Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Or you could tell them buttfucking is risky no matter what they do because condoms have been known to break. Plus it's unnatural.No, not just HPV, but the irritation involved.Stop being an ass. Anal sex leads to an increase in anal and rectal cancer due to the usual viruses and through regular anal friction and irritation.Condom use might lead to increased incidence of rectal cancer?
That's one hell of a latex allergy.
More accurately, HPV leads to increases in anal and rectal cancers.
As luck would have it, condoms are an excellent guard against HPV. Which might explain why schools are teaching condom use.
HPV is *far* more likely to cause cancer than 'irritation'. Which makes condom use far more likely to prevent cancer. And thus, useful for kids to know.
WTF is wrong with you, Skylar? Inflammation leads to an increased risk of cancer EVERYWHERE in the human body, INCLUDING the anus and rectum.
Your own source puts the increase in risk at a paltry 3%. Less than the cancer risk of say, eating bologna.
While *most* of the cancers you've cited are caused by HPV. With HPV causing a total of 5% of all cancers.
And HPV being generally preventable with condom use.
Why wouldn't you want middle school and highschool kids educated on how to protect themselves from one of the most preventable cancer risks? As you so eloquently put it, 'What the fuck is wrong with you? '
It isn't. You aren't following the thread, maybe the blood in your eyes prevents clear vision? Buttholes aren't made for sex, just because you can do something it doesn't mean you should. The emotion comes in by pretending ass fucking is as valid an outlet as what nature intended. That's biologically wrong, emotion is the only reason the lie exists.How is teaching condom use an 'emotional issue'?How dare you introduce facts into an emotional issue.But might lead to an increased incidence of rectal cancer. Great.
It isn't. You aren't following the thread, maybe the blood in your eyes prevents clear vision? Buttholes aren't made for sex, just because you can do something it doesn't mean you should. The emotion comes in by pretending ass fucking is as valid an outlet as what nature intended. That's biologically wrong, emotion is the only reason the lie exists.How is teaching condom use an 'emotional issue'?How dare you introduce facts into an emotional issue.But might lead to an increased incidence of rectal cancer. Great.
Roughly 40% of straight Americans have had anal intercourse.
Whether you approve of it or not- Americans are doing it.
Yes, they live in a non-reality based world.It isn't. You aren't following the thread, maybe the blood in your eyes prevents clear vision? Buttholes aren't made for sex, just because you can do something it doesn't mean you should. The emotion comes in by pretending ass fucking is as valid an outlet as what nature intended. That's biologically wrong, emotion is the only reason the lie exists.How is teaching condom use an 'emotional issue'?How dare you introduce facts into an emotional issue.But might lead to an increased incidence of rectal cancer. Great.
Roughly 40% of straight Americans have had anal intercourse.
Whether you approve of it or not- Americans are doing it.
But pretending it isn't happening makes all the STD's go away.
Right?
I don't approve of idiots like you but how is that pertenant to the discussion? I don't know where you get your stats on anal sex from, no one ever polled me. Maybe you pulled them from your analpussy?It isn't. You aren't following the thread, maybe the blood in your eyes prevents clear vision? Buttholes aren't made for sex, just because you can do something it doesn't mean you should. The emotion comes in by pretending ass fucking is as valid an outlet as what nature intended. That's biologically wrong, emotion is the only reason the lie exists.How is teaching condom use an 'emotional issue'?How dare you introduce facts into an emotional issue.But might lead to an increased incidence of rectal cancer. Great.
Roughly 40% of straight Americans have had anal intercourse.
Whether you approve of it or not- Americans are doing it.
You're trying to twist the argument, which is what liberals always do, like a kid caught with his hand in the cookie jar. You want to normalize a filthy practice because some kids have sex. That makes no sense.Or you could tell them buttfucking is risky no matter what they do because condoms have been known to break. Plus it's unnatural.No, not just HPV, but the irritation involved.Stop being an ass. Anal sex leads to an increase in anal and rectal cancer due to the usual viruses and through regular anal friction and irritation.
More accurately, HPV leads to increases in anal and rectal cancers.
As luck would have it, condoms are an excellent guard against HPV. Which might explain why schools are teaching condom use.
HPV is *far* more likely to cause cancer than 'irritation'. Which makes condom use far more likely to prevent cancer. And thus, useful for kids to know.
Because experience has shown that teaching kids to just say no has been so effective.......and of course if you tell kids its 'unnatural'- that stops them every time.
Between 5-7% of 15-17 old Americans have tried anal sex. I would prefer none of them have any sex- but pretending that every teen will stay a virgin might make you feel better- but doesn't help teens.
That's why I said the equivalent would be to show a diagram of how kids can shoot up heroin with a nice clean needle "easy as 1,2,3"...because some teens have a heroin orientation. Their addictive natures were "born that way". So to prevent teen heroin user suicides, we should teach tolerance of heroin use in the youngest ages of elementary school kids. And we should tell them it's but one of many ways to "feel good". Then our focus instead of dissuading junkies, should be on distributing clean needles to kids as young as 6 so that "if they were born wanting to experiment with heroin, they should do so with protection."You're trying to twist the argument, which is what liberals always do, like a kid caught with his hand in the cookie jar. You want to normalize a filthy practice because some kids have sex. That makes no sense.
The point was that it isn't natural, nature did not provide for it. The point wasn't that no kid will never do unnatural things. If public-ed is normalizing the behavior they are doing an extreme disservice to the community. Brainwashing is not what they are payed to do.
This fails as a false comparison fallacy.That's why I said the equivalent would be to show a diagram of how kids can shoot up heroin with a nice clean needle "easy as 1,2,3"...because some teens have a heroin orientation. Their addictive natures were "born that way". So to prevent teen heroin user suicides, we should teach tolerance of heroin use in the youngest ages of elementary school kids. And we should tell them it's but one of many ways to "feel good". Then our focus instead of dissuading junkies, should be on distributing clean needles to kids as young as 6 so that "if they were born wanting to experiment with heroin, they should do so with protection."You're trying to twist the argument, which is what liberals always do, like a kid caught with his hand in the cookie jar. You want to normalize a filthy practice because some kids have sex. That makes no sense.
The point was that it isn't natural, nature did not provide for it. The point wasn't that no kid will never do unnatural things. If public-ed is normalizing the behavior they are doing an extreme disservice to the community. Brainwashing is not what they are payed to do.
When taboos are removed...
Oh, and we should make a special class protection using the Judicial Branch, for "Heroin shooter Americans" and fine people $250,000 each offense for not propping them up verbally for the lifestyle they fell into..
I would think a dick up the ass causes irritation.
How these queers "think" is beyond me...
What next? They going to condone fucking donkeys?
That's why I said the equivalent would be to show a diagram of how kids can shoot up heroin with a nice clean needle "easy as 1,2,3"...because some teens have a heroin orientation. Their addictive natures were "born that way". So to prevent teen heroin user suicides, we should teach tolerance of heroin use in the youngest ages of elementary school kids. And we should tell them it's but one of many ways to "feel good". Then our focus instead of dissuading junkies, should be on distributing clean needles to kids as young as 6 so that "if they were born wanting to experiment with heroin, they should do so with protection."You're trying to twist the argument, which is what liberals always do, like a kid caught with his hand in the cookie jar. You want to normalize a filthy practice because some kids have sex. That makes no sense.
The point was that it isn't natural, nature did not provide for it. The point wasn't that no kid will never do unnatural things. If public-ed is normalizing the behavior they are doing an extreme disservice to the community. Brainwashing is not what they are payed to do.
This fails as a false comparison fallacy.
That's why I said the equivalent would be to show a diagram of how kids can shoot up heroin with a nice clean needle "easy as 1,2,3"...because some teens have a heroin orientation. Their addictive natures were "born that way". So to prevent teen heroin user suicides, we should teach tolerance of heroin use in the youngest ages of elementary school kids. And we should tell them it's but one of many ways to "feel good". Then our focus instead of dissuading junkies, should be on distributing clean needles to kids as young as 6 so that "if they were born wanting to experiment with heroin, they should do so with protection."You're trying to twist the argument, which is what liberals always do, like a kid caught with his hand in the cookie jar. You want to normalize a filthy practice because some kids have sex. That makes no sense.
The point was that it isn't natural, nature did not provide for it. The point wasn't that no kid will never do unnatural things. If public-ed is normalizing the behavior they are doing an extreme disservice to the community. Brainwashing is not what they are payed to do.
When taboos are removed...
Oh, and we should make a special class protection using the Judicial Branch, for "Heroin shooter Americans" and fine people $250,000 each offense for not propping them up verbally for the lifestyle they fell into..
That wasn't/isn't the concern. You keep trying to twist it into that. The point is that public-ed is taking our money and teaching children that anal sex is simply another valid sex act or expression of love. That's the harm, no one said they shouldn't know what a condom is (as if kids these days don't know).Sex isn't 'shooting heroin'. And pretending that kids aren't going to have sex doesn't magically make STDs go away. Nor does it protect any child. Condom use can help protect kids who are having sex. Which is why we educate them.
That's why I said the equivalent would be to show a diagram of how kids can shoot up heroin with a nice clean needle "easy as 1,2,3"...because some teens have a heroin orientation. Their addictive natures were "born that way". So to prevent teen heroin user suicides, we should teach tolerance of heroin use in the youngest ages of elementary school kids. And we should tell them it's but one of many ways to "feel good". Then our focus instead of dissuading junkies, should be on distributing clean needles to kids as young as 6 so that "if they were born wanting to experiment with heroin, they should do so with protection."You're trying to twist the argument, which is what liberals always do, like a kid caught with his hand in the cookie jar. You want to normalize a filthy practice because some kids have sex. That makes no sense.
The point was that it isn't natural, nature did not provide for it. The point wasn't that no kid will never do unnatural things. If public-ed is normalizing the behavior they are doing an extreme disservice to the community. Brainwashing is not what they are payed to do.
When taboos are removed...
Oh, and we should make a special class protection using the Judicial Branch, for "Heroin shooter Americans" and fine people $250,000 each offense for not propping them up verbally for the lifestyle they fell into..
This fails as a false comparison fallacy.
Actually, no it doesn't.
[/quote]But I'll tell you what does fail as a comparison though..."race = just some deviant sex behaviors" as "a legitimate class of people"
That wasn't/isn't the concern. You keep trying to twist it into that. The point is that public-ed is taking our money and teaching children that anal sex is simply another valid sex act or expression of love. That's the harm, no one said they shouldn't know what a condom is (as if kids these days don't know).Sex isn't 'shooting heroin'. And pretending that kids aren't going to have sex doesn't magically make STDs go away. Nor does it protect any child. Condom use can help protect kids who are having sex. Which is why we educate them.
If you don't embrace sodomy as a viable alternative to natural sex then you have personal baggage?Our focus should be on educating these kids about what is. Not what you wish it was because of your own personal baggage.
When did I oppose condom use? Do you even know what we are discussing here? It doesn't appear so.That wasn't/isn't the concern. You keep trying to twist it into that. The point is that public-ed is taking our money and teaching children that anal sex is simply another valid sex act or expression of love. That's the harm, no one said they shouldn't know what a condom is (as if kids these days don't know).Sex isn't 'shooting heroin'. And pretending that kids aren't going to have sex doesn't magically make STDs go away. Nor does it protect any child. Condom use can help protect kids who are having sex. Which is why we educate them.
It doesn't 'teach them anal sex'. It teaches them condom use.
Which your ilk adamantly oppose, despite the fact that condom use can actually help protect kids from illness.
If you don't embrace sodomy as a viable alternative to natural sex then you have personal baggage?Our focus should be on educating these kids about what is. Not what you wish it was because of your own personal baggage.
LOL
When did I oppose condom use? Do you even know what we are discussing here? It doesn't appear so.That wasn't/isn't the concern. You keep trying to twist it into that. The point is that public-ed is taking our money and teaching children that anal sex is simply another valid sex act or expression of love. That's the harm, no one said they shouldn't know what a condom is (as if kids these days don't know).Sex isn't 'shooting heroin'. And pretending that kids aren't going to have sex doesn't magically make STDs go away. Nor does it protect any child. Condom use can help protect kids who are having sex. Which is why we educate them.
It doesn't 'teach them anal sex'. It teaches them condom use.
Which your ilk adamantly oppose, despite the fact that condom use can actually help protect kids from illness.
That isn't the subject. You need somebody to assist you.Teaching kids condom use isn't 'embracing sodomy'.If you don't embrace sodomy as a viable alternative to natural sex then you have personal baggage?Our focus should be on educating these kids about what is. Not what you wish it was because of your own personal baggage.
LOL
Next fallacy, please.
