Switzerland votes to criminalize homophobia and hate speech

[Asclepias]

I definitely support censoring and jailing homophobes and racists that use violent speech. Is that a bad thing to you?

Yes because there is no such thing as violent speech

Says who?

Reality.

Whos reality?

Who is reality? To whom does reality belong? Whose reality are we talking about?
"Reality" is relative. Every sentient being is a perceptual center of the universe, imposing a "this, and notthis" duality upon a universe that otherwise is not dualistic.
A human's "reality" is the result of that human's perceptions. Perceptions are the very definition of subjective.

Exactly. Thats why soupnazi has no clue what he is talking about.

 

[there4eyeM]

Yes because there is no such thing as violent speech

Says who?

Reality.

Whos reality?

Who is reality? To whom does reality belong? Whose reality are we talking about?
"Reality" is relative. Every sentient being is a perceptual center of the universe, imposing a "this, and notthis" duality upon a universe that otherwise is not dualistic.
A human's "reality" is the result of that human's perceptions. Perceptions are the very definition of subjective.

Exactly. Thats why soupnazi has no clue what he is talking about.

That is also why we cannot know what violence words may be associated with in the mind of a beholder. Laws against words feed our feebleness, they do not develop spiritual strength.

 

[Soupnazi630]

It is not false and reality is the same for everyone absolute fact.

There is no such thing as violent speech

Nope. Different people have different realities. This is demonstrably a fact.

Yes there is a such thing as violent speech.

It is false and you cannot demonstrate that different people have different realities.

It is not demonstrable and you are truly a fool.

There is no such thing as violent speech

Sure I can demonstrate our realities are different. I live in Hawaii you live in new york. What time is it?

Yes there is a such thing as violent speech. Thats why the Swiss have a law against it.

There is no such thing as violent speech the Swiss based their speech control law on a lie.

Your example is a failure as man made time zones do not demonstrate different reality

Yes there is a such thing as violent speech. Thats why the Swiss have a law against it.

If our realities were the same why do we think our times are different? Another example. is Obama Black or white?

There is no such thing as violent speech and the Swiss do not alter reality by passing a law.

Because others designated time zones for convenience which has nothing to do with reality being the same for everyone.

 

[Asclepias]

Says who?

Reality.

Whos reality?

Who is reality? To whom does reality belong? Whose reality are we talking about?
"Reality" is relative. Every sentient being is a perceptual center of the universe, imposing a "this, and notthis" duality upon a universe that otherwise is not dualistic.
A human's "reality" is the result of that human's perceptions. Perceptions are the very definition of subjective.

Exactly. Thats why soupnazi has no clue what he is talking about.

That is also why we cannot know what violence words may be associated with in the mind of a beholder. Laws against words feed our feebleness, they do not develop spiritual strength.

We can define violent words/actions and reach a majority agreement on what that entails. Its not a law against words. Its a law against violent words.

 

[Soupnazi630]

Yes because there is no such thing as violent speech

Says who?

Reality.

Whos reality?

Who is reality? To whom does reality belong? Whose reality are we talking about?
"Reality" is relative. Every sentient being is a perceptual center of the universe, imposing a "this, and notthis" duality upon a universe that otherwise is not dualistic.
A human's "reality" is the result of that human's perceptions. Perceptions are the very definition of subjective.

Exactly. Thats why soupnazi has no clue what he is talking about.

Wrong as I am leaving you a total fool

 

[Soupnazi630]

Reality.

Whos reality?

Who is reality? To whom does reality belong? Whose reality are we talking about?
"Reality" is relative. Every sentient being is a perceptual center of the universe, imposing a "this, and notthis" duality upon a universe that otherwise is not dualistic.
A human's "reality" is the result of that human's perceptions. Perceptions are the very definition of subjective.

Exactly. Thats why soupnazi has no clue what he is talking about.

That is also why we cannot know what violence words may be associated with in the mind of a beholder. Laws against words feed our feebleness, they do not develop spiritual strength.

We can define violent words/actions and reach a majority agreement on what that entails. Its not a law against words. Its a law against violent words.

Majority agreement is worthless and does not define truth.

There is no such thing as a violent word

 

[Asclepias]

Nope. Different people have different realities. This is demonstrably a fact.

Yes there is a such thing as violent speech.

It is false and you cannot demonstrate that different people have different realities.

It is not demonstrable and you are truly a fool.

There is no such thing as violent speech

Sure I can demonstrate our realities are different. I live in Hawaii you live in new york. What time is it?

Yes there is a such thing as violent speech. Thats why the Swiss have a law against it.

There is no such thing as violent speech the Swiss based their speech control law on a lie.

Your example is a failure as man made time zones do not demonstrate different reality

Yes there is a such thing as violent speech. Thats why the Swiss have a law against it.

If our realities were the same why do we think our times are different? Another example. is Obama Black or white?

There is no such thing as violent speech and the Swiss do not alter reality by passing a law.

Because others designated time zones for convenience which has nothing to do with reality being the same for everyone.

The Swiss didnt alter reality. They created their reality. Your opinion cant change that reality.

Thats false because if we had the same reality then it would be the same time everywhere.

 

[Asclepias]

Whos reality?

Who is reality? To whom does reality belong? Whose reality are we talking about?
"Reality" is relative. Every sentient being is a perceptual center of the universe, imposing a "this, and notthis" duality upon a universe that otherwise is not dualistic.
A human's "reality" is the result of that human's perceptions. Perceptions are the very definition of subjective.

Exactly. Thats why soupnazi has no clue what he is talking about.

That is also why we cannot know what violence words may be associated with in the mind of a beholder. Laws against words feed our feebleness, they do not develop spiritual strength.

We can define violent words/actions and reach a majority agreement on what that entails. Its not a law against words. Its a law against violent words.

Majority agreement is worthless and does not define truth.

There is no such thing as a violent word

Majority agreement defines reality for that group.

Of course there is a such thing as a violent word. Violent is merely an adjective describing the type of word.

 

[there4eyeM]

It is false and you cannot demonstrate that different people have different realities.

It is not demonstrable and you are truly a fool.

There is no such thing as violent speech

Sure I can demonstrate our realities are different. I live in Hawaii you live in new york. What time is it?

Yes there is a such thing as violent speech. Thats why the Swiss have a law against it.

There is no such thing as violent speech the Swiss based their speech control law on a lie.

Your example is a failure as man made time zones do not demonstrate different reality

Yes there is a such thing as violent speech. Thats why the Swiss have a law against it.

If our realities were the same why do we think our times are different? Another example. is Obama Black or white?

There is no such thing as violent speech and the Swiss do not alter reality by passing a law.

Because others designated time zones for convenience which has nothing to do with reality being the same for everyone.

The Swiss didnt alter reality. They created their reality. Your opinion cant change that reality.

Thats false because if we had the same reality then it would be the same time everywhere.

Come on, "A", you know perfectly well that the only time that exists is now!

 

[Asclepias]

Sure I can demonstrate our realities are different. I live in Hawaii you live in new york. What time is it?

Yes there is a such thing as violent speech. Thats why the Swiss have a law against it.

There is no such thing as violent speech the Swiss based their speech control law on a lie.

Your example is a failure as man made time zones do not demonstrate different reality

Yes there is a such thing as violent speech. Thats why the Swiss have a law against it.

If our realities were the same why do we think our times are different? Another example. is Obama Black or white?

There is no such thing as violent speech and the Swiss do not alter reality by passing a law.

Because others designated time zones for convenience which has nothing to do with reality being the same for everyone.

The Swiss didnt alter reality. They created their reality. Your opinion cant change that reality.

Thats false because if we had the same reality then it would be the same time everywhere.

Come on, "A", you know perfectly well that the only time that exists is now!

Yeah but you could be standing right next to me and your watch have a different now than mine.

 

[Soupnazi630]

It is false and you cannot demonstrate that different people have different realities.

It is not demonstrable and you are truly a fool.

There is no such thing as violent speech

Sure I can demonstrate our realities are different. I live in Hawaii you live in new york. What time is it?

Yes there is a such thing as violent speech. Thats why the Swiss have a law against it.

There is no such thing as violent speech the Swiss based their speech control law on a lie.

Your example is a failure as man made time zones do not demonstrate different reality

Yes there is a such thing as violent speech. Thats why the Swiss have a law against it.

If our realities were the same why do we think our times are different? Another example. is Obama Black or white?

There is no such thing as violent speech and the Swiss do not alter reality by passing a law.

Because others designated time zones for convenience which has nothing to do with reality being the same for everyone.

The Swiss didnt alter reality. They created their reality. Your opinion cant change that reality.

Thats false because if we had the same reality then it would be the same time everywhere.

No one can create reality.

Fact proves that and I stated fact not opinion

Wrong time is the same everywhere how we measure it's progression varies and does not change reality for everyone.

 

[there4eyeM]

Who is reality? To whom does reality belong? Whose reality are we talking about?
"Reality" is relative. Every sentient being is a perceptual center of the universe, imposing a "this, and notthis" duality upon a universe that otherwise is not dualistic.
A human's "reality" is the result of that human's perceptions. Perceptions are the very definition of subjective.

Exactly. Thats why soupnazi has no clue what he is talking about.

That is also why we cannot know what violence words may be associated with in the mind of a beholder. Laws against words feed our feebleness, they do not develop spiritual strength.

We can define violent words/actions and reach a majority agreement on what that entails. Its not a law against words. Its a law against violent words.

Majority agreement is worthless and does not define truth.

There is no such thing as a violent word

Majority agreement defines reality for that group.

Of course there is a such thing as a violent word. Violent is merely an adjective describing the type of word.

You are both correct.

 

[Soupnazi630]

There is no such thing as violent speech the Swiss based their speech control law on a lie.

Your example is a failure as man made time zones do not demonstrate different reality

Yes there is a such thing as violent speech. Thats why the Swiss have a law against it.

If our realities were the same why do we think our times are different? Another example. is Obama Black or white?

There is no such thing as violent speech and the Swiss do not alter reality by passing a law.

Because others designated time zones for convenience which has nothing to do with reality being the same for everyone.

The Swiss didnt alter reality. They created their reality. Your opinion cant change that reality.

Thats false because if we had the same reality then it would be the same time everywhere.

Come on, "A", you know perfectly well that the only time that exists is now!

Yeah but you could be standing right next to me and your watch have a different now than mine.

Now would be the same for both regardless of accuracy

 

[Asclepias]

Says who?

Reality.

Whos reality?

Who is reality? To whom does reality belong? Whose reality are we talking about?
"Reality" is relative. Every sentient being is a perceptual center of the universe, imposing a "this, and notthis" duality upon a universe that otherwise is not dualistic.
A human's "reality" is the result of that human's perceptions. Perceptions are the very definition of subjective.

Exactly. Thats why soupnazi has no clue what he is talking about.

Wrong as I am leaving you a total fool

Dont leave as a total fool At least take some of this reality with you.

 

[Soupnazi630]

Who is reality? To whom does reality belong? Whose reality are we talking about?
"Reality" is relative. Every sentient being is a perceptual center of the universe, imposing a "this, and notthis" duality upon a universe that otherwise is not dualistic.
A human's "reality" is the result of that human's perceptions. Perceptions are the very definition of subjective.

Exactly. Thats why soupnazi has no clue what he is talking about.

That is also why we cannot know what violence words may be associated with in the mind of a beholder. Laws against words feed our feebleness, they do not develop spiritual strength.

We can define violent words/actions and reach a majority agreement on what that entails. Its not a law against words. Its a law against violent words.

Majority agreement is worthless and does not define truth.

There is no such thing as a violent word

Majority agreement defines reality for that group.

Of course there is a such thing as a violent word. Violent is merely an adjective describing the type of word.

No it does not.

There is no such thing as a violent word

 

[Asclepias]

Exactly. Thats why soupnazi has no clue what he is talking about.

That is also why we cannot know what violence words may be associated with in the mind of a beholder. Laws against words feed our feebleness, they do not develop spiritual strength.

We can define violent words/actions and reach a majority agreement on what that entails. Its not a law against words. Its a law against violent words.

Majority agreement is worthless and does not define truth.

There is no such thing as a violent word

Majority agreement defines reality for that group.

Of course there is a such thing as a violent word. Violent is merely an adjective describing the type of word.

You are both correct.

Thats not reality.

 

[Soupnazi630]

Reality.

Whos reality?

Who is reality? To whom does reality belong? Whose reality are we talking about?
"Reality" is relative. Every sentient being is a perceptual center of the universe, imposing a "this, and notthis" duality upon a universe that otherwise is not dualistic.
A human's "reality" is the result of that human's perceptions. Perceptions are the very definition of subjective.

Exactly. Thats why soupnazi has no clue what he is talking about.

Wrong as I am leaving you a total fool

Dont leave as a total fool At least take some of this reality with you.

I beat the shit out of you with it.

 

[Asclepias]

Exactly. Thats why soupnazi has no clue what he is talking about.

That is also why we cannot know what violence words may be associated with in the mind of a beholder. Laws against words feed our feebleness, they do not develop spiritual strength.

We can define violent words/actions and reach a majority agreement on what that entails. Its not a law against words. Its a law against violent words.

Majority agreement is worthless and does not define truth.

There is no such thing as a violent word

Majority agreement defines reality for that group.

Of course there is a such thing as a violent word. Violent is merely an adjective describing the type of word.

No it does not.

There is no such thing as a violent word

Of course it does. Are you in the US?

Yes there is a such thing as a violent word. Thats why the Swiss made a law against them.

 

[Asclepias]

Whos reality?

Who is reality? To whom does reality belong? Whose reality are we talking about?
"Reality" is relative. Every sentient being is a perceptual center of the universe, imposing a "this, and notthis" duality upon a universe that otherwise is not dualistic.
A human's "reality" is the result of that human's perceptions. Perceptions are the very definition of subjective.

Exactly. Thats why soupnazi has no clue what he is talking about.

Wrong as I am leaving you a total fool

Dont leave as a total fool At least take some of this reality with you.

I beat the shit out of you with it.

Thats not reality.

 

[Soupnazi630]

That is also why we cannot know what violence words may be associated with in the mind of a beholder. Laws against words feed our feebleness, they do not develop spiritual strength.

We can define violent words/actions and reach a majority agreement on what that entails. Its not a law against words. Its a law against violent words.

Majority agreement is worthless and does not define truth.

There is no such thing as a violent word

Majority agreement defines reality for that group.

Of course there is a such thing as a violent word. Violent is merely an adjective describing the type of word.

No it does not.

There is no such thing as a violent word

Of course it does. Are you in the US?

Yes there is a such thing as a violent word. Thats why the Swiss made a law against them.

There is no such thing as a violent word and laws do not change reality