The definitive guide to the 2nd Amendment

[OODA_Loop]

why isn't it working now?

Liberal activist judges

Diversionary programs

Legislation focused on the inanimate object

 

[danielpalos]

why isn't it working now?

Liberal activist judges

Diversionary programs

Legislation focused on the inanimate object

conservatives passed, "three strikes" in California. Some possibly homeless guy "got the book thrown at him", for a one dollar slice of pizza.

 

[frigidweirdo]

Thank God for our right to keep and bear arms. This man is alive and well today because of it...



WATCH: Pawn Shop Owner Kills Armed Robbery Suspect

But how many aren't?

The US's murder rate is 5 times that of the UK and most other first world western countries.

So, this guy is alive, but five times more AREN'T.

 

[frigidweirdo]

why isn't it working now?

Liberal activist judges

Diversionary programs

Legislation focused on the inanimate object

Like we don't ban inanimate objects and you don't support that.

 

[P@triot]

We have a Second Amendment and should have, no security problems in our free States.

We have a 2nd Amendment. Unfortunately, the left violates it. They have created gun restrictions as far and wide as the eye can see.

When the 2nd Amendment is actually restored, we will have no “security problems” in our “free states”.

 

[P@triot]

The left’s favorite lie about firearms is that “an armed citizen has never prevented a mass shooting”. Well, that simply isn’t true. Many armed citizens have prevented many mass shootings. And it happened again this weekend.

An armed bystander with a concealed carry license shot a gunman who opened fire at a back-to-school event in Titusville, Florida, over the weekend.

Thank God for our right to keep and bear arms. Many lives were saved thanks to that common sense right.

Gunman opens fire at back-to-school event in Florida — then armed bystander steps in

 

[danielpalos]

We simply need more well regulated militia not more gun laws.

 

[P@triot]

We simply need more well regulated militia not more gun laws.

“Regulations” are just “laws” that were created illegally (ie sans Congress).

 

[danielpalos]

We simply need more well regulated militia not more gun laws.

“Regulations” are just “laws” that were created illegally (ie sans Congress).

Nope; well regulated militia are express declared Necessary, in our Second Amendment.

 

[P@triot]

We simply need more well regulated militia not more gun laws.

“Regulations” are just “laws” that were created illegally (ie sans Congress).

Nope; well regulated militia are express declared Necessary, in our Second Amendment.

....the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed. The right belongs to the people (not to any militia). Thanks for playing.

 

[danielpalos]

We simply need more well regulated militia not more gun laws.

“Regulations” are just “laws” that were created illegally (ie sans Congress).

Nope; well regulated militia are express declared Necessary, in our Second Amendment.

....the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed. The right belongs to the people (not to any militia). Thanks for playing.

lousy reading comprehension? The People are the Militia; that is the understanding for our Second Amendment. You are either, well regulated or unorganized. There is No recognition of the whole or entire concept of Natural Rights, in our Second Amendment.

 

[P@triot]

lousy reading comprehension?

Yes - you definitely have a reading comprehension problem. I have pointed that out on multiple occasions now.

The People are the Militia;

Not being a part of a militia does not cease to make one a person. This is proof that you have a reading comprehension issue. You’re not a member of a militia, but you are still a person.

 

[danielpalos]

lousy reading comprehension?

Yes - you definitely have a reading comprehension problem. I have pointed that out on multiple occasions now.

The People are the Militia;

Not being a part of a militia does not cease to make one a person. This is proof that you have a reading comprehension issue. You’re not a member of a militia, but you are still a person.

Just lousy right wing reading comprehension. The People are the Militia under the common law for the common defense.

 

[P@triot]

The People are the Militia under the common law for the common defense.

The 2nd Amendment mentions neither “common law” nor “common defense”. Please stop trying to discuss this material. You are way out of your depth here.

A person does not cease to be a person if they are not a member of a militia. You do not belong to a militia, but you are still a person.

 

[danielpalos]

The People are the Militia under the common law for the common defense.

The 2nd Amendment mentions neither “common law” nor “common defense”. Please stop trying to discuss this material. You are way out of your depth here.

A person does not cease to be a person if they are not a member of a militia. You do not belong to a militia, but you are still a person.

Yes, it does. The Common defense is not the general defense. The Common law is Common.

 

[hadit]

The People are the Militia under the common law for the common defense.

The 2nd Amendment mentions neither “common law” nor “common defense”. Please stop trying to discuss this material. You are way out of your depth here.

A person does not cease to be a person if they are not a member of a militia. You do not belong to a militia, but you are still a person. [emoji23]

Yes, it does. The Common defense is not the general defense. The Common law is Common.

And your cycle continues again. Each time, you repeat the same failed slogans, each time, you're shown to have no idea of what you're talking about, and each time you learn nothing.

 

[OODA_Loop]

Nope; well regulated militia are express declared Necessary, in our Second Amendment.

Not according to SCOTUS

 

[danielpalos]

The People are the Militia under the common law for the common defense.

The 2nd Amendment mentions neither “common law” nor “common defense”. Please stop trying to discuss this material. You are way out of your depth here.

A person does not cease to be a person if they are not a member of a militia. You do not belong to a militia, but you are still a person. [emoji23]

Yes, it does. The Common defense is not the general defense. The Common law is Common.

And your cycle continues again. Each time, you repeat the same failed slogans, each time, you're shown to have no idea of what you're talking about, and each time you learn nothing.

all Talk, and no argumentative action, right wingers. even women can do that.

 

[danielpalos]

Nope; well regulated militia are express declared Necessary, in our Second Amendment.

Not according to SCOTUS

Our Constitution is the supreme law of the land.

 

[hadit]

The People are the Militia under the common law for the common defense.

The 2nd Amendment mentions neither “common law” nor “common defense”. Please stop trying to discuss this material. You are way out of your depth here.

A person does not cease to be a person if they are not a member of a militia. You do not belong to a militia, but you are still a person. [emoji23]

Yes, it does. The Common defense is not the general defense. The Common law is Common.

And your cycle continues again. Each time, you repeat the same failed slogans, each time, you're shown to have no idea of what you're talking about, and each time you learn nothing.

all Talk, and no argumentative action, right wingers. even women can do that.

Wow, you even view women with contempt. Do you ever listen to yourself?

The operative word here is misogyny.