Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
yours clearly was.Certainly got an active thread going, didn't I?
Amazing to read the expected replies based on political beliefs. Some are clearly scripted. Guess which.
"dependents"... on food stamps? Does not make any sense.Most of those jobs are filled by dependents who will now make a better wage. Do we really need military families on food stamps?You can prove that all those positions are filled only by family members of military personnel, of course?Military family members get those AAFES jobs
More money coming in to military families and fewer will need food stamps
Just kidding. We all know you're just making things up...do carry on, though..
Keep in mind that dependents are also spouses"dependents"... on food stamps? Does not make any sense.Most of those jobs are filled by dependents who will now make a better wage. Do we really need military families on food stamps?You can prove that all those positions are filled only by family members of military personnel, of course?Military family members get those AAFES jobs
More money coming in to military families and fewer will need food stamps
Just kidding. We all know you're just making things up...do carry on, though..
you have to have a household income below certain level.
"dependent" at age 16 to 19 won't be spending minimum wage on "food"... especially working at place where get discount for food.
See people like you think EVERYONE that is on minimum wage is a "head of household"!
Again the FACTS are:
According to: http://www.bls.gov/cps/minwage2013.pdf :
1) 797,000 people (25.7%) between 16 to 19 years old work at minimum wage of the total of
2) 3.3 million people that work at minimum wage or 1.1% of Americans
So when you speak of military families on "food stamps" in the same breath as "dependents" you are grossly confused.
Think about it. What you said makes no sense especially in light of the above statistics from the government!
Keep in mind that dependents are also spouses"dependents"... on food stamps? Does not make any sense.Most of those jobs are filled by dependents who will now make a better wage. Do we really need military families on food stamps?You can prove that all those positions are filled only by family members of military personnel, of course?Military family members get those AAFES jobs
More money coming in to military families and fewer will need food stamps
Just kidding. We all know you're just making things up...do carry on, though..
you have to have a household income below certain level.
"dependent" at age 16 to 19 won't be spending minimum wage on "food"... especially working at place where get discount for food.
See people like you think EVERYONE that is on minimum wage is a "head of household"!
Again the FACTS are:
According to: http://www.bls.gov/cps/minwage2013.pdf :
1) 797,000 people (25.7%) between 16 to 19 years old work at minimum wage of the total of
2) 3.3 million people that work at minimum wage or 1.1% of Americans
So when you speak of military families on "food stamps" in the same breath as "dependents" you are grossly confused.
Think about it. What you said makes no sense especially in light of the above statistics from the government!
Hungry Heroes 25 Percent of Military Families Seek Food Aid - NBC News
Yetters have been living paycheck-to-paycheck for many years as they work to get rid of debt accumulated over everyday expenses like car repairs and gas and the costs of caring for an autistic son. They often visit food pantries to keep their kitchen stocked.
Yetters have been living paycheck-to-paycheck for many years as they work to get rid of debt accumulated over everyday expenses like car repairs and gas and the costs of caring for an autistic son. They often visit food pantries to keep their kitchen stocked.
Military stores – like exchanges and commissaries – provide savings to troops, he said. (On Monday, the Pentagon issued a new statement on the survey, saying: "The Department of Defense disagrees with the methodology that Feeding America used to calculate the estimated percentage of military households served by its food assistance programs.")
Why doesn't she go to the commissary???? They save 30% on groceries,etc...
American military commissaries sell groceries and household goods to active-duty, Guard, Reserve, and retired service members and their families at an average savings of more than 30 percent when compared to prices at local civilian supermarkets.
Commissaries constitute one of the top benefits for today’s military and are an important inducement to recruitment and retention of skilled personnel, while simultaneously holding down taxpayer costs.
"...they also get tax-free allowances for housing, food and clothing, many families said they were still struggling to get by.
In interviews with veterans and active duty families, many told NBC they had various schemes for trying to stretch their dollars or raise extra cash: recycling, couponing, visiting multiple food pantries and homeless shelters for emergency food like milk for their children, buying groceries from dollar stores, delaying payment of utility bills, and signing up for food stamps and WIC – the nutrition program for women, infants and children.
Commissaries.com - Commissary History
gee, i didn't realize that a low-cost whopper had the same priority level as sterile conditions in a hospital.Bush was hammered for peeling paint at Walter Reed.
Obama raises the cost of food and services to the troops and the left cheers.
Because $100 an hour is outrageous, $10 an hour isn'tWhy only $10/hr.....why not $100/hr???
Come on liberals tell us why the difference.....
Because $100 an hour is outrageous, $10 an hour isn'tWhy only $10/hr.....why not $100/hr???
Come on liberals tell us why the difference.....
I realize how minimum wage has been stagnant for seven years and business had benefitted from a low cost workforce. Workers have not. They can't afford college, can't afford a car, can't afford to get started in lifeBecause $100 an hour is outrageous, $10 an hour isn'tWhy only $10/hr.....why not $100/hr???
Come on liberals tell us why the difference.....
liberals...you have no sense of proportionality... that's why it is so stupid you say $100 is outrageous!
You have NO concept of business operating expenses obviously.
When you increase minimum wage nearly 30% what do you think that means to operating expenses?
Attached is the income statement for an Average McDonald's restaurant.
Note Crew Payroll takes 20% of net sales.
If Crew payroll increases from $7.25 to $10.10 minimum wage that is an increase of 39%.
Using the typical crew payroll would increase from $540,000 to $752,275.
This would be an increase of $212,275.
This would reduce the store's operating income from $153,900 net income to a loss of $58,375. THAT IS A LOSS. That means NO federal/state/local taxes.
That means the store would NOT be able to pay some of the bills.
That's what happens liberals when costs go up more then the revenue comes in.
So are you willing to increase the costs of eating at this McDonalds or any restaurant like McDonalds FACED with a 39% increase in operating expenses?
NOW do you understand how totally economically insane raising the minimum wage for less 3.3 million people of which 1 million are under age 19?
The ONLY way McDonald's and other restaurants faced with this can survive is to let go some of their minimum wage people and replace with
more self service and robots.
Way to go you liberal economic idiots!!!
View attachment 32674
http://www.bluemaumau.org/sites/default/files/Janney-McDonalds Income Statement mock.pdf
The purpose is to get more people dependent on government. Military is already government so they are on the back burner.
I realize how minimum wage has been stagnant for seven years and business had benefitted from a low cost workforce. Workers have not. They can't afford college, can't afford a car, can't afford to get started in lifeBecause $100 an hour is outrageous, $10 an hour isn'tWhy only $10/hr.....why not $100/hr???
Come on liberals tell us why the difference.....
liberals...you have no sense of proportionality... that's why it is so stupid you say $100 is outrageous!
You have NO concept of business operating expenses obviously.
When you increase minimum wage nearly 30% what do you think that means to operating expenses?
Attached is the income statement for an Average McDonald's restaurant.
Note Crew Payroll takes 20% of net sales.
If Crew payroll increases from $7.25 to $10.10 minimum wage that is an increase of 39%.
Using the typical crew payroll would increase from $540,000 to $752,275.
This would be an increase of $212,275.
This would reduce the store's operating income from $153,900 net income to a loss of $58,375. THAT IS A LOSS. That means NO federal/state/local taxes.
That means the store would NOT be able to pay some of the bills.
That's what happens liberals when costs go up more then the revenue comes in.
So are you willing to increase the costs of eating at this McDonalds or any restaurant like McDonalds FACED with a 39% increase in operating expenses?
NOW do you understand how totally economically insane raising the minimum wage for less 3.3 million people of which 1 million are under age 19?
The ONLY way McDonald's and other restaurants faced with this can survive is to let go some of their minimum wage people and replace with
more self service and robots.
Way to go you liberal economic idiots!!!
View attachment 32674
http://www.bluemaumau.org/sites/default/files/Janney-McDonalds Income Statement mock.pdf
$10 is a good start but we need to get to $15