Tell us again that these books are not kiddie porn and grooming....in our public schools.....

[mamooth]

“My back over my hips as

Would you call that pornography if it wasn't gay people?

You wouldn't. Stop being such a transparently dishonest hypocrite.

 

[OldFlame]

Would you call that pornography if it wasn't gay people?

You wouldn't. Stop being such a transparently dishonest hypocrite.

Yes I would, gender of the couple is irrelevant, the material is not appropriate for an 11 year old, period.

And fuck you, defending this bullshit because or your 'politics', you're morally bankrupt.

 

[Jessica-stormlover]

There's not a damn thing wrong with being gay. I am glad that our kids are learning to accept it.

Fuck religion and its reasoning for hating people.

 

[iamwhatiseem]

Librarians can restrict access to books deemed inappropriate foir the younger students.

Pray tell what is your definition of "younger"?
So it is okay to have this book available for 6th graders??

 

[Dogmaphobe]

Yes I would, gender of the couple is irrelevant, the material is not appropriate for an 11 year old, period.

And fuck you, defending this bullshit because or your 'politics', you're morally bankrupt.

The truth of the matter is that he supports the grooming BECAUSE it is gay, and sees himself as virtuous for supporting it.

He assumes you only oppose because it is gay since the only reason he supports it is because of it being gay.

 

[OldFlame]

There's not a damn thing wrong with being gay. I am glad that our kids are learning to accept it.

Fuck religion and its reasoning for hating people.

You might want to discuss the actual topic of the thread...

 

[Zincwarrior]

Multiple posts have been deleted for accusing other posters of grooming or supporting it. This has resulted in me actually having to warn someone which I never do. Discuss the topic like adults without violating the rules against grooming accusations or you will be warned to the maximum permitted going forward.

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

Yeah.....another book read to a school board...this time by an 11 year old......

Tell us again this isn't grooming children for sex.....and leftism...

Eleven-year-old sixth grader Knox Zijac got up at a school board meeting to read a page from the book Nick and Charlie, which is about a homosexual couple having sex. This explicit book was a featured novel on a display stand in his middle school library, according to Knox. The student, so young he still had trouble pronouncing the “r” in “library” and “librarian,” said that his middle school librarian not only helped him check the pornographic book out (Knox wanted to show his father the book) but offered to help him find similar books, including a graphic novel version. “Graphic” is certainly the accurate description of this supposedly sixth-grade-level reading material.

[WATCH] Sixth-Grader Reads to School Board From Gay Sex Book Displayed at His School

pjmedia.com

Here is the next Youtube challenge for leftists....

Take this book, or the other books and hand them out at a public park to children.....wait for the police to arrive, and video what happens next.......

More bigotry, hate, and lies from the right.

 

[OldFlame]

Mamooth cries like a sniveling coward to a leftie mod and then disappears. Shocking.

 

[mamooth]

Yes I would, gender of the couple is irrelevant, the material is not appropriate for an 11 year old, period.

And that's why I said it was rated 13+

You read me saying that, and you still said I supported giving it to 11-years olds.

One of us is acting in an immoral manner here, and it's not me.

 

[Ralph Norton]

So you're claiming that's "homosexual pornography"?

I'm claiming nothing, dumb ass. I'm saying the book is inappropriate for 11 year olds.

No. That's why it's rated 13+.

Thus 11 year olds should not have access to it.
Duh

 

[mamooth]

Mamooth cries like a sniveling coward to a leftie mod and then disappears. Shocking.

So why did you deliberately choose to lie about what I said?

This is the part where you run. Please proceed.

 

[Ralph Norton]

More bigotry, hate, and lies from the right.

Which part is the lie, dumb ass?

 

[OldFlame]

And that's why I said it was rated 13+

You read me saying that, and you still said I supported giving it to 11-years olds.

One of us is acting in an immoral manner here, and it's not me.

You've been in here defending it since your first post dipshit. Why didn't you agree with the op then?

Another leftist who thinks they can erase history.

 

[Zincwarrior]

Mamooth cries like a sniveling coward to a leftie mod and then disappears. Shocking.

All posters are encouraged to report when they see an issue. Frankly, this is something our posters have taken up with enthusiasm.

 

[OldFlame]

All posters are encouraged to report when they see an issue. Frankly, this is something our posters have taken up with enthusiasm.

I'm sure they have, especially against their political opponents. I used to be a mod here many years ago, I know how it works.

 

[Dogmaphobe]

All posters are encouraged to report when they see an issue. Frankly, this is something our posters have taken up with enthusiasm.

Yes, there is collusion between posters and Mods here.

 

[mamooth]

You've been in here defending it since your first post dipshit. Why didn't you agree with the op then?

No, I never said it was appropraite for 11-year-olds. You just made that story up entirely.

When in a stupid-liar hole, stop digging.

You could have just said "yeah, I overreacted", or said nothing at all. You didn't. Instead of walking it back, you doubled down on it. You let your butthurt take control of you.

That means you're worth nobody's time.

 

[SassyIrishLass]

Yes, there is collusion between posters and Mods here.

Anytime that one shows up 8n a thread it's better to leave.

Absolutely no sane person believes sixth graders should be reading that garbage

 

[Zincwarrior]

I'm sure they have, especially against their political opponents. I used to be a mod here many years ago, I know how it works.

Thank you for your cooperation.