Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
How much oil are we importing from them?
about as much as we were before the invasion and occupation.
Company Level Imports
Truth. We're your number one and we don't behead you.
Our preferred method of torture is sending you Justin Beiber and Celine Dion.
Old, decaying cans of sarin buried and forgotten in the desert, are not WMD's.I knew we'd have one...
Please provide that proof of the WMDs that were found.
Thanks.
Perhaps I can assist ? See the 'Iraq WMD Declassified' link below >>
Iraq WMD Declassified
Yes - you'll see that this refers to FIVE HUNDRED of them.
Granted, what's referred to is NOT a stockpile of WMD's in pristine condition. But then, UN Resolution 1441 never insisted that they needed to be. Besides, even the WMD's found, had terrorists captured them instead, had significant terrorist potential.
In case you're wondering, this document became 'public knowledge' in the summer of 2006, courtesy of a press conference held by Rick Santorum (he was one of those on its distribution list, along with Nancy Pelosi, amongst others) - which, 'strangely', was NOT widely reported.
Fox News was one of the few exceptions. They kept a Web link to this same document accessible from their site, which is where I learned about it myself. To my knowledge, NO European media outlet reported on it AT ALL, amounting, surely, to a news blackout about it !!
With that same "logic" of yours, are you suggesting then that Bush 'n' Co. went to war in 2003 over some WMD's that were in use/used in the late 1980's?No it's not 'Nuff sed'. Use logic and tell me what caused the deaths of those Kurds?No, I'm not sure about that.Do you deny that Kurds were killed by the use of WND's in north Iraq on March 16, 1988?
But it's STAGGERING that you've gone back to the '80s in an attempt to obfuscate and excuse Bush and his Administration for their blunders and lies.
Nuff sed.
Moreover, that he was determined to use them.
We now know that was a blatant LIE.
Here's some of the gems that brought us to war with the wrong country for the wrong reasons. These are all quotes...
George Bush said:Saddam's removal is necessary to eradicate the threat from his weapons of mass destruction
Donald Rumsfeld said:Simply stated, there is no doubt that Saddam Hussein now has weapons of mass destruction.
Donald Rumsfeld said:We'll find them. It'll be a matter of time to do so.
George "aWol" Bush said:I'm absolutely sure that there are weapons of mass destruction there and the evidence will be forthcoming. We're just getting it just now.
With all that alleged certainty, you don't just NOT be able to prove it. They lied to us, and they lied repeatedly and for a singular purpose of getting the country in a frame of mind to go to war.
How do the Republicans of USMB reconcile this? What's your response?
Truth. We're your number one and we don't behead you.
Our preferred method of torture is sending you Justin Beiber and Celine Dion.
Stop it. Just stop it, Brian Adams was enough.....
A lot of American(s) companies are working very hard in Canada too.
We're setting her up to torture anyone who doesn't go along with the pipeline by making her Bieber #2. Go with the XL or not a moment's peace next year. 
..and he did have them. Google is you're friend.
. “At another location, we found barrels of chemical material that was intended for use as biochemical weapons. Everyone talks about there being no weapons of mass destruction in Iraq, but they seem to be referring to completed nuclear bombs, not the many deadly chemical weapons or precursors that Saddam had stockpiled.”
When was Bush ever dealt with?Well when you can't defend Obama go back to attacking Bush.
When did YOU ever hold Bush accountable for anything?
And what was the Raygun Administrations response to Iraq using them against Iran and the Kurds? Did he sanction them and halt their most favored trade status? No of course not. In fact they fought a Congressional sanction against Iraq.
got some bad news for ya-------Reagan is dead......Bush is no longer president
Whats happening now belongs to your hero, the kenyan messiah
This thread is not about Obama. Do you have a compulsive disorder?
Old, decaying cans of sarin buried and forgotten in the desert, are not WMD's.Perhaps I can assist ? See the 'Iraq WMD Declassified' link below >>
Iraq WMD Declassified
Yes - you'll see that this refers to FIVE HUNDRED of them.
Granted, what's referred to is NOT a stockpile of WMD's in pristine condition. But then, UN Resolution 1441 never insisted that they needed to be. Besides, even the WMD's found, had terrorists captured them instead, had significant terrorist potential.
In case you're wondering, this document became 'public knowledge' in the summer of 2006, courtesy of a press conference held by Rick Santorum (he was one of those on its distribution list, along with Nancy Pelosi, amongst others) - which, 'strangely', was NOT widely reported.
Fox News was one of the few exceptions. They kept a Web link to this same document accessible from their site, which is where I learned about it myself. To my knowledge, NO European media outlet reported on it AT ALL, amounting, surely, to a news blackout about it !!
Is that so ?
I can only suggest that you take that up with your OWN Intelligence authorities, then, because the document they produced makes it clear enough that they disagree. WMD's were looked for, and 'chemical munitions', i.e chemical WMD's, are what they found.
Why was that study, and that document, ever worked upon, then ? Why the effort expended ?
And, in your view, would it have been much better just to have kept silent about it all ?
Last but by no means least, how come, if this is all so 'questionable', that news of it wasn't far more widely disseminated ? After all, if it could be debunked to any extent, why wasn't that effort publicly and candidly made ?
Why such SILENCE instead ??
