Stormy's amended lawsuit: Bad news for Cohen and, you know who...

[conserveguy877]

Coke snorting, porn whore has no credibility.

She should take a lie detector test on if she was drugged up now.

 

[nat4900]

Trump cultists refuse to address a very, very simple question......

WHY would anyone pay off a porn star $130 K just DAYS before an election?

(see, its a very simple question....lol)

 

[conserveguy877]

Trump cultists refuse to address a very, very simple question......

WHY would anyone pay off a porn star $130 K just DAYS before an election?

(see, its a very simple question....lol)

What's your obsession with the celebrity Trump gossip, though? He walked away from being democrat years ago now...

 

[TemplarKormac]

If these lawsuits and investigations go the way you're hoping them to, what would the likely outcome be? Impeachment. A ruination of a man's character. Something you're no doubt hoping for. Nat, you're one of the biggest trolls on this board, but still you're capable of exercising at least half a brain.

Psst. It doesn't take the lawsuits and investigations for the ruination of the man's character. The ruination of his character results from HIS OWN ACTIONS...

• The fact that he's been divorced multiple times.
• The fact that he's had affairs on his wives.
• That he boinked a porn star while his wife was at home having just given birth to his son.
• Paying off the porn star that he boinked in 2006 just weeks before the 2016 to keep the information hidden from the American voter.
• The fact there are hours of tape of him on the Howard Stern show showing he has no character.
• The fact that he is a fraud (see Trump University).
• The fact that he imports labor instead of hiring Americans.
• The fact that he stiffs contractors instead of paying them for the work they did.
• The his commercial product lines are often manufactured by foreign labor and imported to the US instead of manufacturing them here.

Those a are a few off the top of my head.


>>>>

You won't see me denying any of that. What I will say is how you missed the point entirely. You accuse us of voting for a man with no moral character, but are excusing the millions of people who voted for Bill Clinton. Now, you'll think, oh he's shifting the blame, no I'm pointing out your own hypocrisy on the matter.

Amidst his lack of character as you so call it, he has done more than enough to redeem himself over the past year, whilst you, nat and sealy all cling on to bitter hope and long passed scandals that have no practical or legal bearing on him now. I was 9 years old when the scandal with Bill Clinton broke out. But even then, I had respect for the position he held, as I had been taught to. You guys? Not so much. You seem to think the man is irredeemable.

 

[TemplarKormac]

I GUESS ITS EASIER TO LOOK AT THE SEX PART SO THAT CLINTON CAN ALSO BE BLAMED?

LOL

He did set the president... er, precedent.

really?

who got the $130k?

i must have missed it

Who paid it? That's the question. If Cohen paid it personally, there was no breach of FEC laws.

Seriously, what is it with liberals and jumping to conclusions? Oh wait, everybody does that these days.

 

[Daryl Hunt]

means absolutely nothing...if Bill can perjure himself--a very serious crime--and get away with it

Idiotic retort....
Clinton was IMPEACHED....and his law license suspended.....How do you define "get away with it"???

Clinton was Impeached which is charges were brought up by the House. The Senate decided not to pursue it. But it could have waited until he was no longer President and continued in the Federal Courts where a conviction was cut and dried for perjury. Bush Jr. did give him a modified commuted sentence. Clinton was given a fine of 60K, lost his license to practice law in 5 states. Pretty much exactly what he would have received in a federal court but without the extreme cost and embarrassment of the nation.

 

[del]

I GUESS ITS EASIER TO LOOK AT THE SEX PART SO THAT CLINTON CAN ALSO BE BLAMED?

LOL

He did set the president... er, precedent.

really?

who got the $130k?

i must have missed it

Who paid it? That's the question. If Cohen paid it personally, there was no breach of FEC laws.

Seriously, what is it with liberals and jumping to conclusions? Oh wait, everybody does that these days.

i seriously tend to doubt that

if cohen paid it, it's essentially a campaign contribution

 

[WorldWatcher]

You won't see me denying any of that. What I will say is how you missed the point entirely. You accuse us of voting for a man with no moral character, but are excusing the millions of people who voted for Bill Clinton. Now, you'll think, oh he's shifting the blame, no I'm pointing out your own hypocrisy on the matter.

Amidst his lack of character as you so call it, he has done more than enough to redeem himself over the past year, whilst you, nat and sealy all cling on to bitter hope and long passed scandals that have no practical or legal bearing on him now. I was 9 years old when the scandal with Bill Clinton broke out. But even then, I had respect for the position he held, as I had been taught to. You guys? Not so much. You seem to think the man is irredeemable.

Well I'm glad you didn't disagree with any of that which would include he ruined his character based on his actions and not those action becoming public.

I don't excuse anything for the dirtbag also known as Bill Clinton since I've been a Republican since 1978 and voting for Reagan, Reagan, Bush I, Bush I, Dole, Bush II, Bush II, McCain, Romney, and Kaisch (2016 in both the Primary and General elections).

So watch who you associate with "you guys". Next time you might ask first.

>>>>

 

[TemplarKormac]

I GUESS ITS EASIER TO LOOK AT THE SEX PART SO THAT CLINTON CAN ALSO BE BLAMED?

LOL

He did set the president... er, precedent.

really?

who got the $130k?

i must have missed it

Who paid it? That's the question. If Cohen paid it personally, there was no breach of FEC laws.

Seriously, what is it with liberals and jumping to conclusions? Oh wait, everybody does that these days.

i seriously tend to doubt that

if cohen paid it, it's essentially a campaign contribution

Your doubts do not suddenly become reality when you want them to. Even if what Trump did was morally objectionable, you can't charge him with breaking any laws when his attorney paid a porn star hush money out of his own pocket.

 

[TemplarKormac]

I don't excuse anything for the dirtbag also known as Bill Clinton since I've been a Republican since 1978 and voting for Reagan, Reagan, Bush I, Bush I, Dole, Bush II, Bush II, McCain, Romney, and Kaisch (2016 in both the Primary and General elections).

So watch who you associate with "you guys". Next time you might ask first.

Sorry, it's kinda hard knowing who's who, you know, with all of this judgement and moral preening flying around. Kinda hard to tell, since it pretty much sounds all the same to me.

 

[del]

I GUESS ITS EASIER TO LOOK AT THE SEX PART SO THAT CLINTON CAN ALSO BE BLAMED?

LOL

He did set the president... er, precedent.

really?

who got the $130k?

i must have missed it

Who paid it? That's the question. If Cohen paid it personally, there was no breach of FEC laws.

Seriously, what is it with liberals and jumping to conclusions? Oh wait, everybody does that these days.

i seriously tend to doubt that

if cohen paid it, it's essentially a campaign contribution

Your doubts do not suddenly become reality when you want them to. Even if what Trump did was morally objectionable, you can't charge him with breaking any laws when his attorney paid a porn star hush money out of his own pocket.

who knew there was an exemption for porn star payoffs in the campaign finding laws?

 

[del]

I don't excuse anything for the dirtbag also known as Bill Clinton since I've been a Republican since 1978 and voting for Reagan, Reagan, Bush I, Bush I, Dole, Bush II, Bush II, McCain, Romney, and Kaisch (2016 in both the Primary and General elections).

So watch who you associate with "you guys". Next time you might ask first.

Sorry, it's kinda hard knowing who's who, you know, with all of this judgement and moral preening flying around. Kinda hard to tell, since it pretty much sounds all the same to me.

do you seriously think what you're doing is substantively different?

 

[TemplarKormac]

I don't excuse anything for the dirtbag also known as Bill Clinton since I've been a Republican since 1978 and voting for Reagan, Reagan, Bush I, Bush I, Dole, Bush II, Bush II, McCain, Romney, and Kaisch (2016 in both the Primary and General elections).

So watch who you associate with "you guys". Next time you might ask first.

Sorry, it's kinda hard knowing who's who, you know, with all of this judgement and moral preening flying around. Kinda hard to tell, since it pretty much sounds all the same to me.

do you seriously think what you're doing is substantively different?

So, what makes you think you're entitled to do the same? Oh, because he's Donald Trump and all the basic rules of morality suddenly apply to him and him alone.

 

[TemplarKormac]

LOL

He did set the president... er, precedent.

really?

who got the $130k?

i must have missed it

Who paid it? That's the question. If Cohen paid it personally, there was no breach of FEC laws.

Seriously, what is it with liberals and jumping to conclusions? Oh wait, everybody does that these days.

i seriously tend to doubt that

if cohen paid it, it's essentially a campaign contribution

Your doubts do not suddenly become reality when you want them to. Even if what Trump did was morally objectionable, you can't charge him with breaking any laws when his attorney paid a porn star hush money out of his own pocket.

who knew there was an exemption for porn star payoffs in the campaign finding laws?

Did the money come directly from the campaign? Geez.

I said I was leaving a while ago.

You can judge him by whatever hypocritical standards you wish. I am not going to play in the mud any longer.

 

[del]

I don't excuse anything for the dirtbag also known as Bill Clinton since I've been a Republican since 1978 and voting for Reagan, Reagan, Bush I, Bush I, Dole, Bush II, Bush II, McCain, Romney, and Kaisch (2016 in both the Primary and General elections).

So watch who you associate with "you guys". Next time you might ask first.

Sorry, it's kinda hard knowing who's who, you know, with all of this judgement and moral preening flying around. Kinda hard to tell, since it pretty much sounds all the same to me.

do you seriously think what you're doing is substantively different?

So, what makes you think you're entitled to do the same? Oh, because he's Donald Trump and all the basic rules of morality suddenly apply to him and him alone.

you do have a vivid imagination, don't you?

if you'll point me to another pol who's in hot water for paying off a porn star 3 days before the election, i'll be happy to unload on them

they're called inalienable rights for a reason, *templar*

don't get your hauberk in an uproar

 

[TemplarKormac]

I don't excuse anything for the dirtbag also known as Bill Clinton since I've been a Republican since 1978 and voting for Reagan, Reagan, Bush I, Bush I, Dole, Bush II, Bush II, McCain, Romney, and Kaisch (2016 in both the Primary and General elections).

So watch who you associate with "you guys". Next time you might ask first.

Sorry, it's kinda hard knowing who's who, you know, with all of this judgement and moral preening flying around. Kinda hard to tell, since it pretty much sounds all the same to me.

do you seriously think what you're doing is substantively different?

So, what makes you think you're entitled to do the same? Oh, because he's Donald Trump and all the basic rules of morality suddenly apply to him and him alone.

you do have a vivid imagination, don't you?

if you'll point me to another pol who's in hot water for paying off a porn star 3 days before the election, i'll be happy to unload on them

they're called inalienable rights for a reason, *templar*

don't get your hauberk in an uproar

 

[del]

glad to see the rogaine is working for you

 

[TemplarKormac]

if you'll point me to another pol who's in hot water for paying off a porn star 3 days before the election, i'll be happy to unload on them

One last thing...

If you can point me to the exact law you believe was broken, if you have any tangible evidence that campaign money was used to pay off a porn star, I'll change my mind right here and now, on the spot. Fair enough?

Until then, I'll go back to my vivid imagination.

 

[del]

if you'll point me to another pol who's in hot water for paying off a porn star 3 days before the election, i'll be happy to unload on them

One last thing...

If you can point me to the exact law you believe was broken, if you have any tangible evidence that campaign money was used to pay off a porn star, I'll change my mind right here and now, on the spot. Fair enough?

Until then, I'll go back to my vivid imagination.

i'm sorry.

you've mistaken me for someone who gives a fuck.

do you think interacting with your ilk is the highlight of my day?

nice hair, btw

 

[TemplarKormac]

if you'll point me to another pol who's in hot water for paying off a porn star 3 days before the election, i'll be happy to unload on them

One last thing...

If you can point me to the exact law you believe was broken, if you have any tangible evidence that campaign money was used to pay off a porn star, I'll change my mind right here and now, on the spot. Fair enough?

Until then, I'll go back to my vivid imagination.

i'm sorry.

you've mistaken me for someone who gives a fuck.

do you think interacting with your ilk is the highlight of my day?

nice hair, btw

Just as I thought. Your arguments are purely emotional, not factual.

Nice concession, by the way.

Good day.