🌟 Exclusive 2024 Prime Day Deals! 🌟

Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁

Summing Up The News.....

10. The only group that we know has colluded with, conspired with, contracted with, been bribed by, paid the Russians, the Kremlin, Moscow....

...are Democrats.



I fervently await a similarly well documented exposition from you, for your position.

Once these charges have been proven in court and not in the media, come talk to me. Till then they are all just opinion.


So we can agree that you are not able to prove a well constructed exposition?


Exactly as expected.

I have no need to try and change your opinion, we live in a free country and you are welcome to it.


Just your returning to the thread casts the lie to your post.
You'd like nothing better than to be able to contend with my huuuuugggggge list of examples.


Well...nothing other than the
Rooty Tooty Fresh ‘N Fruity® Pancakes At IHOP.
 
Yeah, this whole thing isnt about Russia and protecting our democracy from an enemy state. This is about taking down Trump because some shadowy reasons.

But if that was the case why would Trump and Co lie so much about innocent things?

The problem here is that there is nobody from either side that is not dirty. Trump and Clinton are two sides of the same coin.


Hardly.

The Trump side didn't sell out the United States to Russia for $ millions, nor contract with Moscow for the fabricated dossier.
 
Lots of names, lots of 'facts,'......lots of 'fake news.'

The hermeneutic key that puts all of it in perspective, is the following:

"... this city’s hatred for President Trump, and its fanatic determination to bring him down in disgrace, predates his presidency.

For Trump ran in 2016 not simply as the Republican alternative. He presented his candidacy as a rejection, a repudiation of the failed elites, political and media, of both parties. Americans voted in 2016 not just for a change in leaders but for a revolution to overthrow a ruling regime.



Thus, this city has never reconciled itself to Trump’s victory, and the president daily rubs their noses in their defeat with his tweets.

Seeking a rationale for its rejection, this city has seized upon that old standby. We didn’t lose! The election was stolen in a vast conspiracy, an “act of war” against America, an assault upon “our democracy,” criminal collusion between the Kremlin and the Trumpites.



If Trump is brought down on the basis of what Putin correctly labels “nonsense,” this city will have executed a nonviolent coup against a constitutionally elected president.

Such an act would drop us into the company of those Third World nations where such means are the customary ways that corrupt elites retain their hold on power."
http://www.wnd.com/2017/06/the-impeach-trump-conspiracy/

We know where the Fake news is coming from now lol. After a guilty plea and 3 criminal indictments, all the Fake news is coming from your right wing web sites and talk show hosts, whom have relentlessly called the Russian investigation fake.
 
Lots of names, lots of 'facts,'......lots of 'fake news.'

The hermeneutic key that puts all of it in perspective, is the following:

"... this city’s hatred for President Trump, and its fanatic determination to bring him down in disgrace, predates his presidency.

For Trump ran in 2016 not simply as the Republican alternative. He presented his candidacy as a rejection, a repudiation of the failed elites, political and media, of both parties. Americans voted in 2016 not just for a change in leaders but for a revolution to overthrow a ruling regime.



Thus, this city has never reconciled itself to Trump’s victory, and the president daily rubs their noses in their defeat with his tweets.

Seeking a rationale for its rejection, this city has seized upon that old standby. We didn’t lose! The election was stolen in a vast conspiracy, an “act of war” against America, an assault upon “our democracy,” criminal collusion between the Kremlin and the Trumpites.



If Trump is brought down on the basis of what Putin correctly labels “nonsense,” this city will have executed a nonviolent coup against a constitutionally elected president.

Such an act would drop us into the company of those Third World nations where such means are the customary ways that corrupt elites retain their hold on power."
http://www.wnd.com/2017/06/the-impeach-trump-conspiracy/

We know where the Fake news is coming from now lol. After a guilty plea and 3 criminal indictments, all the Fake news is coming from your right wing web sites and talk show hosts, whom have relentlessly called the Russian investigation fake.


"...guilty plea..." to what?

Collusion?

Nope.

And now the professor says Papadopolous was lying.....it never happened.

"Professor Denies Evidence He Shopped Kremlin ‘Dirt’ on Hillary to Trump Campaign"
Professor Denies Evidence He Shopped Kremlin ‘Dirt’ on Hillary to Trump Campaign


Any other lies you bought like they were on sale?




The ONLY ones with any collusion with Russia are Democrats.

The Democrats colluded, collaborated, conspired with Moscow, the Kremlin, Putin.....to sink the Trump candidacy.

And the Kremlin was happy to do so: they wanted the candidate that they had a history of bribing, to be President.


The only group that we know has colluded with, conspired with, contracted with, been bribed by, paid the Russians, the Kremlin, Moscow....


...are Democrats.

 
Lots of names, lots of 'facts,'......lots of 'fake news.'

The hermeneutic key that puts all of it in perspective, is the following:

"... this city’s hatred for President Trump, and its fanatic determination to bring him down in disgrace, predates his presidency.

For Trump ran in 2016 not simply as the Republican alternative. He presented his candidacy as a rejection, a repudiation of the failed elites, political and media, of both parties. Americans voted in 2016 not just for a change in leaders but for a revolution to overthrow a ruling regime.



Thus, this city has never reconciled itself to Trump’s victory, and the president daily rubs their noses in their defeat with his tweets.

Seeking a rationale for its rejection, this city has seized upon that old standby. We didn’t lose! The election was stolen in a vast conspiracy, an “act of war” against America, an assault upon “our democracy,” criminal collusion between the Kremlin and the Trumpites.



If Trump is brought down on the basis of what Putin correctly labels “nonsense,” this city will have executed a nonviolent coup against a constitutionally elected president.

Such an act would drop us into the company of those Third World nations where such means are the customary ways that corrupt elites retain their hold on power."
http://www.wnd.com/2017/06/the-impeach-trump-conspiracy/
A lot of similarities to how the GOP treated Obama in '08. Ironically Trump came to prominence as a 'birther' in an attempt to invalidate Obama's victory and his slogan of change.
 
Lots of names, lots of 'facts,'......lots of 'fake news.'

The hermeneutic key that puts all of it in perspective, is the following:

"... this city’s hatred for President Trump, and its fanatic determination to bring him down in disgrace, predates his presidency.

For Trump ran in 2016 not simply as the Republican alternative. He presented his candidacy as a rejection, a repudiation of the failed elites, political and media, of both parties. Americans voted in 2016 not just for a change in leaders but for a revolution to overthrow a ruling regime.



Thus, this city has never reconciled itself to Trump’s victory, and the president daily rubs their noses in their defeat with his tweets.

Seeking a rationale for its rejection, this city has seized upon that old standby. We didn’t lose! The election was stolen in a vast conspiracy, an “act of war” against America, an assault upon “our democracy,” criminal collusion between the Kremlin and the Trumpites.



If Trump is brought down on the basis of what Putin correctly labels “nonsense,” this city will have executed a nonviolent coup against a constitutionally elected president.

Such an act would drop us into the company of those Third World nations where such means are the customary ways that corrupt elites retain their hold on power."
http://www.wnd.com/2017/06/the-impeach-trump-conspiracy/
A lot of similarities to how the GOP treated Obama in '08. Ironically Trump came to prominence as a 'birther' in an attempt to invalidate Obama's victory and his slogan of change.


"A lot of similarities to how the GOP treated Obama in '08."

You poor sad thing.

He who walks blamelessly, and does what is right, and speaks truth from his heart;
Psalm 15:2
 
Yeah, this whole thing isnt about Russia and protecting our democracy from an enemy state. This is about taking down Trump because some shadowy reasons.

But if that was the case why would Trump and Co lie so much about innocent things?

The problem here is that there is nobody from either side that is not dirty. Trump and Clinton are two sides of the same coin.

Sorry, that namby pamby line of bs wont work anymore. Trump is in the hot seat and everytime he's in it he tries to hug someone else at the same time to share the smear. Wont work.
 
Yeah, this whole thing isnt about Russia and protecting our democracy from an enemy state. This is about taking down Trump because some shadowy reasons.

But if that was the case why would Trump and Co lie so much about innocent things?

The problem here is that there is nobody from either side that is not dirty. Trump and Clinton are two sides of the same coin.

Sorry, that namby pamby line of bs wont work anymore. Trump is in the hot seat and everytime he's in it he tries to hug someone else at the same time to share the smear. Wont work.

I am not letting Trump off the hook, but to pretend one side is somehow worse than the other is to admit you have not been paying attention the last 20 or so years.
 
Yeah, this whole thing isnt about Russia and protecting our democracy from an enemy state. This is about taking down Trump because some shadowy reasons.

But if that was the case why would Trump and Co lie so much about innocent things?

The problem here is that there is nobody from either side that is not dirty. Trump and Clinton are two sides of the same coin.

Sorry, that namby pamby line of bs wont work anymore. Trump is in the hot seat and everytime he's in it he tries to hug someone else at the same time to share the smear. Wont work.

I am not letting Trump off the hook, but to pretend one side is somehow worse than the other is to admit you have not been paying attention the last 20 or so years.


Stop lyin'....

If you believed that, you'd be able to come up with a post like this:

1. There is zero evidence that of any collusion between the Trump campaign and the Russians.


There are scads of evidence of collusion between the media and the DNC, and there is this:

The only folks with a close relationship with the Russians are Democrats.

The names Clinton and Podesta come to mind.


2. "52% Say Clintons Should Be Part of Russia Probe"

52% Say Clintons Should Be Part of Russia Probe - Rasmussen Reports™



Here's why:

You can fool all the people some of the time, and some of the people all the time, but you cannot fool all the people all the time.

The first Republican President



And this:

3. "Cash Flowed to Clinton Foundation Amid Russian Uranium Deal


...the Russian atomic energy agency, Rosatom, had taken over a Canadian company with uranium-mining stakes stretching from Central Asia to the American West. The deal made Rosatom one of the world’s largest uranium producers and brought Mr. Putin closer to his goal of controlling much of the global uranium supply chain.


....major donors to the charitable endeavors of former President Bill Clinton and his family. Members of that group built, financed and eventually sold off to the Russians a company that would become known as Uranium One.


Among the agencies that eventually signed off was the State Department, then headed by Mr. Clinton’s wife, Hillary Rodham Clinton.


Uranium One’s chairman used his family foundation to make four donations totaling $2.35 million. Those contributions were not publicly disclosed by the Clintons,...."

https://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/24/...s-pressed-for-control-of-uranium-company.html



And


4. "Both Hillary Clinton And John Podesta Made Millions From Russia & Putin"

Both Hillary Clinton And John Podesta Made Millions From Russia & Putin » Liberty Alliance


And


5. "EXCLUSIVE: Dem Super-Lobbyist Podesta Got $170K to End US Sanctions On Russian Bank"

EXCLUSIVE: Dem Super-Lobbyist Podesta Got $170K to End US Sanctions On Russian Bank



6. News anchor highlights all of the known links to Russia





-------------------------------------------------------------


Democrat collusion???



7. "Claire McCaskill Used Undisclosed Foundation to Pay for Dinner at Russian Ambassador’s House


Democratic Sen. Claire McCaskill (Mo.) used a personal foundation to pay for a dinner she attended at Russian ambassador Sergey Kislyak's Washington, D.C., residence. The senator had failed to disclose her role in the foundation until earlier this month.



McCaskill came under fire this March after she told the Washington Post she never had a "call or meeting" with Kislyak even though she had publicly announced both a call and meeting with him. This week, CNN reportedthat McCaskill also attended a black-tie reception at Kislyak's D.C. residence in November 2015.



McCaskill's attendance at the dinner was accompanied by an $873 payment to the American-Russian Cultural Cooperation Foundation, where Kislyak serves on its board of directors as honorary chairman."


Claire McCaskill Used Undisclosed Foundation to Pay for Dinner at Russian Ambassador's House




8. Podesta Group retroactively files more DOJ disclosures for pro-Putin work


...the powerful Washington lobbying firm run by Clinton ally Tony Podesta filed a document admitting its work for the pro-Russia European Centre for a Modern Ukraine may have principally benefited a foreign government. New disclosures revealed dozens of previously unreported interactions the firm made with influential government offices, including Hillary Clinton's State Department and the office of former Vice President Joe Biden, while lobbying on behalf of the center. Embattled ex-Trump campaign manager Paul Manafort failed to disclose his extensive lobbying efforts on behalf of the center at the time as well.


How do you say 'whoops' in Russian? Podesta Group retroactively files more DOJ disclosures for pro-Putin work




9. And we now know.....

..

a. The Russians paid $145 million to the Clinton Crime Family, and in return appropriated a large portion of our uranium.
They have energy....so it in to be used for weapons......
Against whom?
Us.


b. Bill was slipped $500,000 to give a fake speech.
See a. above.

c. " Former Hillary Clinton campaign chairman John Podesta exits after ... a company that received $35 million from the Russian government..."
http://nypost.com/2017/07/05/uncovering-the-russia-ties-of-hillarys-campaign-chief/

d. "WASHINGTON — Tony Podesta and the Podesta Group are now the subjects of a federal investigation being led by Special Counsel Robert Mueller,...violated the Foreign Agents Registration Act, known as FARA."
Mueller now investigating Democratic lobbyist Tony Podesta
Russian spies influencing the Obama/Clinton administration via bribes.

e. In 11 months of thorough investigations, there has not been a smidgen of evidence of any connections of Trump to the Russians.




10. The ONLY ones with any collusion with Russia are Democrats.

The Democrats colluded, collaborated, conspired with Moscow, the Kremlin, Putin.....to sink the Trump candidacy.

And the Kremlin was happy to do so: they wanted the candidate that they had a history of bribing, to be President.


The only group that we know has colluded with, conspired with, contracted with, been bribed by, paid the Russians, the Kremlin, Moscow....


...are Democrats.
 
Lots of names, lots of 'facts,'......lots of 'fake news.'

The hermeneutic key that puts all of it in perspective, is the following:

"... this city’s hatred for President Trump, and its fanatic determination to bring him down in disgrace, predates his presidency.

For Trump ran in 2016 not simply as the Republican alternative. He presented his candidacy as a rejection, a repudiation of the failed elites, political and media, of both parties. Americans voted in 2016 not just for a change in leaders but for a revolution to overthrow a ruling regime.



Thus, this city has never reconciled itself to Trump’s victory, and the president daily rubs their noses in their defeat with his tweets.

Seeking a rationale for its rejection, this city has seized upon that old standby. We didn’t lose! The election was stolen in a vast conspiracy, an “act of war” against America, an assault upon “our democracy,” criminal collusion between the Kremlin and the Trumpites.



If Trump is brought down on the basis of what Putin correctly labels “nonsense,” this city will have executed a nonviolent coup against a constitutionally elected president.

Such an act would drop us into the company of those Third World nations where such means are the customary ways that corrupt elites retain their hold on power."
http://www.wnd.com/2017/06/the-impeach-trump-conspiracy/
World Nut Daily. The perfect source for a nutcase like yourself.
Just once use a legitimate site. You can’t because it wouldn’t push your propaganda.
 
Lots of names, lots of 'facts,'......lots of 'fake news.'

The hermeneutic key that puts all of it in perspective, is the following:

"... this city’s hatred for President Trump, and its fanatic determination to bring him down in disgrace, predates his presidency.

For Trump ran in 2016 not simply as the Republican alternative. He presented his candidacy as a rejection, a repudiation of the failed elites, political and media, of both parties. Americans voted in 2016 not just for a change in leaders but for a revolution to overthrow a ruling regime.



Thus, this city has never reconciled itself to Trump’s victory, and the president daily rubs their noses in their defeat with his tweets.

Seeking a rationale for its rejection, this city has seized upon that old standby. We didn’t lose! The election was stolen in a vast conspiracy, an “act of war” against America, an assault upon “our democracy,” criminal collusion between the Kremlin and the Trumpites.



If Trump is brought down on the basis of what Putin correctly labels “nonsense,” this city will have executed a nonviolent coup against a constitutionally elected president.

Such an act would drop us into the company of those Third World nations where such means are the customary ways that corrupt elites retain their hold on power."
http://www.wnd.com/2017/06/the-impeach-trump-conspiracy/
World Nut Daily. The perfect source for a nutcase like yourself.
Just once use a legitimate site. You can’t.

In her defense, she did use the Free Beacon, you know the people that initially paid for the Trump dossier
 
3FBD969C-933B-4E5B-979B-6A12379C7D47.jpeg
Yeah, this whole thing isnt about Russia and protecting our democracy from an enemy state. This is about taking down Trump because some shadowy reasons.

But if that was the case why would Trump and Co lie so much about innocent things?

The problem here is that there is nobody from either side that is not dirty. Trump and Clinton are two sides of the same coin.

Sorry, that namby pamby line of bs wont work anymore. Trump is in the hot seat and everytime he's in it he tries to hug someone else at the same time to share the smear. Wont work.

I am not letting Trump off the hook, but to pretend one side is somehow worse than the other is to admit you have not been paying attention the last 20 or so years.


Stop lyin'....

If you believed that, you'd be able to come up with a post like this:

1. There is zero evidence that of any collusion between the Trump campaign and the Russians.


There are scads of evidence of collusion between the media and the DNC, and there is this:

The only folks with a close relationship with the Russians are Democrats.

The names Clinton and Podesta come to mind.


2. "52% Say Clintons Should Be Part of Russia Probe"

52% Say Clintons Should Be Part of Russia Probe - Rasmussen Reports™



Here's why:

You can fool all the people some of the time, and some of the people all the time, but you cannot fool all the people all the time.

The first Republican President



And this:

3. "Cash Flowed to Clinton Foundation Amid Russian Uranium Deal


...the Russian atomic energy agency, Rosatom, had taken over a Canadian company with uranium-mining stakes stretching from Central Asia to the American West. The deal made Rosatom one of the world’s largest uranium producers and brought Mr. Putin closer to his goal of controlling much of the global uranium supply chain.


....major donors to the charitable endeavors of former President Bill Clinton and his family. Members of that group built, financed and eventually sold off to the Russians a company that would become known as Uranium One.


Among the agencies that eventually signed off was the State Department, then headed by Mr. Clinton’s wife, Hillary Rodham Clinton.


Uranium One’s chairman used his family foundation to make four donations totaling $2.35 million. Those contributions were not publicly disclosed by the Clintons,...."

https://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/24/...s-pressed-for-control-of-uranium-company.html



And


4. "Both Hillary Clinton And John Podesta Made Millions From Russia & Putin"

Both Hillary Clinton And John Podesta Made Millions From Russia & Putin » Liberty Alliance


And


5. "EXCLUSIVE: Dem Super-Lobbyist Podesta Got $170K to End US Sanctions On Russian Bank"

EXCLUSIVE: Dem Super-Lobbyist Podesta Got $170K to End US Sanctions On Russian Bank



6. News anchor highlights all of the known links to Russia





-------------------------------------------------------------


Democrat collusion???



7. "Claire McCaskill Used Undisclosed Foundation to Pay for Dinner at Russian Ambassador’s House


Democratic Sen. Claire McCaskill (Mo.) used a personal foundation to pay for a dinner she attended at Russian ambassador Sergey Kislyak's Washington, D.C., residence. The senator had failed to disclose her role in the foundation until earlier this month.



McCaskill came under fire this March after she told the Washington Post she never had a "call or meeting" with Kislyak even though she had publicly announced both a call and meeting with him. This week, CNN reportedthat McCaskill also attended a black-tie reception at Kislyak's D.C. residence in November 2015.



McCaskill's attendance at the dinner was accompanied by an $873 payment to the American-Russian Cultural Cooperation Foundation, where Kislyak serves on its board of directors as honorary chairman."


Claire McCaskill Used Undisclosed Foundation to Pay for Dinner at Russian Ambassador's House




8. Podesta Group retroactively files more DOJ disclosures for pro-Putin work


...the powerful Washington lobbying firm run by Clinton ally Tony Podesta filed a document admitting its work for the pro-Russia European Centre for a Modern Ukraine may have principally benefited a foreign government. New disclosures revealed dozens of previously unreported interactions the firm made with influential government offices, including Hillary Clinton's State Department and the office of former Vice President Joe Biden, while lobbying on behalf of the center. Embattled ex-Trump campaign manager Paul Manafort failed to disclose his extensive lobbying efforts on behalf of the center at the time as well.


How do you say 'whoops' in Russian? Podesta Group retroactively files more DOJ disclosures for pro-Putin work




9. And we now know.....

..

a. The Russians paid $145 million to the Clinton Crime Family, and in return appropriated a large portion of our uranium.
They have energy....so it in to be used for weapons......
Against whom?
Us.


b. Bill was slipped $500,000 to give a fake speech.
See a. above.

c. " Former Hillary Clinton campaign chairman John Podesta exits after ... a company that received $35 million from the Russian government..."
http://nypost.com/2017/07/05/uncovering-the-russia-ties-of-hillarys-campaign-chief/

d. "WASHINGTON — Tony Podesta and the Podesta Group are now the subjects of a federal investigation being led by Special Counsel Robert Mueller,...violated the Foreign Agents Registration Act, known as FARA."
Mueller now investigating Democratic lobbyist Tony Podesta
Russian spies influencing the Obama/Clinton administration via bribes.

e. In 11 months of thorough investigations, there has not been a smidgen of evidence of any connections of Trump to the Russians.




10. The ONLY ones with any collusion with Russia are Democrats.

The Democrats colluded, collaborated, conspired with Moscow, the Kremlin, Putin.....to sink the Trump candidacy.

And the Kremlin was happy to do so: they wanted the candidate that they had a history of bribing, to be President.


The only group that we know has colluded with, conspired with, contracted with, been bribed by, paid the Russians, the Kremlin, Moscow....


...are Democrats.

Oh look a squirrel.
 
Lots of names, lots of 'facts,'......lots of 'fake news.'

The hermeneutic key that puts all of it in perspective, is the following:

"... this city’s hatred for President Trump, and its fanatic determination to bring him down in disgrace, predates his presidency.

For Trump ran in 2016 not simply as the Republican alternative. He presented his candidacy as a rejection, a repudiation of the failed elites, political and media, of both parties. Americans voted in 2016 not just for a change in leaders but for a revolution to overthrow a ruling regime.



Thus, this city has never reconciled itself to Trump’s victory, and the president daily rubs their noses in their defeat with his tweets.

Seeking a rationale for its rejection, this city has seized upon that old standby. We didn’t lose! The election was stolen in a vast conspiracy, an “act of war” against America, an assault upon “our democracy,” criminal collusion between the Kremlin and the Trumpites.



If Trump is brought down on the basis of what Putin correctly labels “nonsense,” this city will have executed a nonviolent coup against a constitutionally elected president.

Such an act would drop us into the company of those Third World nations where such means are the customary ways that corrupt elites retain their hold on power."
http://www.wnd.com/2017/06/the-impeach-trump-conspiracy/
Pretty sure this 'chic' is a Russian troll... nobody is this stupid
 
Lots of names, lots of 'facts,'......lots of 'fake news.'

The hermeneutic key that puts all of it in perspective, is the following:

"... this city’s hatred for President Trump, and its fanatic determination to bring him down in disgrace, predates his presidency.

For Trump ran in 2016 not simply as the Republican alternative. He presented his candidacy as a rejection, a repudiation of the failed elites, political and media, of both parties. Americans voted in 2016 not just for a change in leaders but for a revolution to overthrow a ruling regime.



Thus, this city has never reconciled itself to Trump’s victory, and the president daily rubs their noses in their defeat with his tweets.

Seeking a rationale for its rejection, this city has seized upon that old standby. We didn’t lose! The election was stolen in a vast conspiracy, an “act of war” against America, an assault upon “our democracy,” criminal collusion between the Kremlin and the Trumpites.



If Trump is brought down on the basis of what Putin correctly labels “nonsense,” this city will have executed a nonviolent coup against a constitutionally elected president.

Such an act would drop us into the company of those Third World nations where such means are the customary ways that corrupt elites retain their hold on power."
http://www.wnd.com/2017/06/the-impeach-trump-conspiracy/
World Nut Daily. The perfect source for a nutcase like yourself.
Just once use a legitimate site. You can’t.

In her defense, she did use the Free Beacon, you know the people that initially paid for the Trump dossier
Not one of the Trumpolini’s ever use a real news site. They can’t push their garbage with them.
 
Yeah, this whole thing isnt about Russia and protecting our democracy from an enemy state. This is about taking down Trump because some shadowy reasons.

But if that was the case why would Trump and Co lie so much about innocent things?

The problem here is that there is nobody from either side that is not dirty. Trump and Clinton are two sides of the same coin.

Sorry, that namby pamby line of bs wont work anymore. Trump is in the hot seat and everytime he's in it he tries to hug someone else at the same time to share the smear. Wont work.

I am not letting Trump off the hook, but to pretend one side is somehow worse than the other is to admit you have not been paying attention the last 20 or so years.

Maybe because I'm talking about today and not the combination of total badness throughout political history
 
Lots of names, lots of 'facts,'......lots of 'fake news.'

The hermeneutic key that puts all of it in perspective, is the following:

"... this city’s hatred for President Trump, and its fanatic determination to bring him down in disgrace, predates his presidency.

For Trump ran in 2016 not simply as the Republican alternative. He presented his candidacy as a rejection, a repudiation of the failed elites, political and media, of both parties. Americans voted in 2016 not just for a change in leaders but for a revolution to overthrow a ruling regime.



Thus, this city has never reconciled itself to Trump’s victory, and the president daily rubs their noses in their defeat with his tweets.

Seeking a rationale for its rejection, this city has seized upon that old standby. We didn’t lose! The election was stolen in a vast conspiracy, an “act of war” against America, an assault upon “our democracy,” criminal collusion between the Kremlin and the Trumpites.



If Trump is brought down on the basis of what Putin correctly labels “nonsense,” this city will have executed a nonviolent coup against a constitutionally elected president.

Such an act would drop us into the company of those Third World nations where such means are the customary ways that corrupt elites retain their hold on power."
http://www.wnd.com/2017/06/the-impeach-trump-conspiracy/
Pretty sure this 'chic' is a Russian troll... nobody is this stupid
Wouldn’t doubt it, she probably started those Hillary has Parkinsons lies on FB last year that all the bedwetters ate up..
 
Lots of names, lots of 'facts,'......lots of 'fake news.'

The hermeneutic key that puts all of it in perspective, is the following:

"... this city’s hatred for President Trump, and its fanatic determination to bring him down in disgrace, predates his presidency.

For Trump ran in 2016 not simply as the Republican alternative. He presented his candidacy as a rejection, a repudiation of the failed elites, political and media, of both parties. Americans voted in 2016 not just for a change in leaders but for a revolution to overthrow a ruling regime.



Thus, this city has never reconciled itself to Trump’s victory, and the president daily rubs their noses in their defeat with his tweets.

Seeking a rationale for its rejection, this city has seized upon that old standby. We didn’t lose! The election was stolen in a vast conspiracy, an “act of war” against America, an assault upon “our democracy,” criminal collusion between the Kremlin and the Trumpites.



If Trump is brought down on the basis of what Putin correctly labels “nonsense,” this city will have executed a nonviolent coup against a constitutionally elected president.

Such an act would drop us into the company of those Third World nations where such means are the customary ways that corrupt elites retain their hold on power."
http://www.wnd.com/2017/06/the-impeach-trump-conspiracy/
World Nut Daily. The perfect source for a nutcase like yourself.
Just once use a legitimate site. You can’t because it wouldn’t push your propaganda.


I'm certainly not the first to remind all that those who cannot dispute the facts.....FACTS...presented, attempt to scoff at the source.



Perhaps you can help find clarity here, with reference to your post....

I can never decide which of these is the case:

a. Those who decry the source of a statement rather than the truth of same, ....are they doing so because they are unable to deny the truth of what is being said....

or...

b. ...are they simply so stupid that they don't recognize that the source is secondary to the importance and the veracity of what is stated?


Which one???
 

Forum List

Back
Top