Paul Essien
Platinum Member
- Jun 9, 2017
- 5,654
- 2,985
- 970
- Banned
- #221
OJ Simpson was 100% innocent.The OJ trial was theater. In the grand scheme of things, it wasn't anything more than another negro killing an innocent white woman and an innocent white man...
When they asked the lead detective (Mark Fuhrman who was a racist) did he plant evidence, he say he pleads the 5th..That equals NOT GUILTY. What you fail to realize was the moment the LAPD broke the chain of blood evidence, that put doubt in the case. The job of the defense isn’t to prove innocence, but punch holes in the prosecution’s case. The LAPD is rotten to the core when it comes to setting black men up. Elmer Geronimo Pratt was in prison for nearly 30 years because the LAPD set him up.
But you believe OJ got up that day, put on a sweat suit with a skull cap and some bruno magi shoes, drove to his ex wife house and killed her and another person he didn't know would be there, and didn't get any bruises on his face or body, and caught a flight afterward ?
You can say they found blood DNA on OJ's property. But they fail to mention it all had EDTA in it.
EDTA is a chemical used in stored blood.
EDTA isn't found naturally in the body in significant quantities. The fact the blood samples had it proves blood was planted. To this day no one can explain how OJ's blood samples had all those EDTA chemicals in it.
![DFOZcePUAAEriZb.jpg](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DFOZcePUAAEriZb.jpg)
When they asked Mark Furhman if he planted the glove. He refused to answer the question on the grounds it might incriminate him.
OJ Simpson didn't kill anybody.
Mark Fuhrman wasn't just an average white supremacist (like you). He was a white extremist. These are Fuhrman words about planting evidence on blacks.
![DFOXcL6V0AA4JWp.jpg](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DFOXcL6V0AA4JWp.jpg)
This was the lead detective in the case in the OJ Simpson case