Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
which lawHe is obligated to follow the law
Laws allowing same sex marriagewhich lawHe is obligated to follow the law
But what does that have to do with this thread?Laws allowing same sex marriagewhich lawHe is obligated to follow the law
The Air Force allowed the man to follow his religious RIGHTS and found someone who agreed to sign the appreciation. No one was harmed and everyone is happy. You don't like that?Laws allowing same sex marriagewhich lawHe is obligated to follow the law
Laws allowing same sex marriagewhich lawHe is obligated to follow the law
No, this is stupid. This is not a good analogye to the marketplace. I rate this thread, "hot garbage".This is the way to handle these cases. If someone won't participate due to religious convictions, find someone who will. Live and let live.
Air Force clears colonel who refused to endorse same-sex spouse
The Air Force allowed the man to follow his religious RIGHTS and found someone who agreed to sign the appreciation. No one was harmed and everyone is happy. You don't like that?Laws allowing same sex marriagewhich lawHe is obligated to follow the law
All that matters is this Christian believes the Biblical definition of marriage, which is his Constitutional right.The Air Force allowed the man to follow his religious RIGHTS and found someone who agreed to sign the appreciation. No one was harmed and everyone is happy. You don't like that?Laws allowing same sex marriagewhich lawHe is obligated to follow the law
Was this certificate signed by someone who had authority to sign it and was the spouse appropriately honored? I found nothing in this article to suggest that this took place and the airman's spouse was not slighted.
Also, people need to spell out WHICH Christian sect/denomination this Bohannon follows. Otherwise it sounds like all Christians feel the same about this issue, which is a lie.
All that matters is this Christian believes the Biblical definition of marriage, which is his Constitutional right.The Air Force allowed the man to follow his religious RIGHTS and found someone who agreed to sign the appreciation. No one was harmed and everyone is happy. You don't like that?Laws allowing same sex marriagewhich lawHe is obligated to follow the law
Was this certificate signed by someone who had authority to sign it and was the spouse appropriately honored? I found nothing in this article to suggest that this took place and the airman's spouse was not slighted.
Also, people need to spell out WHICH Christian sect/denomination this Bohannon follows. Otherwise it sounds like all Christians feel the same about this issue, which is a lie.
I agree. Laws can be amended and changed. The way this was handled bother you?He is obligated to follow the law
Read the OPBut what does that have to do with this thread?Laws allowing same sex marriagewhich lawHe is obligated to follow the law
All that matters is this Christian believes the Biblical definition of marriage, which is his Constitutional right.The Air Force allowed the man to follow his religious RIGHTS and found someone who agreed to sign the appreciation. No one was harmed and everyone is happy. You don't like that?Laws allowing same sex marriagewhich law
Was this certificate signed by someone who had authority to sign it and was the spouse appropriately honored? I found nothing in this article to suggest that this took place and the airman's spouse was not slighted.
Also, people need to spell out WHICH Christian sect/denomination this Bohannon follows. Otherwise it sounds like all Christians feel the same about this issue, which is a lie.
No. That is definitely NOT all that matters. What matters EQUALLY is whether or not this airman and his husband received the honors due at this event.
The problem with you "Christian" types is that you think that you are the only ones who count and deserve special rules.
That said, to which sect/denomination does this guy belong? Not all Christians are into this sort of thing, and use of the generic term "Christian" makes it appear to the public that all adherents of the Christian faith would endorse this sort of behavior.
What I find most disturbing is that this guy was a commander and then general. Should we now worry that people placed in high-level vital military jobs will subordinate the conduct of their official duties to the dictates of whatever religion they happen to be? The idea that every service member has a Constitutional right to refuse to do something s/he doesn't want to do opens up a whole new can of worms.
And I remember the days that conscientious objects were jailed or forced to flee to Canadia, and this was back in the days when people were involuntarily conscripted. No one mollycoddled them.
Remember the Constitution and "free exercise thereof"?I agree. Laws can be amended and changed. The way this was handled bother you?He is obligated to follow the law
We do not operate the laws according to the bible, remember separation of church and state, the Col should of been suspended and fired.
Well, that's one narrow minded way of looking at it. The Air Force chose to not to punish the American citizen who is a Christian. No one got their rights trampled on. No one was forced to do something they didn't believe in. Once again a few posters here proved my point. It's not about rights. It's about forcing the Christian to submit. Go to hell.All that matters is this Christian believes the Biblical definition of marriage, which is his Constitutional right.The Air Force allowed the man to follow his religious RIGHTS and found someone who agreed to sign the appreciation. No one was harmed and everyone is happy. You don't like that?Laws allowing same sex marriage
Was this certificate signed by someone who had authority to sign it and was the spouse appropriately honored? I found nothing in this article to suggest that this took place and the airman's spouse was not slighted.
Also, people need to spell out WHICH Christian sect/denomination this Bohannon follows. Otherwise it sounds like all Christians feel the same about this issue, which is a lie.
No. That is definitely NOT all that matters. What matters EQUALLY is whether or not this airman and his husband received the honors due at this event.
The problem with you "Christian" types is that you think that you are the only ones who count and deserve special rules.
That said, to which sect/denomination does this guy belong? Not all Christians are into this sort of thing, and use of the generic term "Christian" makes it appear to the public that all adherents of the Christian faith would endorse this sort of behavior.
What I find most disturbing is that this guy was a commander and then general. Should we now worry that people placed in high-level vital military jobs will subordinate the conduct of their official duties to the dictates of whatever religion they happen to be? The idea that every service member has a Constitutional right to refuse to do something s/he doesn't want to do opens up a whole new can of worms.
And I remember the days that conscientious objects were jailed or forced to flee to Canadia, and this was back in the days when people were involuntarily conscripted. No one mollycoddled them.
This is a reason we can’t have these religious accommodation laws
It goes beyond participation in a wedding
Beyond refusal to provide anything that can be used in that wedding
Now, we have an Airforce official refusing to acknowledge the contributions and accomplishments of a person just because they are in a same sex marriage
Remember the Constitution and "free exercise thereof"?I agree. Laws can be amended and changed. The way this was handled bother you?He is obligated to follow the law
We do not operate the laws according to the bible, remember separation of church and state, the Col should of been suspended and fired.
