Study finds conservatives have lower-IQs than liberals

[Liminal]

In case you missed it: Fossil record.

 

[ClosedCaption]

I understand the concept of blaming others for thoughts you hold. It's common with cons...they claim they would support things if only dems didn't do *insert action here*

So you don't know what confirmation bias is and seek to erect a straw man in hopes of evading the issue at hand.

Delta is a retard who failed to even follow the link he posted, so we will ignore him. But the contention of the left is that they can prove the right is stupid through studies of conservatives. Is the the study legitimate? Is the testing methodology sound and complaint with statistical controls? Are the questions on the study valid, or do they lead to a predesignated conclusion?

1. In psychology and cognitive science, confirmation bias (or confirmatorybias) is a tendency to search for or interpret information in a way that confirms one's preconceptions, leading to statistical errors.

No study that offends you is accurate...and those you agree with are valid. Got it..and much easier than your paragraphs of babble

 

[SassyIrishLass]

She thanked elektra for calling her dumb so she probably forgot her argument as well.

I have to wonder how stupid someone has to be to characterize evolution as a "study" that could somehow be refuted by another study. Evolution is a fundamental pillar of science, part of the foundation of reason. People who don't understand that much have no business even having opinions about science.

You obviously (and as usual) didn't pay attention. I said evolution has never been observed...now maybe you can provide proof it HAS been observed? Your cohort failed miserably and was reduced to blabbering like a 6 y/o

You are the one that failed to pay attention. Several people cited links for you. Pretending you didnt see them is not a get out of stupid free card.

No they didn't, it can't be a viable link because once again EVOLUTION HAS NEVER BEEN OBSERVED, that is a fact. You lose and I knew this before I posted it. Now stop with your BS, you've lost

Fossil record.

That's not proof of evolution, it's proof something existed not that they evolved. Keep trying....but it's a lost cause, it's never been observed. I already knew this from a debate I attended while in college and the losing team failed to make a case it had ever been observed.

 

[Liminal]

And be sure not to forget about the fossil record.

 

[SassyIrishLass]

I understand the concept of blaming others for thoughts you hold. It's common with cons...they claim they would support things if only dems didn't do *insert action here*

So you don't know what confirmation bias is and seek to erect a straw man in hopes of evading the issue at hand.

Delta is a retard who failed to even follow the link he posted, so we will ignore him. But the contention of the left is that they can prove the right is stupid through studies of conservatives. Is the the study legitimate? Is the testing methodology sound and complaint with statistical controls? Are the questions on the study valid, or do they lead to a predesignated conclusion?

1. In psychology and cognitive science, confirmation bias (or confirmatorybias) is a tendency to search for or interpret information in a way that confirms one's preconceptions, leading to statistical errors.

No study that offends you is accurate...and those you agree with are valid. Got it..and much easier than your paragraphs of babble

There is no record of evolution ever being observed, sorry that's just a fact. A million studies won't change that fact

 

[Asclepias]

I have to wonder how stupid someone has to be to characterize evolution as a "study" that could somehow be refuted by another study. Evolution is a fundamental pillar of science, part of the foundation of reason. People who don't understand that much have no business even having opinions about science.

You obviously (and as usual) didn't pay attention. I said evolution has never been observed...now maybe you can provide proof it HAS been observed? Your cohort failed miserably and was reduced to blabbering like a 6 y/o

You are the one that failed to pay attention. Several people cited links for you. Pretending you didnt see them is not a get out of stupid free card.

No they didn't, it can't be a viable link because once again EVOLUTION HAS NEVER BEEN OBSERVED, that is a fact. You lose and I knew this before I posted it. Now stop with your BS, you've lost

Fossil record.

That's not proof of evolution, it's proof something existed not that they evolved. Keep trying....but it's a lost cause, it's never been observed. I already knew this from a debate I attended while in college and the losing team failed to make a case it had ever been observed.

Of course youre right.

 

[SassyIrishLass]

You obviously (and as usual) didn't pay attention. I said evolution has never been observed...now maybe you can provide proof it HAS been observed? Your cohort failed miserably and was reduced to blabbering like a 6 y/o

You are the one that failed to pay attention. Several people cited links for you. Pretending you didnt see them is not a get out of stupid free card.

No they didn't, it can't be a viable link because once again EVOLUTION HAS NEVER BEEN OBSERVED, that is a fact. You lose and I knew this before I posted it. Now stop with your BS, you've lost

Fossil record.

That's not proof of evolution, it's proof something existed not that they evolved. Keep trying....but it's a lost cause, it's never been observed. I already knew this from a debate I attended while in college and the losing team failed to make a case it had ever been observed.

Of course your right.

Link or shut up. Thats the end of your nonsense, fool

 

[Liminal]

I have to wonder how stupid someone has to be to characterize evolution as a "study" that could somehow be refuted by another study. Evolution is a fundamental pillar of science, part of the foundation of reason. People who don't understand that much have no business even having opinions about science.

You obviously (and as usual) didn't pay attention. I said evolution has never been observed...now maybe you can provide proof it HAS been observed? Your cohort failed miserably and was reduced to blabbering like a 6 y/o

You are the one that failed to pay attention. Several people cited links for you. Pretending you didnt see them is not a get out of stupid free card.

No they didn't, it can't be a viable link because once again EVOLUTION HAS NEVER BEEN OBSERVED, that is a fact. You lose and I knew this before I posted it. Now stop with your BS, you've lost

Fossil record.

That's not proof of evolution, it's proof something existed not that they evolved. Keep trying....but it's a lost cause, it's never been observed. I already knew this from a debate I attended while in college and the losing team failed to make a case it had ever been observed.

No you're wrong, and the people you debated were obviously stupid. The fossil record is conclusive evidence, end of story.

 

[Asclepias]

You are the one that failed to pay attention. Several people cited links for you. Pretending you didnt see them is not a get out of stupid free card.

No they didn't, it can't be a viable link because once again EVOLUTION HAS NEVER BEEN OBSERVED, that is a fact. You lose and I knew this before I posted it. Now stop with your BS, you've lost

Fossil record.

That's not proof of evolution, it's proof something existed not that they evolved. Keep trying....but it's a lost cause, it's never been observed. I already knew this from a debate I attended while in college and the losing team failed to make a case it had ever been observed.

Of course your right.

Link or shut up. Thats the end of your nonsense, fool

I'm agreeing with you. Youre right.

 

[SassyIrishLass]

You obviously (and as usual) didn't pay attention. I said evolution has never been observed...now maybe you can provide proof it HAS been observed? Your cohort failed miserably and was reduced to blabbering like a 6 y/o

You are the one that failed to pay attention. Several people cited links for you. Pretending you didnt see them is not a get out of stupid free card.

No they didn't, it can't be a viable link because once again EVOLUTION HAS NEVER BEEN OBSERVED, that is a fact. You lose and I knew this before I posted it. Now stop with your BS, you've lost

Fossil record.

That's not proof of evolution, it's proof something existed not that they evolved. Keep trying....but it's a lost cause, it's never been observed. I already knew this from a debate I attended while in college and the losing team failed to make a case it had ever been observed.

No you're wrong, and the people you debated were obviously stupid. The fossil record is conclusive evidence, end of story.

No it's not, now either cough up a link or sit down. Your ramblings are not facts

 

[sealybobo]

Social conservatives have a lower I.Q. probably - Gene Expression

"Looking at the General Social Survey I too have found at a correlation between higher intelligence and social liberalism."

lots more at link

But they have bigger biceps

 

[SassyIrishLass]

No they didn't, it can't be a viable link because once again EVOLUTION HAS NEVER BEEN OBSERVED, that is a fact. You lose and I knew this before I posted it. Now stop with your BS, you've lost

Fossil record.

That's not proof of evolution, it's proof something existed not that they evolved. Keep trying....but it's a lost cause, it's never been observed. I already knew this from a debate I attended while in college and the losing team failed to make a case it had ever been observed.

Of course your right.

Link or shut up. Thats the end of your nonsense, fool

I'm agreeing with you. Youre right.

Ignored, you contribute nothing and are a waste of time

 

[Liminal]

Bronze Age metaphysics don't refute science.

 

[Liminal]

You are the one that failed to pay attention. Several people cited links for you. Pretending you didnt see them is not a get out of stupid free card.

No they didn't, it can't be a viable link because once again EVOLUTION HAS NEVER BEEN OBSERVED, that is a fact. You lose and I knew this before I posted it. Now stop with your BS, you've lost

Fossil record.

That's not proof of evolution, it's proof something existed not that they evolved. Keep trying....but it's a lost cause, it's never been observed. I already knew this from a debate I attended while in college and the losing team failed to make a case it had ever been observed.

No you're wrong, and the people you debated were obviously stupid. The fossil record is conclusive evidence, end of story.

No it's not, now either cough up a link or sit down. Your ramblings are not facts

A link to what?

 

[SassyIrishLass]

Bronze Age metaphysics don't refute science.

Link...that is your problem at the moment. I don't want to hear your ramblings

 

[SassyIrishLass]

No they didn't, it can't be a viable link because once again EVOLUTION HAS NEVER BEEN OBSERVED, that is a fact. You lose and I knew this before I posted it. Now stop with your BS, you've lost

Fossil record.

That's not proof of evolution, it's proof something existed not that they evolved. Keep trying....but it's a lost cause, it's never been observed. I already knew this from a debate I attended while in college and the losing team failed to make a case it had ever been observed.

No you're wrong, and the people you debated were obviously stupid. The fossil record is conclusive evidence, end of story.

No it's not, now either cough up a link or sit down. Your ramblings are not facts

A link to what?

Your proof evolution has been observed. You don't expect me to take your ramblings serious do you?

 

[Asclepias]

Fossil record.

That's not proof of evolution, it's proof something existed not that they evolved. Keep trying....but it's a lost cause, it's never been observed. I already knew this from a debate I attended while in college and the losing team failed to make a case it had ever been observed.

Of course your right.

Link or shut up. Thats the end of your nonsense, fool

I'm agreeing with you. Youre right.

Ignored, you contribute nothing and are a waste of time

I agree you are a waste of time.

 

[1stRambo]

Yo, simple, look at the idiots pic, he is a blazing Socialist pushing the Agenda, lets put some fire under the Puppets and get them uppity? You idiots belong in HELL!!!

"GTP"

 

[Uncensored2008]

No study that offends you is accurate...and those you agree with are valid. Got it..and much easier than your paragraphs of babble

Offending me irrelevant, a politically motivated hack job is not a "study" but rather demagoguery. I've dissected this "study" dozens of times. Do you know where it was based?

 

[Uncensored2008]

I agree you are a waste of time.