The events in Paris are the reason we should NOT take any Muslim refugees from the middle east

[Contumacious]

Yeah we can blame decades of US interference in middle eastern affairs from both sides for this. Sorry but only a fool would blame this on your POTUS.

Only the lowest brand of despicable douche bag would actually blame the United States for this.

THE US , AND THE COALITION OF THE BRAIN DEAD, AKA, FRANCE AND THE UK, ARE 100% RESPONSIBLE FOR TODAY'S CARNAGE IN PARIS.



.

 

[Flopper]

Fuck em. If they can't fight for their freedom in their own home country why bring the cowards here.
At the very least NO MALES OVER THE AGE OF 12

There are a couple problems with your suggestion. Denying entrance to US based on religious grounds would clearly be a constitutional violation. Also, federal law prevents the government from asking a person's religious. Lastly, what good would it do? An Islamic terrorist entering this country intending to engage in terrorist activities is certain not going to declare their religion to government.

There are a couple problems with your suggestion. Denying entrance to US based on religious grounds would clearly be a constitutional violation.

That's an interesting claim. Which part of the Constitution?

Assuming we are discussing preventing Muslim from entering the US, Amendment 1.

 

[bripat9643]

UN condemns attacks in Paris....Wow.That's really going out on a limb.
Will they call for an emergency session to work on more gun control in the US?

What did you expect the UN to do other than condemn it?

I certainly don't expect them to take action. The same goes for Obama.

 

[bripat9643]

Yeah we can blame decades of US interference in middle eastern affairs from both sides for this. Sorry but only a fool would blame this on your POTUS.

Only the lowest brand of despicable douche bag would actually blame the United States for this.

THE US , AND THE COALITION OF THE BRAIN DEAD, AKA, FRANCE AND THE UK, ARE 100% RESPONSIBLE FOR TODAY'S CARNAGE IN PARIS.



.

You mean because they didn't exterminate these vermin when they had the chance?

 

[bripat9643]

Fuck em. If they can't fight for their freedom in their own home country why bring the cowards here.
At the very least NO MALES OVER THE AGE OF 12

There are a couple problems with your suggestion. Denying entrance to US based on religious grounds would clearly be a constitutional violation. Also, federal law prevents the government from asking a person's religious. Lastly, what good would it do? An Islamic terrorist entering this country intending to engage in terrorist activities is certain not going to declare their religion to government.

There are a couple problems with your suggestion. Denying entrance to US based on religious grounds would clearly be a constitutional violation.

That's an interesting claim. Which part of the Constitution?

Assuming we are talking about preventing Muslim from entering the US, Amendment 1.

foreigners have no rights under the Constitution, so the First Amendment doesn't apply to them.

 

[Unkotare]

Fuck em. If they can't fight for their freedom in their own home country why bring the cowards here.
At the very least NO MALES OVER THE AGE OF 12

That post sure seemed like the words of a coward.

 

[bripat9643]

Fuck em. If they can't fight for their freedom in their own home country why bring the cowards here.
At the very least NO MALES OVER THE AGE OF 12

THe US, and the Coalition of the Fucktards , have been fucking around in the middle east since , at least, 1949.

Payback is a bitch.


.

Hey dipshit read some history. Barbary pirates

Sent from my SM-G386T1 using Tapatalk

Hey dipshit some history : Barbary pirates "the main purpose of their attacks was to capture Christian slaves for the Ottoman slave trade".


No go eat a banana and fantasize is me.


.

They were Muslims, dumbfuck. Their god told them taking infidels into slavery was a good thing. No he tells them the same thing, and also to kill the infidels.

 

[bripat9643]

Fuck you

Making sure the message sinks in. Warmongers have thick skulls:


The US, and the Coalition of the Fucktards , have been fucking around in the middle east since , at least, 1949.

Payback is a bitch.

Then apparently Obozo shouldn't have started his illegal war in Syria, DUMBASS!!!

THAT 'S TRUE.

THE US SUPPLIED ISIS WITH WEAPONS AND $$$$$$$$ BECAUSE THEY WERE PART OF THE SYRIAN RESISTANCE AND ANTI- ASSAD. SO NOW THEY ARE RICH AND MILITARILY POWERFUL THANKS TO THE US TAXPAYERS.


BUT BUSH II, BUSH III, AND ANY OTHER REPUGNANT PRESIDENT WOULD HAVE DONE *********EXACTLY*********THE SAME THING.


.

Except they didn't...

Obama and Hillary did...

Live with it, and the fact that you are a fool who blindly supports those fools!!!

I DON'T SUPPORT ANY BODY.

I MERELY CALL A SPADE A SPADE.

Fiat justitia ruat caelum


.

You support mass murdering terrorist scum.

 

[bripat9643]

Fuck you

Making sure the message sinks in. Warmongers have thick skulls:


The US, and the Coalition of the Fucktards , have been fucking around in the middle east since , at least, 1949.

Payback is a bitch.

Then apparently Obozo shouldn't have started his illegal war in Syria, DUMBASS!!!

THAT 'S TRUE.

THE US SUPPLIED ISIS WITH WEAPONS AND $$$$$$$$ BECAUSE THEY WERE PART OF THE SYRIAN RESISTANCE AND ANTI- ASSAD. SO NOW THEY ARE RICH AND MILITARILY POWERFUL THANKS TO THE US TAXPAYERS.


BUT BUSH II, BUSH III, AND ANY OTHER REPUGNANT PRESIDENT WOULD HAVE DONE *********EXACTLY*********THE SAME THING.


.

President Trump would NOT have done that..... But McLame was all for it, as was McGrAmnesty!

Russian airstrikes in Syria 'OK' with Trump

What's your point?

 

[bripat9643]

Fuck em. If they can't fight for their freedom in their own home country why bring the cowards here.
At the very least NO MALES OVER THE AGE OF 12

There are a couple problems with your suggestion. Denying entrance to US based on religious grounds would clearly be a constitutional violation. Also, federal law prevents the government from asking a person's religious. Lastly, what good would it do? An Islamic terrorist entering this country intending to engage in terrorist activities is certain not going to declare their religion to government.

The solution is simply, simply don't allow any immigration for countries with large Muslim populations.

 

[bripat9643]

Fuck em. If they can't fight for their freedom in their own home country why bring the cowards here.
At the very least NO MALES OVER THE AGE OF 12

No.

Regugees should be screened but taken based on need not religion.

Fuck their "need." The primary concern should be whether the U.S. would benefit from their presence.

 

[Unkotare]

I got a better idea. Let's just not kill anymore Arab Muslims over there.

If any Arab Muslims were responsible for the events of today, they need to be killed.

 

[Contumacious]

Yeah we can blame decades of US interference in middle eastern affairs from both sides for this. Sorry but only a fool would blame this on your POTUS.

Only the lowest brand of despicable douche bag would actually blame the United States for this.

THE US , AND THE COALITION OF THE BRAIN DEAD, AKA, FRANCE AND THE UK, ARE 100% RESPONSIBLE FOR TODAY'S CARNAGE IN PARIS.



.

You mean because they didn't exterminate these vermin when they had the chance?

SINCE I KNOW YOU A A TAD SLOW IN THE UPTAKE, LET ME SPELL IT OUT FOR YA'


THE US AND THE COALITION OF THE BRAIN DEAD, HAVE DESTROYED SYRIA, FORCING THOSE UNFORTUNATE PEOPLE TO LEAVE THEIR COUNTRY AND BECOME REFUGEES ALL OVER THE WORLD.


OK RETARD.

NOW REPEAT WHAT I JUST SAID HEREINBELOW


________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________


.

 

[JimBowie1958]

Assuming we are discussing preventing Muslim from entering the US, Amendment 1.

Lol, you liberals have twisted the 1st Amendment all to hell so that Madison himself wouldnt recognize it.

The restrictions on religious tests is to prohibit it being done for federal office holders, later extended by a massive re-interpretation of the 14th.

It has nothing to do with preventing the complete banning of entire religions from the US if we want to.

 

[bripat9643]

Fuck em. If they can't fight for their freedom in their own home country why bring the cowards here.
At the very least NO MALES OVER THE AGE OF 12

There are a couple problems with your suggestion. Denying entrance to US based on religious grounds would clearly be a constitutional violation. Also, federal law prevents the government from asking a person's religious. Lastly, what good would it do? An Islamic terrorist entering this country intending to engage in terrorist activities is certain not going to declare their religion to government.

There are a couple problems with your suggestion. Denying entrance to US based on religious grounds would clearly be a constitutional violation.

That's an interesting claim. Which part of the Constitution?

Assuming we are discussing preventing Muslim from entering the US, Amendment 1.

Nope. That only applies to America or people living here. It doesn't apply to foreigners in foreign countries.

 

[Flopper]

There are a couple problems with your suggestion. Denying entrance to US based on religious grounds would clearly be a constitutional violation. Also, federal law prevents the government from asking a person's religious. Lastly, what good would it do. Anyone entering this country intending to engage in terrorist activities is certain not going to declare their religion to government.

Done during WWII with Germans and Japanese, and all that has to be done is declare us under attack!

Wrong! Neither the Japanese nor Germans were confined because of their religious preference.

Replace ETHNIC with RELIGIOUS for CURRENT CONDITIONS... do I have to spell out everything for you?...OR are you just a terrorist sympathizer...I, for one, would not be surprised!

There are about 100 recognized ethnic groups and almost all of them contain Muslims. To make it little more complicated, most people are a combination of ethnic groups. So discriminating basic ethnicity won't work.

We'll do our best!

You can no more legally stop Muslims from entering the country than Catholics, Jews, or Hindus.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Fuck em. If they can't fight for their freedom in their own home country why bring the cowards here.
At the very least NO MALES OVER THE AGE OF 12

There are a couple problems with your suggestion. Denying entrance to US based on religious grounds would clearly be a constitutional violation. Also, federal law prevents the government from asking a person's religious. Lastly, what good would it do? An Islamic terrorist entering this country intending to engage in terrorist activities is certain not going to declare their religion to government.

There are a couple problems with your suggestion. Denying entrance to US based on religious grounds would clearly be a constitutional violation.

That's an interesting claim. Which part of the Constitution?

Assuming we are discussing preventing Muslim from entering the US, Amendment 1.

Assuming we are discussing preventing Muslim from entering the US, Amendment 1.

Please post the 1st Amendment and explain which part prevents us from keeping Muslims out. Thanks!

 

[Remodeling Maidiac]

Done during WWII with Germans and Japanese, and all that has to be done is declare us under attack!

Wrong! Neither the Japanese nor Germans were confined because of their religious preference.

Replace ETHNIC with RELIGIOUS for CURRENT CONDITIONS... do I have to spell out everything for you?...OR are you just a terrorist sympathizer...I, for one, would not be surprised!

There are about 100 recognized ethnic groups and almost all of them contain Muslims. To make it little more complicated, most people are a combination of ethnic groups. So discriminating basic ethnicity won't work.

We'll do our best!

You can no more legally stop Muslims from entering the country than Catholics, Jews, or Hindus.

You can stop ANYONE from entering this country. Unless of course you live in the land of make believe aka liberaltopia

 

[Vigilante]

Done during WWII with Germans and Japanese, and all that has to be done is declare us under attack!

Wrong! Neither the Japanese nor Germans were confined because of their religious preference.

Replace ETHNIC with RELIGIOUS for CURRENT CONDITIONS... do I have to spell out everything for you?...OR are you just a terrorist sympathizer...I, for one, would not be surprised!

There are about 100 recognized ethnic groups and almost all of them contain Muslims. To make it little more complicated, most people are a combination of ethnic groups. So discriminating basic ethnicity won't work.

We'll do our best!

You can no more legally stop Muslims from entering the country than Catholics, Jews, or Hindus.

Of course you can, silly child.... Patriots always try!

• Ted Cruz CALLS FOR END to Syrian refugee resettlement to America after #Paris TERROR ATTACK
  Right Scoop ^
  Ted Cruz got down to brass tacks about what to do after the heinous Paris terror attack today.Here’s his entire statement [emphasis added]: “America must stand with our allies against the scourge of radical Islamic terrorism. This is an evil that does not discriminate between French, German or American, Christian, Muslim or Jew, soldier, football player, or concert goer. Their only goal is to murder those who do not submit to their vicious, totalitarian ideology. Our deepest condolences go out to our French allies, and I know the government of the United States stands by to offer any assistance necessary.“We...

 

[Flopper]

Fuck em. If they can't fight for their freedom in their own home country why bring the cowards here.
At the very least NO MALES OVER THE AGE OF 12

There are a couple problems with your suggestion. Denying entrance to US based on religious grounds would clearly be a constitutional violation. Also, federal law prevents the government from asking a person's religious. Lastly, what good would it do? An Islamic terrorist entering this country intending to engage in terrorist activities is certain not going to declare their religion to government.

There are a couple problems with your suggestion. Denying entrance to US based on religious grounds would clearly be a constitutional violation.

That's an interesting claim. Which part of the Constitution?

Assuming we are discussing preventing Muslim from entering the US, Amendment 1.

Nope. That only applies to America or people living here. It doesn't apply to foreigners in foreign countries.

You know quite well that is not how SCOTUS would see it. To eliminate or lessen the number of Muslims in the US, would put the government in the position of prohibiting the free exercise of a religion and that is a clearly a violation of the 1st amendment. Even a court packed with conversations would agree.