the_human_being
Gold Member
- Sep 8, 2014
- 15,277
- 2,741
- 290
It's your link, How does Science PROVE the BibleThe first question in religious discussion remains: "Which God?"
The Cosmos could just as easily be evidence of a god as not.... but if God is, especially in light of this new evidence concerning our place in the universe and our point on The Timeline, doesn't it make sense that God's way bigger than the ancient stories of Monkeys from Earth?
First generation to let go of the past and put their faith instead in The Future and Monkey Spawn gets to watch their grandchildren explore the stars.IMore than happy to oblige: The Institute for Creation Research
Actually science Proves the Bible: How does Science PROVE the Bible
We can even prove the existence of God without using the Bible at all: Prove There Is a God - Even Without the Bible - Vertical Thought United Church of God
In your link, "How does Science PROVE the Bible" You claim that Genesis 7:11 is scientific proof of the Bible. The logic seems to be that Noah reported fountains in the ocean. We are to assume that these fountains are the result of Hydrothermal Vents on the ocean floor discovered by scientists in 1977. This proves nothing other than Noah saw what he believed to be a fountain of water in the ocean. Maybe it was cataracts since he was 600 years old Or maybe it was the result of Hydrothermal Vents or maybe it was just a whale spout. There is no way knowing what he saw, or even saw anything at all.More than happy to oblige: The Institute for Creation Research
Actually science Proves the Bible: How does Science PROVE the Bible
We can even prove the existence of God without using the Bible at all: Prove There Is a God - Even Without the Bible - Vertical Thought United Church of God
This is certainly good evidence as to why we should not consider the Bible a book of science. The Bible is a collection of 66 books written by 40 authors over 1500 years ago in 3 different language. Scholars can't agree on what the various verses mean so we have over 50 versions in English with varying interpretations. No one in his right mind can claim the Bible offers scientific proof of anything.
However, this does not alter in any way the religious significance and purpose of the Bible which has nothing to do with Science and everything to do with man's relationship to God.
Whatever pushes your button
Even the title is screwed up. It is text in the Bible that is being submitted as proof of something, not Science. The whole article is illogically.
Actually we don't have to prove anything. Your own evolutionist scientists have been caught in enough fraud to totally make any comment on evolution suspect.
Big Bang Theory Busted By 33 Top Scientists
33 vs. 30,000. You could find 33 nut job Christians in 1 state let alone 50.
Typical. You're like a cockroach discover when the light is turned on. Scurry!!