The Dems' Desperation To Rewrite History

[Dad2three]

Your request is granted:

Party switching in the United States - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia

ROFL

Which of those were Dixicrats, Comrade?

Dixiecrat - Senators
(D)VA Harry F. Byrd, 1933-1965
(D)VA A. Willis Robertson, 1946-1966
(D)WV Robert C. Byrd, 1959-2010
(D)MS John C. Stennis, 1947-1989
(D)MS James O. Eastland, 1941-1941,1943-1978
(D)LA Allen J. Ellender, 1937-1972
(D)LA Russell B. Long, 1948-1987
(D)NC Sam Ervin, 1954-1974
(D)NC Everett Jordan, 1958-1973
(R)NC Jesse Helms, 1973-2003
(D)OK Thomas Pryor Gore, 1906-1921,1931-1937
(D)AL J. Lister Hill, 1938-1969
(D)AL John J. Sparkman, 1946-1979
(D)FL Spessard Holland, 1946-1971
(D)FL George Smathers, 1951-1969
(D)SC Olin D. Johnston, 1945-1965
(D,R)SC Strom Thurmond, 1954-1956,1956-2003
(D)AR John McClellan, 1943-1977
(D)GA Richard B. Russell, Jr., 1933-1971
(D)GA Herman E. Talmadge, 1957-1981
(D)TN Herbert S. Walters, 1963-1964

Dixiecrat - State governors
(D)Benjamin Travis Laney, Arkansas Governor
(D)Fielding Wright, Mississippi Governor
(D)Frank M. Dixon, Former Alabama Governor
(D)William H. Murray, Former Oklahoma Governor
(D)Mills E. Godwin Jr. governor of Virginia

HINT: if it says (D) next to their name, they did NOT join the Republican Party.

Weird you can't accept the FACTS

Many white voters who initially cast Dixiecrat ballots gravitated back toward the Democratic Party only grudgingly, and they remained nominal Democrats at best. Ultimately, the Dixiecrat movement paved the way for the rise of the modern Republican Party in the South. Many former Dixiecrat supporters eventually became Republicans, as was highlighted by Strom Thurmond's conversion in the 1960s.

Dixiecrats New Georgia Encyclopedia

 

[Dad2three]

HONESTY ISN'T IN YOUR VOCABULARY I SEE

The term "Dixiecrat" is sometimes used by Northern Democrats to refer to conservative Southern Democrats from the 1940s to the 1990s, regardless of where they stood in 1948

Since the republican Party was founded as the anti-slavery party, Southern Democrats declared that they would rather vote for a “yellow dog” that vote for a Republican

Jesse Helms, He successfully advocated that conservative whites move to the Republican Party because the national Democratic party was too liberal for them.


They were actually called States Rights Democrats, most of them did move to the Republican party in the 50s and 60s.

They were Southerners who were Democrats before the 1964 Civil Rights Act.

Once President Johnson gave Civil Rights to the Blacks, they left the party and became Republicans.


Many white voters who initially cast Dixiecrat ballots gravitated back toward the Democratic Party only grudgingly, and they remained nominal Democrats at best. Ultimately, the Dixiecrat movement paved the way for the rise of the modern Republican Party in the South. Many former Dixiecrat supporters eventually became Republicans, as was highlighted by Strom Thurmond's conversion in the 1960s.

Dixiecrats New Georgia Encyclopedia

Um Stupidfuck?

I realize you never made it past 3rd grade, but Helms never held office until 73 - and was a Republican from the start.

After the war, he pursued his twin interests of journalism and Democratic Party politics

In 1950, Helms played a critical role as campaign publicity director for Willis Smith in the U.S. Senate campaign against a prominent liberal, Frank Porter Graham. Smith (a conservative Democratic lawyer and former president of the American Bar Association) portrayed Graham, who supported school desegregation, as a "dupe of communists" and a proponent of the "mingling of the races." Smith's fliers said, "Wake Up, White People," in the campaign for the virtually all-white primaries.

In 1957, Helms won his first election as a Democrat- for a Raleigh City Council seat; he served two terms and earned a reputation as a conservative gadfly who "fought against everything from putting a median strip on Downtown Boulevard to an urban renewal project". In 1960, Helms worked on the unsuccessful primary gubernatorial campaign of I. Beverly Lake, Sr., who ran on a platform of racial segregation.


Jesse Helms - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia


GROW A BRAIN

 

[Dad2three]

AND WHERE IS YOUR GRAPH FROM? WAS IT PEER REVIEWED? LOL

It's good that you're picking up lingo like "peer review" but now you need to understand what it means. Raw data doesn't need to undergo peer review. The data came from the US Dept. of Education's National Center for Educational Statistics. All those tests kids take in school, in every school in every state, get fed into this database. This isn't just 500 kids in a sample, it's the whole enchilada.

Got a link there Bubba, Or do I just take your word for it? I'm sure they just happened to make one with Texas, NY and Cali right? lol

I gave you the organization name. Its database is used by all manner of academics. Don't forget the national statistics are included alongside the Big 3 - NY, CA & TX - the 3 states with the largest populations and which drive much of education policy because of their influence on textbook content. Looking at Wyoming or Maine doesn't tell researchers much because they're very small states in terms of population and diversity. The meaningful action is found in CA, NY & TX.

Got it, no link. Just trust you. From CATO? AEI? Heritage? Or worse?

 

[georgephillip]

How do Cracker Libertarians explain why the number of racially liberal congressional Republicans declined by 75% during the same eight year span when the number of racially conservative Republicans in congress quintupled?

Hint: FDR had nothing to do with it.

McAdam is a partisan hack.

First thing you need to do is define what "racially conservative" even means? Opposed to institutional racism through Affirmative Action quota's? Opposed to a dependency strategy to buy votes with the public treasury?

Racial conservatives in this instance would refer to insecure whites with little impulse control who believed they were superior in every way to Blacks and therefore denied Blacks the rights of citizenship.

Sound like anyone you know?

 

[NYcarbineer]

Well, the Rabbi won't explain it, but I will.

Conservative segregationist Zell Miller, once a protege of Lester Maddox, is about the only Democrat that the Rabbi likes.

Do the math.

You lied about this before and I slapped you down, Zell Miller is a far left democrat.


{I know what Dan Quayle means when he says it's best for children to have two parents. You bet it is! And it would be nice for them to have trust funds, too. We can't all be born rich and handsome and lucky. And that's why we have a Democratic Party. My family would still be isolated and destitute if we had not had F.D.R.'s Democratic brand of government. I made it because Franklin Delano Roosevelt energized this nation. I made it because Harry Truman fought for working families like mine. I made it because John Kennedy's rising tide lifted even our tiny boat. I made it because Lyndon Johnson showed America that people who were born poor didn't have to die poor. And I made it because a man with whom I served in the Georgia Senate, a man named Jimmy Carter, brought honesty and decency and integrity to public service.[5]}

Zell Miller - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia

Zell Miller is a far left Democrat.

You'd better take that up with the Rabbi, because Zell Miller is one of the few Democrats that Rabbi is madly in love with.
lol

 

[NYcarbineer]

Because BushCo crashed the economy you Koch shill.

So Bush has been out of office for nearly 6 years and the economy is his fault.
Obama has been in office for nearly 6 years and the economy is not his fault.
Did you learn that at "Columbia"?? LOL!

Segregationist conservative Democrats have been out of office longer than that.
y.

No, Byrd died in 2010.
You're a total fail.

Was Byrd a segregationist till he died?

Was Zell Miller?

You tell us. Zell Miller is your kind of Democrat.

 

[NYcarbineer]

Why would any of you care what a political party used to be, when it's only relevant politically what that party is today?

 

[Political Junky]

“When Strom Thurmond ran for president, [as a segregationist in 1948] we voted for him. We’re proud of it. And if the rest of the country had followed our lead, we wouldn’t have had all these problems over the years, either” - Trent Lott, Proud GOP, Majority Leader, back, oh then...whistling Dixie...

Hmmmm...really...you are quoting something said at the old man's birthday party, off the cuff, without meaning...

Something modern conservatives need to learn...and burn into their brains for the coming fight against the lib/prog/democrat/socialist/statists....

Republicans play politics, they win some they lose some, they wait for the next election...the democrats fight complete and total political war to destroy their enemies and they take no prisoners...

Learn this or lose every election...

Run for President[edit]
Main article: United States presidential election, 1948
In 1948, President Harry S. Truman ordered the end of racial discrimination in the U.S. Army, proposed the creation of a permanent Fair Employment Practices Commission, supported the elimination of state poll taxes (which effectively discriminated against poor blacks and whites in voting), and supported drafting federal anti-lynching laws.

In response, Thurmond became a candidate for president on the third party ticket of theStates' Rights Democratic Party (also known as the Dixiecrats). It split from the national Democrats over the threat of federal intervention in state affairs regarding segregation andJim Crow. Thurmond's supporters took control of the Democratic Party in the Deep South, and Truman was not included on the presidential ballot. Thurmond carried four states and received 39 electoral votes, but Truman was reelected. In 1948, Thurmond said the following in a speech, when he was met with cheers by supporters: listen (help·info)

I wanna tell you, ladies and gentlemen, that there's not enough troops in the army to force the Southern people to break down segregation and admit the Nigra race into our theaters, into our swimming pools, into our homes, and into our churches.[6]
Strom Thurmond - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia

 

[Antares]

But I'm curious why Left States have the best education and the Right States have the lowest education.

Not so fast partner. Here's a data table I have on hand which shed some light on the issue. The big 3 State - Liberal California and New York versus Conservative Texas. Also included is the National mean. Notice the gap between the states for the category "all students" and then notice the gap between the states when the "all students" is disaggregated into race and gender categories.

A lot of those Red States are carrying a lot of baggage from under-performing black populations.

Look at Texas, for instance, in "all students" it is only 3 points above the national mean, however is 7 points above for white males, 5 points above for white females, 10 points above for black males, 8 points above for black females, 8 points above for Hispanic males, 11 points above for Hispanic females, 12 points above for Asian males, and 12 points above for Asian females.

All of that exemplary performance is swamped out by the high minority population in Texas.

Yes, red states suck and give prefertiantial treatment to whites, and?

Blue States are from Scandinavia, Red States are from Guatemala A theory of a divided nation


In the red states, government is cheaper, which means the people who live there pay lower taxes. But they also get a lot less in return. The unemployment checks run out more quickly and the schools generally aren’t as good. Assistance with health care, child care, and housing is skimpier, if it exists at all. The result of this divergence is that one half of the country looks more and more like Scandinavia, while the other increasingly resembles a social Darwinist’s paradise.



Blue States are from Scandinavia Red States are from Guatemala New Republic


AND WHERE IS YOUR GRAPH FROM? WAS IT PEER REVIEWED? LOL

"Peer reviewed" has simply come to mean 2 or more like minded simpletons jerking each other off.

You, like most Cali's simply suck up the Pelosi/Feinstein jizz and pretend to be "intellectual".

Sorry, you jumped in mid posting. The original poster blasted a NON peer reviewed study last night, then turned around and used part of it. Pretend to be intellectual? Oh I guess that's much better than pretending to love the Constitution as you tear it apart like conservatives do or hide behind the flag with 'patriotism of hate and misogyny like the right wingers!

NOBODY has torn apart the "Constitution" more than President "You have me" Barak Pigfucker Obama.

 

[Dad2three]

But I'm curious why Left States have the best education and the Right States have the lowest education.

Not so fast partner. Here's a data table I have on hand which shed some light on the issue. The big 3 State - Liberal California and New York versus Conservative Texas. Also included is the National mean. Notice the gap between the states for the category "all students" and then notice the gap between the states when the "all students" is disaggregated into race and gender categories.

A lot of those Red States are carrying a lot of baggage from under-performing black populations.

Look at Texas, for instance, in "all students" it is only 3 points above the national mean, however is 7 points above for white males, 5 points above for white females, 10 points above for black males, 8 points above for black females, 8 points above for Hispanic males, 11 points above for Hispanic females, 12 points above for Asian males, and 12 points above for Asian females.

All of that exemplary performance is swamped out by the high minority population in Texas.

Yes, red states suck and give prefertiantial treatment to whites, and?

Blue States are from Scandinavia, Red States are from Guatemala A theory of a divided nation


In the red states, government is cheaper, which means the people who live there pay lower taxes. But they also get a lot less in return. The unemployment checks run out more quickly and the schools generally aren’t as good. Assistance with health care, child care, and housing is skimpier, if it exists at all. The result of this divergence is that one half of the country looks more and more like Scandinavia, while the other increasingly resembles a social Darwinist’s paradise.



Blue States are from Scandinavia Red States are from Guatemala New Republic


AND WHERE IS YOUR GRAPH FROM? WAS IT PEER REVIEWED? LOL

"Peer reviewed" has simply come to mean 2 or more like minded simpletons jerking each other off.

You, like most Cali's simply suck up the Pelosi/Feinstein jizz and pretend to be "intellectual".

Sorry, you jumped in mid posting. The original poster blasted a NON peer reviewed study last night, then turned around and used part of it. Pretend to be intellectual? Oh I guess that's much better than pretending to love the Constitution as you tear it apart like conservatives do or hide behind the flag with 'patriotism of hate and misogyny like the right wingers!

NOBODY has torn apart the "Constitution" more than President "You have me" Barak Pigfucker Obama.

You'd think those GOPers could do something about it, weird

 

[NYcarbineer]

“When Strom Thurmond ran for president, [as a segregationist in 1948] we voted for him. We’re proud of it. And if the rest of the country had followed our lead, we wouldn’t have had all these problems over the years, either” - Trent Lott, Proud GOP, Majority Leader, back, oh then...whistling Dixie...

Hmmmm...really...you are quoting something said at the old man's birthday party, off the cuff, without meaning...

Something modern conservatives need to learn...and burn into their brains for the coming fight against the lib/prog/democrat/socialist/statists....

Republicans play politics, they win some they lose some, they wait for the next election...the democrats fight complete and total political war to destroy their enemies and they take no prisoners...

Learn this or lose every election...

Run for President[edit]
Main article: United States presidential election, 1948
In 1948, President Harry S. Truman ordered the end of racial discrimination in the U.S. Army, proposed the creation of a permanent Fair Employment Practices Commission, supported the elimination of state poll taxes (which effectively discriminated against poor blacks and whites in voting), and supported drafting federal anti-lynching laws.

In response, Thurmond became a candidate for president on the third party ticket of theStates' Rights Democratic Party (also known as the Dixiecrats). It split from the national Democrats over the threat of federal intervention in state affairs regarding segregation andJim Crow. Thurmond's supporters took control of the Democratic Party in the Deep South, and Truman was not included on the presidential ballot. Thurmond carried four states and received 39 electoral votes, but Truman was reelected. In 1948, Thurmond said the following in a speech, when he was met with cheers by supporters: listen (help·info)

I wanna tell you, ladies and gentlemen, that there's not enough troops in the army to force the Southern people to break down segregation and admit the Nigra race into our theaters, into our swimming pools, into our homes, and into our churches.[6]
Strom Thurmond - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia

And now the nuts on USMB are trying to portray Strom Thurmond as a liberal.

 

[Antares]

Not so fast partner. Here's a data table I have on hand which shed some light on the issue. The big 3 State - Liberal California and New York versus Conservative Texas. Also included is the National mean. Notice the gap between the states for the category "all students" and then notice the gap between the states when the "all students" is disaggregated into race and gender categories.

A lot of those Red States are carrying a lot of baggage from under-performing black populations.

Look at Texas, for instance, in "all students" it is only 3 points above the national mean, however is 7 points above for white males, 5 points above for white females, 10 points above for black males, 8 points above for black females, 8 points above for Hispanic males, 11 points above for Hispanic females, 12 points above for Asian males, and 12 points above for Asian females.

All of that exemplary performance is swamped out by the high minority population in Texas.

Yes, red states suck and give prefertiantial treatment to whites, and?

Blue States are from Scandinavia, Red States are from Guatemala A theory of a divided nation


In the red states, government is cheaper, which means the people who live there pay lower taxes. But they also get a lot less in return. The unemployment checks run out more quickly and the schools generally aren’t as good. Assistance with health care, child care, and housing is skimpier, if it exists at all. The result of this divergence is that one half of the country looks more and more like Scandinavia, while the other increasingly resembles a social Darwinist’s paradise.



Blue States are from Scandinavia Red States are from Guatemala New Republic


AND WHERE IS YOUR GRAPH FROM? WAS IT PEER REVIEWED? LOL

"Peer reviewed" has simply come to mean 2 or more like minded simpletons jerking each other off.

You, like most Cali's simply suck up the Pelosi/Feinstein jizz and pretend to be "intellectual".

Sorry, you jumped in mid posting. The original poster blasted a NON peer reviewed study last night, then turned around and used part of it. Pretend to be intellectual? Oh I guess that's much better than pretending to love the Constitution as you tear it apart like conservatives do or hide behind the flag with 'patriotism of hate and misogyny like the right wingers!

NOBODY has torn apart the "Constitution" more than President "You have me" Barak Pigfucker Obama.

You'd think those GOPers could do something about it, weird

No, most of us respect Democracy.
We will see how much your side does.
WE will have control of the House and Senate very soon.

Let's see how the Boi King acts....and what great things you have to say about "our side" for the next two years.

We are the "do nothing" Congress except that there are more than 300 Bills sitting on Harry's desk that he will NOT bring up for a vote.

 

[Dad2three]

Yes, red states suck and give prefertiantial treatment to whites, and?

Blue States are from Scandinavia, Red States are from Guatemala A theory of a divided nation


In the red states, government is cheaper, which means the people who live there pay lower taxes. But they also get a lot less in return. The unemployment checks run out more quickly and the schools generally aren’t as good. Assistance with health care, child care, and housing is skimpier, if it exists at all. The result of this divergence is that one half of the country looks more and more like Scandinavia, while the other increasingly resembles a social Darwinist’s paradise.



Blue States are from Scandinavia Red States are from Guatemala New Republic


AND WHERE IS YOUR GRAPH FROM? WAS IT PEER REVIEWED? LOL

"Peer reviewed" has simply come to mean 2 or more like minded simpletons jerking each other off.

You, like most Cali's simply suck up the Pelosi/Feinstein jizz and pretend to be "intellectual".

Sorry, you jumped in mid posting. The original poster blasted a NON peer reviewed study last night, then turned around and used part of it. Pretend to be intellectual? Oh I guess that's much better than pretending to love the Constitution as you tear it apart like conservatives do or hide behind the flag with 'patriotism of hate and misogyny like the right wingers!

NOBODY has torn apart the "Constitution" more than President "You have me" Barak Pigfucker Obama.

You'd think those GOPers could do something about it, weird

No, most of us respect Democracy.
We will see how much your side does.
WE will have control of the House and Senate very soon.

Let's see how the Boi King acts....and what great things you have to say about "our side" for the next two years.

We are the "do nothing" Congress except that there are more than 300 Bills sitting on Harry's desk that he will NOT bring up for a vote.

So IF the GOP wins the Senate, what changes? lol. The Dems need 60 to get ANYTHING passed, think the Dems will let the GOP run things without 60?

300 bills? Oh right MORE tax cuts for Corps and the 1%ers will move the economy, or getting rid of the EPA *shaking head*

 

[Antares]

"Peer reviewed" has simply come to mean 2 or more like minded simpletons jerking each other off.

You, like most Cali's simply suck up the Pelosi/Feinstein jizz and pretend to be "intellectual".

Sorry, you jumped in mid posting. The original poster blasted a NON peer reviewed study last night, then turned around and used part of it. Pretend to be intellectual? Oh I guess that's much better than pretending to love the Constitution as you tear it apart like conservatives do or hide behind the flag with 'patriotism of hate and misogyny like the right wingers!

NOBODY has torn apart the "Constitution" more than President "You have me" Barak Pigfucker Obama.

You'd think those GOPers could do something about it, weird

No, most of us respect Democracy.
We will see how much your side does.
WE will have control of the House and Senate very soon.

Let's see how the Boi King acts....and what great things you have to say about "our side" for the next two years.

We are the "do nothing" Congress except that there are more than 300 Bills sitting on Harry's desk that he will NOT bring up for a vote.

So IF the GOP wins the Senate, what changes? lol. The Dems need 60 to get ANYTHING passed, think the Dems will let the GOP run things without 60?

300 bills? Oh right MORE tax cuts for Corps and the 1%ers will move the economy, or getting rid of the EPA *shaking head*

Instead of showing your ignorance like the rest of these fools do some research.

Obama will be dead in the water as he should be.

 

[Dad2three]

Sorry, you jumped in mid posting. The original poster blasted a NON peer reviewed study last night, then turned around and used part of it. Pretend to be intellectual? Oh I guess that's much better than pretending to love the Constitution as you tear it apart like conservatives do or hide behind the flag with 'patriotism of hate and misogyny like the right wingers!

NOBODY has torn apart the "Constitution" more than President "You have me" Barak Pigfucker Obama.

You'd think those GOPers could do something about it, weird

No, most of us respect Democracy.
We will see how much your side does.
WE will have control of the House and Senate very soon.

Let's see how the Boi King acts....and what great things you have to say about "our side" for the next two years.

We are the "do nothing" Congress except that there are more than 300 Bills sitting on Harry's desk that he will NOT bring up for a vote.

So IF the GOP wins the Senate, what changes? lol. The Dems need 60 to get ANYTHING passed, think the Dems will let the GOP run things without 60?

300 bills? Oh right MORE tax cuts for Corps and the 1%ers will move the economy, or getting rid of the EPA *shaking head*

Instead of showing your ignorance like the rest of these fools do some research.

Obama will be dead in the water as he should be.

Moron, IF the GOP takes the Senate, NOTHING much will change. Judges are getting sitted and the GOP is doing EVERYTHING to STILL make him a one termer, lol


GOP needs to get 60 votes AND then override the Prez veto's, keep dreaming, NOTHING changes much!

 

[Antares]

NOBODY has torn apart the "Constitution" more than President "You have me" Barak Pigfucker Obama.

You'd think those GOPers could do something about it, weird

No, most of us respect Democracy.
We will see how much your side does.
WE will have control of the House and Senate very soon.

Let's see how the Boi King acts....and what great things you have to say about "our side" for the next two years.

We are the "do nothing" Congress except that there are more than 300 Bills sitting on Harry's desk that he will NOT bring up for a vote.

So IF the GOP wins the Senate, what changes? lol. The Dems need 60 to get ANYTHING passed, think the Dems will let the GOP run things without 60?

300 bills? Oh right MORE tax cuts for Corps and the 1%ers will move the economy, or getting rid of the EPA *shaking head*

Instead of showing your ignorance like the rest of these fools do some research.

Obama will be dead in the water as he should be.

Moron, IF the GOP takes the Senate, NOTHING much will change. Judges are getting sitted and the GOP is doing EVERYTHING to STILL make him a one termer, lol


GOP needs to get 60 votes AND then override the Prez veto's, keep dreaming, NOTHING changes much!

No sweat then pig fucker.

We'll see.

Wait until we make your children earn their keep.

Who will you cry to then?????
Nobody, you will have taught them to be takers like you.

 

[The Rabbi]

So Bush has been out of office for nearly 6 years and the economy is his fault.
Obama has been in office for nearly 6 years and the economy is not his fault.
Did you learn that at "Columbia"?? LOL!

Segregationist conservative Democrats have been out of office longer than that.
y.

No, Byrd died in 2010.
You're a total fail.

Was Byrd a segregationist till he died?

Was Zell Miller?

You tell us. Zell Miller is your kind of Democrat.

Really? WHo brought Zell Miller into this discussion?

 

[2aguy]

So IF the GOP wins the Senate, what changes?

Obama may not be able to stack the federal courts with anti American judges....and it may be harder for him to replace the next one or two Supreme court justices who may retire...

 

[Wry Catcher]

Weird how you don't recognize it was CONSERVATIVES who started the KKK and opposed freeing the slaves and civil rights as well as EVERY other policy that helped create US. Instead you prefer NOT to be honest and recognize the Dems/GOP switched several times the past 150 years!

Weird how you're such a fucking retard without even a 3rd grade education.

But it explains why you're a democrat.

Even an average third grader could respond rationally, two-year olds respond in the manner in which uncensored2008 most always does.

 

[Uncensored2008]

Zell Miller supported Dubya over Kerry in 2004 and endorsed segregation in two of his early political races, and, somehow, he's "a far left democrat"?

Do explain...

Zell Miller - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia

So miller was lying in his statement of adherence to the far left - only the hate sites can tell the real truth?