The blueprint for prosperity

[danielpalos]

read our Second Amendment; the People are the Militia when it is about the security of our free States.

No where in the 2nd Amendment does it state “the people are the militia”. It doesn’t even imply that. It clearly states that arms are a right and it belongs to the people.

Words matter. You lose.

Meaning matters. The security of a free State necessitates the collective action of the Militia.

Only the right wing, never gets it.

 

[P@triot]

Yes social-ism is a concept;

No, snowflake, socialism (not social-ism ) is not a “concept”. It is an economic system. A failed economic system. Just like all of your posts!

 

[P@triot]

Only the right wing, never gets it.

The king of the comma is at it again. No wonder you don’t grasp the U.S. constitution or basic economics. You can’t even grasp grammar.

Now I’m going to try that sentence again, as you:

The, king of, the comma is at, it again. No, wonder you don’t grasp the U.S., constitution or basic, economics. You can’t even grasp, grammar.

 

[P@triot]

read our Second Amendment; the People are the Militia when it is about the security of our free States.

No where in the 2nd Amendment does it state “the people are the militia”. It doesn’t even imply that. It clearly states that arms are a right and it belongs to the people.

Words matter. You lose.

Meaning matters.

Meaning does matter. And “the right of the people to keep and bear arms” means that the people (not some militia) have a right to keep and bear arms!

 

[danielpalos]

Yes social-ism is a concept;

No, snowflake, socialism (not social-ism ) is not a “concept”. It is an economic system. A failed economic system. Just like all of your posts!

social is the term.

 

[P@triot]

social is the term.

Stupidity is your hallmark.

 

[P@triot]

We have the blueprint for prosperity...

1. In 1774, colonial Americans had the highest standard of living on earth

According to historian Alice Hansen Jones, Americans at the end of the colonial era averaged an annual income of £13.85, which was the highest in the western world

2. The average tax rate in colonial America was between 1% and 1.5%

Colonial and Early Americans paid a very low tax rate, both by modern and contemporary standards. Just prior to the Revolution, Americans‘ tax rates stood at 1% -1.5%.

Low tax rates and the highest standard of living in the world (despite being a fledgling “nation”). It’s not a coincidence.

Ten Facts About the Early American Economy

 

[danielpalos]

social is the term.

Stupidity is your hallmark.

i know how to resort to dictionary definitions, too.

 

[danielpalos]

We have the blueprint for prosperity...

1. In 1774, colonial Americans had the highest standard of living on earth

According to historian Alice Hansen Jones, Americans at the end of the colonial era averaged an annual income of £13.85, which was the highest in the western world

2. The average tax rate in colonial America was between 1% and 1.5%

Colonial and Early Americans paid a very low tax rate, both by modern and contemporary standards. Just prior to the Revolution, Americans‘ tax rates stood at 1% -1.5%.

Low tax rates and the highest standard of living in the world (despite being a fledgling “nation”). It’s not a coincidence.

Ten Facts About the Early American Economy

it claims tax cut economics are worthless if they don't help our own manufacturing base restructure and retool to meet new market conditions.

 

[Cellblock2429]

An astounding 80% drop in food stamps recipients in just over one year, and a 114% increase in incomes. Who could possibly argue with these results?

/——/ who could argue with success? Any self respecting Commie Lib democRAT....that’s who.

 

[P@triot]

social is the term.

Stupidity is your hallmark.

i know how to resort to dictionary definitions, too.

Clearly you don’t.

 

[P@triot]

it claims tax cut economics are worthless if they don't help our own manufacturing base restructure and retool to meet new market conditions.

Which is what any tax cut would do. It leaves money where it belongs - in the pockets of the people and the businesses who earned it. That, in turn, allows those businesses to “restructure” and “retool” to “meet new market conditions”.

 

[danielpalos]

An astounding 80% drop in food stamps recipients in just over one year, and a 114% increase in incomes. Who could possibly argue with these results?

/——/ who could argue with success? Any self respecting Commie Lib democRAT....that’s who.

people who read charts instead of trade on news?

 

[danielpalos]

it claims tax cut economics are worthless if they don't help our own manufacturing base restructure and retool to meet new market conditions.

Which is what any tax cut would do. It leaves money where it belongs - in the pockets of the people and the businesses who earned it. That, in turn, allows those businesses to “restructure” and “retool” to “meet new market conditions”.

stock buy backs is not, retooling.

 

[Cellblock2429]

it claims tax cut economics are worthless if they don't help our own manufacturing base restructure and retool to meet new market conditions.

Which is what any tax cut would do. It leaves money where it belongs - in the pockets of the people and the businesses who earned it. That, in turn, allows those businesses to “restructure” and “retool” to “meet new market conditions”.

stock buy backs is not, retooling.

/——-/ Daniel thinks one size fits all is a solid business plan. After all that the only clothing she buys.

 

[danielpalos]

it claims tax cut economics are worthless if they don't help our own manufacturing base restructure and retool to meet new market conditions.

Which is what any tax cut would do. It leaves money where it belongs - in the pockets of the people and the businesses who earned it. That, in turn, allows those businesses to “restructure” and “retool” to “meet new market conditions”.

stock buy backs is not, retooling.

/——-/ Daniel thinks one size fits all is a solid business plan. After all that the only clothing she buys.

Standards for the Union not the profiteers.

 

[P@triot]

stock buy backs is not, retooling.

The, king of, the comma, strikes again.

For the love of all things holy and decent, will you please take a basic grammar course at your local community college?!?

 

[P@triot]

it claims tax cut economics are worthless if they don't help our own manufacturing base restructure and retool to meet new market conditions.

Which is what any tax cut would do. It leaves money where it belongs - in the pockets of the people and the businesses who earned it. That, in turn, allows those businesses to “restructure” and “retool” to “meet new market conditions”.

stock buy backs is not, retooling.

Actually, that’s exactly what it is.

 

[P@triot]

Standards for the Union not the profiteers.

The “union” is not authorized to create “standards” for private industry. Even though you wish otherwise, the fact is, businesses do not exist to serve the state.

 

[danielpalos]

stock buy backs is not, retooling.

The, king of, the comma, strikes again.

For the love of all things holy and decent, will you please take a basic grammar course at your local community college?!?

lol. focusing on grammar instead of a valid rebuttal is an ad hominem. fallacy is all the right wing has.