Study finds conservatives have lower-IQs than liberals

[SassyIrishLass]

Of course you didn't...

No need. This forum proves the OP to be true everyday. One of your group even said evolution was just a theory and had not been observed.

Maybe you can provide the link? I won't wait AHAHAHAHAHA Libturds: all fluff and no substance

Go read the thread. Some people took pity on you and posted proof of how illiterate you were in regard to evolution.

Evolution has never been observed. I know this, it's a fact. I don't have to go read some left loon's ramblings

.....and you double down on ignorance.

Maybe you'll believe an evolutionist scientist?

A current leading evolutionist, Jeffrey Schwartz, professor of anthropology at the University of Pittsburgh, has recently acknowledged that:

. . . it was and still is the case that, with the exception of Dobzhansky's claim about a new species of fruit fly, the formation of a new species, by any mechanism, has never been observed

BOOM!!!! Now sit down

 

[Asclepias]

No need. This forum proves the OP to be true everyday. One of your group even said evolution was just a theory and had not been observed.

Maybe you can provide the link? I won't wait AHAHAHAHAHA Libturds: all fluff and no substance

Go read the thread. Some people took pity on you and posted proof of how illiterate you were in regard to evolution.

Evolution has never been observed. I know this, it's a fact. I don't have to go read some left loon's ramblings

.....and you double down on ignorance.

Maybe you'll believe an evolutionist scientist?

A current leading evolutionist, Jeffrey Schwartz, professor of anthropology at the University of Pittsburgh, has recently acknowledged that:

. . . it was and still is the case that, with the exception of Dobzhansky's claim about a new species of fruit fly, the formation of a new species, by any mechanism, has never been observed

BOOM!!!! Now sit down

He must be a retard. Millions of other scientists say he is wrong. What makes you think this guy is right?

 

[SassyIrishLass]

Maybe you can provide the link? I won't wait AHAHAHAHAHA Libturds: all fluff and no substance

Go read the thread. Some people took pity on you and posted proof of how illiterate you were in regard to evolution.

Evolution has never been observed. I know this, it's a fact. I don't have to go read some left loon's ramblings

.....and you double down on ignorance.

Maybe you'll believe an evolutionist scientist?

A current leading evolutionist, Jeffrey Schwartz, professor of anthropology at the University of Pittsburgh, has recently acknowledged that:

. . . it was and still is the case that, with the exception of Dobzhansky's claim about a new species of fruit fly, the formation of a new species, by any mechanism, has never been observed

BOOM!!!! Now sit down

He must be a retard. Millions of other scientists say he is wrong. What makes you think this guy is right?

You can win this argument..all you have to do is show me observed evolution. Chop chop and don't bother responding without, I've grown weary of your buffoonery and BS

 

[EdwardBaiamonte]

even if conservatives had a significantly lower IQ it would not matter unless there was something mistaken about conservatism that resulted from the low IQ. I assume if there was something mistaken a liberal would have the IQ to point it out.

 

[Delta4Embassy]

Tada!!!!!!

Republicans Are Smarter Than Democrats The Right Stuff

It's actually using the same study. Just a different spin.

 

[Asclepias]

Go read the thread. Some people took pity on you and posted proof of how illiterate you were in regard to evolution.

Evolution has never been observed. I know this, it's a fact. I don't have to go read some left loon's ramblings

.....and you double down on ignorance.

Maybe you'll believe an evolutionist scientist?

A current leading evolutionist, Jeffrey Schwartz, professor of anthropology at the University of Pittsburgh, has recently acknowledged that:

. . . it was and still is the case that, with the exception of Dobzhansky's claim about a new species of fruit fly, the formation of a new species, by any mechanism, has never been observed

BOOM!!!! Now sit down

He must be a retard. Millions of other scientists say he is wrong. What makes you think this guy is right?

You can win this argument..all you have to do is show me observed evolution. Chop chop and don't bother responding without, I've grown weary of your buffoonery and BS

I'm not trying to win an argument. I'm laughing at how ignorant you are. Go read the links in the thread if you want proof. I dont have time to convince you of your ignorance.

 

[kaz]

Social conservatives have a lower I.Q. probably - Gene Expression

"Looking at the General Social Survey I too have found at a correlation between higher intelligence and social liberalism."

lots more at link

Social conservatives, LOL, they are the same as liberals

 

[guno]

Bible-bangers aren't the brightest, study shows

Bible-bangers aren t the brightest study shows - National - NZ Herald News

 

[guno]

correlation to social conservatives

 

[SassyIrishLass]

Tada!!!!!!

Republicans Are Smarter Than Democrats The Right Stuff

It's actually using the same study. Just a different spin.

My point was any study can be refuted with another study

 

[SassyIrishLass]

Evolution has never been observed. I know this, it's a fact. I don't have to go read some left loon's ramblings

.....and you double down on ignorance.

Maybe you'll believe an evolutionist scientist?

A current leading evolutionist, Jeffrey Schwartz, professor of anthropology at the University of Pittsburgh, has recently acknowledged that:

. . . it was and still is the case that, with the exception of Dobzhansky's claim about a new species of fruit fly, the formation of a new species, by any mechanism, has never been observed

BOOM!!!! Now sit down

He must be a retard. Millions of other scientists say he is wrong. What makes you think this guy is right?

You can win this argument..all you have to do is show me observed evolution. Chop chop and don't bother responding without, I've grown weary of your buffoonery and BS

I'm not trying to win an argument. I'm laughing at how ignorant you are. Go read the links in the thread if you want proof. I dont have time to convince you of your ignorance.

Why don't you just provide a link? C'mon know it all, you can end it by doing that. I know you can't because it HAS NEVER BEEN OBSERVED, fact

I knew this going in.

 

[SuperDemocrat]

I think that more intelligent someone is, the less likely they are to deny the findings of science.

The more intelligent someone is, the more likely they are to grasp that science is a process, not dogma.

Despite my superior intelligence I can't figure out that 5.5% unemployment is not a positive number. Me so smart...I agree with everything cnn tells me

 

[Liminal]

Of course you didn't...

I havent even looked at the study to be honest. Just going on the general actions of cons let me know they are correct no matter their methods

No need. This forum proves the OP to be true everyday. One of your group even said evolution was just a theory and had not been observed.

Maybe you can provide the link? I won't wait AHAHAHAHAHA Libturds: all fluff and no substance

Go read the thread. Some people took pity on you and posted proof of how illiterate you were in regard to evolution.

Evolution has never been observed. I know this, it's a fact. I don't have to go read some left loon's ramblings

Because the fossil record is meaningless.

 

[Asclepias]

.....and you double down on ignorance.

Maybe you'll believe an evolutionist scientist?

A current leading evolutionist, Jeffrey Schwartz, professor of anthropology at the University of Pittsburgh, has recently acknowledged that:

. . . it was and still is the case that, with the exception of Dobzhansky's claim about a new species of fruit fly, the formation of a new species, by any mechanism, has never been observed

BOOM!!!! Now sit down

He must be a retard. Millions of other scientists say he is wrong. What makes you think this guy is right?

You can win this argument..all you have to do is show me observed evolution. Chop chop and don't bother responding without, I've grown weary of your buffoonery and BS

I'm not trying to win an argument. I'm laughing at how ignorant you are. Go read the links in the thread if you want proof. I dont have time to convince you of your ignorance.

Why don't you just provide a link? C'mon know it all, you can end it by doing that. I know you can't because it HAS NEVER BEEN OBSERVED, fact

I knew this going in.

For 2 reasons. Its common knowledge and there are links in the thread. I dont have anything to end. Dares dont work on intelligent people.

 

[SassyIrishLass]

Maybe you'll believe an evolutionist scientist?

A current leading evolutionist, Jeffrey Schwartz, professor of anthropology at the University of Pittsburgh, has recently acknowledged that:

. . . it was and still is the case that, with the exception of Dobzhansky's claim about a new species of fruit fly, the formation of a new species, by any mechanism, has never been observed

BOOM!!!! Now sit down

He must be a retard. Millions of other scientists say he is wrong. What makes you think this guy is right?

You can win this argument..all you have to do is show me observed evolution. Chop chop and don't bother responding without, I've grown weary of your buffoonery and BS

I'm not trying to win an argument. I'm laughing at how ignorant you are. Go read the links in the thread if you want proof. I dont have time to convince you of your ignorance.

Why don't you just provide a link? C'mon know it all, you can end it by doing that. I know you can't because it HAS NEVER BEEN OBSERVED, fact

I knew this going in.

For 2 reasons. Its common knowledge and there are links in the thread. I dont have anything to end. Dares dont work on intelligent people.

Translation: I don't have a link and I looked and found zilch.

Know why? Because it's never been observed. You lose, badly

 

[Asclepias]

He must be a retard. Millions of other scientists say he is wrong. What makes you think this guy is right?

You can win this argument..all you have to do is show me observed evolution. Chop chop and don't bother responding without, I've grown weary of your buffoonery and BS

I'm not trying to win an argument. I'm laughing at how ignorant you are. Go read the links in the thread if you want proof. I dont have time to convince you of your ignorance.

Why don't you just provide a link? C'mon know it all, you can end it by doing that. I know you can't because it HAS NEVER BEEN OBSERVED, fact

I knew this going in.

For 2 reasons. Its common knowledge and there are links in the thread. I dont have anything to end. Dares dont work on intelligent people.

Translation: I don't have a link and I looked and found zilch.

Know why? Because it's never been observed. You lose, badly

OK

 

[SassyIrishLass]

You can win this argument..all you have to do is show me observed evolution. Chop chop and don't bother responding without, I've grown weary of your buffoonery and BS

I'm not trying to win an argument. I'm laughing at how ignorant you are. Go read the links in the thread if you want proof. I dont have time to convince you of your ignorance.

Why don't you just provide a link? C'mon know it all, you can end it by doing that. I know you can't because it HAS NEVER BEEN OBSERVED, fact

I knew this going in.

For 2 reasons. Its common knowledge and there are links in the thread. I dont have anything to end. Dares dont work on intelligent people.

Translation: I don't have a link and I looked and found zilch.

Know why? Because it's never been observed. You lose, badly

OK

 

[Liminal]

He must be a retard. Millions of other scientists say he is wrong. What makes you think this guy is right?

You can win this argument..all you have to do is show me observed evolution. Chop chop and don't bother responding without, I've grown weary of your buffoonery and BS

I'm not trying to win an argument. I'm laughing at how ignorant you are. Go read the links in the thread if you want proof. I dont have time to convince you of your ignorance.

Why don't you just provide a link? C'mon know it all, you can end it by doing that. I know you can't because it HAS NEVER BEEN OBSERVED, fact

I knew this going in.

For 2 reasons. Its common knowledge and there are links in the thread. I dont have anything to end. Dares dont work on intelligent people.

Translation: I don't have a link and I looked and found zilch.

Know why? Because it's never been observed. You lose, badly

I was just wondering when you'll get around to substantiating your wild claims? Any time soon?

 

[Asclepias]

I'm not trying to win an argument. I'm laughing at how ignorant you are. Go read the links in the thread if you want proof. I dont have time to convince you of your ignorance.

Why don't you just provide a link? C'mon know it all, you can end it by doing that. I know you can't because it HAS NEVER BEEN OBSERVED, fact

I knew this going in.

For 2 reasons. Its common knowledge and there are links in the thread. I dont have anything to end. Dares dont work on intelligent people.

Translation: I don't have a link and I looked and found zilch.

Know why? Because it's never been observed. You lose, badly

OK

 

[Liminal]

Tada!!!!!!

Republicans Are Smarter Than Democrats The Right Stuff

It's actually using the same study. Just a different spin.

My point was any study can be refuted with another study

You haven't made that case here.