usmbguest5318
Gold Member
Though I don't agree with that in form, I certainly agree with it in substance. I would agree in form but for there being a variety of highly plausible, as Mom called them, "i-reasons" why they have only "invective in lieu of argument": immaturity, ignorance, insipidity, indolence, and/or idiocy. That's just the five primary "i-reasons." There are others, but "intelligence" is not among them, for, as she often enough informed us, "if intelligence had anything to do with it, you'd have just kept your mouth shut."When you can't refute a post and offer nothing but invective in lieu of argument, the only logical conclusion is that you agree the other poster is dead on accurate but you're too frustrated to admit it out loud.