P@triot
Diamond Member
- Jul 5, 2011
- 61,490
- 11,696
- Thread starter
- #161
So one type of advertising is okay with you, another isn't. Thanks for admitting your hypocrisy.
![]()
![]()
SW - you're really so stupid that you don't understand why one advertises?
Yep - no doubt about it - you've definitely been a dependent of government since becoming an "adult" (and I do use that term lightly).
By the way, thank you for admitting you are a hypocrite (by your own standards). After all, since you approve one type of spending (welfare for you and your children) you must approve ALL forms of spending (Iraq "war").
![]()
Perhaps you did not notice that spending on assistance to our citizens serves a social purpose and provides benefits to our society... I approve such spending...the spending on Iraq did us no good, served no social purpose, provided no benefits and killed a bunch of innocent people... I repudiate that spending with prejudice...![]()
First of all, spending on "assistance" serves absolutely no purpose what so ever and in fact does tremendously more harm than good.
But that aside, perhaps SW did not notice that advertising to recruit for the military is simply a must, while advertising for a law that already passed is not only comparing apples-to-oranges, but is also a monumental waste.
Incidentally, can you describe where the origin of debt arises from [MENTION=45552]TyroneSlothrop[/MENTION]?