Stormy Daniels sues Trump

I am looking forward to Stormy's 60 Minutes interview. Currently scheduled to air on March 25, 2018.

Lol, you looking for ward to a porn whore's interview where she slanders a sitting President of our nation?

Pathetic.

It is only slander if it is not true, and it has been confirmed by Trump's lawyers that it is true.


Lol, you are a partisan fool. none of that shit is True, much less relevant.

Nope, not a partisan, just not a Trump zealot like yourself. But do not feel bad, all you mindless zealots call me that.

What is true is that one cannot breach a Non-Disclosure agreement unless there is something to disclose. Trump's lawyer are suing Stormy for 20 million dollars of breaching the NDA, which means that she is telling the truth. I know that is probably a little too complicated for your little zealot mind, but trust me, it is the truth.
 
I am looking forward to Stormy's 60 Minutes interview. Currently scheduled to air on March 25, 2018.

Lol, you looking for ward to a porn whore's interview where she slanders a sitting President of our nation?

Pathetic.

It is only slander if it is not true, and it has been confirmed by Trump's lawyers that it is true.


Lol, you are a partisan fool. none of that shit is True, much less relevant.

Nope, not a partisan, just not a Trump zealot like yourself. But do not feel bad, all you mindless zealots call me that.

What is true is that one cannot breach a Non-Disclosure agreement unless there is something to disclose. Trump's lawyer are suing Stormy for 20 million dollars of breaching the NDA, which means that she is telling the truth. I know that is probably a little too complicated for your little zealot mind, but trust me, it is the truth.
The question is will stormy's appearance on TV on the 25th break super bowl record for watchers?? Will there be pictures??
 
I am looking forward to Stormy's 60 Minutes interview. Currently scheduled to air on March 25, 2018.

Lol, you looking for ward to a porn whore's interview where she slanders a sitting President of our nation?

Pathetic.

It is only slander if it is not true, and it has been confirmed by Trump's lawyers that it is true.


Lol, you are a partisan fool. none of that shit is True, much less relevant.

Nope, not a partisan, just not a Trump zealot like yourself. But do not feel bad, all you mindless zealots call me that.

What is true is that one cannot breach a Non-Disclosure agreement unless there is something to disclose. Trump's lawyer are suing Stormy for 20 million dollars of breaching the NDA, which means that she is telling the truth. I know that is probably a little too complicated for your little zealot mind, but trust me, it is the truth.
The question is will stormy's appearance on TV on the 25th break super bowl record for watchers?? Will there be pictures??
At this point, she’ll be lucky if she doesn’t end up dead.
 
Lol, you looking for ward to a porn whore's interview where she slanders a sitting President of our nation?

Pathetic.

It is only slander if it is not true, and it has been confirmed by Trump's lawyers that it is true.


Lol, you are a partisan fool. none of that shit is True, much less relevant.

Nope, not a partisan, just not a Trump zealot like yourself. But do not feel bad, all you mindless zealots call me that.

What is true is that one cannot breach a Non-Disclosure agreement unless there is something to disclose. Trump's lawyer are suing Stormy for 20 million dollars of breaching the NDA, which means that she is telling the truth. I know that is probably a little too complicated for your little zealot mind, but trust me, it is the truth.
The question is will stormy's appearance on TV on the 25th break super bowl record for watchers?? Will there be pictures??
At this point, she’ll be lucky if she doesn’t end up dead.
Brave lady going up against the Trump scum
 
What is true is that one cannot breach a Non-Disclosure agreement unless there is something to disclose. Trump's lawyer are suing Stormy for 20 million dollars of breaching the NDA, which means that she is telling the truth. I know that is probably a little too complicated for your little zealot mind, but trust me, it is the truth.

There may be a new ground for invalidating the NDA. The arbitration penalty is $1 million per disclosure, as an estimated harm done to Donald J. Trump as head of the Trump multi-billion enterprise. That a harm to his reputation as CEO of Trump inc, would cause the worth of Trump inc to suffer, and hence Trump to suffer economic loss.

Trump is no longer running Trump enterprises, he has no managing ties to the organization, and no effect upon it's operations. As Trumps reputation as president of the US, has no effect upon the worth of Trump inc, any statements made about Trump have no financial effect on his worth any more.

So the penalty of $1 million , may have been valid when Trump was CEO of Trump inc, that is no longer the case.
 
What is true is that one cannot breach a Non-Disclosure agreement unless there is something to disclose. Trump's lawyer are suing Stormy for 20 million dollars of breaching the NDA, which means that she is telling the truth. I know that is probably a little too complicated for your little zealot mind, but trust me, it is the truth.

There may be a new ground for invalidating the NDA. The arbitration penalty is $1 million per disclosure, as an estimated harm done to Donald J. Trump as head of the Trump multi-billion enterprise. That a harm to his reputation as CEO of Trump inc, would cause the worth of Trump inc to suffer, and hence Trump to suffer economic loss.

Trump is no longer running Trump enterprises, he has no managing ties to the organization, and no effect upon it's operations. As Trumps reputation as president of the US, has no effect upon the worth of Trump inc, any statements made about Trump have no financial effect on his worth any more.

So the penalty of $1 million , may have been valid when Trump was CEO of Trump inc, that is no longer the case.
I doubt that matters. She agreed to pay $1 million per disclosure.
 
I doubt that matters. She agreed to pay $1 million per disclosure.
That was based on an estimation of how much financial harm would be done to Trump by such a disclosure.

That is no longer the case. IN addition the damages are to be paid to David Dennison, who was not a signatory to the NDA.
 
180306203120-trump-stormy-daniels-split-exlarge-169.jpg


Stormy Daniels sues President Trump over alleged affair and 'hush' agreement

Washington (CNN)A new lawsuit filed by the porn star known as Stormy Daniels claims President Donald Trump never signed a hush agreement regarding an alleged sexual encounter between the two and therefore the agreement is void.

According to the legal complaint filed in California state court and tweeted out by her lawyer on Tuesday, Trump's personal lawyer, Michael Cohen, signed the document on behalf of the President instead.

The porn star, whose real name is Stephanie Clifford, claims in the lawsuit to have had an affair with Trump several years prior to his presidency. However, the lawsuit claims that when he was running for office and multiple women were coming forward to share stories of their own alleged encounters with the then-Republican presidential candidate, Cohen intervened in an attempt to keep Clifford from coming forward as well.

The lawsuit says Cohen has continued his attempts at silencing Clifford -- including as recently as February 27, 2018.

More: Stormy Daniels sues Trump

Stormy Daniels Lawsuit (15 pages w/attachments)

I have always believed that Stormy would get the last laugh. Will Trump have to testify under oath?

An interesting take on this subject.

Hush Contract Liquidated Damage Clause of $1 Mil. per Breach Is Invalid & Unenforceable
 
This country feeling sorry for a porn queen that alledgedly had an affair with a man willingly, is as desperate as it gets. People take heed to all this trash going on, because this nation has got to finally see the left for what it is. "Demon"-crats.
 
:lol:

I think Donald Trump may have met his match on this one...

And if what she had said in her True Confession in the InTouch magazine interview, he had told her that she should be on his Apprentice show because she was brilliant....
(she also was the editor of her high school news paper), and she set up an exploratory campaign committee as a Republican to run against that senator that spent time with prostitutes all over the place and something to do with him liking diapers...ugh..I dunno,can't remember his name at the moment, OH Yeah, David Vitter,

but anyway, she decided she would run against him in the Republican primary because if he could run for office again after his prostitute exposure, then she, as a porn star could certainly run also! :rofl::rofl::rofl:

OH MY LORD! You can not make this up! She's a sassy one!!!!! :D

I can see how he liked her.....
 
It matters not whether its a dimorat or rethug caught up in these types of matters. Its just fun to see this stuff come out. Its good for our political system.
 
:lol:

I think Donald Trump may have met his match on this one...

And if what she had said in her True Confession in the InTouch magazine interview, he had told her that she should be on his Apprentice show because she was brilliant.....


I can't see why she fell for such a bad NDA. It's like somebody was tisting her arm, it's so one sided. It doesn't look like something her current lawyer would have let her sign.
 
I doubt that matters. She agreed to pay $1 million per disclosure.
That was based on an estimation of how much financial harm would be done to Trump by such a disclosure.

That is no longer the case. IN addition the damages are to be paid to David Dennison, who was not a signatory to the NDA.
EC, LLC is a party to the contract, which is Cohen. She will have to pay him, not Trump.
 
I am a Pornhub performer and really would need a double dose of Viagra to deal with her flat ass and fake tits. If The Donald banged that ho he deserves a medal!
 
It matters not whether its a dimorat or rethug caught up in these types of matters. Its just fun to see this stuff come out. Its good for our political system.
Nothing is good about it......especially when the alleged right wing moral majority cheers the president of the USAs behavior by staying mum.....the silence is deafening!!!

Clinton or Obama would have been admonished to no end, a public flogging and then Probably impeached if not hung from a tree...... :eek:

So no it is not good for anyone but our Nation's enemies, seeing how weak our Nation is with this disgusting man that is worshipped by his minions, blindly.....
 

Forum List

Back
Top