shockedcanadian
Diamond Member
- Aug 6, 2012
- 30,008
- 27,269
- 2,905
There is an important underlying motive for conservatives not to admit that Trump won because he won so much more of the labor/union vote than previous Republican candidates.
To admit that would be to admit that the conservatives' most sacred view - that presidential candidates need to move to the right to do better -
was thoroughly trashed by Trump. He moved LEFT, not right.
Well I would say this, he redefined left and right and in particular, what it means to be GOP. He basically told the country and GOP, "it's ok to bend on some of the smaller issues that really noone cares about (except special interest groups and lobbyists) if it will address the pressing concerns of Americans and voters." Furthermore, an honest an objective view of what ails Americans is a winning formula, not some fool with deep pockets who will donate to push a cause that is a loser.
So, he was able to take on NAFTA, TPP, illegal immigration, self serving climate "agreements", abuses against honest police, abuses against the military, assault against free speech and religion. You could go on and on. In the end, Trump was not ideologically rigid, which is what most sane citizens not in the back pocket of a lobbyist are.
He has certain core beliefs such as support for the Constitution, respect for tax payers money, law and order at the border and support for the military, but all other issues he will listen and make a decision as a businessman will. This impacts only those entrenched and established, everyone knows who these politicians are anyways, it will not impact the voters, in fact, it will strengthen them.
I think his approach gained some fans with people like Rand Paul, who is in his own way an outsider. Rand is principled enough to realize that he and Trump may differ on many issues, but Trumps minimalist, laissez-faire approach to government is a huge winner for America and libertarians. Paul showed himself to be pragmatic enough to realize that because of this he can strongly support Trump on many issues, try and influence on others. Since Rand Paul and he are far more alike in their thinking process than others believe, they will come together on ideas. Notice how Paul eventually supported Trumps health plan? Pragmatic.
Rand Paul is used as an example as I am a supporter of his and I specifically recall he was NOT critical of Trump through the General Election process on many of the controversies, while others jumped ship at the first chance they got. This was a signal to Paul supporters, "vote Trump, he is not an establishment guy and will shake things up". Notice how some took a different approach after the Access Hollywood set-up/leak? Some even went so far as to privately tell him to withdraw his candidacy.
I admit that often the way he delivers his message leaves something to be desired, but it's also unapologetic at a period in time in which Americans are tired of being exploited and apologising.
Last edited: