The executive branch can nuder the supreme court

[bodecea]

Yeah, fuck the judicial branch, what have they ever done for us?

They're non-elected, appointed asshats. They are dispensible, they can and should be replaced when they fuck with the constitution.

Yeah, throw the bums out for not being the elected officials they were never intended to be. And, man oh man, if one of them performs his Constitutional duties by deciding what is Constitutional and what is not then let's string 'em up because someone in a trailor park sees it differently.

If they did their Constitutional duties and enforced the Constitution, then there wouldn't be a problem. The problem is they don't limit the other branches to doing only Constitutional things, which is their duty and they legislate, which isn't their duty

First off, the Supreme Court doesn't just say "Hey, we need to look at that law you guys jjust passed!", it has to bubble up to them through the courts.

Secondly, there are many interpretations about what is Constitutional and what is not. That is why you have a Supreme Court molded by the elected offices of the Executive and Legislative branches and a step away from on-demand democracy where opinions are more volatile. It's a pretty good system, not perfect, there is no such thing.

Anyway, I wish you guys luck in nothing coming of this.

I'm talking about the supreme court rulings. You have to wonder if they've ever read the Constitution

Do you ever read their decisions, Kaz? You know they have to clearly and in detail explain their decisions and how they follow the Constitution and Constitutional precedence.

 

[bodecea]

Because the Supreme Court 'traitors' will be thrown out of the court? That is what you've been talking about.

No because the transformation of our country isn't going to stop, and it isn't going to be good, and you will be crying like a whiny bitch.

Like you guys are now, in this thread? Nah, I have trust in our form of government.

Our form of government is no longer our form of government. Your faith in government just because it's government shows you for a statist tool.

Oh, what changed?

The courts, congress and our executive branch no longer abide by the constitution.

Translation: "The courts, congress and our executive branch no longer do what I like".

 

[bodecea]

Yeah, throw the bums out for not being the elected officials they were never intended to be. And, man oh man, if one of them performs his Constitutional duties by deciding what is Constitutional and what is not then let's string 'em up because someone in a trailor park sees it differently.

If they did their Constitutional duties and enforced the Constitution, then there wouldn't be a problem. The problem is they don't limit the other branches to doing only Constitutional things, which is their duty and they legislate, which isn't their duty

First off, the Supreme Court doesn't just say "Hey, we need to look at that law you guys jjust passed!", it has to bubble up to them through the courts.

Secondly, there are many interpretations about what is Constitutional and what is not. That is why you have a Supreme Court molded by the elected offices of the Executive and Legislative branches and a step away from on-demand democracy where opinions are more volatile. It's a pretty good system, not perfect, there is no such thing.

Anyway, I wish you guys luck in nothing coming of this.

I'm talking about the supreme court rulings. You have to wonder if they've ever read the Constitution

Because you disagree with them means nothing. Nobody always agrees with the Supreme Court. But if you think a minority of wingnuts gets to decide what is Constitutional and ignore elections and the Constitution itself because Kaz is having a sad is....well...it's funny as hell.

Making up law like gay marriage, roe v. wade isn't an opinion, they are not in the Constitution.

And they have flagrantly ignored the 10th amendment limits on Federal power repeatedly, failed to protect our rights regarding free speech in political campaigns and the second amendment as well as the fourth amendment in the war on drugs, the fifth amendment in allowing government to take property from one citizen and give it to another rather than for public use, they allow the use of Interstate trade to justify intrastate business regulations and they use the 16th amendment to justify control of healthcare The list of their crimes goes on, it's not objective, it's clear and direct

Ok, so you say that gay marriage is a law....what is the statute # for that gay marriage law?


And have you read the opinion on Roe v Wade? Are you asserting that we do not have freedom of privacy...control over our own bodies?

 

[bodecea]

They frankly could all where Burkas and I wouldn't be too much.

Yea, they could all wear white robes with hoods too.

But they probably won't.


What the hell happened to the spelling on here?

Nuder for neuter. Where for wear.
Is this a new right wing thing?

Their continuing disdain for education.

 

[eddiew]

I was kind of thinking of a way we can neutralize court decisions that we don't like. A state could simply refuse but the problem with that is that those that refuse could be thrown in jail. The solution would be for the executive branch to simply pardon any official who is charged with contempt of court in those cases thus rendering the courts ability to enforce its decrees powerless. This could be done on a host of issues such as Roe V. Wade or Obamacare bullshit.

or citizens united

 

[koshergrl]

Public lands are owned by the people. A corrupt judge and a corrupt law enforcement official (also appointed) colluded to establish an unconstitutional military presence, and to imprison people who absolutely should not be in prison..and who are in prison for PROTESTING unconstitutional actions of the feds.

The feds do not have the right to point guns at people over land use. Fuck the feds, it's just a matter of time before people start taking them out. I expect it will start in Grant County.

Doesn't mean you get to do any damn thing you want.

Again. The feds do not have the right to point guns at people over land use. We will point our guns back.

And they do not have the right to tell us how to use our private, OR our public, lands.

They are the custodians of our public land yes in a by the people for the poeple kind of way they get to tell us exactly what we can do with our public lands.

Er..no, they are not. They do not get to tell us exactly what we can do with our public lands, which do, after all, belong to us.

They do not own them. They cannot have them. And they need to get the fuck off them.

Cool, I'm gonna' go build my dream home on some free public land now.

You can't afford to build anything.

 

[koshergrl]

No because the transformation of our country isn't going to stop, and it isn't going to be good, and you will be crying like a whiny bitch.

Like you guys are now, in this thread? Nah, I have trust in our form of government.

Our form of government is no longer our form of government. Your faith in government just because it's government shows you for a statist tool.

Oh, what changed?

The courts, congress and our executive branch no longer abide by the constitution.

Translation: "The courts, congress and our executive branch no longer do what I like".

No, the courts, congress and our executive branch no longer operate as a Constitutional republic.

 

[bodecea]

Doesn't mean you get to do any damn thing you want.

Again. The feds do not have the right to point guns at people over land use. We will point our guns back.

And they do not have the right to tell us how to use our private, OR our public, lands.

They are the custodians of our public land yes in a by the people for the poeple kind of way they get to tell us exactly what we can do with our public lands.

Er..no, they are not. They do not get to tell us exactly what we can do with our public lands, which do, after all, belong to us.

They do not own them. They cannot have them. And they need to get the fuck off them.

Cool, I'm gonna' go build my dream home on some free public land now.

You can't afford to build anything.

There's the Allie projection we've become acquainted with.

 

[Avatar4321]

Obama removing the clothes of the supreme court justices... I want to throw up

 

[Contumacious]

I was kind of thinking of a way we can neutralize court decisions that we don't like. A state could simply refuse but the problem with that is that those that refuse could be thrown in jail. The solution would be for the executive branch to simply pardon any official who is charged with contempt of court in those cases thus rendering the courts ability to enforce its decrees powerless. This could be done on a host of issues such as Roe V. Wade or Obamacare bullshit.

HUH

WTF

Isn't that what socialist scumbag FDR did in 1935?

He abolished the Court - the "justices" job nowadays is to:

1- enjoy the prestige of being a "justice"
2- enjoy a steady paycheck
3- enjoy federal blue cross / blue shield
4- assist in perpetrating the fraud that we still enjoy Article III reviews

If the Supreme Court was actually performing its duties we wouldn't have a

gargantuan bankrupt welfare/warfare police state.

.

 

[HappyJoy]

Doesn't mean you get to do any damn thing you want.

Again. The feds do not have the right to point guns at people over land use. We will point our guns back.

And they do not have the right to tell us how to use our private, OR our public, lands.

They are the custodians of our public land yes in a by the people for the poeple kind of way they get to tell us exactly what we can do with our public lands.

Er..no, they are not. They do not get to tell us exactly what we can do with our public lands, which do, after all, belong to us.

They do not own them. They cannot have them. And they need to get the fuck off them.

Cool, I'm gonna' go build my dream home on some free public land now.

You can't afford to build anything.

I can, but that's not the point. You obviously don't have a problem if anyone builds their own home on public lands, pollutes in it's rivers, builds a golf course...what have you.

 

[LoneLaugher]

Nuder. Is that like.....more nude?

You idiot.

 

[theDoctorisIn]

Over my dead body will I ever tolerate the President sending FBI agents marching into the Supreme Court and performing strip searches just because the President doesn't like the way a court case went down.

But you will tolerate your president sending fbi agents marching into Burns Oregon to kill people because he doesn't like the way the people use their own land...

Yes. they took over a government building on public lands. They broke the law.

Public lands are owned by the people. A corrupt judge and a corrupt law enforcement official (also appointed) colluded to establish an unconstitutional military presence, and to imprison people who absolutely should not be in prison..and who are in prison for PROTESTING unconstitutional actions of the feds.

The feds do not have the right to point guns at people over land use. Fuck the feds, it's just a matter of time before people start taking them out. I expect it will start in Grant County.

Doesn't mean you get to do any damn thing you want.

Again. The feds do not have the right to point guns at people over land use. We will point our guns back.

And they do not have the right to tell us how to use our private, OR our public, lands.

Actually, they do have that right - and if more clowns need to be taught that with bullets, so be it.

Point a gun at a Fed, and you'll be killed. Simple as that - and no great loss, from where I'm sitting.

 

[kaz]

Whoa, I hit a nerve. Calm down, Chickie

If you really knew how the courts worked (which you don't) you would know that the Court can't do ANYTHING unless a case is brought before them.

I said nothing contrary to that. When you address the voices in your head, can you let people know that?

So...this is what you do (if you don't want to just keep whining)...bring a case accusing elected officials of not being what they were intended to be. Make sure you've got a good case now and keep us posted.

Sorry , couldn't understand through the tears and sobs, what's that again? Try calming down first

 

[kaz]

Nuder. Is that like.....more nude?

You idiot.

That's why you're the lone laugher. You don't get what everyone else has been laughing about until page 4.

Does your face light up when all off a sudden you sit up and say, OMG, I get it now?

 

[guno]

I was kind of thinking of a way we can neutralize court decisions that we don't like. A state could simply refuse but the problem with that is that those that refuse could be thrown in jail. The solution would be for the executive branch to simply pardon any official who is charged with contempt of court in those cases thus rendering the courts ability to enforce its decrees powerless. This could be done on a host of issues such as Roe V. Wade or Obamacare bullshit.

nuder?. some one who is very prudish, doesnt like to talk about sex, or have it, they think everyone should be nuetered

 

[kaz]

They're non-elected, appointed asshats. They are dispensible, they can and should be replaced when they fuck with the constitution.

Yeah, throw the bums out for not being the elected officials they were never intended to be. And, man oh man, if one of them performs his Constitutional duties by deciding what is Constitutional and what is not then let's string 'em up because someone in a trailor park sees it differently.

If they did their Constitutional duties and enforced the Constitution, then there wouldn't be a problem. The problem is they don't limit the other branches to doing only Constitutional things, which is their duty and they legislate, which isn't their duty

First off, the Supreme Court doesn't just say "Hey, we need to look at that law you guys jjust passed!", it has to bubble up to them through the courts.

Secondly, there are many interpretations about what is Constitutional and what is not. That is why you have a Supreme Court molded by the elected offices of the Executive and Legislative branches and a step away from on-demand democracy where opinions are more volatile. It's a pretty good system, not perfect, there is no such thing.

Anyway, I wish you guys luck in nothing coming of this.

I'm talking about the supreme court rulings. You have to wonder if they've ever read the Constitution

Do you ever read their decisions, Kaz? You know they have to clearly and in detail explain their decisions and how they follow the Constitution and Constitutional precedence.

You mean like when they cite foreign laws. Yeah, it's a gas, or it would be if it didn't fuck us so badly

 

[kaz]

Ok, so you say that gay marriage is a law....what is the statute # for that gay marriage law?

Obergefell v. Hodges

And have you read the opinion on Roe v Wade? Are you asserting that we do not have freedom of privacy...control over our own bodies?

Yes, imbecile, I'm a libertarian who doesn't think we have a right to privacy. That's as stupid as believing you leftists thinking we do have a right to privacy. The IRS and Obamacare blow that crap out of the water.

Privacy is protected by the 10th amendment. But that's TOO powerful for leftists, it is severely restricting on all the other things you want from government, so you make up another fictitious "right to privacy" to replace it. A far weaker one. It is one which is randomly applied to leftist positions.

And if you had a long term memory, you'd recall I"m pro-choice. However, not being as butt stupid as you are, I don't think the law says what I want it to say, I think it says what it says. It says the Feds have no say on abortion. I think States should keep it legal though

 

[bodecea]

Whoa, I hit a nerve. Calm down, Chickie

If you really knew how the courts worked (which you don't) you would know that the Court can't do ANYTHING unless a case is brought before them.

I said nothing contrary to that. When you address the voices in your head, can you let people know that?

So...this is what you do (if you don't want to just keep whining)...bring a case accusing elected officials of not being what they were intended to be. Make sure you've got a good case now and keep us posted.

Sorry , couldn't understand through the tears and sobs, what's that again? Try calming down first

I understand there are still con-federate flag crying towels available for you.

 

[kaz]

Whoa, I hit a nerve. Calm down, Chickie

If you really knew how the courts worked (which you don't) you would know that the Court can't do ANYTHING unless a case is brought before them.

I said nothing contrary to that. When you address the voices in your head, can you let people know that?

So...this is what you do (if you don't want to just keep whining)...bring a case accusing elected officials of not being what they were intended to be. Make sure you've got a good case now and keep us posted.

Sorry , couldn't understand through the tears and sobs, what's that again? Try calming down first

I understand there are still con-federate flag crying towels available for you.

I'll pass on another rag after you finish crying in it. They always are not only soaking wet but smell funny