Text began coming in to Meadows on January 6th, begging trump to stop the Capitol attack

Just what I thought... the BOMBSHELL was Trump yelled and got angry and said some stuff.

Geraldo Rivera again

LOL

No, the bombshell was learning there were armed people in that crowd ... that Trump knew there were armed people in that crowd ... that Trump wanted them let into the Ellipse without having their weapons confiscated because he knew they weren't coming after him ... and that he then summoned them to the Capitol.
 
Trump was told before he began his speech that there were armed people arriving for his speech. The committee then played the Capitol Police transmissions stating they were finding all manner of arms on the attendees.

Trump then asked for the magnetometers which scanned for weapons and which kept the armed attendees from getting too close be disabled. He stated they were not there to hurt him.

Meaning he knew those people were armed for the march on the Capitol.

And no one has been prohibited from testifying, dipshit. Though some Trump lickspittles have REFUSED to tesify.

All caught up now, idiot?
This goes on the tangent of what people had on them who attended his speech
Otherwise it’s got nothing to do with bombshells nor insurrection (neither of which has happened)
 


However, what’s of our real interest here is that Trump is being driven around in his bespoke SUV, nicknamed ‘The Beast’.

Dumbshit.

There are several presidential vehicles.

And the SUV would make it that much easier for Trump to try to grab the wheel.
 
LOL

Baseless claims?? He paid her a lot of money during the run up to an election just to not talk about it publicly. Nobody does that over a false claim.
Baseless.... Let me know when this reaches a court of law.. Until then, this is bull shit claims that are unsupported by cooberating evidence.
 
So that's how we do hearings in the USA now? Hope if you go to court the same happens to you.
The Republicans and Trump had their chance to put loyal Trump lickspittles on the committee. They chose not to.

And now they have the audacity to whine about no loyalists being on the committee!

Only the dumbest of tards like yourself is drinking their piss.
 
There was no evidence of that presented. A lot of hearsay was presented without cooberating evidence.

This only means you were either not watching the hearing or you lacked the ability to comprehend it. They literally replayed audio of police communication from Capitol Grounds proving weapons were spotted.
 
Now we know, a) members of that mob were armed; and b) Trump knew members of that mob were armed; and c) Trump summoned them to the Capitol.

Hutchinson also demolished the oft-used assertion that it was just a 'spontaneous' march to the Capitol, that it was an unplanned attack, a 'protest that got outta hand', yadda, yadda, yadda.

Hutchinson told us it was none of those things.
Meadows, Trump, Giuliani, et al, were well aware at least days in advance that there was an intention, and there were firearms, that Oathkeepers and Proud Boys were in the mix to some end.

As such, we can only hope and pray that credible testimony emerges that makes the link between Trump's inner circle.....and some one within those violent organizations who played such a leading role in effecting the actual breach of the building.
 
The Republicans and Trump had their chance to put loyal Trump lickspittles on the committee. They chose not to.

And now they have the audacity to whine about no loyalists being on the committee!

Only the dumbest of tards like yourself is drinking their piss.
The dismissals would make a wee bit more sense if there weren't a parade of Republicans and Trump appointees talking up there.

And still, it's all fake news. All the witnesses are lying. These folks don't believe a word. And I believe them. They're serious. That's the nature of a cult.
 
It will happen but not by the Select Committee nor Grand Juries; both are investigative.

When indictments are issued, and a jury becomes the trier of facts, during the trial you will get what you want. In fact, more:
  1. Direct Examination
  2. Cross Examination
  3. Redirect
  4. Recross.
A "fact-finding" committee is supposed to operate under legal rules of evidence... This is nothing more than a giant cluster fuck witch trial.
 
There was no evidence of that presented. A lot of hearsay was presented without cooberating evidence.
How...ironic.

Trump broadcasts a Big Lie to this day, and you whine about a lack of corroborating evidence at the hearing? Trump has ZERO evidence for his lies.

BWA-HA-HA-HA-HA-HA!

There has been a MOUNTAIN of evidence at the hearings. Maybe you should stop guzzling the piss your propagandists are feeding you and see for yourself.
 
LOL

No, the bombshell was learning there were armed people in that crowd ... that Trump knew there were armed people in that crowd ... that Trump wanted them let into the Ellipse without having their weapons confiscated because he knew they weren't coming after him ... and that he then summoned them to the Capitol.
That was hearsay. She wasn't in the care with him at the time.
 
Trump was told before he began his speech that there were armed people arriving for his speech. The committee then played the Capitol Police transmissions stating they were finding all manner of arms on the attendees.

Trump then asked for the magnetometers which scanned for weapons and which kept the armed attendees from getting too close be disabled. He stated they were not there to hurt him.

Meaning he knew those people were armed for the march on the Capitol.

And no one has been prohibited from testifying, dipshit. Though some Trump lickspittles have REFUSED to tesify.

All caught up now, idiot?

LOL

Cracks me up that these idiots didn't watch the hearing but now talk about what they didn't see.

:lmao:
 

Forum List

Back
Top