The Disreputable Robert Mueller

[PoliticalChic]

"Anger those who attempt to poison and destroy my brothers"

Amazing lack of self-realization you evince, eddie.....that means you Democrats lying about Trump for two years.



Tomorrow, the Mueller Report....but, don't worry.....grief councilors will be available.

I'm really surprised, not ,, that you and trumpettes wouldn't want to hear the truth and nothing but the truth Why keep protecting that evil vile putz in our WH?

"....wouldn't want to hear the truth..."


What are you talking about????


We heard the truth when Barr summarized Mueller's findings, and it's the very same truth we told you two years ago.


Got tissues and antacids ready???

You mean the trump butt kisser summarized ?? The trump moron said it exonerated him One more piece of bullshit out of the liars mouth

The vulgarity.

I really upset you, huh?


Save it for tomorrow when you're REALLY upset.

PC you are funny Gotta give credit where credit is due You can twist with the best of them ,,,could take Sarahs job protecting Trump

Psssst....just between the two of us....you know everything I post is 100% true, accurate and correct....don't you.

 

[edward37]

“while this report does not conclude that the President committed a crime, it also does not exonerate him”

Quit spinning moron, you'll make yourself dizzy. Here, let me explain it to you punkinhead, "IF YOU ARE NOT GUILTY OF A CRIME, WHY THAT MUST MEAN, YOU ARE INNOCENT." You do not need to exonerate an innocent man, duhhhh.

Mueller wanted to leave it in the hands of congress Barr f-ed that up Trump has the right kiss ass working for him

 

[PoliticalChic]

“while this report does not conclude that the President committed a crime, it also does not exonerate him”

Quit spinning moron, you'll make yourself dizzy. Here, let me explain it to you punkinhead, "IF YOU ARE NOT GUILTY OF A CRIME, WHY THAT MUST MEAN, YOU ARE INNOCENT." You do not need to exonerate an innocent man, duhhhh.

Mueller wanted to leave it in the hands of congress Barr f-ed that up Trump has the right kiss ass working for him

Sooooo......it you are correct about Trump, we can expect impeachment?


The Socialists.....er, Democrats, control the House....

Let's hear your prediction.

 

[playtime]

Since you seem incapable of following a link:
Donald Trump falsely tweets that Puerto Rico got $91 billion in hurricane aid
By Amy Sherman on Wednesday, April 3rd, 2019 at 5:35 p.m.

In this Jan. 31, 2018 file photo, Public Works Sub-Director Ramon Mendez, wearing a hard hat at left, works with municipal workers, as they install a new post to return electricity in El Ortiz sector of Coamo, Puerto Rico. (AP)
After Democrats and Republicans in the Senate failed to reach an agreement on disaster aid for Puerto Rico, President Donald Trump falsely tweeted about the amount of hurricane aid already distributed.

"Puerto Rico got 91 Billion Dollars for the hurricane, more money than has ever been gotten for a hurricane before, & all their local politicians do is complain & ask for more money. The pols are grossly incompetent, spend the money foolishly or corruptly, & only take from USA....," Trump tweeted April 2.

Then he praised his own leadership:

"....The best thing that ever happened to Puerto Rico is President Donald J. Trump. So many wonderful people, but with such bad Island leadership and with so much money wasted. Cannot continue to hurt our Farmers and States with these massive payments, and so little appreciation!"





We found that Trump is wrong about the dollar amount the territory has received and wrong when he said it was a record.

His comments about hurricane aid follow other misleading statements he made related to the 2017 hurricanes Irma and Maria in Puerto Rico. Trump mischaracterized the death toll saying the estimate was "done by Democrats," and he exaggerated the poor condition of Puerto Rico’s electrical grid before the hurricanes.

The future of aid to Puerto Rico is up in the air after the Senate failed to move forward on legislation. Both parties have pointed fingers at each other for not reaching an agreement after months of proposals.

While proposals from both parties have included $600 million for food assistance for Puerto Rico, Democrats want millions more for other needs in Puerto Rico including for the electrical grid, FEMA reimbursement and water projects.

Puerto Rico has not received $91 billion
The federal government’s recovery website shows shows $40.7 billion has been allocated (Congress appropriated the spending) through December 2018. Of that, $19.4 billion has been obligated (the government has promised to spend the money) and of that $11.2 billion has been spent. The money comes from various agencies and funds including FEMA, U.S. Housing and Urban Development, the Community Development Fund and the Disaster Relief Fund.

A senior administration official told PolitiFact that Trump arrived at the $91 billion figure by combining the roughly $41 billion already allocated with additional estimated future FEMA costs of $50 billion. (The Washington Post’s Fact Checker wrote that the $50 billion was a high end estimate of what would need to be committed under the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act of 1988.)

That means the $50 billion is speculative, said Steve Ellis, vice president of Taxpayers for Common Sense.

"It may be spent, it may not, and some of it will be far into the future," he said.

How far into the future? A look at Katrina spending shows it can last for more than a decade after a storm.

There is still Disaster Relief Fund money being paid out related to Katrina (and Rita and Wilma, also 2005 storms), to the tune of nearly $200 million this year, Ellis said.

Sorting out exactly how much the federal government has spent after disasters is tricky. Some hurricanes hit more than one state, and some states receive money for multiple disasters.

Comparing how much various jurisdictions have gotten for different disasters is not an apples-to-apples comparison because some disasters create more damage. Comparisons to disaster aid in Puerto Rico versus other storms also omits inflation and that it is more expensive to get disaster supplies to Puerto Rico ,which is located approximately 1,000 nautical miles from the U.S. mainland.

"Obviously Puerto Rico is not in the continental U.S. so all supplies have to be sent by ship or plane, which increases costs," Ellis said. "You can truck supplies into Louisiana and Texas and Florida. Inflation is a factor -- $1 billion in 2005 is worth more than $1 billion in 2017."

Federal officials did not respond to our questions asking how Trump concluded that the $91 billion figure was more than any other disaster. But federal reports show that the government has already spent more on Hurricane Katrina -- and that’s without factoring in inflation. The Congressional Research Service estimated in 2014 that "Congress provided roughly $120 billion for Hurricane Katrina."

In his attack on Puerto Rico disaster spending, Trump said that we "cannot continue to hurt our Farmers and States with these massive payments, and so little appreciation!"

The federal government pays for disasters in various states and the territory of Puerto Rico, which is a part of the United States. (This is despite the comments by White House spokesman Hogan Gidley on MSNBC who referred to Puerto Rico as "that country." He called it a slip of the tongue.)

Our ruling
Trump tweeted "Puerto Rico got $91 Billion for the hurricane, more money than has ever been gotten for a hurricane before."

Trump arrived at that figure by combining the $41 billion already allocated with additional estimated future FEMA costs over the life of the disaster of $50 billion. But that future payment is speculative, and it will be years before we know how much of it is realized.

Even if the $91 billion is the ultimate cost down the road, the federal government already has estimated it spent $120 billion on Hurricane Katrina.

so dude where is the lie? I'm still waiting? the article says, 41 + 50, in my math education that = 91 billion. so, how's he wrong?

puerto rico did not receive 91billion already... as trump tried to peddle. & it wasn't a record amount either.

It is estimated that Hurricane Harvey had total costs of $125 billion—second only to Hurricane Katrina in the period of record, which had an approximate cost of $161 billion.

Hurricane Costs

He didn’t say that. He said they Got, funding. He still didn’t lie. Your source lied. Ironic eh?

uh-huh... just like the funding allocated for military base/housing/school construction, went to their respective recipients, right?

that WALLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLL will need mo' money, mo' money, mo' money....

A cartoon of Democrats talking to a Muslim woman???

<yawn> (D)s that were once KKK are no more so just like the (R)s of today are still the party of lincoln.

the parties have flipped, oompa... do try to keep up.

 

[playtime]

so dude where is the lie? I'm still waiting? the article says, 41 + 50, in my math education that = 91 billion. so, how's he wrong?

puerto rico did not receive 91billion already... as trump tried to peddle. & it wasn't a record amount either.

It is estimated that Hurricane Harvey had total costs of $125 billion—second only to Hurricane Katrina in the period of record, which had an approximate cost of $161 billion.

Hurricane Costs

He didn’t say that. He said they Got, funding. He still didn’t lie. Your source lied. Ironic eh?

uh-huh... just like the funding allocated for military base/housing/school construction, went to their respective recipients, right?

that WALLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLL will need mo' money, mo' money, mo' money....

A cartoon of Democrats talking to a Muslim woman???

 

[skookerasbil]

Lol....tomorrow yet another day for Trump supporters to spike the football! Rhetorical hyperbole is ghey!!

 

[edward37]

I'm really surprised, not ,, that you and trumpettes wouldn't want to hear the truth and nothing but the truth Why keep protecting that evil vile putz in our WH?

"....wouldn't want to hear the truth..."


What are you talking about????


We heard the truth when Barr summarized Mueller's findings, and it's the very same truth we told you two years ago.


Got tissues and antacids ready???

You mean the trump butt kisser summarized ?? The trump moron said it exonerated him One more piece of bullshit out of the liars mouth

The vulgarity.

I really upset you, huh?


Save it for tomorrow when you're REALLY upset.

PC you are funny Gotta give credit where credit is due You can twist with the best of them ,,,could take Sarahs job protecting Trump

Psssst....just between the two of us....you know everything I post is 100% true, accurate and correct....don't you.

Yes as true and accurate as Barr As the POS that let the WH in on his report so they can prepare an answer Don't you see you're on the wrong side of history ??

 

[edward37]

“while this report does not conclude that the President committed a crime, it also does not exonerate him”

Quit spinning moron, you'll make yourself dizzy. Here, let me explain it to you punkinhead, "IF YOU ARE NOT GUILTY OF A CRIME, WHY THAT MUST MEAN, YOU ARE INNOCENT." You do not need to exonerate an innocent man, duhhhh.

Mueller wanted to leave it in the hands of congress Barr f-ed that up Trump has the right kiss ass working for him

Sooooo......it you are correct about Trump, we can expect impeachment?


The Socialists.....er, Democrats, control the House....

Let's hear your prediction.

I would love going to his funeral to honor this great honest man of the people This Sunday would be a great time

 

[edward37]

We found the collusion ,,,It's between the AG and the WH

 

[skookerasbil]

We found the collusion ,,,It's between the AG and the WH

But nobody thinks that....well maybe CNN viewers but go check their ratings and do the math.

2020 voters never cared about the Russia investigation

 

[edward37]

We found the collusion ,,,It's between the AG and the WH

But nobody thinks that....well maybe CNN viewers but go check their ratings and do the math.

2020 voters never cared about the Russia investigation

Barr is acting like a council for a crime boss not an AG of the people

 

[jc456]

It means that rectitude is more important than shekels.
You can't take it with you.


I'm here to lead you in the path of righteousness.

You'll have to stop being a mouthpiece for the corrupt, anti-American Democrat Party.
Forthwith.

For you pc and jc
Ezekiel 25:17
Samuel L. Jackson

The path of the righteous man is beset on all sides by the
Inequities of the selfish and the tyranny of evil men
Blessed is he who, in the name of charity and good will
shepherds the weak through the valley of darkness
for he is truly his brother's keeper and the finder of lost children
And I will strike down upon thee with great vengeance and furious
Anger those who attempt to poison and destroy my brothers
And you will know
My name is the Lord when I lay my vengeance upon thee

"Anger those who attempt to poison and destroy my brothers"

Amazing lack of self-realization you evince, eddie.....that means you Democrats lying about Trump for two years.



Tomorrow, the Mueller Report....but, don't worry.....grief councilors will be available.

I'm really surprised, not ,, that you and trumpettes wouldn't want to hear the truth and nothing but the truth Why keep protecting that evil vile putz in our WH?

when you find some truth, let us know. we've been waiting for three years now.

I sure as shit haven't found any with your leader I mean seriously, how can you pc,any republican talk about truth when you have that world class liar in the WH?

And yet I’ve debunked your claim! Too funny I proved two lies from a list weren’t. Doubling down on tds

 

[ptbw forever]

"...mueller was mandated to keep his investigation to a very narrow set of inquiries. anything that ventured out of that, he outsourced to other people. no worries - SDNY & the NY AG & the grand jury are still very active in their investigations..."

You are a bald-faced liar....and every other variation of that phrase.


Mueller's mandate was to investigate 'any matters that arose or may arise directly from the investigation"
Rosenstein letter appointing Mueller special counsel



Hence, he had no right not to investigate Hillary Clinton, Christopher Steele, Mills, Abedin, et al.


Now, get lost, you lying low-life.

well....... duh. if he found anything like say................ RICO... then he would assign the appropriate people to the case.... poor poor you.... believing trump will get away with all of it.

Grand jury investigation started by Mueller 'continuing robustly,' prosecutor says
By Katelyn Polantz, CNN
Updated 10:05 PM ET, Wed March 27, 2019
Grand jury investigation started by Robert Mueller 'continuing robustly,' prosecutor says - CNNPolitics

Mueller is done. Trump’s legal woes aren’t.
We don’t yet know what Mueller found, but here’s an overview of the president’s other legal jeopardy.
By Andrew Prokop Updated Mar 23, 2019, 9:47am EDT

No matter what special counsel Robert Mueller found, it won’t be the end of the president’s legal woes — because he, his business, and his family are in jeopardy from many other investigationS and lawsuits.

The Justice Department is digging into the Trump Organization’s role in hush money payments and the Trump inaugural committee’s finances. Congressional committees are probing everything from how Trump’s son-in-law and daughter got security clearances to Trump’s taxes. State investigators are looking into Trump’s foundation and business.
Mueller is done. Trump’s legal woes aren’t.

New York attorney general subpoenas banks about Trump projects
State investigators are seeking records from Deutsche Bank and Investors Bank on Trump projects as a result of Michael Cohen's congressional testimony.
New York attorney general subpoenas banks about Trump projects

Why are you back???

To save face????

There never was any to save. I proved you to be a lying low-live, not have it monogrammed on your jammies.

you prove nothing. zero. nada. goose egg.

tic toc.

I proved nothing????

Well.....I'll take this opportunity to smash the custard pie in your lying kisser yet again.


You lied, claiming this: " mueller was mandated to keep his investigation to a very narrow set of inquiries. "



I simply provided the exact words of Mueller's mandate:
Mueller's mandate was to investigate 'any matters that arose or may arise directly from the investigation"\

and other matters within the scope of
28 CFR § 600.4:


Everyone can see it, and see that you are lying scum, here: https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/3726408-Rosenstein-letter-appointing-Mueller-special.html



Almost as disreputable as you are, Mueller could have investigated Hillary and the entire corrupt DNC.




But here's what happened instead:


1.The Hillary campaign paid for an anti-Trump Russian creation called the dossier: they used law firm Perkins Coie to funnel money to GPS Fusion and Christopher Steele


2. The Hillary campaign screamed that they had been hacked, but refused to allow any government agencies to inspect the supposedly hacked servers

3. The FBI admitted that they knew the dossier was fake from the start, but used it to get a FISA warrant to surveil Trump and associates

4. A secret cabal at the highest levels of the FBI and the DoJ worked with GPS Fusion to undermine the Trump campaign...before and after the election.

5. FBI found classified data on Huma and Anthony Weiner’s laptop….so they gave them a pass

6. The FBI decided no charges against Hillary before they interviewed her…..with no record kept of the interview, and not under oath.

7. Both Huma Abedin and Cheryl Mills were found to be lying to the FBI….but given a pass ...and allowed to keep their laptops, and destroy any evidence on same

8. FBI agents Strzok and Page and McCabe talked over a plan to overturn the election….an ‘insurance policy’

9. Loretta Lynch with Comey’s acquiescence, worked to benefit Hillary’s campaign

10. Obama knew about Hillary’s use of unsecured emails, as he conversed with her on same…kept his name out of the reports.

11. BTW…..Mueller, Comey and Rosenstein were all government officials when Hillary received the $145 million bribe for the sale of our uranium.

....Robert Mueller was the FBI Director during the time of the Russian uranium probe, and so was his successor James Comey who took over in 2013 as the FBI was still developing the case. Rod Rosenstein, then-U.S. Attorney....


12. The FBI offered to pay Christopher Steele if he could corroborate the dossier….so he told Yahoo New’s Michael Isikoff about the dossier, had him print the information….then told the FBI that Isikoff independently discovered the “facts”…

Steele admitted, in a British court, that he leaked the material to Yahoo. September 23 Yahoo ran the story.

The FBI took the Isikoff Yahoo story to the FISA court to get the warrant….then fired Steele for sharing it with news outlets.

13. After the FBI fired Steele, he continued to confer with Bruce Ohr and the DoJ…and Rod Rosestein and Sally Yates.

In September of 2016, this was Steele’s statement to Bruce Ohr that he “was desperate that Donald Trump not get elected and was passionate about him not being president.”


14. And in another stunning revelation, the memo asserts that Justice Department official Bruce Ohr was used to pass information from the author of the dossier, Christopher Steele, to the DOJ.
Ohr’s wife, Nellie Ohr, worked at the time for Fusion GPS, the opposition research firm research firm that commissioned the dossier. Bruce Ohr, who worked closely with Deputy Attorney Generals Sally Yates and Rod Rosenstein, passed his wife’s opposition research on Trump to the FBI, the memo says.


15. Fired by the FBI as untrustworthy, Steele is maintained by the DoJ as a contact, and all the while, Bruce Ohr’s wife is drawing a salary from the group Hillary hired to produce the dossier….GPS Fusion.

Bruce Ohr’s wife’s connections to Hillary’s paid dossier-producers, GPS Fusion, was never disclosed to the FISA court.

16. Not Hillary Clinton’s Campaign, nor the DNC, nor Christopher Steel, nor Fusion GPS, nor Bruce Ohr’s wife, the roles of none of these participants in the creation of the dossier….not a one was revealed to the FISA court.

17. The memo also says that the FBI’s deputy director, Andrew McCabe, told Congress that a FISA warrant against the campaign adviser, Carter Page, would not have been granted without use of the dossier. That despite the FBI later determining that very little of the Democrat-funded document was corroborated


18. Let’s compare the zealous and very aggressive action by Mueller against Flynn, Manafort, Papadopoulos, and Carter Page with the immunity and passes given above…..

19..The memo notes that the Papadopoulos information “triggered” the FBI investigation into possible Trump campaign collusion.
It says that there is no evidence that Page and Papadopoulos engaged in a conspiracy. “
Spy Warrant Granted Based On Dossier And News Stories Planted By Fusion GPS



…and lots of evidence of associations of Democrats with the Kremlin….

…completely different treatment.

20. And all of the players in on the fix were demanding the Memo not be released….and lied about why it should not be released.




Now....be sure to let me know the next time you need another spanking, fool.

LOL... mueller was not going to ignore avenues that branched outa the russian investigation - so he made sure anything needed attending to - was. he's a marine who a earned a purple heart in vietnam while donny weaseled out on a bone spur & also said 'aids was his vietnam' ... & mueller is a law man who brought down mafia dudes... so he knows corruption when he sees it.

oh btw - you are using the the daily caller as a source???????????

Daily Caller
Has this Media Source failed a fact check? LET US KNOW HERE.

Share:
RIGHT BIAS
These media sources are moderately to strongly biased toward conservative causes through story selection and/or political affiliation. They may utilize strong loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using appeal to emotion or stereotypes), publish misleading reports and omit reporting of information that may damage conservative causes. Some sources in this category may be untrustworthy. See all Right Bias sources.

• Overall, we rate the Daily Caller strongly right biased based on story selection that almost always favors the right and Mixed for factual reporting due to numerous failed fact checks. The Daily Caller is a source that needs to be fact checked on a per article basis.

Detailed Report
Factual Reporting: MIXED
Country: USA
World Press Freedom Rank: USA 45/180

History

Founded in 2010, the Daily Caller is an American news and opinion website based in Washington, D.C.. It was founded by Tucker Carlson, a libertarian conservative political pundit, and Neil Patel, former adviser to former Vice President Dick Cheney. The current editor-in-chief is Geoff Ingersol.

Funded by / Ownership

The Daily Caller is owned by The Daily Caller, Inc., which does not list its ownership or members. The website was initially launched after raising $3 million in funding from businessman Foster Friess. Currently, the Daily Caller is funded through native online advertising, averaging 30 million+ page views per month.

Analysis / Bias

In review, The Daily Caller is a strongly right leaning news and opinion website that has been involved with publishing controversial and false stories. For example, they routinely publish misleading or false information regarding climate change that goes against the consensus of science. The Daily Caller has also published articles by Jason Kessler, a white supremacist who organized a rally of hundreds of white nationalists in Charlottesville. They subsequently scrubbed those articles after the Charlottesville vehicular homicide incident.

The Daily Caller frequently uses loaded emotional language that typically favors the right such as this: DEM NOMINEE FOR FLORIDA GOVERNOR IS PROGRESSIVE MAYOR WITH CORRUPTION INVESTIGATION SWIRLING AROUND HIM. The Daily Caller usually sources their information to credible media outlets, but sometimes they utilize sources that are factually mixed such as the Daily Wire and Questionable sources such as Judicial Watch. In reviewing story content, virtually all favored the right in story selection and wording, while denigrating the left. The Daily Caller also promotes a favorable view of President Donald Trump through promotion of his policies.

A factual search reveals a very poor track record with fact checking. Here is a short list of some failed fact checks:

• “Former President Bill Clinton and his Clinton Health Access Initiative (CHAI) distributed ‘watered-down’ HIV/AIDS drugs to patients in sub-Saharan Africa.” – FALSE
• “Jeanne Shaheen was principally involved in a plot with Lois Lerner and President Barack Obama’s political appointee at the IRS to lead a program of harassment against conservative nonprofit groups during the 2012 election” – FALSE
• George Soros-controlled Smartmatic manufactures the voting machines used in 16 crucial states, and those states will be rigged in favor of Hillary Clinton. – FALSE
• Indiana Muslims are appalled by a billboard displaying a list of deeds by the Prophet Muhammad even though it is accurate. – MOSTLY FALSE
• Washington state has updated their curriculum standards to include teaching “transgenderism” to Kindergarteners. – MOSTLY FALSE

The Daily Caller has failed numerous fact checks, however they post a significant amount of articles each day. Based on the volume of articles published, versus failed fact checks, they do not fall into the Questionable category, though they are close.

Overall, we rate the Daily Caller strongly right biased based on story selection that almost always favors the right and Mixed for factual reporting due to numerous failed fact checks. The Daily Caller is a source that needs to be fact checked on a per article basis. (7/19/2016) Updated (D. Van Zandt 8/29/2018)

Daily Caller - Media Bias/Fact Check

you are dismissed, sunshine.

LOL

Name a single source you use that doesn’t qualify as “strongly left”.

Emotional and over-the-top/hateful language is what the modern left in the west is all about.

 

[ptbw forever]

So these idiotic trumpers are still whining about people like manafort getting convicted on multiple felonies?

But have the nerve to say "drain the swamp"?? gtfoh

not sure your point. if he was the swamp, he's now gone. nobody fking cares about him. The issue at hand is, his ugly behavior began under the Pedesta Group. When are they going down for the same thing? oh wait immunity. LOL. can't make it up. you ain't for draining nothing but your unit.

But you complain about "HE" and others being charged at all... because "YOU" feel if it wasn't for that meddling Mueller and those pesky kids-- Manafort and others would have gotten away with it...
View attachment 256167

Which makes you an enabler of the very same corruption you claim to be against -- but the truth of the matter is, you could careless about corruption as long as its someone from your team.

Flynn literally didn’t do anything to get away with.

He lied to the FBI due to an investigation that never should have included him.

 

[Kondor3]

Robert Mueller is an honorable man….I mean that in the same way Antony meant this about Brutus: “…for Brutus is an honorable man; they are all honorable men…”


While the stain is rapidly spreading over Comey, Rosenstein, McCabe, Strzok, Lynch,….and Obama, all of them are snakes, and are covered by that same quote.




1.Right off the top, Mueller has a history with Trump that should have required him to recuse himself, and refuse the special counsel position



“Trump argued that Mueller had three conflicts of interest preventing him from leading a fully unbiased investigation, according to the New York Times. The first two conflicts being Mueller’s previous work for a law firm that represented Jared Kushner; the second being Mueller interviewing to return for a second stint as FBI director immediately before being appointed as special counsel in May.

But arguably the most eye-catching alleged conflict of interest involves a purported dispute between Mueller and the Trump National Golf Club in Sterling, Virginia, in October 2011. President Trump claimed Mueller resigned his membership at the club due to the alleged disagreement over fees and believes he still holds a grudge against him over the matter.

Mueller, who was FBI director at the time of the alleged dispute, denied the incident and any potential hard feelings.

“Mr. Mueller left the club in October 2011 without dispute,” special counsel spokesman Joshua Stueve said in July.”
Why did Mueller quit Trump’s golf club? Dispute reportedly key to president’s desire to fire special counsel




2. Unless Mueller is a total fool, he knew from day one that there was no substance to the collusion charges. Yet…..he ruined lives by pretending.


3. Stocking his ‘team’ with Clinton donors and anti-Trump partisans proves what he was about.


4. Although Mueller had right to look into anything that arises in connection with the alleged events, he refused to direct investigation toward Clinton…gave immunity.





The man signed on to the attempted…..failed…..coup to depose a duly elected President.


No honor or repute of any sort should ever be attached to this man.

Oh, look, Mumsie... a TrumpBot-hack... trying (and failing) to discredit the Special Counsel in advance of the release of the Report...

It's a cute little TrumpBot-hack, isn't it?... can I have one for Easter, Mumsie?... please?... I'll keep it next to my jelly-beans...

---------

What a pile of Trumpian bull$hit...

 

[Kondor3]

..He lied to the FBI due to an investigation that never should have included him.

Perhaps he shouldn't have lied to the FBI, eh?

 

[ptbw forever]

..He lied to the FBI due to an investigation that never should have included him.

Perhaps he shouldn't have lied to the FBI, eh?

So when the FBI comes knocking on your door, and you tell them something that isn’t true because you forgot or you have a false recollection of something, do you think that you should go to jail solely because of this?

 

[PoliticalChic]

"....wouldn't want to hear the truth..."


What are you talking about????


We heard the truth when Barr summarized Mueller's findings, and it's the very same truth we told you two years ago.


Got tissues and antacids ready???

You mean the trump butt kisser summarized ?? The trump moron said it exonerated him One more piece of bullshit out of the liars mouth

The vulgarity.

I really upset you, huh?


Save it for tomorrow when you're REALLY upset.

PC you are funny Gotta give credit where credit is due You can twist with the best of them ,,,could take Sarahs job protecting Trump

Psssst....just between the two of us....you know everything I post is 100% true, accurate and correct....don't you.

Yes as true and accurate as Barr As the POS that let the WH in on his report so they can prepare an answer Don't you see you're on the wrong side of history ??

 

[PoliticalChic]

We found the collusion ,,,It's between the AG and the WH

Still holding on by your fingernails???


This guy held on for 30 years after the war was over.

Is this you on the cover?

 

[Zorro!]