period before the men were connected to the Trump campaign (this fact check rates that claim as “mostly false”),

Trump finds Russia investigation 'very distracting', says John Kelly – as it happened

Busted liar!!!

Nothing you just posted proves me to be a liar.

Manafort was indicted for Tax Evasion charges dating back to 2006.
- No evidence against Trump. No collusion.
- If Manafort was guilty of tax evasion in 2006 then why didn't Mueller take him down then?
- Mueller's indictment of Manafort is his 'Scooter Libby', a desperate attempt to justify spending $20 MILLION dollars on an investigation that has come up with NO evidence or indictments of Trump but a lame-ass indictment against Manafort for Tax Evasion dating back to 2006.

Papadopoulos pleaded guilty to lying, not for anything to do with Tump, no evidence against Trump. The guy was also wearing a wire and shopping a book deal 3 weeks ago - he is an obvious Mueller 'plant'.

There is still no evidence against Trump, none to support the Collusion Lie. There IS evidence to prove criminal activity against the Podestas, the Clintons, Holder, Mueller, and Obama.


Nice try...you still lose.

If trump's goal was to drain the swamp then why hire a guy like that. The fact is that Trump's talk about draining the swamp was talk. He is just restocking it. The fact is that Manafort was under investigation by the Justice Department and that investigation was handed to Mueller when he was appointed special counsel. That is why Manafort was forced to register as a foreign agent earlier this year.

You don't know what Papadoupoulos is doing. It is not unusual for witnesses who provide relevant information to plead guilty on a lesser charge. We have no clue what it is all about.

There is evidence that links the Trump campaign to collusion. Donald Trump Jr met with a Russian National to get dirt on Clinton. His e-mail is proof of at least 1 case of collusion. There is no evidence of crimes against the Clintons or even Podesta at this point. You sound just like another crazy conspiracy theorist.

Trump wasn't responsible for letting Papadopoulos in his campaign. He was just a low level volunteer without pay. Now he's been tied to Fusion GPS and the dossier source and oh, there is no Russian collusion directly linked to Trump.

Papadopoulos Is Connected to Fusion Dossier: Was in Contact with Sergie Millian, the Steele Source for the Dossier

No, Trump's not responsible for anything that backfires on him. He's only responsible when he can take credit for something whether he deserves it or not.