Fort Fun Indiana
Diamond Member
- Mar 10, 2017
- 97,449
- 73,674
Because they weren't stupid and didn't think the world was about to end...?Ok. Why didn’t they put an end date on the 14th? An expiration date?
It clearly was meant to carry forward.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Because they weren't stupid and didn't think the world was about to end...?Ok. Why didn’t they put an end date on the 14th? An expiration date?
Because they weren't stupid and didn't think the world was about to end...?
It clearly was meant to carry forward.
Obviously yesExcellent. So the 14th still applies today. Great.
according to the left its walking around inside the capital and taking selfies .What is an insurrection like some type of C-section ?
Funny how they don't even know who Ashley Babbitt was .according to the left its walking around inside the capital and taking selfies .
a 5ft 110 lb unarmed woman that was shot for trespassing .Funny how they don't even know who Ashley Babbitt was .
Liar. Normal people understand she wasn't shot for trespassing.a 5ft 110 lb unarmed woman that was shot for trespassing .
It is a dumb idea...I’m not sure most Trump voters can spell “Trump” though.People can write in Trump's name and will.
Also, it's against the notion of free and fair elections to take a candidate off the ballot. Do Democrats realize that?
Would you Democrats think it a good idea to take Biden off the ballot?
It is a dumb idea...I’m not sure most Trump voters can spell “Trump” though.
No doubt, there are those on the right also that want to see trump fail, and they’ll sacrifice their own party to do it, but in this regard, I really see most of it eminating from the left nNo it's people from both parties that have called out Trump for his ethics violations.
Because more on the left are honest about his participation in insurrection.No doubt, there are those on the right also that want to see trump fail, and they’ll sacrifice their own party to do it, but in this regard, I really see most of it eminating from the left n
Because more on the left are honest about his participation in insurrection.
Because that's a mess they can avoid.If they are so honest, then why not just charge him with insurrection?
But it’s a necessary mess if they want to disqualify him. Just saying he committed insurrection isn’t enough. He needs to be charged under the 14th amendment with insurrection, otherwise, you are leaving it all up to interpretation, and you are also saying that state courts can determine elections.Because that's a mess they can avoid.
No it isn't. As you can see in Colorado and Maine.But it’s a necessary mess if they want to disqualify him.
I know, I know, conviction isn’t required, dems can just say “it’s an insurrection” and that’s all that is required.No it isn't. As you can see in Colorado and Maine.
And you are making silly errors. In your strange fatasyworld we are talking about, "the democrats" are a monolith that includes special prosecutors. That isn't how the real world works.
Then you are abjectly ignorant of current events and should not even be commenting. It's up to the courts. Please read up on the topic again.I know, I know, conviction isn’t required, dems can just say “it’s an insurrection” and that’s all that is required.
Then you are abjectly ignorant of current events and should not even be commenting. It's up to the courts. Please read up on the topic again.
Irrelevant. Already covered.Has any court charged him with insurrection?
So we’re just going with any body, like a Secretary of State, being able to make their own decision about if someone committed insurrection? You do see how that’s a dangerous precedent right? As I’ve argued in other threads..that open a can of worms that many will not like.Irrelevant. Already covered.