Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Based upon his argument, if only Pop would turn gay, and get married, he'd be equal? This problem seems to bother him but I have no issues with the lesbians down the street, they like the same porn that I do...You still pissed? Cuz gays have been using bathrooms like singles bars? Is your party over now?
They have? I had no idea. I've been going into public restrooms and showering in public showers when necessary for over 40 years and never once have I heard a pickup line or seen a disco ball. Where ARE you peeing? Are you sure you've been using public restrooms?
What is the remarkable difference between a Married Lesbian and a Married Male. Are they not similarily situated?
In regards to marriage- they are similarily situated. In regards to gender they are not.
Since locker rooms are segregated by gender for everyone, and not by marital status- your question is irrelevant.
Appears you are wrong again:
Woman Is Suing Planet Fitness Over Locker Room Policy The Daily Caller
Unrelated to what you think your argument is.
That doesn't help you at all since that is a genital issue, not a spousal issue. That invalidates your point completely.You still pissed? Cuz gays have been using bathrooms like singles bars? Is your party over now?
They have? I had no idea. I've been going into public restrooms and showering in public showers when necessary for over 40 years and never once have I heard a pickup line or seen a disco ball. Where ARE you peeing? Are you sure you've been using public restrooms?
What is the remarkable difference between a Married Lesbian and a Married Male. Are they not similarily situated?
In regards to marriage- they are similarily situated. In regards to gender they are not.
Since locker rooms are segregated by gender for everyone, and not by marital status- your question is irrelevant.
Appears you are wrong again:
Woman Is Suing Planet Fitness Over Locker Room Policy The Daily Caller
She is transgender, but not completely yet obviously, and that doesn't help you at all because the woman is upset not about a spouse in her locker room, but a penis, which we can legally discriminate based upon.That doesn't help you at all since that is a genital issue, not a spousal issue. That invalidates your point completely.They have? I had no idea. I've been going into public restrooms and showering in public showers when necessary for over 40 years and never once have I heard a pickup line or seen a disco ball. Where ARE you peeing? Are you sure you've been using public restrooms?
What is the remarkable difference between a Married Lesbian and a Married Male. Are they not similarily situated?
In regards to marriage- they are similarily situated. In regards to gender they are not.
Since locker rooms are segregated by gender for everyone, and not by marital status- your question is irrelevant.
Appears you are wrong again:
Woman Is Suing Planet Fitness Over Locker Room Policy The Daily Caller
Ummm, dudes a male, in a woman's locker room.
There is legal discrimination, bathrooms, and illegal discrimination, marriage licenses. Is this news to you? A lot of us got over this after taking baths with our sisters. Seems to be a problem for you still?No, it said they were equal. If the sign says Married People Only, and they are, they can both go in.Can you stay focused for more than 2 seconds? You said some were being discriminated against. When it's pointed out to you that's false since no one is being discriminated against, you shift to separate but equal.So having access to a separate but equal Civil Marriage was actually constitutional then.
Who's side are you on?
Meanwhile, there remains no discrimination in your silly example. Everyone has access to those same locker rooms regardless of their race, religion, gender, or sexual preference.
And again, compare that to SSM, where until recently, gays were denied access to their right to marry the person they love.
You just love distraction. The male in a straight couple cannot escort his wife into the women's locker room as the lesbian partners can, which is odd since the USSC said all four in my example are the same.
So it's ok to discriminate against groups, just not individuals.
So the sign SeaWytch posted saying "no queers allowed" is not discrimination?
Then, of course there's this link.....Woman Is Suing Planet Fitness Over Locker Room Policy The Daily Caller
Hmmmmmm
She is transgender, but not completely yet obviously, and that doesn't help you at all because the woman is upset not about a spouse in her locker room, but a penis, which we can legally discriminate based upon.That doesn't help you at all since that is a genital issue, not a spousal issue. That invalidates your point completely.What is the remarkable difference between a Married Lesbian and a Married Male. Are they not similarily situated?
In regards to marriage- they are similarily situated. In regards to gender they are not.
Since locker rooms are segregated by gender for everyone, and not by marital status- your question is irrelevant.
Appears you are wrong again:
Woman Is Suing Planet Fitness Over Locker Room Policy The Daily Caller
Ummm, dudes a male, in a woman's locker room.
If this is your version of "dealing with it", I would hate to see what it's like when you don't. How about just dealing with equal bathrooms and equal standing before the law, instead of worrying about who might get aroused seeing others of their same sex standing around in their undies?There is legal discrimination, bathrooms, and illegal discrimination, marriage licenses. Is this news to you? A lot of us got over this after taking baths with our sisters. Seems to be a problem for you still?No, it said they were equal. If the sign says Married People Only, and they are, they can both go in.Can you stay focused for more than 2 seconds? You said some were being discriminated against. When it's pointed out to you that's false since no one is being discriminated against, you shift to separate but equal.
Meanwhile, there remains no discrimination in your silly example. Everyone has access to those same locker rooms regardless of their race, religion, gender, or sexual preference.
And again, compare that to SSM, where until recently, gays were denied access to their right to marry the person they love.
You just love distraction. The male in a straight couple cannot escort his wife into the women's locker room as the lesbian partners can, which is odd since the USSC said all four in my example are the same.
So it's ok to discriminate against groups, just not individuals.
So the sign SeaWytch posted saying "no queers allowed" is not discrimination?
Then, of course there's this link.....Woman Is Suing Planet Fitness Over Locker Room Policy The Daily Caller
Hmmmmmm
Ahhhhh, the marriage license issue was when your hero Justice Kennedy declared we were like situated.
See how easy that was, like playing dominoes.
So, you go ahead and bathe with your sister if you like, us adults will deal with the USSC's societal ramifications.
No, it said they were equal. If the sign says Married People Only, and they are, they can both go in.Can you stay focused for more than 2 seconds? You said some were being discriminated against. When it's pointed out to you that's false since no one is being discriminated against, you shift to separate but equal.So having access to a separate but equal Civil Marriage was actually constitutional then.
Who's side are you on?
Meanwhile, there remains no discrimination in your silly example. Everyone has access to those same locker rooms regardless of their race, religion, gender, or sexual preference.
And again, compare that to SSM, where until recently, gays were denied access to their right to marry the person they love.
You just love distraction. The male in a straight couple cannot escort his wife into the women's locker room as the lesbian partners can, which is odd since the USSC said all four in my example are the same.
So it's ok to discriminate against groups, just not individuals.
So the sign SeaWytch posted saying "no queers allowed" is not discrimination?
Then, of course there's this link.....Woman Is Suing Planet Fitness Over Locker Room Policy The Daily Caller
Hmmmmmm
A no Jews/blacks/gays sign would be discriminatory. One sign is legal in over half the states. It's still discrimination, it's just allowed.
Good luck with transitioning.
If this is your version of "dealing with it", I would hate to see what it's like when you don't. How about just dealing with equal bathrooms and equal standing before the law, instead of worrying about who might get aroused seeing others of their same sex standing around in their undies?There is legal discrimination, bathrooms, and illegal discrimination, marriage licenses. Is this news to you? A lot of us got over this after taking baths with our sisters. Seems to be a problem for you still?No, it said they were equal. If the sign says Married People Only, and they are, they can both go in.You just love distraction. The male in a straight couple cannot escort his wife into the women's locker room as the lesbian partners can, which is odd since the USSC said all four in my example are the same.
So it's ok to discriminate against groups, just not individuals.
So the sign SeaWytch posted saying "no queers allowed" is not discrimination?
Then, of course there's this link.....Woman Is Suing Planet Fitness Over Locker Room Policy The Daily Caller
Hmmmmmm
Ahhhhh, the marriage license issue was when your hero Justice Kennedy declared we were like situated.
See how easy that was, like playing dominoes.
So, you go ahead and bathe with your sister if you like, us adults will deal with the USSC's societal ramifications.
Transgender has nothing at all to do with sexual orientation. For all you know the TG woman digs chicks? It's their policy and they have a right to set it. I've used unisex locker rooms several times and it was absolutely no big deal.She is transgender, but not completely yet obviously, and that doesn't help you at all because the woman is upset not about a spouse in her locker room, but a penis, which we can legally discriminate based upon.That doesn't help you at all since that is a genital issue, not a spousal issue. That invalidates your point completely.In regards to marriage- they are similarily situated. In regards to gender they are not.
Since locker rooms are segregated by gender for everyone, and not by marital status- your question is irrelevant.
Appears you are wrong again:
Woman Is Suing Planet Fitness Over Locker Room Policy The Daily Caller
Ummm, dudes a male, in a woman's locker room.
Get it? They allow dicks in the locker room, unless it's a straight dick, then they'd call the cops b
She is transgender, but not completely yet obviously, and that doesn't help you at all because the woman is upset not about a spouse in her locker room, but a penis, which we can legally discriminate based upon.That doesn't help you at all since that is a genital issue, not a spousal issue. That invalidates your point completely.What is the remarkable difference between a Married Lesbian and a Married Male. Are they not similarily situated?
In regards to marriage- they are similarily situated. In regards to gender they are not.
Since locker rooms are segregated by gender for everyone, and not by marital status- your question is irrelevant.
Appears you are wrong again:
Woman Is Suing Planet Fitness Over Locker Room Policy The Daily Caller
Ummm, dudes a male, in a woman's locker room.
And bisexuals like both. So what? Oh right, there's nothing that matters here at all.If this is your version of "dealing with it", I would hate to see what it's like when you don't. How about just dealing with equal bathrooms and equal standing before the law, instead of worrying about who might get aroused seeing others of their same sex standing around in their undies?There is legal discrimination, bathrooms, and illegal discrimination, marriage licenses. Is this news to you? A lot of us got over this after taking baths with our sisters. Seems to be a problem for you still?No, it said they were equal. If the sign says Married People Only, and they are, they can both go in.
So it's ok to discriminate against groups, just not individuals.
So the sign SeaWytch posted saying "no queers allowed" is not discrimination?
Then, of course there's this link.....Woman Is Suing Planet Fitness Over Locker Room Policy The Daily Caller
Hmmmmmm
Ahhhhh, the marriage license issue was when your hero Justice Kennedy declared we were like situated.
See how easy that was, like playing dominoes.
So, you go ahead and bathe with your sister if you like, us adults will deal with the USSC's societal ramifications.
Lesbians get aroused looking at women (ask SeaWytch)
Men get aroused looking at women (ask me)
Making us similar situated.
She wouldn't need one, regardless of her junk. Many women don't, including XY females.She is transgender, but not completely yet obviously, and that doesn't help you at all because the woman is upset not about a spouse in her locker room, but a penis, which we can legally discriminate based upon.That doesn't help you at all since that is a genital issue, not a spousal issue. That invalidates your point completely.In regards to marriage- they are similarily situated. In regards to gender they are not.
Since locker rooms are segregated by gender for everyone, and not by marital status- your question is irrelevant.
Appears you are wrong again:
Woman Is Suing Planet Fitness Over Locker Room Policy The Daily Caller
Ummm, dudes a male, in a woman's locker room.
She? Where's she stick the tampon?
Transgender has nothing at all to do with sexual orientation. For all you know the TG woman digs chicks? It's their policy and they have a right to set it. I've used unisex locker rooms several times and it was absolutely no big deal.She is transgender, but not completely yet obviously, and that doesn't help you at all because the woman is upset not about a spouse in her locker room, but a penis, which we can legally discriminate based upon.That doesn't help you at all since that is a genital issue, not a spousal issue. That invalidates your point completely.
Ummm, dudes a male, in a woman's locker room.
Get it? They allow dicks in the locker room, unless it's a straight dick, then they'd call the cops b
More than likely not. Most people, even transgender people, are heterosexual. She most likely likes boys, not girls.Of course he digs women...
She wouldn't need one, regardless of her junk. Many women don't, including XY females.She is transgender, but not completely yet obviously, and that doesn't help you at all because the woman is upset not about a spouse in her locker room, but a penis, which we can legally discriminate based upon.That doesn't help you at all since that is a genital issue, not a spousal issue. That invalidates your point completely.
Ummm, dudes a male, in a woman's locker room.
She? Where's she stick the tampon?
More than likely not. Most people, even transgender people, are heterosexual. She most likely likes boys, not girls.Of course he digs women...
Learn some biology today: Androgen insensitivity syndrome - Genetics Home ReferenceShe wouldn't need one, regardless of her junk. Many women don't, including XY females.She is transgender, but not completely yet obviously, and that doesn't help you at all because the woman is upset not about a spouse in her locker room, but a penis, which we can legally discriminate based upon.That doesn't help you at all since that is a genital issue, not a spousal issue. That invalidates your point completely.
Ummm, dudes a male, in a woman's locker room.
She? Where's she stick the tampon?
OMG.
That I know of, he's either straight or bisexual. Tell us Pop, if two bisexuals marry what locker room should they use?More than likely not. Most people, even transgender people, are heterosexual. She most likely likes boys, not girls.Of course he digs women...
Yes, talk to Bruce Jenner bout dat
And bisexuals like both. So what? Oh right, there's nothing that matters here at all.If this is your version of "dealing with it", I would hate to see what it's like when you don't. How about just dealing with equal bathrooms and equal standing before the law, instead of worrying about who might get aroused seeing others of their same sex standing around in their undies?There is legal discrimination, bathrooms, and illegal discrimination, marriage licenses. Is this news to you? A lot of us got over this after taking baths with our sisters. Seems to be a problem for you still?So it's ok to discriminate against groups, just not individuals.
So the sign SeaWytch posted saying "no queers allowed" is not discrimination?
Then, of course there's this link.....Woman Is Suing Planet Fitness Over Locker Room Policy The Daily Caller
Hmmmmmm
Ahhhhh, the marriage license issue was when your hero Justice Kennedy declared we were like situated.
See how easy that was, like playing dominoes.
So, you go ahead and bathe with your sister if you like, us adults will deal with the USSC's societal ramifications.
Lesbians get aroused looking at women (ask SeaWytch)
Men get aroused looking at women (ask me)
Making us similar situated.
That I know of, he's either straight or bisexual. Tell us Pop, if two bisexuals marry what locker room should they use?More than likely not. Most people, even transgender people, are heterosexual. She most likely likes boys, not girls.Of course he digs women...
Yes, talk to Bruce Jenner bout dat
