The Bolton Bombshell (from his book)

[Billy_Kinetta]

An investigation into Democrats involved in corruption with the former Ukraine government perhaps, for which Biden would have no immunity.

In a nutshell:

You have my allow evidence and witnesses into Trump's wrongdoing, unless an investigation is opened into someone else.

Because you don't care if Trump did anything wrong, regardless of witnesses or evidence.

And Barr can investigate any time he wants. Why hasn't he? Easy answer...

Please make sense so that I can respond.

Please read more slowly, with a friend, so you can understand.

"You have my allow evidence and witnesses ..."

Already edited, cackling goober...

This is better?

An investigation into Democrats involved in corruption with the former Ukraine government perhaps, for which Biden would have no immunity.

In a nutshell:

You have wouldn't allow evidence and witnesses

 

[Rye Catcher]

It seems Real Conservatives are coming to the defense of Bolton. Maybe the Faux Conservatives who are defending trump will wake up and smell the coffee, well, maybe one or two of them.

Winds of change have begun to blow, the one question will be if there are Republican Senators who took the oath seriously and will vote to convict Donald J. Trump and remove him from office.

For what? What crime wry? By the way....let Bolton be a witness, because I want to hear from Biden Jr and the whistleblower.
Bolton's book is no more than a red herring anyways.

Why do you want the WB to testify?

Whistleblower Protection Act (WPA)
The Whistleblower Protection Act (WPA) protects Federal employees and applicants for employment who lawfully disclose information they reasonably believe evidences:

• a violation of law, rule, or regulation;
• gross mismanagement;
• a gross waste of funds;
• an abuse of authority;
• or a substantial and specific danger to public health or safety.

Under the WPA, certain federal employees may not take or fail to take, or threaten to take or fail to take; any personnel action against an employee or applicant for employment because of the employee or applicant’s protected whistleblowing. See 5 U.S.C. § 2302(b)(8).

 

[jc456]

show me the transcript that says what bolton says.

Absolutely, will do. Once he testifies, I will forward it to you.

you have the transcript. It's part of the articles. where is the info from Bolton at? you're really not able to tie the transcript to what you think he wrote? too fking funny, you should go play with blocks, square block goes in the square hole remember.

 

[jc456]

It seems Real Conservatives are coming to the defense of Bolton. Maybe the Faux Conservatives who are defending trump will wake up and smell the coffee, well, maybe one or two of them.

Winds of change have begun to blow, the one question will be if there are Republican Senators who took the oath seriously and will vote to convict Donald J. Trump and remove him from office.

For what? What crime wry? By the way....let Bolton be a witness, because I want to hear from Biden Jr and the whistleblower.
Bolton's book is no more than a red herring anyways.

Why do you want the WB to testify?

Whistleblower Protection Act (WPA)
The Whistleblower Protection Act (WPA) protects Federal employees and applicants for employment who lawfully disclose information they reasonably believe evidences:

• a violation of law, rule, or regulation;
• gross mismanagement;
• a gross waste of funds;
• an abuse of authority;
• or a substantial and specific danger to public health or safety.

Under the WPA, certain federal employees may not take or fail to take, or threaten to take or fail to take; any personnel action against an employee or applicant for employment because of the employee or applicant’s protected whistleblowing. See 5 U.S.C. § 2302(b)(8).

why do you need any body else as a witness?

 

[Billy_Kinetta]

It seems Real Conservatives are coming to the defense of Bolton. Maybe the Faux Conservatives who are defending trump will wake up and smell the coffee, well, maybe one or two of them.

Winds of change have begun to blow, the one question will be if there are Republican Senators who took the oath seriously and will vote to convict Donald J. Trump and remove him from office.

For what? What crime wry? By the way....let Bolton be a witness, because I want to hear from Biden Jr and the whistleblower.
Bolton's book is no more than a red herring anyways.

Why do you want the WB to testify?

Whistleblower Protection Act (WPA)
The Whistleblower Protection Act (WPA) protects Federal employees and applicants for employment who lawfully disclose information they reasonably believe evidences:

• a violation of law, rule, or regulation;
• gross mismanagement;
• a gross waste of funds;
• an abuse of authority;
• or a substantial and specific danger to public health or safety.

Under the WPA, certain federal employees may not take or fail to take, or threaten to take or fail to take; any personnel action against an employee or applicant for employment because of the employee or applicant’s protected whistleblowing. See 5 U.S.C. § 2302(b)(8).

WPA does not render a whistleblower anonymous, but only protects from certain agency actions. Testifying before federal committees or Congress is not among them.

 

[Meister]

Whaaat? I think this takes the "Stupid Post Of The Day Award" Thanks for the humor

So can the president decide to investigate anyone for anything?

Obviously not.

Ha ha ha,

you are flailing all over the place....

You are ignoring my post that destroys the absurd Bolton narrative desperate Schiff is trying to float.

Post 1020 you have ignored from the previous page of this thread.

You are an embarrassment to the human race with your galaxy level severe stupidity and ignorance.

You’re afraid. I get it. Don’t want Bolton to testify because it might upset the little fantasy you’ve created.

Let him testify, then we get Biden Jr.

What do you expect Hunter Biden will be asked, and what do you expect he will say in response?

He will show that there was reason for concern over corruption. Hell, the Heinz kid distanced himself and his employer
from what Biden Jr. was doing and emailed the State Dept of his concerns, wry.

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

Do you have any reasonable evidence to open a investigation?

So the whistleblower and all the people from them down to Bolton are lying to sell books?

see what’s wrong with republican thinking? The scientists are lying not the oil companies and everyone trump hired is lying not trump.

how many trump supporters have you thrown under the bus? Bolton is no liberal. If he’s warning you about hitler don’t call him a liberal

gibberish ,, did you just say the whistle blower? Like he’s legit lol that’s funny.

Well all the other witnesses corroborate what the whistleblower said. That's 1.
Two, Trump played the tape/transcripts and it is clear the whistleblower was not lying
Bolton is confirming what the whistleblower is saying.

You've thrown everyone who has come forward under the bus.

Fox Hosts Turn On ‘Tool For The Left’ John Bolton Like Never Before

Tucker Carlson, Sean Hannity, Laura Ingraham, Lou Dobbs and others condemned President Donald Trump’s former national security adviser ― who was a paid Fox News contributor for 11 years until he joined Trump’s White House in 2018 ― over his forthcoming book that reportedly confirms the impeachment case against the president.

So Fox News loved this guy for 11 years. Shows you they have a credibility problem.

Bolton writes in “The Room Where It Happened” that Trump tied the release of congressionally approved military aid to Ukraine to the country’s announcement of an investigation into Joe Biden.

Fox Business Network host Lou Dobbs claimed Bolton “has been reduced to a tool for the radical Dims and the deep state.”


Holy shit! There is it. Anyone who speaks out against Trump is a "deep state" republican. LOL. Do you see? Your party is being run by criminals and they manipulate you with conspiracy theories, lies and fake news. God you guys are brainwashed.

Trump was asking about suspicious activity from Joe Biden .. if that’s against the law you are putting a lot of democrats in jail for doing the same investigations into trump, muller, schiff, nadler, Pelosi will all be impeached

Then why didn’t he ask the DoJ about it? He wanted to force Zelensky to announce an investigation. That’s not how our DoJ operates.

You have exactly zero evidence of that and lots of evidence that says it is simply a lie.

 

[Meister]

You do realize that the managers brought up Biden or Burisma in excess of 400 times during the proceedings, right?
That means that they both are open game.

False.

When the House managers gave you their presentation, when they submitted their brief, they repeatedly referenced Hunter Biden and Burisma. They spoke to you for over 21 hours, and they referenced Biden or Burisma over 400 times. And when they gave these presentations, they said there was nothing to see, it was a sham," Pam Bondi, a former Florida attorney general who is among the lawyers on the president's impeachment team, told senators Monday
Trump impeachment defense team turns attention to Bidens, Burisma

 

[Jitss617]

Because no one knows what your talking about, the aid went out, the Ukraine President has no idea what your talking about

Most of the aid went out. Some didn’t. The Ukrainians did know. We have lots of evidence. Your case is built on lies.

Trump claims aid and the investigation wasn’t linked. If Bolton testifies otherwise, it’ll continue to prove that Trump has been this whole time. That’s bad for the defense.

Trumps conversation still isn’t impeachable lol
And the aid went out. Gotta move on

Seems like an awfully strange thing to lie about then.

Awfully strange you think private conversations with his cabinet is impeachable lol

Ask Richard Nixon.

Talking about foreign aid? That’s what Richard Nixon did? Lol

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

Trump was asking about suspicious activity from Joe Biden .. if that’s against the law you are putting a lot of democrats in jail for doing the same investigations into trump, muller, schiff, nadler, Pelosi will all be impeached

Then why didn’t he ask the DoJ about it? He wanted to force Zelensky to announce an investigation. That’s not how our DoJ operates.

Who carEs how the doj operates ,, trump has always used a lawyer to investigate.. trump isn’t the swamp.. grow up

The DoJ would actually have a responsibility protect the rights of American citizens. Trump really didn’t want to bother with that.

WHO CARES! In 1776 we didn’t even have a doj,, we didn’t have osha, we investigated our selves.. you don’t like it move out

It ain’t 1776 champ. Trump didn’t want to involve the DoJ because they are accountable to the country. Rudy ain’t.

The DOJ is filled with Deep State Never Trumpers. That is why he didn't.

 

[colfax_m]

Then why didn’t he ask the DoJ about it? He wanted to force Zelensky to announce an investigation. That’s not how our DoJ operates.

Who carEs how the doj operates ,, trump has always used a lawyer to investigate.. trump isn’t the swamp.. grow up

The DoJ would actually have a responsibility protect the rights of American citizens. Trump really didn’t want to bother with that.

WHO CARES! In 1776 we didn’t even have a doj,, we didn’t have osha, we investigated our selves.. you don’t like it move out

It ain’t 1776 champ. Trump didn’t want to involve the DoJ because they are accountable to the country. Rudy ain’t.

The DOJ is filled with Deep State Never Trumpers. That is why he didn't.

Trump has appointed all of nearly all US federal attorneys in the DoJ.

 

[Rye Catcher]

It seems Real Conservatives are coming to the defense of Bolton. Maybe the Faux Conservatives who are defending trump will wake up and smell the coffee, well, maybe one or two of them.

Winds of change have begun to blow, the one question will be if there are Republican Senators who took the oath seriously and will vote to convict Donald J. Trump and remove him from office.

For what? What crime wry? By the way....let Bolton be a witness, because I want to hear from Biden Jr and the whistleblower.
Bolton's book is no more than a red herring anyways.

Why do you want the WB to testify?

Whistleblower Protection Act (WPA)
The Whistleblower Protection Act (WPA) protects Federal employees and applicants for employment who lawfully disclose information they reasonably believe evidences:

• a violation of law, rule, or regulation;
• gross mismanagement;
• a gross waste of funds;
• an abuse of authority;
• or a substantial and specific danger to public health or safety.

Under the WPA, certain federal employees may not take or fail to take, or threaten to take or fail to take; any personnel action against an employee or applicant for employment because of the employee or applicant’s protected whistleblowing. See 5 U.S.C. § 2302(b)(8).

WPA does not render a whistleblower anonymous, but only protects from certain agency actions. Testifying before federal committees or Congress is not among them.

Read the law before you post again:

5 U.S. Code § 2302 - Prohibited personnel practices

 

[colfax_m]

Most of the aid went out. Some didn’t. The Ukrainians did know. We have lots of evidence. Your case is built on lies.

Trump claims aid and the investigation wasn’t linked. If Bolton testifies otherwise, it’ll continue to prove that Trump has been this whole time. That’s bad for the defense.

Trumps conversation still isn’t impeachable lol
And the aid went out. Gotta move on

Seems like an awfully strange thing to lie about then.

Awfully strange you think private conversations with his cabinet is impeachable lol

Ask Richard Nixon.

Talking about foreign aid? That’s what Richard Nixon did? Lol

He was impeached based on “conversations”. Don’t be dense.

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

Who carEs how the doj operates ,, trump has always used a lawyer to investigate.. trump isn’t the swamp.. grow up

The DoJ would actually have a responsibility protect the rights of American citizens. Trump really didn’t want to bother with that.

WHO CARES! In 1776 we didn’t even have a doj,, we didn’t have osha, we investigated our selves.. you don’t like it move out

It ain’t 1776 champ. Trump didn’t want to involve the DoJ because they are accountable to the country. Rudy ain’t.

If you break the law you break the law.. it is 1776,, you will never change the bill of rights

You mean like due process? That was denied to Joe Biden.

What due process did Bolton not receive? You apparently don't know what that means because you were never in a high school civics class.

 

[Jitss617]

Who carEs how the doj operates ,, trump has always used a lawyer to investigate.. trump isn’t the swamp.. grow up

The DoJ would actually have a responsibility protect the rights of American citizens. Trump really didn’t want to bother with that.

WHO CARES! In 1776 we didn’t even have a doj,, we didn’t have osha, we investigated our selves.. you don’t like it move out

It ain’t 1776 champ. Trump didn’t want to involve the DoJ because they are accountable to the country. Rudy ain’t.

The DOJ is filled with Deep State Never Trumpers. That is why he didn't.

Trump has appointed all of nearly all US federal attorneys in the DoJ.

And his options were? People in the system already.. it’s why it’s the deep state

 

[colfax_m]

So the whistleblower and all the people from them down to Bolton are lying to sell books?

see what’s wrong with republican thinking? The scientists are lying not the oil companies and everyone trump hired is lying not trump.

how many trump supporters have you thrown under the bus? Bolton is no liberal. If he’s warning you about hitler don’t call him a liberal

gibberish ,, did you just say the whistle blower? Like he’s legit lol that’s funny.

Well all the other witnesses corroborate what the whistleblower said. That's 1.
Two, Trump played the tape/transcripts and it is clear the whistleblower was not lying
Bolton is confirming what the whistleblower is saying.

You've thrown everyone who has come forward under the bus.

Fox Hosts Turn On ‘Tool For The Left’ John Bolton Like Never Before

Tucker Carlson, Sean Hannity, Laura Ingraham, Lou Dobbs and others condemned President Donald Trump’s former national security adviser ― who was a paid Fox News contributor for 11 years until he joined Trump’s White House in 2018 ― over his forthcoming book that reportedly confirms the impeachment case against the president.

So Fox News loved this guy for 11 years. Shows you they have a credibility problem.

Bolton writes in “The Room Where It Happened” that Trump tied the release of congressionally approved military aid to Ukraine to the country’s announcement of an investigation into Joe Biden.

Fox Business Network host Lou Dobbs claimed Bolton “has been reduced to a tool for the radical Dims and the deep state.”


Holy shit! There is it. Anyone who speaks out against Trump is a "deep state" republican. LOL. Do you see? Your party is being run by criminals and they manipulate you with conspiracy theories, lies and fake news. God you guys are brainwashed.

Trump was asking about suspicious activity from Joe Biden .. if that’s against the law you are putting a lot of democrats in jail for doing the same investigations into trump, muller, schiff, nadler, Pelosi will all be impeached

Then why didn’t he ask the DoJ about it? He wanted to force Zelensky to announce an investigation. That’s not how our DoJ operates.

You have exactly zero evidence of that and lots of evidence that says it is simply a lie.

It was all over the testimony. Where’s the evidence that it is a lie?

 

[Jitss617]

Trumps conversation still isn’t impeachable lol
And the aid went out. Gotta move on

Seems like an awfully strange thing to lie about then.

Awfully strange you think private conversations with his cabinet is impeachable lol

Ask Richard Nixon.

Talking about foreign aid? That’s what Richard Nixon did? Lol

He was impeached based on “conversations”. Don’t be dense.

Impeach means accused and he’s about to be Acquitted

 

[Meister]

It seems Real Conservatives are coming to the defense of Bolton. Maybe the Faux Conservatives who are defending trump will wake up and smell the coffee, well, maybe one or two of them.

Winds of change have begun to blow, the one question will be if there are Republican Senators who took the oath seriously and will vote to convict Donald J. Trump and remove him from office.

For what? What crime wry? By the way....let Bolton be a witness, because I want to hear from Biden Jr and the whistleblower.
Bolton's book is no more than a red herring anyways.

Why do you want the WB to testify?

Whistleblower Protection Act (WPA)
The Whistleblower Protection Act (WPA) protects Federal employees and applicants for employment who lawfully disclose information they reasonably believe evidences:

• a violation of law, rule, or regulation;
• gross mismanagement;
• a gross waste of funds;
• an abuse of authority;
• or a substantial and specific danger to public health or safety.

Under the WPA, certain federal employees may not take or fail to take, or threaten to take or fail to take; any personnel action against an employee or applicant for employment because of the employee or applicant’s protected whistleblowing. See 5 U.S.C. § 2302(b)(8).

WPA does not render a whistleblower anonymous, but only protects from certain agency actions. Testifying before federal committees or Congress is not among them.

Read the law before you post again:

5 U.S. Code § 2302 - Prohibited personnel practices

Wanna be a little more specific?

 

[colfax_m]

The DoJ would actually have a responsibility protect the rights of American citizens. Trump really didn’t want to bother with that.

WHO CARES! In 1776 we didn’t even have a doj,, we didn’t have osha, we investigated our selves.. you don’t like it move out

It ain’t 1776 champ. Trump didn’t want to involve the DoJ because they are accountable to the country. Rudy ain’t.

If you break the law you break the law.. it is 1776,, you will never change the bill of rights

You mean like due process? That was denied to Joe Biden.

What due process did Bolton not receive? You apparently don't know what that means because you were never in a high school civics class.

Biden, we are talking about Biden.

You can’t launch investigations into anyone for any reason. Doing so violates their rights.

 

[jc456]

It seems Real Conservatives are coming to the defense of Bolton. Maybe the Faux Conservatives who are defending trump will wake up and smell the coffee, well, maybe one or two of them.

Winds of change have begun to blow, the one question will be if there are Republican Senators who took the oath seriously and will vote to convict Donald J. Trump and remove him from office.

For what? What crime wry? By the way....let Bolton be a witness, because I want to hear from Biden Jr and the whistleblower.
Bolton's book is no more than a red herring anyways.

Why do you want the WB to testify?

Whistleblower Protection Act (WPA)
The Whistleblower Protection Act (WPA) protects Federal employees and applicants for employment who lawfully disclose information they reasonably believe evidences:

• a violation of law, rule, or regulation;
• gross mismanagement;
• a gross waste of funds;
• an abuse of authority;
• or a substantial and specific danger to public health or safety.

Under the WPA, certain federal employees may not take or fail to take, or threaten to take or fail to take; any personnel action against an employee or applicant for employment because of the employee or applicant’s protected whistleblowing. See 5 U.S.C. § 2302(b)(8).

WPA does not render a whistleblower anonymous, but only protects from certain agency actions. Testifying before federal committees or Congress is not among them.

Read the law before you post again:

5 U.S. Code § 2302 - Prohibited personnel practices

This subsection shall not be construed to authorize the withholding of information from Congress or the taking of any personnel action against an employee who discloses information to Congress. For purposes of paragraph (8), (i) any presumption relating to the performance of a duty by an employee whose conduct is the subject of a disclosure as defined under subsection (a)(2)(D) may be rebutted by substantial evidence, and (ii) a determination as to whether an employee or applicant reasonably believes that such employee or applicant has disclosed information that evidences any violation of law, rule, regulation, gross mismanagement, a gross waste of funds, an abuse of authority, or a substantial and specific danger to public health or safety shall be made by determining whether a disinterested observer with knowledge of the essential facts known to and readily ascertainable by the employee or applicant could reasonably conclude that the actions of the Government evidence such violations, mismanagement, waste, abuse, or danger.

What is it you think this says?