Weatherman2020
Diamond Member
Clown show has the SS scheduled to testify before I heard from a friends uncle about something he heard from a neighbor?Those directly involved are welcome to testify under oath
Hutchinson did, why won’t they?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Clown show has the SS scheduled to testify before I heard from a friends uncle about something he heard from a neighbor?Those directly involved are welcome to testify under oath
Hutchinson did, why won’t they?
Guns legally inside of locked cars make you piddle your pants?As was reported yesterday, there were arms confiscated including AR15s and Glocks
Trump was informed many of his people were armed and couldn’t witness his speech. He said let them to the Capitol anyway and sent them to get Mike Pence and Congress
Yeah uh huh.Good to hear
Now they can be asked to testify exactly what Trump said and did.
You are just making shit upGuns legally inside of locked cars make you piddle your pants?
Actually most of her testimony was from direct conversations with key staff and Trump himselfYeah uh huh.
The circus committee spent hours willing to listen to a "witness" with third-hand information - that they like. But are unwilling to hear, and never called to testify - the ACTUAL PEOPLE THERE.
And this is yet another example of why this is a banana republic clown show
There is a word for that... HEARSAY and not one lick of it is admissible in any court of law. The Jan 6 Committee was supposed to be a fact-finding committee and use rules of evidence. Pelosi ensured that did not happen. You idiot are spewing bull shit.. That is all you have. And its crumbling now...Actually most of her testimony was from direct conversations with key staff and Trump himself
Yes direct testimony that there were armed members of the crowd, that he sent the crowd to the Capital, and that he wanted to meet the crowd there. Whether he "grabbed for the wheel" is irrelevant.Actually most of her testimony was from direct conversations with key staff and Trump himself
Actually it's double hearsay. I heard it from someone who heard it from someone else who was told by another person ......Democrats relying on hearsay instead of those directly involved says everything.
Does anyone really believe Trump lunged from the rear of a limo to the front and grabbed the steering wheel? If people are going to invent stories, they should at least make them somewhat believableYes direct testimony that there were armed members of the crowd, that he sent the crowd to the Capital, and that he wanted to meet the crowd there. Whether he "grabbed for the wheel" is irrelevant.
No, I do not. Your questions are good questions. I hope that future testimony or revelations will show us the answers.
There was testimony that Gaetz's 'ask' was very very broad and going back many years.*
What is noteworthy for me though, is these requests were for 'pre-emptive' pardons. Not pardons after a conviction, or even an indictment. To me, that is a 'tell'. A signal that they strongly suspected that what they had done was a violation and could possibly catch up with them eventually. Ergo.....let's obtain a 'get-outta-jail' card now to keep in the safety-deposit box.... if that eventuality comes to pass.
I personally look at it as not foresight or wisdom.....but rather a tacit admission that they knew they had committed some bad juju and they were scrambling for self-preservation.
*CBS News on April 7, 2021 reported: "
Congressman Matt Gaetz, a close ally of former President Trump, asked the White House for a blanket preemptive pardon before Mr. Trump left office, two sources familiar with the situation confirm to CBS News.
One of the sources said Gaetz asked for the blanket preemptive pardon for both himself and other congressional allies. The source noted that Gaetz and a few others couched the request broadly, implying that anyone close to Mr. Trump should receive a preemptive pardon...."
They should. At the very least, if those agents make a public statement disputing her account, the 1/6 committee should address that so that it's on the public record.
That aside, you lied. You falsely claimed she lied but you have no proof Tony Ornato didn't tell her what she claimed he told her.
Does anyone really believe Trump lunged from the rear of a limo to the front and grabbed the steering wheel? If people are going to invent stories, they should at least make them somewhat believable
Its irrelevant. A story she relayed that makes the papers. Again this is the real bombshell:Does anyone really believe Trump lunged from the rear of a limo to the front and grabbed the steering wheel? If people are going to invent stories, they should at least make them somewhat believable
There is a word for that... HEARSAY and not one lick of it is admissible in any court of law. The Jan 6 Committee was supposed to be a fact-finding committee and use rules of evidence. Pelosi ensured that did not happen. You idiot are spewing bull shit.. That is all you have. And its crumbling now...
Why dont you want Ray Epps to testify? He is on video inciting the insurrection.
He already did. What a pity you don't pay attention to real news.
Conservatives deny that he attempted to grab the wheelWhether he "grabbed for the wheel" is irrelevant.
Show us YOUR proof she didn't know what she said was a lie.
See how that works when you are dealing with hearsay?