Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
see what happens when you lie, you spend the rest of you time pretending things you only wish were said were actually said....no one claimed you said he was being prosecuted, in fact the claim was about you fantasizing about what would happen to trump and not trump himself...and it is manaforts indictment that should have hillary worried, instead the left wing media has you focused on their "bright shiny object"... Papadopoluos[sp]Where did I say Trump "will" be prosecuted? I said the noose is tightening -- which it is as a result of Papadopoulos' guilty plea.
first off his name from now on is " ol whats his name" WHN" or "OWHN"[pronounced OWEN] and is this the big news you were expecting today? that OWEN was going to be indicted? the media had you all worked up and then dropped OWEN in your lap and now they are selling him to you as "THE BIG FISH" "Mr. BIG", "THE GODFATHER" ...Even a handful of lefties would figure out they'd been had by the media...but in case you would like to continue to fool yourself into think you are fooling anyone else congratulations on your big catch, may the rest of your days be filled with these kind of victories.It's obvious that Fox News didn't cover the George Papadopoulos plea.
It's an "oh shit" moment for Trump supporters. Can you say screwed?
..and it is manaforts indictment that should have hillary worried,
first off his name from now on is " ol whats his name" WHN" or "OWHN"[pronounced OWEN] and is this the big news you were expecting today? that OWEN was going to be indicted?.
Gregg Jarrett: Still no evidence of Trump-Russia 'collusion' - but Hillary is a different matter
"To put it plainly, Mueller is tasked with finding a crime that does not exist in the law. It is a legal impossibility. He is being asked to do something that is manifestly unattainable".
Zero evidence, and the Indictnents against Manafort equate to a tax fraud xase, nothing to do with Trump or non-existent Trump Collusion...
Billary Clinton and the case that can be made against her, however, is something different altogether:
"Hillary Clinton
It is against the law for the Clinton campaign and the Democratic National Committee to funnel millions of dollars to a British spy and to Russian sources in order to obtain the infamous and discredited Trump “dossier.” The Federal Election Campaign Act (52 USC 30101) prohibits foreign nationals and governments from giving or receiving money in U.S. campaigns. It also prohibits the filing of false or misleading campaign reports to hide the true purpose of the money (52 USC 30121). This is what Clinton and the DNC appear to have done.
Most often the penalty for violating this law is a fine, but in egregious cases, like this one, criminal prosecutions have been sought and convictions obtained. In this sense, it could be said that Hillary Clinton is the one who was conspiring with the Russians by breaking campaign finance laws with impunity."
This is called the 'tip of the iceberg'.
"But that’s not all. Damning new evidenceappears to show that Clinton used her office as Secretary of State to confer benefits to Russia in exchange for millions of dollars in donations to her foundation and cash to her husband. Secret recordings, intercepted emails, financial records, and eyewitness accounts allegedly show that Russian nuclear officials enriched the Clintons at the very time Hillary presided over a governing body which unanimously approved the sale of one-fifth of America’s uranium supply to Russia.
If this proves to be a corrupt “pay-to-play” scheme, it would constitute a myriad of crimes, including bribery (18 USC 201-b), mail fraud (18 USC 1341), and wire fraud (18 USC 1343). It might also qualify for racketeering charges (18 USC 1961-1968), if her foundation is determined to have been used as a criminal enterprise."
lol. you know what I just know [lol] that hillary had to be sedated again after todays news [see how that works?]...it was like election night all over again for her except this time it was suppose to be trump and not her instead her and not trump...can you tell us how you found out trump said "oh shit"?I have no clue what you're talking about.
I just know it's an "oh shit" moment for Trump supporters, knowing that Mueller was able to keep arrests and convictions completely secret. So when you ask for proof of anything Mueller is investigating, you know that the evidence isn't going to get leaked ever, but only released after somebody is either charged or convicted, and maybe not even for weeks after that.
The Clinton Foundation has a four star charity rating.If this proves to be a corrupt “pay-to-play” scheme, it would constitute a myriad of crimes, including bribery (18 USC 201-b), mail fraud (18 USC 1341), and wire fraud (18 USC 1343). It might also qualify for racketeering charges (18 USC 1961-1968), if her foundation is determined to have been used as a criminal enterprise."
She's a gonna get Bernied!!!
Greg
was papapoopalattass anywhere near it? when you found out he was involved in all this russian collusion did you shout out "I KNEW IT"!!!!!The Clinton Foundation has a four star charity rating.
Meanwhile the Trump foundation is under criminal investigation.
don't be a sore loser rosie, you should have known this was going to end badly for you
Quick, look over there.
you're being a sore loser rosie
Again, nothing tied to Trump - no evidence. Repeating the same lies gets you nothing.'Not yet'...'Not yet... that is all we have heard after a year, multiple investigations, and a stacked Council.You lie! No charge of obstruction was filed, liar.Yep, no evidence...except pubic confession to obstruction of justice.
Not yet, but confession is on file, so when you say "no evidence" you are full of it.
Trump fired Comey because of Russia investigation, that's a fact.
Thank you for admitting there us no evidence.
lol what the fuck? What planet are you residing on?
FBI began investigation last summer and Mueller's investigation is only 5 months old.
There are now
1 guilty plea
2 indictments
Nutcase... how does one go to jail without being prosecuted?see what happens when you lie, you spend the rest of you time pretending things you only wish were said were actually said....no one claimed you said he was being prosecuted, in fact the claim was about you fantasizing about what would happen to trump and not trump himself...and it is manaforts indictment that should have hillary worried, instead the left wing media has you focused on their "bright shiny object"... Papadopoluos[sp]Where did I say Trump "will" be prosecuted? I said the noose is tightening -- which it is as a result of Papadopoulos' guilty plea.
It's impossible to install a garbage disposal upside down, dumbass.Having Trump minions around is a bit like when your plumber installed the garbage disposal upside down. Whatever you had for dinner the night before keeps backing up into the sink no matter what you do. Not only does it defy logic, it defies gravity.Gregg Jarrett: Still no evidence of Trump-Russia 'collusion' - but Hillary is a different matter
"To put it plainly, Mueller is tasked with finding a crime that does not exist in the law. It is a legal impossibility. He is being asked to do something that is manifestly unattainable".
Zero evidence, and the Indictnents against Manafort equate to a tax fraud xase, nothing to do with Trump or non-existent Trump Collusion...
Billary Clinton and the case that can be made against her, however, is something different altogether:
"Hillary Clinton
It is against the law for the Clinton campaign and the Democratic National Committee to funnel millions of dollars to a British spy and to Russian sources in order to obtain the infamous and discredited Trump “dossier.” The Federal Election Campaign Act (52 USC 30101) prohibits foreign nationals and governments from giving or receiving money in U.S. campaigns. It also prohibits the filing of false or misleading campaign reports to hide the true purpose of the money (52 USC 30121). This is what Clinton and the DNC appear to have done.
Most often the penalty for violating this law is a fine, but in egregious cases, like this one, criminal prosecutions have been sought and convictions obtained. In this sense, it could be said that Hillary Clinton is the one who was conspiring with the Russians by breaking campaign finance laws with impunity."
This is called the 'tip of the iceberg'.
"But that’s not all. Damning new evidenceappears to show that Clinton used her office as Secretary of State to confer benefits to Russia in exchange for millions of dollars in donations to her foundation and cash to her husband. Secret recordings, intercepted emails, financial records, and eyewitness accounts allegedly show that Russian nuclear officials enriched the Clintons at the very time Hillary presided over a governing body which unanimously approved the sale of one-fifth of America’s uranium supply to Russia.
If this proves to be a corrupt “pay-to-play” scheme, it would constitute a myriad of crimes, including bribery (18 USC 201-b), mail fraud (18 USC 1341), and wire fraud (18 USC 1343). It might also qualify for racketeering charges (18 USC 1961-1968), if her foundation is determined to have been used as a criminal enterprise."
Is there Fox News Firefox add-on that automatically changes Trump advisors indicted and plead not guilt to Hillary Did It!?
It's a joke, dumbass.It's impossible to install a garbage disposal upside down, dumbass.Having Trump minions around is a bit like when your plumber installed the garbage disposal upside down. Whatever you had for dinner the night before keeps backing up into the sink no matter what you do. Not only does it defy logic, it defies gravity.Gregg Jarrett: Still no evidence of Trump-Russia 'collusion' - but Hillary is a different matter
"To put it plainly, Mueller is tasked with finding a crime that does not exist in the law. It is a legal impossibility. He is being asked to do something that is manifestly unattainable".
Zero evidence, and the Indictnents against Manafort equate to a tax fraud xase, nothing to do with Trump or non-existent Trump Collusion...
Billary Clinton and the case that can be made against her, however, is something different altogether:
"Hillary Clinton
It is against the law for the Clinton campaign and the Democratic National Committee to funnel millions of dollars to a British spy and to Russian sources in order to obtain the infamous and discredited Trump “dossier.” The Federal Election Campaign Act (52 USC 30101) prohibits foreign nationals and governments from giving or receiving money in U.S. campaigns. It also prohibits the filing of false or misleading campaign reports to hide the true purpose of the money (52 USC 30121). This is what Clinton and the DNC appear to have done.
Most often the penalty for violating this law is a fine, but in egregious cases, like this one, criminal prosecutions have been sought and convictions obtained. In this sense, it could be said that Hillary Clinton is the one who was conspiring with the Russians by breaking campaign finance laws with impunity."
This is called the 'tip of the iceberg'.
"But that’s not all. Damning new evidenceappears to show that Clinton used her office as Secretary of State to confer benefits to Russia in exchange for millions of dollars in donations to her foundation and cash to her husband. Secret recordings, intercepted emails, financial records, and eyewitness accounts allegedly show that Russian nuclear officials enriched the Clintons at the very time Hillary presided over a governing body which unanimously approved the sale of one-fifth of America’s uranium supply to Russia.
If this proves to be a corrupt “pay-to-play” scheme, it would constitute a myriad of crimes, including bribery (18 USC 201-b), mail fraud (18 USC 1341), and wire fraud (18 USC 1343). It might also qualify for racketeering charges (18 USC 1961-1968), if her foundation is determined to have been used as a criminal enterprise."
Is there Fox News Firefox add-on that automatically changes Trump advisors indicted and plead not guilt to Hillary Did It!?
It appears that all the snowflakes in here have had a lobotomy. They are all incapable of committing logic.
It's a joke, dumbass.It's impossible to install a garbage disposal upside down, dumbass.Having Trump minions around is a bit like when your plumber installed the garbage disposal upside down. Whatever you had for dinner the night before keeps backing up into the sink no matter what you do. Not only does it defy logic, it defies gravity.Gregg Jarrett: Still no evidence of Trump-Russia 'collusion' - but Hillary is a different matter
"To put it plainly, Mueller is tasked with finding a crime that does not exist in the law. It is a legal impossibility. He is being asked to do something that is manifestly unattainable".
Zero evidence, and the Indictnents against Manafort equate to a tax fraud xase, nothing to do with Trump or non-existent Trump Collusion...
Billary Clinton and the case that can be made against her, however, is something different altogether:
"Hillary Clinton
It is against the law for the Clinton campaign and the Democratic National Committee to funnel millions of dollars to a British spy and to Russian sources in order to obtain the infamous and discredited Trump “dossier.” The Federal Election Campaign Act (52 USC 30101) prohibits foreign nationals and governments from giving or receiving money in U.S. campaigns. It also prohibits the filing of false or misleading campaign reports to hide the true purpose of the money (52 USC 30121). This is what Clinton and the DNC appear to have done.
Most often the penalty for violating this law is a fine, but in egregious cases, like this one, criminal prosecutions have been sought and convictions obtained. In this sense, it could be said that Hillary Clinton is the one who was conspiring with the Russians by breaking campaign finance laws with impunity."
This is called the 'tip of the iceberg'.
"But that’s not all. Damning new evidenceappears to show that Clinton used her office as Secretary of State to confer benefits to Russia in exchange for millions of dollars in donations to her foundation and cash to her husband. Secret recordings, intercepted emails, financial records, and eyewitness accounts allegedly show that Russian nuclear officials enriched the Clintons at the very time Hillary presided over a governing body which unanimously approved the sale of one-fifth of America’s uranium supply to Russia.
If this proves to be a corrupt “pay-to-play” scheme, it would constitute a myriad of crimes, including bribery (18 USC 201-b), mail fraud (18 USC 1341), and wire fraud (18 USC 1343). It might also qualify for racketeering charges (18 USC 1961-1968), if her foundation is determined to have been used as a criminal enterprise."
Is there Fox News Firefox add-on that automatically changes Trump advisors indicted and plead not guilt to Hillary Did It!?
It appears that all the snowflakes in here have had a lobotomy. They are all incapable of committing logic.
Not all things have to be, idiot. And we now return to Trump folks face the judge and plead not guilty. Happy days for the lawyers.It's a joke, dumbass.It's impossible to install a garbage disposal upside down, dumbass.Having Trump minions around is a bit like when your plumber installed the garbage disposal upside down. Whatever you had for dinner the night before keeps backing up into the sink no matter what you do. Not only does it defy logic, it defies gravity.Gregg Jarrett: Still no evidence of Trump-Russia 'collusion' - but Hillary is a different matter
"To put it plainly, Mueller is tasked with finding a crime that does not exist in the law. It is a legal impossibility. He is being asked to do something that is manifestly unattainable".
Zero evidence, and the Indictnents against Manafort equate to a tax fraud xase, nothing to do with Trump or non-existent Trump Collusion...
Billary Clinton and the case that can be made against her, however, is something different altogether:
"Hillary Clinton
It is against the law for the Clinton campaign and the Democratic National Committee to funnel millions of dollars to a British spy and to Russian sources in order to obtain the infamous and discredited Trump “dossier.” The Federal Election Campaign Act (52 USC 30101) prohibits foreign nationals and governments from giving or receiving money in U.S. campaigns. It also prohibits the filing of false or misleading campaign reports to hide the true purpose of the money (52 USC 30121). This is what Clinton and the DNC appear to have done.
Most often the penalty for violating this law is a fine, but in egregious cases, like this one, criminal prosecutions have been sought and convictions obtained. In this sense, it could be said that Hillary Clinton is the one who was conspiring with the Russians by breaking campaign finance laws with impunity."
This is called the 'tip of the iceberg'.
"But that’s not all. Damning new evidenceappears to show that Clinton used her office as Secretary of State to confer benefits to Russia in exchange for millions of dollars in donations to her foundation and cash to her husband. Secret recordings, intercepted emails, financial records, and eyewitness accounts allegedly show that Russian nuclear officials enriched the Clintons at the very time Hillary presided over a governing body which unanimously approved the sale of one-fifth of America’s uranium supply to Russia.
If this proves to be a corrupt “pay-to-play” scheme, it would constitute a myriad of crimes, including bribery (18 USC 201-b), mail fraud (18 USC 1341), and wire fraud (18 USC 1343). It might also qualify for racketeering charges (18 USC 1961-1968), if her foundation is determined to have been used as a criminal enterprise."
Is there Fox News Firefox add-on that automatically changes Trump advisors indicted and plead not guilt to Hillary Did It!?
It appears that all the snowflakes in here have had a lobotomy. They are all incapable of committing logic.
That's right, it is a joke. It's certainly not a credible argument.
They are pleading not guilty because there is no evidence to connect Trump To Russian Collusion....while there is an overwhelming amount of evidence proving Hillary's guilt, which the thread title and subject are about.Not all things have to be, idiot. And we now return to Trump folks face the judge and plead not guilty. Happy days for the lawyers.
