Texas sent one bus to Chicago today, El Paso tells Chicago and New York to get ready for a flood

[Tiburon]

I dont like perverts. Are you a pervert that wants illegal children being abused by those in Hollyweird? I noticed you didnt deny the last question i asked.

You literally just said you couldn’t care less about those kids, which makes your accusations utterly meaningless.

In fact, you openly fantasize about the mass murder of the victims of human trafficking.

 

[AMart]

Hey dipshit, the illegal settlement started before the Revolution. The British trying to crack down on it was one of the colonists’ main grievances.

LOL so a country across the Atlantic had the legal right to tell settlers where they could move? That's hilarious. And surely you will post confirmation of this. And it's all a fucking moot point retard.

 

[Tiburon]

LOL so a country across the Atlantic had the legal right to tell settlers where they could move? That's hilarious. And surely you will post confirmation of this. And it's all a fucking moot point retard.

Do you not understand how colonization works? British law applied in the 13 colonies, yes.

What’s really hilarious is how much morons like you whine when forced to confront actual history.

 

[AMart]

You literally just said you couldn’t care less about those kids, which makes your accusations utterly meaningless.

In fact, you openly fantasize about the mass murder of the victims of human trafficking.

Do you care what are doing about? Nothing but voting for politicians that support it lol.

 

[AMart]

Do you not understand how colonization works? British law applied in the 13 colonies, yes.

What’s really hilarious is how much morons like you whine when forced to confront actual history.

Post the orders from the King forbidding settlers to move west, and if you can it's a moot point retard. It would have happened anyway. Regardless if it's a colony or part of France or whatever. Why does any of this matter.

 

[GMCGeneral]

Do you not understand how colonization works? British law applied in the 13 colonies, yes.

What’s really hilarious is how much morons like you whine when forced to confront actual history.

What's really hilarious is how much Leftist morons like you whine when forced to confront revisionist history. There, fixed it for you. Now pull your pants up. Oh I forgot! Wearing pants properly is waycissss.

 

[Tiburon]

Post the orders from the King forbidding settlers to move west, and if you can it's a moot point retard. It would have happened anyway. Regardless if it's a colony or part of France or whatever. Why does any of this matter.

“The Royal Proclamation of 1763 was issued by King George III on 7 October 1763. It followed the Treaty of Paris (1763), which formally ended the Seven Years' War and transferred French territory in North America to Great Britain.[1] The Proclamation forbade all settlements west of a line drawn along the Appalachian Mountains, which was delineated as an Indian Reserve.[2] Exclusion from the vast region of Trans-Appalachiacreated discontent between Britain and colonial land speculators and potential settlers. The proclamation and access to western lands was one of the first significant areas of dispute between Britain and the colonies and would become a contributing factor leading to the American Revolution.[3] The 1763 proclamation line is situated similar to the Eastern Continental Divide, extending from Georgia to the divide's northern terminus near the middle of the northern border of Pennsylvania, where it intersects the northeasterly St. Lawrence Divide, and extends further through New England.”

Royal Proclamation of 1763 - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

Not a moot point in the slightest, since it demonstrates, quite clearly, that this country was built on illegal settlement. I get that you are too stupid to grasp even basic historical facts though

 

[Tiburon]

What's really hilarious is how much Leftist morons like you whine when forced to confront revisionist history. There, fixed it for you. Now pull your pants up. Oh I forgot! Wearing pants properly is waycissss.

You haven’t “confronted” me with anything, just a bunch of tearful sniveling.

 

[Flash]

Those stupid Democrats wanted "Sanctuary Cities" so let them put their money where their mouth's is.

 

[GMCGeneral]

You haven’t “confronted” me with anything, just a bunch of tearful sniveling.

Shut up you piece of ghetto trash hoodrat. Pull your pants up. Nobody wants to see your shitstained drawers.

 

[Meathead]

The calculated cruelty of today’s Republican Party.

Yes, let's weep together for those poor wetbacks leaving El Paso for Chicago.

 

[AMart]

“The Royal Proclamation of 1763 was issued by King George III on 7 October 1763. It followed the Treaty of Paris (1763), which formally ended the Seven Years' War and transferred French territory in North America to Great Britain.[1] The Proclamation forbade all settlements west of a line drawn along the Appalachian Mountains, which was delineated as an Indian Reserve.[2] Exclusion from the vast region of Trans-Appalachiacreated discontent between Britain and colonial land speculators and potential settlers. The proclamation and access to western lands was one of the first significant areas of dispute between Britain and the colonies and would become a contributing factor leading to the American Revolution.[3] The 1763 proclamation line is situated similar to the Eastern Continental Divide, extending from Georgia to the divide's northern terminus near the middle of the northern border of Pennsylvania, where it intersects the northeasterly St. Lawrence Divide, and extends further through New England.”

Royal Proclamation of 1763 - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

Not a moot point in the slightest, since it demonstrates, quite clearly, that this country was built on illegal settlement. I get that you are too stupid to grasp even basic historical facts though

LOL and what happened a few years later, poof it was legal because Britain lost.

 

[Tiburon]

Shut up you piece of ghetto trash hoodrat. Pull your pants up. Nobody wants to see your shitstained drawers.

Aww, another Stormfront wannabe crying because Jim Crow is gone and never coming back.

 

[Tiburon]

LOL and what happened a few years later, poof it was legal because Britain lost.

Yep, the US justified its illegal settlements after the fact. Doesn’t change the reality that Americans were illegally settling for decades, which enabled us to claim that land in the first place.

 

[leftwinger]

Yep, the US justified its illegal settlements after the fact. Doesn’t change the reality that Americans were illegally settling for decades, which enabled us to claim that land in the first place.

Hello earth to loon, Who do you think the savages murdered and chased off to inhabit the land they were on? How far back do we to? Cave men taking others cave and broad? If you can't defend you land you deserve what you get for not running off. Sort of like what you and your kind are doing on the open southern border.

 

[GMCGeneral]

Aww, another Stormfront wannabe crying because Jim Crow is gone and never coming back.

And you can STFU Farrakhan.

Aww, another Stormfront wannabe crying because Jim Crow is gone and never coming back.

 

[BlueGin]

What is cruel about using people to score political Points?

Meh.

The Biden Administration could close the borders at any time.

 

[Tiburon]

Hello earth to loon, Who do you think the savages murdered and chased off to inhabit the land they were on? How far back do we to? Cave men taking others cave and broad? If you can't defend you land you deserve what you get for not running off. Sort of like what you and your kind are doing on the open southern border.

Ah yes, the old “might makes right” philosophy. Unfortunately for you people with brains have been moving away from that philosophy for a while now due to the obvious issues with it.

 

[Tiburon]

And you can STFU Farrakhan.

I accept your surrender, seeing as you are apparently unable to disprove any of what I pointed out

 

[AMart]

Yep, the US justified its illegal settlements after the fact. Doesn’t change the reality that Americans were illegally settling for decades, which enabled us to claim that land in the first place.

You are wrong again loser boy.

The proclamation line was not intended to be a permanent boundary between the colonists and Native American lands, but rather a temporary boundary that could be extended further west in an orderly, lawful manner.....

British colonists and land speculators objected to the proclamation boundary since the British government had already assigned land grants to them. Including the wealthy owners of the Ohio company who protested the line to the governor of Virginia, as they had plans for settling the land to grow business.[15] Many settlements already existed beyond the proclamation line,[16] some of which had been temporarily evacuated during Pontiac's War, and there were many already granted land claims yet to be settled. For example, George Washington and his Virginia soldiers had been granted lands past the boundary. Prominent American colonials joined with the land speculators in Britain to lobby the government to move the line further west.[3][17]

The colonists' demands were met and the boundary line was adjusted in a series of treaties with the Native Americans.[18] The first two of these treaties were completed in 1768; the Treaty of Fort Stanwix adjusted the border with the Iroquois Confederacy in the Ohio Country and the Treaty of Hard Labour adjusted the border with the Cherokee in the Carolinas.[19][20] The Treaty of Hard Labour was followed by the Treaty of Lochaber in 1770, adjusting the border between Virginia and the Cherokee.[21] These agreements opened much of what is now Kentucky and West Virginia to British settlement.[22] The land granted by the Virginian and North Carolinian government heavily favored the land companies, seeing as they had more wealthy backers than the poorer settlers who wanted to settle west to hopefully gain a fortune.[23]