That Bright, Dying Star, the WASP

[flacaltenn]

Here --- try this next time....

 

[NLT]

Keep wishing. Our genes are stronger and overwrite yours weaksauce. We were here first and we will be the last ones standing.

Yea you Africans have shown the world so much knowledge and enlightment. You were the first to sell you fellow africans into slavery and still are today slavers.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/worldviews/files/2013/10/slavery-per-capita-map-wo-arrows.jpg

Sorry bud. White people invented slavery. Where do you think the word came from? The Slavs were the original slaves.

You're an idiot

Evidence of slavery predates written records, the practice of slavery would have proliferated after the development of agriculture during the Neolithic Revolution about 11,000 years ago.

Slavery was known in civilizations as old as Sumer, as well as almost every other ancient civilization, including Ancient Egypt, Ancient China, the Akkadian Empire, Assyria, Ancient India, Ancient Greece, the Roman Empire, the Islamic Caliphate, and the pre-Columbian civilizations of the Americas.[9] Such institutions were a mixture of debt-slavery, punishment for crime, the enslavement of prisoners of war, child abandonment, and the birth of slave children to slaves.[10]

 

[Asclepias]

Yea you Africans have shown the world so much knowledge and enlightment. You were the first to sell you fellow africans into slavery and still are today slavers.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/worldviews/files/2013/10/slavery-per-capita-map-wo-arrows.jpg

Sorry bud. White people invented slavery. Where do you think the word came from? The Slavs were the original slaves.

You're an idiot

Evidence of slavery predates written records, the practice of slavery would have proliferated after the development of agriculture during the Neolithic Revolution about 11,000 years ago.

Slavery was known in civilizations as old as Sumer, as well as almost every other ancient civilization, including Ancient Egypt, Ancient China, the Akkadian Empire, Assyria, Ancient India, Ancient Greece, the Roman Empire, the Islamic Caliphate, and the pre-Columbian civilizations of the Americas.[9] Such institutions were a mixture of debt-slavery, punishment for crime, the enslavement of prisoners of war, child abandonment, and the birth of slave children to slaves.[10]

You're a bigger idiot.

Word History: The derivation of the word slave encapsulates a bit of European history and explains why the two words slaves and Slavs are so similar; they are, in fact, historically identical.

Just because Europeans did not have a civilization prior to Greece doesn't mean they didn't practice slavery. They practiced cannibalism as well. I guess you are going to pretend they didnt do that either?

 

[holston]

The signs of conspiracy are always in the heads of the tin foil crowd.. It's part of the disease. And it causes you to HIDE your real OP until Page 2 when you hijack your own OP because no one would care to comment if you set this topic on Page 1..

Get treatment...

Sobran's --- The Jewish Establishment

In the early 1930s, Walter Duranty of the New York Times was in Moscow, covering Joe Stalin the way Joe Stalin wanted to be covered. To maintain favor and access, he expressly denied that there was famine in Ukraine even while millions of Ukrainian Christians were being starved into submission. For his work Duranty won the Pulitzer Prize for journalism.

To this day, the Times remains the most magisterial and respectable of American newspapers.

There you have an epitome of what is lamely called “media bias.” The Western supporters of Stalin haven’t just been excused; they have received the halo of victimhood for the campaign, in what liberals call the “McCarthy era,” to get them out of the government, the education system, and respectable society itself.

Not only persecution of Jews but any critical mention of Jewish power in the media and politics is roundly condemned as “anti-Semitism.” But there isn’t even a term of opprobrium for participation in the mass murders of Christians. Liberals still don’t censure the Communist attempt to extirpate Christianity from Soviet Russia and its empire, and for good reason — liberals themselves, particularly Jewish liberals, are still trying to uproot Christianity from America.

It’s permissible to discuss the power of every other group, from the Black Muslims to the Christian Right, but the much greater power of the Jewish Establishment is off-limits. That, in fact, is the chief measure of its power: its ability to impose its own taboos while tearing down the taboos of others — you might almost say its prerogative of offending. You can read articles in Jewish-controlled publications from the Times to Commentary blaming Christianity for the Holocaust or accusing Pope Pius XII of indifference to it, but don’t look for articles in any major publication that wants to stay in business examining the Jewish role in Communism and liberalism, however temperately.

Power openly acquired, openly exercised, and openly discussed is one thing. You may think organized labor or the Social Security lobby abuses its power, but you don’t jeopardize your career by saying so. But a kind of power that forbids its own public mention, like the Holy Name in the Old Testament, is another matter entirely.


The Jewish establishment, it hardly needs saying, is predominantly secularist and systematically anti-Christian. In fact, it is unified far more by its hostility to Christianity than by its support of Israel, on which it is somewhat divided. The more left-wing Jews are faintly critical of Israel, though never questioning its “right to exist” — that is, its right to exist on terms forbidden to any Christian country; that is, its right to deny rights to non-Jews.

A state that treated Jews as Israel treats gentiles would be condemned outright as Nazi-like. But Israel is called “democratic,” even “pluralistic.”

Jewish-owned publications like the Wall Street Journal, The New Republic, The Atlantic Monthly, U.S. News & World Report, the New York Post, and New York’s Daily News emit relentless pro-Israel propaganda; so do such pundits as William Safire, A.M. Rosenthal, Charles Krauthammer, Jeane Kirkpatrick, and George Will, to name a few.

That Israel’s journalistic partisans include so many gentiles — lapsed goyim, you might say — is one more sign of the Jewish establishment’s power. So is the fact that this fact isn’t mentioned in public (though it is hardly unnoticed in private.)

So is the fear of being called “anti-Semitic.” Nobody worries about being called “anti-Italian” or “anti-French” or “anti-Christian”; these aren’t words that launch avalanches of vituperation and make people afraid to do business with you.

It’s pointless to ask what “anti-Semitic” means. It means trouble. It’s an attack signal. The practical function of the word is not to define or distinguish things, but to conflate them indiscriminately — to equate the soberest criticism of Israel or Jewish power with the murderous hatred of Jews. And it works. Oh, how it works.

When Joe McCarthy accused people of being Communists, the charge was relatively precise. You knew what he meant. The accusation could be falsified. In fact the burden of proof was on the accuser: when McCarthy couldn’t make his loose charges stick, he was ruined. (Of course, McCarthy was hated less for his “loose” charges than for his accurate ones. His real offense was stigmatizing the Left.)

The opposite applies to charges of “anti-Semitism.” The word has no precise definition. An “anti-Semite” may or may not hate Jews. But he is certainly hated by Jews. There is no penalty for making the charge loosely; the accused has no way of falsifying the charge, since it isn’t defined.

When there are incentives to accuse but no penalties for slander, the result is predictable.

What is true of “anti-Semitism” is also true to a lesser degree of other bogus predicates like “racism,” “sexism,” and “homophobia.” Other minorities have seen and adopted the successful model of the Jewish establishment. And so our public tongue has become not only Jewish-oriented but more generally minority-oriented in its inhibitions.

The illusion that we enjoy free speech has been fostered by the breaking of Christian taboos, which has become not only safe but profitable. To violate minority taboos is “offensive” and “insensitive”; to violate Christian taboos — many of them shared by religious Jews — is to be “daring” and “irreverent.” (“Irreverence,” of course, has become good.)

Raymond Chandler once observed of them that they want to be Jews among themselves but resent being seen as Jews by gentiles. They want to pursue their own distinct interests while pretending that they have no such interests, using the charge of “anti-Semitism” as sword and shield. As Chandler put it, they are like a man who refuses to give his real name and address but insists on being invited to all the best parties. Unfortunately, it’s this third type that wields most of the power and skews the rules for gentiles. The columnist Richard Cohen cites an old maxim: “Dress British, think Yiddish.”

Americans ought to be free to discuss Jewish power and Jewish interests frankly, without being accused of denying the rights of Jews. That should go without saying. The truth is both otherwise and unmentionable.

 

[flacaltenn]

The signs of conspiracy are always in the heads of the tin foil crowd.. It's part of the disease. And it causes you to HIDE your real OP until Page 2 when you hijack your own OP because no one would care to comment if you set this topic on Page 1..

Get treatment...

Sobran's --- The Jewish Establishment

In the early 1930s, Walter Duranty of the New York Times was in Moscow, covering Joe Stalin the way Joe Stalin wanted to be covered. To maintain favor and access, he expressly denied that there was famine in Ukraine even while millions of Ukrainian Christians were being starved into submission. For his work Duranty won the Pulitzer Prize for journalism.

DAYUM you bigots gotta dig deep to validate your biases dontcha? It's a cluster-fuck of deviants offering mutual support and encouragement.. Funny to watch what kind of "authority" and knowledge all of your farting is based on...

Joseph Sobran: Far Worse than a Holocaust Skeptic | sans everything

As I’ve noted before, the death of a bigot presents a problem for obituary writers. Politeness dictates that we skimp over the misdeeds of the dead while honesty requires a fuller reckoning with the past.

Joseph Sobran, onetime National Review editor, died earlier this week. Outside the circles of the far right, Sobran was known, to the extent he’s known at all, as someone who made repeated statements about Jews that were so embarrassing that his mentor William F. Buckley had to upbraid Sobran in the pages of the magazine they both edited. Eventually, Buckley’s magazine severed its ties with Sobran over the Jewish question.

YEAH YEAH -- I know. You can't get a fair shake because Lenny and Moshe own the media.
So that's why you got your head in the lap of Sobran.. Keep digging.. You'll find SOME justification for what you do....

I trust Bill Buckley's judgement on crank bigots..

 

[holston]

DAYUM you bigots gotta dig deep to validate your biases dontcha? It's a cluster-fuck of deviants offering mutual support and encouragement.. Funny to watch what kind of "authority" and knowledge all of your farting is based on...

As I’ve noted before, the death of a bigot presents a problem for obituary writers. Politeness dictates that we skimp over the misdeeds of the dead while honesty requires a fuller reckoning with the past.

Joseph Sobran, onetime National Review editor, died earlier this week. Outside the circles of the far right, Sobran was known, to the extent he’s known at all, as someone who made repeated statements about Jews that were so embarrassing that his mentor William F. Buckley had to upbraid Sobran in the pages of the magazine they both edited. Eventually, Buckley’s magazine severed its ties with Sobran over the Jewish question.

YEAH YEAH -- I know. You can't get a fair shake because Lenny and Moshe own the media.
So that's why you got your head in the lap of Sobran.. Keep digging.. You'll find SOME justification for what you do....

I trust Bill Buckley's judgement on crank bigots..

My my, what a nasty disposition you have.


Truth About the Talmud: Judaism's Holiest Book

Jewish Deception and Dissimulation

The response of the orthodox rabbis to documentation regarding the racism and hatred in their sacred texts is simply to brazenly lie, in keeping with the Talmud's Baba Kamma 113a which states that Jews may use lies ("subterfuge") to circumvent a Gentile.

The Simon Wiesenthal Center, a multi-million dollar rabbinical propaganda center dispatched Rabbi Daniel Landes in 1995 to deny that the Talmud dehumanizes non-Jews. "This is utter rot," he said. His proof? Why, his word, of course.

Lying to "circumvent a Gentile" has a long patrimony in Judaism. Take for example the 13th century Talmud debate in Paris between Nicholas of Donin, a Jewish convert to Christianity, whom Hyam Maccoby admits had "a good knowledge of the Talmud" ( "The Jews on Trial," p. 26) and Rabbi Yehiel. Yehiel was not under threat of death, bodily injury, imprisonment or fine. Yet he brazenly lied during the course of the debate.

When asked by Donin whether there were attacks on Jesus in the Talmud, Yehiel denied that there were any. Donin, a Hebrew and Aramaic scholar, knew this to be false. Hyam Maccoby, a 20th century Jewish commentator on the debate, defends Rabbi Yehiel's lying in this way:

"The question may be asked, however, whether Yehiel really believed that Jesus was not mentioned in the Talmud, or whether he put this forward as an ingenious ploy in the desperate situation in which he found himself...It would certainly have been pardonable of the rabbi to attempt some condonation in which he did not fully believe, to prevent such tyrannical proceedings by one religious culture against another." ( Maccoby, "The Jews on Trial," p. 28).

This is how Jewish denial of the existence of hateful Talmud texts is justified to this day. A fanciful word for Jewish lying is conjured ("condonation") and deemed "pardonable," while any scrutiny of Jewish holy books by Christian investigators is characterized as a "tyrannical proceeding."

In 1994, Rabbi Tzvi Marx, director of Applied Education at the Shalom Hartman Institute in Jerusalem, made a remarkable admission concerning how Jewish rabbis in the past have issued two sets of texts: the authentic Talmudic texts with which they instruct their own youth in the Talmud schools (yeshiviot) and "censured and amended" versions which they disseminate to gullible non-Jews for public consumption.

Rabbi Marx states that in the version of Maimonides' teachings published for public consumption, Maimonides is made to say that whoever kills a human being transgresses the law.

But, Rabbi Marx points out "...this only reflects the censured and amended printed text, whereas the original manuscripts have it only as 'whoever kills an Israelite."(Tikkun: A Bi-Monthly Jewish Critique May-June, 1994).

The Jewish book, Hesronot Ha-shas ("that which is removed from the Talmud"), is important in this regard. (Cf. William Popper, The Censorship of Hebrew Books p. 59).

Hesronot Ha-shas was reprinted in 1989 by Sinai Publishing of Tel-Aviv. Hesronot Ha-shas is valuable because it lists both the original Talmud texts that were later changed or omitted, and the falsified texts cited for Gentile consumption as authentic.

Historian William Popper states: "It was not always that long passages...were censored...but often single words alone were omitted...Often, in these cases, another method of correction was used in place of omission--substitution." (Cf. William Popper, The Censorship of Hebrew Books pp. 58-59).

For example, the translators of the English Soncino version of the Talmud sometimes render the Hebrew word goyim (Gentiles) under any number of disguise words such as "heathen, Cuthean, Kushite, Egyptian, idolater" etc. But these are actually references to Gentiles (all non-Jews). Footnotes for certain passages in the Soncino Talmud translation state: "Cuthean (Samaritan) was here substituted for the original goy..."

The heirs of the Pharisees often deny the existence of the Talmud passages here cited, in order to brazenly claim that such passages are the "fabrications of anti-Semites."

In 1994, the 80 year old Lady Jane Birdwood was arrested and prosecuted in a criminal court in London, England for the "crime" of publishing in her pamphlet, The Longest Hatred, the truthful statement that the Talmud contains anti-Gentile and anti-Christian passages. (She was accused of violating the Public Order Act of 1986).

In the course of her Orwellian thought-crime trial, which was ignored by the U.S. media, a rabbi was called as a prosecution witness. The rabbi proceeded to flatly deny that the Talmud contained anti-Gentile or anti-Christian passages and on the basis of the rabbi's "prestige," this elderly and ailing woman was sentenced to three months in jail and fined the equivalent of $1,000.

 

[holston]

A Jewish journalist is not sincere about Jewish ownership of media | Mondoweiss

A Jewish journalist is not sincere about Jewish ownership of media

 

[guno]

Wow looks like the christian crackers are shitting their pants once again

 

[holston]

Jews DO control the media | Manny Friedman | Ops & Blogs | The Times of Israel

We Jews are a funny breed. We love to brag about every Jewish actor. Sometimes we even pretend an actor is Jewish just because we like him enough that we think he deserves to be on our team. We brag about Jewish authors, Jewish politicians, Jewish directors. Every time someone mentions any movie or book or piece of art, we inevitably say something like, “Did you know that he was Jewish?” That’s just how we roll.

We’re a driven group, and not just in regards to the art world. We have, for example, AIPAC, which was essentially constructed just to drive agenda in Washington DC. And it succeeds admirably. And we brag about it. Again, it’s just what we do.

But the funny part is when any anti-Semite or anti-Israel person starts to spout stuff like, “The Jews control the media!” and “The Jews control Washington!”

Suddenly we’re up in arms. We create huge campaigns to take these people down. We do what we can to put them out of work. We publish articles. We’ve created entire organizations that exist just to tell everyone that the Jews don’t control nothin’. No, we don’t control the media, we don’t have any more sway in DC than anyone else. No, no, no, we swear: We’re just like everybody else!

Does anyone else (who’s not a bigot) see the irony of this?

Let’s be honest with ourselves, here, fellow Jews. We do control the media.

 

[holston]

Wow looks like the christian crackers are shitting their pants once again

Sarah Palin's family is Jewish. This is one example of how grass roots movements get opted and derailed by Jewish interests.

Anytime there is a surge among the WASP crowd the Jews step in and start leading the parade. Before you know it, the thing has fizzled out or goes the way of the Paleo-Conservative.

Anytime anyone calls attention to this phenomenon they are assailed by nasty Hasbarats and Jewish Supremacists.

http://ts1.mm.bing.net/th?id=HN.608039727127855708&pid=15.1

 

[holston]

Jews DO control the media | Manny Friedman | Ops & Blogs | The Times of Israel

We’ve got so many dudes up in the executive offices in all the big movie production companies it’s almost obscene. Just about every movie or TV show, whether it be “Tropic Thunder” or “Curb Your Enthusiasm,” is rife with actors, directors, and writers who are Jewish. Did you know that all eight major film studios are run by Jews?

But that’s not all. We also control the ads that go on those TV shows.

And let’s not forget AIPAC, every anti-Semite’s favorite punching bag. We’re talking an organization that’s practically the equivalent of the Elders of Zion. I’ll never forget when I was involved in Israeli advocacy in college and being at one of the many AIPAC conventions. A man literally stood in front of us and told us that their whole goal was to only work with top-50 school graduate students because they would eventually be the people making changes in the government. Here I am, an idealistic little kid that goes to a bottom 50 school (ASU) who wants to do some grassroots advocacy, and these guys are literally talking about infiltrating the government. Intense.

But come on. We’re the ones who are bragging about this stuff all the time. Can’t we admit that we’re incredibly successful? Can’t we say it to the world?

I’ll give my theory for why Jews don’t want to talk about their control of the media.

First of all, as much as Jews like to admit that so many of them are successful, and that so many of them have accomplished so much, they hate to admit that it has to do with they’re being Jewish.

The truth is, the anti-Semites got it right. We Jews have something planted in each one of us that makes us completely different from every group in the world.

That’s why the Jews were enslaved in Egypt. We were too successful. Go look at the Torah — it’s right there. And we did it in Germany too.

I think that’s the real reason most Jews are so afraid to admit that there’s something inherently powerful and good about them. Not because they’re afraid of being special. But because they’re afraid of being responsible. It means that they’re suddenly culpable when they create dirty TV shows that sully the spiritual atmosphere of the world.

The time has come, though. We no longer have to change our names. We no longer have to blend in like chameleons. We own a whole freaking country.

 

[holston]

Wow looks like the christian crackers are shitting their pants once again

How Jews Control The American Media | Real Jew News

 

[Two Thumbs]

kagan is not qualified to lead a lemonaide stand let alone be a Judge

 

[flacaltenn]

DAYUM you bigots gotta dig deep to validate your biases dontcha? It's a cluster-fuck of deviants offering mutual support and encouragement.. Funny to watch what kind of "authority" and knowledge all of your farting is based on...

As I’ve noted before, the death of a bigot presents a problem for obituary writers. Politeness dictates that we skimp over the misdeeds of the dead while honesty requires a fuller reckoning with the past.

Joseph Sobran, onetime National Review editor, died earlier this week. Outside the circles of the far right, Sobran was known, to the extent he’s known at all, as someone who made repeated statements about Jews that were so embarrassing that his mentor William F. Buckley had to upbraid Sobran in the pages of the magazine they both edited. Eventually, Buckley’s magazine severed its ties with Sobran over the Jewish question.

YEAH YEAH -- I know. You can't get a fair shake because Lenny and Moshe own the media.
So that's why you got your head in the lap of Sobran.. Keep digging.. You'll find SOME justification for what you do....

I trust Bill Buckley's judgement on crank bigots..

My my, what a nasty disposition you have.


Truth About the Talmud: Judaism's Holiest Book

Jewish Deception and Dissimulation

The response of the orthodox rabbis to documentation regarding the racism and hatred in their sacred texts is simply to brazenly lie, in keeping with the Talmud's Baba Kamma 113a which states that Jews may use lies ("subterfuge") to circumvent a Gentile.

The Simon Wiesenthal Center, a multi-million dollar rabbinical propaganda center dispatched Rabbi Daniel Landes in 1995 to deny that the Talmud dehumanizes non-Jews. "This is utter rot," he said. His proof? Why, his word, of course.

Heck my disposition is just fine. I live in the real world. How u doin in that bunker bunky?
You really need to explain how intricate and contorted bashing of the Talmud has ANYTHING to do with the Decline of WASProtestant culture.. Seems like you have hijacked your own thread. OR MAYBE --- the OP and title were misleading.. Shameful to be deceptive like that --- dontcha think??

Seems like there's more to the story. As usual, you've scraped the sewers of knowledge for any shred of evidence to prove you are sane. But HECK -- let's go with a known crank and Holocaust denier's contorted opinions and see what the Biblical deal is with your "accusation" above..

Theft From Gentiles
Baba Kamma 113a

There are a number of important points in this passage. First, we see that stealing from a gentile is undeniably forbidden. The Talmud emphasizes this by explaining a difficult verse in Leviticus. As we have seen, this passage has been accepted throughout the post-Talmudic literature. Another important point is that annulling a loan from a gentile is permitted. Normally, a loan is witnessed and documented to make it legally effective. When this is not done, a Jew is still obligated to take pity on his lender despite the lack of legal proof. Even though the lender was careless and neglected to properly document his business dealing, a Jew must go beyond the letter of the law and have mercy on his hapless colleague. However, this brotherly act need only extend to this borrower's extended family. A Jew is only obligated to go beyond the letter of common business law for his Jewish brothers and cousins. Those who are not part of his extended family, part of his organic nation, are treated fairly and respectfully but do not receive the special treatment reserved for his family.

Going back to the prohibition of stealing from a gentile, there is a debate regarding this prohibition. Some scholars contend that this prohibition is biblical, as seems evident from the derivation from biblical verses [see Maimonides, Mishneh Torah, Hilchot Geneivah 1:1, 7:8, Hilchot Gezeilah 1:1; R. Yechezkel Landau, Noda BiYehudah I Y"D 81; R. Yom Tov Algazi, Hilchot Bechorot 2:17; R. Chaim of Volozhin, Responsa Chut Hameshulash, 14, 17; R. Ephraim Navon, Machaneh Ephraim, Hilchot Gezeilah, 3; R. Yair Bachrach, Chavot Yair, 79; R. Tzvi Ashkenazi, Chacham Tzvi, 26]. Others believe that theft from gentiles is biblically permitted but the rabbis, using their own authority, prohibited this act for all Jews [see Rashi, Sanhedrin 57a; R. Nissim of Gerona, Chiddushei HaRan, Sanhedrin 57a]. However that may be, we see that Jewish law clearly forbids stealing from anyone whether Jew or gentile.

Wow man -- were you LIED TO --- or what? It's not as simple as that guy told you. Seems like the Talmud -- which is like being forced to study the Constitutional Law of Romania, has a LOT of interpretation and frank discussion in it. Just like your normal Supreme Ct decisions. Yet -- your dealer of smut glossed RIGHT OVER all that -- didn't he?

Well lets' see who your are quoting...

Michael A. Hoffman II - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

He said that he learned from his maternal grandfather that elections in the United States were rigged by organized crime.[1] From this, Hoffman was said to have deduced that "[n]othing is at seems to be," which in turn led to a "life long vocation, researching the subterranean workings of the occult cryptocracy's orchestration of American history".[1] He has worked on the projects of neo-Nazi Tom Metzger and of the Holocaust deniers Willis Carto, David Irving, Ernst Zündel, and Herman Otten.[4] Moreover, he served as Assistant Director of the Institute for Historical Review.[5]

BUT WAIT YOU NOT ONLY GET A SUPER-STAR holocaust denier and history revisionist (read that crank whacko) BUT THERE'S MORE !!!!!

Hoffman is the author of Secret Societies and Psychological Warfare which outlines his conspiracy theory of a shadow government or "cryptocracy"[1] that gains power through manipulation of symbols and twilight language. Examples of such "psychodramas," in Hoffman's view, include Route 66 (which connects various centers of occult significance), and the Assassination of President John F. Kennedy, in which Hoffman sees ritualistic elements.[1] The theory of masonic symbolism in the assassination of President Kennedy was first articulated by James Shelby Downard, with whom Hoffman co-authored King/Kill-33 which became the inspiration for a song by Marilyn Manson[13]

In other words -- he is certifiably commitable -- just like many assassins and mass murderers.. Surprised he didn't do John Lennon .. So who ya gonna believe. The thousands of pages of Talmudic arguments -- or your guy?

Here's the problem.. There''s a lot of you.. CERTAINLY -- you could all get organized and go get a couple PhD in crank hating and write some Academic material that ISN"T found in the gutters of the Internet. Or maybe some artistic SkinHeads and Nazi wannabees could produce a major release film to make a case. Seems like your cult is lazy and unproductive. And just MAYBE -- your problem is NOT TALMUDIC writings, but the fact that you're wasting time and energy living in "revisionist" land..

 

[Impenitent]

If I was Empress I would crucify racists of every race and then have them burned. Their screams would be like music to my ears. That or I would turn them into human sacrifices during religious ceremonies.

You'd have to burn 80% of blacks! Blacks committ over twice as many interracial murders against whites. Vs the other way around....

You don't provide any supporting data, so I'll provide it:

" Only about 1 percent of African Americans — and no more than 2 percent of black males — will commit a violent crime in a given year;

* Even though there are more black-on-white interracial crimes than white-on-black interracial crimes, this fact is not evidence of anti-white racial targeting by black offenders. Rather, it is completely explained by two factors having nothing to do with anti-white bias: namely, the general differences in rates of criminal offending, and the rates at which whites and blacks encounter one another (and thus, have the opportunity to victimize one another). Once these two factors are “controlled for” in social science terms, the actual rates of black-on-white crime are lower than random chance would predict;

* No more than 0.7 percent (seven-tenths of one percent) of African Americans will commit a violent crime against a white person in a given year, and fewer than 0.3 (three-tenths of one percent) of whites will be victimized by a black person in a given year;

* Whites are 6 times as likely to be murdered by another white person as by a black person; and overall, the percentage of white Americans who will be murdered by a black offender in a given year is only 2/10,000ths of 1 percent (0.0002). This means that only 1 in every 500,000 white people will be murdered by a black person in a given year. Although the numbers of black-on-white homicides are higher than the reverse (447 to 218 in 2010), the 218 black victims of white murderers is actually a higher percentage of the black population interracially killed than the 447 white victims of black murderers as a percentage of the white population. In fact, any given black person is 2.75 times as likely to be murdered by a white person as any given white person is to be murdered by an African American."

Tim Wise » Race, Crime and Statistical Malpractice: How the Right Manipulates White Fear With Bogus Data - via The Watch Dog - Newsvine

 

[holston]

Heck my disposition is just fine. I live in the real world. How u doin in that bunker bunky?
You really need to explain how intricate and contorted bashing of the Talmud has ANYTHING to do with the Decline of WASProtestant culture.. Seems like you have hijacked your own thread. OR MAYBE --- the OP and title were misleading.. Shameful to be deceptive like that --- dontcha think??

Did you miss my post above which contained this link?

Jews DO control the media | Manny Friedman | Ops & Blogs | The Times of Israel

The "bashing of the Talmud" has nothing to do with ignorance of WASPs in allowing the US to be hijacked by Zionist Jewish Supremacists and their lackey's. But it has everything to do with the deceptive and usurious ways of the Jews.

Most people take their cues for what is socially acceptable standards of behavior from things like TV, movie, and advertisements. As we have seen, the Jews control these for the most part.

I am the first to condemn the WASP culture for allowing themselves to be made into Putzes and for serving as the Zionist Golem.

If WASP culture decides to sacrifice it's religious and cultural heritage on the alter of "G-d's Chosen" and sell their inheritance for a bowl of soup, then they deserve whatever their Jewish overlord's dish out to them.

I have argued long and hard for people, not just gentiles, to give the New Testament doctrines of Christ a thorough examination and seriously consider whether the censorship, abandonment, and ridicule which so many Jews would put to it is a good thing to accept from them.

In other words, if the US decides to go the way of the modern Pharisees and Saducees (Jewish atheists) it is selling it's soul cheap. If righteousness exalts a nation, then what does unrighteousness do?

Conducting illegal, unconstitutional, and immoral unjustified wars, sewing seeds of sedition in other countries for the sake of expanding Zionism is not what I call righteous behavior. Neither is giving aid to an Apartheid country which is operating an open air concentration camp and throwing people off their land.

The national sanctioning of homosexuality, which has been a major agenda of the Jewish lobby, while censoring New Testament teachings on the subject isn't either.

The "JUDEO" Zio xtian community ought to pay more deference to Christ than to the Jewish oligarchs who have bamboozled them into believing that we still live in an Old Testament era.

Because the majority of white non-Jews have been suckered into accepting the "free love", hate 'the establishment', anything goes drug culture which originated in the '60s, they have been suffering a gradual deterioration of mind and soul.
Jews were leading the way. The record industry, again, dominated by Jews, has been instrumental in setting the tenor.

Since people are more prone to follow trends, and conform to whatever the majority does, and since those things are derived from pop culture, and since pop culture is largely a product of media and advertising, one can say that those who are in charge of those outlets have a great influence over what becomes accepted in the general population.

Jewish psychologists, psychiatrists, social commentators, and other activists have churned out a great deal of literature which has promoted the destruction of the traditional family by encouraging women to hate men, wives to hate their husbands and children to turn against their parents. That was long before the current move to make sexual perversion not only an acceptable norm, but to FORCE the general population to accept it BY LAW.

I can produce lots of material evidence that demonstrates the tendency among Jews to attack WASP society on all these levels.

Pointing out the exceptions to the rule doesn't alter the general rule itself.


I haven't posted these things for your consumption. My intended audience are the White Anglo Saxon Protestants themselves. They need to be made aware of who the Pied Piper is who has been manipulating them via advertising and media indoctrination, and informed as to the direction in which they are being led.

If they continue in their sleep walk to deeper decadence, they will surely be led over the cliff to their destruction like the Lemmings in the old film.

Those JUDEO Zio xtians need to pay heed to the Old Testament stories about what happened to the ancient Israelites over and over again. If they are convinced that they must take their cues from the Jews and follow their instructions all the time in order to receive "blessings from G-d" , then they need to pay at least as much attention to the Old Testament contexts about which they were written.

Seems like there's more to the story. As usual, you've scraped the sewers of knowledge for any shred of evidence to prove you are sane. But HECK -- let's go with a known crank and Holocaust denier's contorted opinions and see what the Biblical deal is with your "accusation" above..

Whether I am sane or not is beside the point. You really are not qualified to say. At any rate those reading these words need to consider them on their own merit and decide for themselves whether they are true or to what extent, and not simply dismiss them based upon your spurious allegations.

Wow man -- were you LIED TO --- or what? It's not as simple as that guy told you. Seems like the Talmud -- which is like being forced to study the Constitutional Law of Romania, has a LOT of interpretation and frank discussion in it. Just like your normal Supreme Ct decisions. Yet -- your dealer of smut glossed RIGHT OVER all that -- didn't he?

Jews have been known to lie. In fact, practically everyone alive is probably guilty of lying about something at one time or another.
But the fact that the practice of lying is so widespread and has become so popular makes it no more desirable than it ever was.

Too many people seem to have lost site of the fact that to lie is not only destructive to those around them, but especially deleterious to the character of the one who tells them.

The accepted tradition of Kol Nidre by Jews should serve as a red flag to Christians and all people who believe that lying is unacceptable as to who they are dealing with.
This is only one of many points about Judaism with which their Zio ministers fail to inform them about the Jews they hold in such high esteem.
If these JUDEO xtians were as familiar with all the references to Jews in the New Testament as they ought to, they should know better. Instead they have grown more accustomed to looking at church services as something more akin to a shindig, an amateur hour, or a place for hob knobbing and amusement rather than a worship service.

If we all attempted to please God more than men a lot of these improprieties would fix themselves.

You're right about one thing though. This thread has nothing to do with Holocaust denial or Holocaust deniers. That's a different can of worms. One thing at a time shall we?

Well lets' see who your are quoting...

Michael A. Hoffman II - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

He said that he learned from his maternal grandfather that elections in the United States were rigged by organized crime.[1] From this, Hoffman was said to have deduced that "[n]othing is at seems to be," which in turn led to a "life long vocation, researching the subterranean workings of the occult cryptocracy's orchestration of American history".[1] He has worked on the projects of neo-Nazi Tom Metzger and of the Holocaust deniers Willis Carto, David Irving, Ernst Zündel, and Herman Otten.[4] Moreover, he served as Assistant Director of the Institute for Historical Review.[5]

Well, I can't say that I disagree entirely with the bold highlighted portions.
Take a look at how JFK got elected. I'm not saying anything about JFK's character one way or the other. But it is clear that his Daddy, who made a fortune bootlegging enlisted mob support to get JFK elected.
A lot of Jews have accused Richard Nixon of being elected the same way.
And then there is Al Gore and all the Democrats who say that Bush Jr stole the election.
What would you call that?

I think it is fair to say that there are quite a few things that are not what they appear to be. Many of them are made that way deliberately.

That's why it is important to have a free press which is unbiased, unlike the one we have now which is little more than Zionist propaganda and a tool used by Jewish Supremacists to mold public opinion and manipulate mass behavior.

BUT WAIT YOU NOT ONLY GET A SUPER-STAR holocaust denier and history revisionist (read that crank whacko) BUT THERE'S MORE !!!!!

Sounds like an infomercial.
"BUT WAIT, ....ORDER TODAY and WE'LL SEND YOU.... THAT's RIGHT.... TWO for the PRICE of ONE PLUS.... and FOR FREE!!"

Hoffman is the author of Secret Societies and Psychological Warfare which outlines his conspiracy theory of a shadow government or "cryptocracy"[1] that gains power through manipulation of symbols and twilight language. Examples of such "psychodramas," in Hoffman's view, include Route 66 (which connects various centers of occult significance), and the Assassination of President John F. Kennedy, in which Hoffman sees ritualistic elements.[1] The theory of masonic symbolism in the assassination of President Kennedy was first articulated by James Shelby Downard, with whom Hoffman co-authored King/Kill-33 which became the inspiration for a song by Marilyn Manson[13]

If a person could take the time and watch all the old programs from way back up until now, they could see the natural progression of political indoctrination that was occurring.
What appears to be intended as nothing but entertainment is not altogether that alone. The format of entertainment has long been used as a means of public indoctrination.
Advertisement works on the same principles. Only with the sit-coms and dramas, and etc the message is more social and political than commercial. Both are trying to sell you something.

As much as I liked the actor who played Todd on Route 66, the socio/political messages were apparent. Only at the time I watched them, I was too young to notice or even understand. Now I do. That's what concerns me about the young and pliable minds which are growing up now and how what they are viewing will mold their character and contribute to the decisions they make, including how they behave both publicly and privately.

Anyone who says that they are not or have not been influenced by TV or theater is either lying or fooling themselves. If this were not so, advertisers would not pay exorbitant amounts of money trying to package and present their products the way they do. A simple announcement and a plain wrapper and label would suffice.

In other words -- he is certifiably commitable -- just like many assassins and mass murderers.. Surprised he didn't do John Lennon .. So who ya gonna believe. The thousands of pages of Talmudic arguments -- or your guy?

I don't believe you have any more grasp of what "certifiable" means than I do.
I was a fan of John Lennon. But having matured somewhat since then, I have realized that John Lennon never walked on water as some would have had him do.

I do not believe that all the quotations that I have seen taken from the Talmud were fabricated. And there is only so much spin that a person can put on the amount of material available. Some of those statements would indeed require a great deal of "contortion" as you put it to render their meanings innocuous.

We have to remember that the Jews deny the account of the role of the Pharisees and Sanhedrin in the arrest and crucifixion of Christ. What Christian worth his salt would take the word of one of these modern day Pharisees over the attestations of the Apostles?

The central thrust of Judaism IS the DENIAL of Christ. It was then and it is now.

Here's the problem.. There''s a lot of you.. CERTAINLY -- you could all get organized and go get a couple PhD in crank hating and write some Academic material that ISN"T found in the gutters of the Internet. Or maybe some artistic SkinHeads and Nazi wannabees could produce a major release film to make a case. Seems like your cult is lazy and unproductive. And just MAYBE -- your problem is NOT TALMUDIC writings, but the fact that you're wasting time and energy living in "revisionist" land..

There may be such a thing as a "Skin Head" or some other kind of CULT. But I assure you, I am not a member of any of them. I have an aversion to cults, particularly those who would center around some charismatic leader or tend to twist the arms of it's members.
That's one reason I don't trust televangelists who are always hitting the audience up for money by making promises on behalf of God Almighty that they can't enforce. I do believe that those people will be judged according to their works and I wouldn't trade places with any of them.
But all the phonies in the world couldn't dissuade me from believing the things that Christ spoke of. As far from perfect as I may be, I have never been able to totally divest myself of that peculiar conviction, as hard as I've tried.

This is something that some "athiests" find hard to accept. Inasmuch as they may be honest in their inability to believe in such things as Christ's resurrection from the dead, it is equally impossible for me to sweep the whole matter under the rug and pretend that it doesn't exist.

It isn't that I wouldn't crave the kind of TOTAL ABSOLUTE PROOF that they would demand in order to have any conviction. I can't claim to "know" everything in that sense. As far as that goes I'm not sure that I understand what the nature of an ABSOLUTE PROOF would be.
What I CAN say is this. I have never been able to shed myself of the sneaking suspicion that Christ DID rise from the dead! I know it sounds to incredible to be true. But I keep coming back to it again and again, everyday, as much astonished by the proposition as the day before.

Where I can't achieve the type of faith which allows me to endure all manner of pain and aggravation without being reduced to swearing ugly things, neither can I shake the fear of judgement to the point that I don't turn it over in my mind with dread every time I muck up. I am not so free of the dread of God that I can permit myself to do just anything.

So I deliberately steer clear of people who would use coercion as a means of getting me to do anything. And I give a wide berth to anyone who doesn't seem to have a conscience.


Now, if you want, I can provide plenty of links to information which would corroborate the contentions I have made. But those things take time. I'm sorry I can't be more concise.

 

[Unkotare]

What a surprise that Holstein would find this thread and show his cowardly ass yet again...

 

[holston]

What a surprise that Holstein would find this thread and show his cowardly ass yet again...

It's my thread, DooDoo.

 

[Unkotare]

It's your serious mental and emotional problem, Holstein.

 

[flacaltenn]

All I get from that long response holsten is that you think MOST WASProtestants are weak minded people who's faith doesn't serve them well and are particularly susceptible to media and Hollywood. And you need an excuse for all that. And second, that you have conspiratorial views of most historical events BECAUSE you need to put a convienient wrapper on all your issues and problems.. Do I have that all correct??