Teen arrested for defending him self against the mob!

[martybegan]

Pictures Show Young Rittenhouse Shot At
Least Two BLM Rioters in Self Defense, One
Rioter Was Carrying a Gun and Is a Convicted Felon




CONTENDER FOR 'DARWIN AWARDS'

Attacker with a skateboard versus someone carrying an AR-15?
- Never bring a skateboard to a gun fight!

'It may be the last thing the skateboard carrier ever did. It appears this man was shot right after attacking the young Rittenhouse with a skateboard. After that he fell to the ground and didn’t move.'

No sympathy here for the violent attackers / terrorists who chose the wrong victim to attack, one carrying an AR-15.

Pictures Show Young Rittenhouse Shot At Least Two BLM Rioters in Self Defense, One Rioter Was Carrying a Gun and Is a Convicted Felon | The Gateway Pundit | by Joe Hoft

On Tuesday night two people were killed in the continued violence in Kenosha, Wisconsin. It appears they were killed by the same shooter, a 17-year-old by the name of Kyle Rittenhouse. Another individual shot by Rittenhouse appears to have been carrying a handgun.

www.thegatewaypundit.com

I guess it doesn't matter to you that a 17 year old who is carrying a long gun in public is in violation of WI gun laws

What laws were being enforced in the area at the time?

The police decided to take a powder.

irrelevant.

The idea of the State handling the punishment for criminal activity instead of the people dealing with it themselves requires the State to actively try to prevent and prosecute criminal behavior.

When the police decide not to do so, the people still retain the right to defend themselves, and their property, and to enlist the help of others to do so.

Government in these cases has decided to not deal with the situations, thus the people are allowed to do so.

This isn't about law, it's about natural rights.

 

[easyt65]

But you call looters criminal;s even though they have not been convicted.

This 17 year old was breaking the law. Period.

An individual on video entering a store through a broken window and carrying out a new TV is a 'Looter'. If you have to wait for a jury to convict for you to make up your own mind about that you're probably a snowflake.

A 17yo carrying an AR-15 may be breaking the law, but attacking him with a skateboard is still the dumbest, and probably LAST, thing you will ever do in your life. It was for THIS guy.

 

[Blues Man]

So was pretty much everyone else there. The rioters made the mistake of attacking an armed man.

No jury is going to convict him.

Never underestimate the stupidity of people. The Soros DA will pack an all black, all BLM jury. He should never be charged, armed men chased him brandishing firearms.


Kyle Rittenhouse - TRUE AMERICAN PATRIOT

View attachment 380602

He was a criminal in violation of WI gun laws.

If you think otherwise you are a hypocrite

 

[Blues Man]

Pictures Show Young Rittenhouse Shot At
Least Two BLM Rioters in Self Defense, One
Rioter Was Carrying a Gun and Is a Convicted Felon




CONTENDER FOR 'DARWIN AWARDS'

Attacker with a skateboard versus someone carrying an AR-15?
- Never bring a skateboard to a gun fight!

'It may be the last thing the skateboard carrier ever did. It appears this man was shot right after attacking the young Rittenhouse with a skateboard. After that he fell to the ground and didn’t move.'

No sympathy here for the violent attackers / terrorists who chose the wrong victim to attack, one carrying an AR-15.

Pictures Show Young Rittenhouse Shot At Least Two BLM Rioters in Self Defense, One Rioter Was Carrying a Gun and Is a Convicted Felon | The Gateway Pundit | by Joe Hoft

On Tuesday night two people were killed in the continued violence in Kenosha, Wisconsin. It appears they were killed by the same shooter, a 17-year-old by the name of Kyle Rittenhouse. Another individual shot by Rittenhouse appears to have been carrying a handgun.

www.thegatewaypundit.com

I guess it doesn't matter to you that a 17 year old who is carrying a long gun in public is in violation of WI gun laws

What laws were being enforced in the area at the time?

The police decided to take a powder.

irrelevant.

The idea of the State handling the punishment for criminal activity instead of the people dealing with it themselves requires the State to actively try to prevent and prosecute criminal behavior.

When the police decide not to do so, the people still retain the right to defend themselves, and their property, and to enlist the help of others to do so.

Government in these cases has decided to not deal with the situations, thus the people are allowed to do so.

This isn't about law, it's about natural rights.

He had no "natural right to break the law.

If he had been a law abiding minor he would not have been on the streets with a gun and would not have needed to defend himself

 

[martybegan]

If Law Distortion officers and Soros DA's attempt to screw this boy, other patriots need to step up and enforce the constitution - with all prejudice.

So you don't care that he was breaking WI gun laws either?

Since no other laws were being enforced at the time, procedural bullshit like "you can't carry gun X" doesn't warrant respect.

 

[martybegan]

So was pretty much everyone else there. The rioters made the mistake of attacking an armed man.

No jury is going to convict him.

Never underestimate the stupidity of people. The Soros DA will pack an all black, all BLM jury. He should never be charged, armed men chased him brandishing firearms.


Kyle Rittenhouse - TRUE AMERICAN PATRIOT

View attachment 380602

He was a criminal in violation of WI gun laws.

If you think otherwise you are a hypocrite

Procedural bullshit.

People have a right to defend property from lawlessness. Chickenshit gun grabber laws don't stop that.

It's amazing how you ignore the rioters and focus on this guy because he had the audacity to defend himself and someone's property.

Maybe the rioters should visit your property.

 

[martybegan]

Pictures Show Young Rittenhouse Shot At
Least Two BLM Rioters in Self Defense, One
Rioter Was Carrying a Gun and Is a Convicted Felon




CONTENDER FOR 'DARWIN AWARDS'

Attacker with a skateboard versus someone carrying an AR-15?
- Never bring a skateboard to a gun fight!

'It may be the last thing the skateboard carrier ever did. It appears this man was shot right after attacking the young Rittenhouse with a skateboard. After that he fell to the ground and didn’t move.'

No sympathy here for the violent attackers / terrorists who chose the wrong victim to attack, one carrying an AR-15.

Pictures Show Young Rittenhouse Shot At Least Two BLM Rioters in Self Defense, One Rioter Was Carrying a Gun and Is a Convicted Felon | The Gateway Pundit | by Joe Hoft

On Tuesday night two people were killed in the continued violence in Kenosha, Wisconsin. It appears they were killed by the same shooter, a 17-year-old by the name of Kyle Rittenhouse. Another individual shot by Rittenhouse appears to have been carrying a handgun.

www.thegatewaypundit.com

I guess it doesn't matter to you that a 17 year old who is carrying a long gun in public is in violation of WI gun laws

What laws were being enforced in the area at the time?

The police decided to take a powder.

irrelevant.

The idea of the State handling the punishment for criminal activity instead of the people dealing with it themselves requires the State to actively try to prevent and prosecute criminal behavior.

When the police decide not to do so, the people still retain the right to defend themselves, and their property, and to enlist the help of others to do so.

Government in these cases has decided to not deal with the situations, thus the people are allowed to do so.

This isn't about law, it's about natural rights.

He had no "natural right to break the law.

If he had been a law abiding minor he would not have been on the streets with a gun and would not have needed to defend himself

LOL, so everyone is supposed to follow all laws, no matter how unjust?

Even procedural bullshit?

Go to the barricades with your rioting buddies, you tone deaf fucking hack.

FOAD

 

[Blues Man]

But you call looters criminal;s even though they have not been convicted.

This 17 year old was breaking the law. Period.

An individual on video entering a store through a broken window and carrying out a new TV is a 'Looter'. If you have to wait for a jury to convict for you to make up your own mind about that you're probably a snowflake.

A 17yo carrying an AR-15 may be breaking the law, but attacking him with a skateboard is still the dumbest, and probably LAST, thing you will ever do in your life. It was for THIS guy.

The fact is it was this kid's flagrant violation of the law that put him in jeopardy.

If he obeyed the law, as you think everyone should, then he would not have been in the middle of a riot with a firearm and would not have had to defend himself.

It's no different than a 17 year old driving drunk.

 

[easyt65]

So was pretty much everyone else there. The rioters made the mistake of attacking an armed man.

No jury is going to convict him.

Never underestimate the stupidity of people. The Soros DA will pack an all black, all BLM jury. He should never be charged, armed men chased him brandishing firearms.


Kyle Rittenhouse - TRUE AMERICAN PATRIOT

View attachment 380602

He was a criminal in violation of WI gun laws.

If you think otherwise you are a hypocrite

The DEAD guy who attacked him with a skateboard was guilty of assault, though he will never be indicted / charged now. The terrorists destroying the car dealership violated the law and instigated the entire thing.

If you decide to destroy someone's business and end up getting shot while doing it, don't bitch afterwards about how YOUR rights were violated and laws were broken.

 

[Uncensored2008]

I guess it doesn't matter to you that a 17 year old who is carrying a long gun in public is in violation of WI gun laws.

Of course it does - I did not say it did not. I just pointed out that the individuals who attacked someone carrying an AR-15, especially the moron who attacked him with a SKATEBOARD, had a death wish.

'Darwin Award' contestants...

The Klan has been assured that local Law Distortion will protect them as they rape, loot, murder, and burn. The Klansman with the skateboard felt safe attacking the boy because the police and prosecution are basically PART of BLM. Up until this point, there has never been a price for the Klan assaulting people.

 

[Blues Man]

So was pretty much everyone else there. The rioters made the mistake of attacking an armed man.

No jury is going to convict him.

Never underestimate the stupidity of people. The Soros DA will pack an all black, all BLM jury. He should never be charged, armed men chased him brandishing firearms.


Kyle Rittenhouse - TRUE AMERICAN PATRIOT

View attachment 380602

He was a criminal in violation of WI gun laws.

If you think otherwise you are a hypocrite

Procedural bullshit.

People have a right to defend property from lawlessness. Chickenshit gun grabber laws don't stop that.

It's amazing how you ignore the rioters and focus on this guy because he had the audacity to defend himself and someone's property.

Maybe the rioters should visit your property.

It was not his property.

He was acting illegally as armed security.

 

[Blues Man]

So was pretty much everyone else there. The rioters made the mistake of attacking an armed man.

No jury is going to convict him.

Never underestimate the stupidity of people. The Soros DA will pack an all black, all BLM jury. He should never be charged, armed men chased him brandishing firearms.


Kyle Rittenhouse - TRUE AMERICAN PATRIOT

View attachment 380602

He was a criminal in violation of WI gun laws.

If you think otherwise you are a hypocrite

The DEAD guy who attacked him with a skateboard was guilty of assault, though he will never be indicted / charged now. The terrorists destroying the car dealership violated the law and instigated the entire thing.

If you decide to destroy someone's business and end up getting shot while doing it, don't bitch afterwards about how YOUR rights were violated and laws were broken.

It was not his business.

This kid was breaking the law. The same laws you criticize others for breaking.

 

[easyt65]

The fact is it was this kid's flagrant violation of the law that put him in jeopardy.

Actually, the decision made by looters and domestic terrorists to show up and attempt to destroy someone's business forced the owner and others to have to defend their property. The looters / terrorists created the situation, not the one defending public / private property from them.

Attempting to blame those defending their property from domestic terrorists is like blaming a cop for having to shoot some SOB who was coming at him with a machete.

 

[initforme]

Let the investigation begin and well then whether guilty or innocent that's ok.

 

[Uncensored2008]

The fact is it was this kid's flagrant violation of the law that put him in jeopardy.

If he obeyed the law, as you think everyone should, then he would not have been in the middle of a riot with a firearm and would not have had to defend himself.

It's no different than a 17 year old driving drunk.

The right to defend ourselves and our community is not just enshrined in our Constitution, it is God given. Wisconsin is an open carry state, the patriot Kyle Rittenhouse has EVERY RIGHT to bear arms - as enshrined in our Constitution. Law Distortion REFUSES to protect property or lives, they stand by as the Klan burns another city, afraid that NBC will call them names.

This boy is more of a MAN that anyone on the Kenosha police department or ANY branch of law distortion in the area.

 

[Lucy Hamilton]

Kenosha violence: Juvenile arrested in deadly shooting amid Jacob Blake unrest, Illinois police say

A 17-year-old suspect has been arrested in connection to at least one of the two shooting deaths amid the unrest Tuesday night in Kenosha, Wis., Illinois police confirmed on Wednesday.

www.foxnews.com

How do arrest someone for self defense!? If we don’t get this child out of jail we are doing to let them
Arrest all of us! We need to fight back!

Kyle Rittenhouse should get a MEDAL for killing the Antifa Commie scum, ESPECIALLY considering the first one he killed was a CONVICTED CHILD RAPIST, Joseph D. Rosenbaum, registered sex offender for a sex crime involving a minor:

 

[easyt65]

It was not his property.

So what? He was defending someone else's property. Again, bitches intent on destroying someone else's property and end up getting shot in the process have no right to bitch and whine. It was their choice -they put themselves in that position. Had they not been there intent on destroying someone else's property they would be alive. BAD choice.

People have been pushed too far by left wing violent thugs, rioters, looters, murderers, and foreign-funded domestic terrorists. The police have been FORCED back, so Americans have answered the challenge put to them by these terrorists / criminals...and now the criminals / terrorists are crying because THEY are paying a price, not their intended victims.

Sucks to be them. The Justice System will deal with the young man - Americans are putting an end to the terrorism and BS.

Don't want none, don't come for none.
- They came, they attempted to commit terrorism, they got shot.

 

[martybegan]

So was pretty much everyone else there. The rioters made the mistake of attacking an armed man.

No jury is going to convict him.

Never underestimate the stupidity of people. The Soros DA will pack an all black, all BLM jury. He should never be charged, armed men chased him brandishing firearms.


Kyle Rittenhouse - TRUE AMERICAN PATRIOT

View attachment 380602

He was a criminal in violation of WI gun laws.

If you think otherwise you are a hypocrite

Procedural bullshit.

People have a right to defend property from lawlessness. Chickenshit gun grabber laws don't stop that.

It's amazing how you ignore the rioters and focus on this guy because he had the audacity to defend himself and someone's property.

Maybe the rioters should visit your property.

It was not his property.

He was acting illegally as armed security.

More procedural bullshit. Again, when the police are not enforcing the law, people can defend themselves and property.

 

[easyt65]

The fact is it was this kid's flagrant violation of the law that put him in jeopardy.

If he obeyed the law, as you think everyone should, then he would not have been in the middle of a riot with a firearm and would not have had to defend himself.

It's no different than a 17 year old driving drunk.

The right to defend ourselves and our community is not just enshrined in our Constitution, it is God given. Wisconsin is an open carry state, the patriot Kyle Rittenhouse has EVERY RIGHT to bear arms - as enshrined in our Constitution. Law Distortion REFUSES to protect property or lives, they stand by as the Klan burns another city, afraid that NBC will call them names.

This boy is more of a MAN that anyone on the Kenosha police department or ANY branch of law distortion in the area.

Democrat leaders in these cities have failed to do their #1 job: Provide for the safety and security of their citizens. Instead theyhave betrayed the Police, citizens, and business owners. THIS, the blood, is on THEIR hands.

 

[martybegan]

So was pretty much everyone else there. The rioters made the mistake of attacking an armed man.

No jury is going to convict him.

Never underestimate the stupidity of people. The Soros DA will pack an all black, all BLM jury. He should never be charged, armed men chased him brandishing firearms.


Kyle Rittenhouse - TRUE AMERICAN PATRIOT

View attachment 380602

He was a criminal in violation of WI gun laws.

If you think otherwise you are a hypocrite

The DEAD guy who attacked him with a skateboard was guilty of assault, though he will never be indicted / charged now. The terrorists destroying the car dealership violated the law and instigated the entire thing.

If you decide to destroy someone's business and end up getting shot while doing it, don't bitch afterwards about how YOUR rights were violated and laws were broken.

It was not his business.

This kid was breaking the law. The same laws you criticize others for breaking.

Not the same laws.

By carrying open he was breaking a procedural law, one who's breaking results in zero harm to anyone or society.

Destroying people's property and assaulting people are not procedural issues.

That you try to equate the two shows your utter dishonesty.

And again, as always, go fuck yourself.