Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Pay attention, Dear. First, I said I would guess. I didn't say anything factual.At any rate, newborn babies are happier making skin-to-skin contact with mothers - even surrogate mothers, I would guess - than with men.The article doesn't go into details about everything, so we don't know if the surrogate nursed. It is possible to use donor milk though. Donor milk is thoroughly tested and is pasteurized.
If I were gay, I would think of the baby, leave it with its mother, and adopt an older child who would be happy with me.
That way, we would know that everyone is happy.
Really? You talk to a lot of newborns and know this for a fact do you? No, you're speculating from the position of your own bias against gays. How about you just leave us the fuck alone to parent as we see fit and we'll do the same for you?
Does anyone else find it weird that these guys felt the need to be stripped to the waist in the delivery room?
Not people who understand that skin to skin bonding is good for the baby, no.
Surely you're not suggesting that hosp personnel gave this baby to the wrong couple?
There was nothing random about this. The pregnancy was planned, a surrogate mother was chosen and everyone was there for the birth.
A beautiful, nuclear family was born.
Deal with it.
Does anyone else find it weird that these guys felt the need to be stripped to the waist in the delivery room?
Not people who understand that skin to skin bonding is good for the baby, no.
Does anyone else find it weird that these guys felt the need to be stripped to the waist in the delivery room?
Not people who understand that skin to skin bonding is good for the baby, no.
it's child molestation and these perverts couldn't even wait to get home to start in. America is even sicker than i thought.
And what about the heterosexual couples who can't have children of their own and use a surrogate or even adopt???? Does that make them any less of a parent?
No, because the kid will have what's he's supposed to have: A MOTHER and a FATHER.
I don't approve of surrogates myself. That brings up another moral issue.
I'm gonna jump on to a slightly different subject. Do you have children of your own?
I don't get what is creepy about it.Does anyone else find it weird that these guys felt the need to be stripped to the waist in the delivery room?
Not people who understand that skin to skin bonding is good for the baby, no.
I've seen a few births and not one of the men were ever stripped to the waist. Those kids were just fine.
I find it creepy.
Just as an aside I wonder what the breast feeding police are thinking. It's another one of those liberal dilemmas I guess.
I don't get what is creepy about it.I've seen a few births and not one of the men were ever stripped to the waist. Those kids were just fine.
I find it creepy.
Just as an aside I wonder what the breast feeding police are thinking. It's another one of those liberal dilemmas I guess.
Any busybody thinking that they need to tell people how to live, be it about best feeding or anything else really needs to get a life.
Does anyone else find it weird that these guys felt the need to be stripped to the waist in the delivery room?
Not people who understand that skin to skin bonding is good for the baby, no.
I've seen a few births and not one of the men were ever stripped to the waist. Those kids were just fine.
I find it creepy.
Just as an aside I wonder what the breast feeding police are thinking. It's another one of those liberal dilemmas I guess.
There always has to exist a hierarchy of principles.
It's great that these two men are happy.
It's wrong that their happiness is bought at the raping of the human rights of the child.
Parental happiness should NEVER be purchased at the expense of the human rights of the child.
Simple as that.
Not people who understand that skin to skin bonding is good for the baby, no.
I've seen a few births and not one of the men were ever stripped to the waist. Those kids were just fine.
I find it creepy.
Just as an aside I wonder what the breast feeding police are thinking. It's another one of those liberal dilemmas I guess.
That's your loss and your own stupidity.
As soon as my daughter was born, I took off my shirt and held her to my chest, where she could hear my heartbeat and sense my skin, while the docs were tending to her mother. It creates a (hopefully) lifelong bond that is indescribable and wonderful and part of the boundless love to a child. You know, children, our future, the future of humanity. My daughter and I, we have a very close, loving, correct father-daughter relationship and it shows in the way she is growing up so beautifully. Kids who feel the real closeness to both parents are indeed at an advantage.
I can only recommend to every father-in-waiting that he do this when his child is born.
And for you to make a snipe over this as if it is a Liberal vs. Conservative issue not only shows your utter ignorance, but also, a certain lack of humanity.
BTW, breast-feeding, if the woman is up to it, is the best way to go, for a child's immune system and it is a special bond that a man will never have to his child. It's important, if a woman can do it. Not all can, and it is not a huge tragedy if they cannot, but a definite plus if they can.
Sorry, I'm sleepy so I accidentally read over a few words. Homosexuals and heterosexuals both have extra marital affairs. That's not a fair comparison.
Homosexual conceptions of what constitutes monogamy are far, far more lenient than how heterosexuals define monogamy. Monogamy precludes extramarital affairs in the heterosexual definition.
I would post a picture and story about a white Christian heterosexual couple and their newborn, but I don't want to gross out our resident libs.
At any rate, newborn babies are happier making skin-to-skin contact with mothers - even surrogate mothers, I would guess - than with men.Will the baby suckle? Will he get some colostrum? Will he start out healthy?
The article doesn't go into details about everything, so we don't know if the surrogate nursed. It is possible to use donor milk though. Donor milk is thoroughly tested and is pasteurized.
If I were gay, I would think of the baby, leave it with its mother, and adopt an older child who would be happy with me.
That way, we would know that everyone is happy.
You sure are an eloquent fellow!
I've seen a few births and not one of the men were ever stripped to the waist. Those kids were just fine.
I find it creepy.
Just as an aside I wonder what the breast feeding police are thinking. It's another one of those liberal dilemmas I guess.
That's your loss and your own stupidity.
As soon as my daughter was born, I took off my shirt and held her to my chest, where she could hear my heartbeat and sense my skin, while the docs were tending to her mother. It creates a (hopefully) lifelong bond that is indescribable and wonderful and part of the boundless love to a child. You know, children, our future, the future of humanity. My daughter and I, we have a very close, loving, correct father-daughter relationship and it shows in the way she is growing up so beautifully. Kids who feel the real closeness to both parents are indeed at an advantage.
I can only recommend to every father-in-waiting that he do this when his child is born.
And for you to make a snipe over this as if it is a Liberal vs. Conservative issue not only shows your utter ignorance, but also, a certain lack of humanity.
BTW, breast-feeding, if the woman is up to it, is the best way to go, for a child's immune system and it is a special bond that a man will never have to his child. It's important, if a woman can do it. Not all can, and it is not a huge tragedy if they cannot, but a definite plus if they can.
Until teeth start growing in.
I boob fed 3 of 3 and not one suffers from oral fixations.
All 3 of my boys really like boobs, however. LOL
Regards from Rosie
You don't really deserve any better than that. Deal with it.
