georgephillip
Diamond Member
- Thread starter
- #301
Here's where I'm starting, Rocco:georgephillip, Hossfly, et al,
I'm kind-a-intrigued by the alternative perspective.
(COMMENT)Can you link to a single Haaretz writer calling for Israel's destruction?Leave it to Georgie Boy to post something from a Leftist newspapers whose writers so many times appear to wish the destruction of Israel. I much rather believe the Reverend who fought apartheid in South Africa than anything Haaretz has to say. He saw what real apartheid is, not those writing for Haaretz. Meanwhile, Georgie Boy, doesn't want to believe the Arab journalists who say that the Arabs have it better in Israel than the other Arab countries. It is almost against Georgie Boy's religion to hear anyone say anything good about israel even if it is said by Arabs themselves. Since you brought up Mandela, did you notice what the Reverend said he would say to Desmond Tutu if Tutu were in front of him? Get back to us, Georgie Boy, about apartheid when you can tell us how wonderful the Arab world is to the people living in their countries.
There exists a rigid apartheid legal system in Greater Israel.
Israeli Arab gets arrested for throwing rocks and is tried in civil courts for assault.
Palestinian Arab gets arrested for the same offense and is tried by military courts for terrorism.
OK, I'm opening my mind. Granted I don't agree with the Administration of the Occupied Territories, and have often thought that there are alternative ways of doing the same thing. But I have to ask, other than sensationalize and propaganda effects, why some consistently invoke the "apartheid" label on nearly all things security and police related.
I mean, I know how to begin the process of fixing the Administration of the Occupied Territories (not that Israel would do it); but, I see I don't quite understand this labeling.
How are you applying the concepts of "Apartheid" to the "OTs?"
Most Respectfully,
R
"The comparison between Israel's treatment of the Palestinians to South Africa's treatment of non-whites during its apartheid era is controversial.[1]
"The analogy has been used by United Nations investigators, human rights groups and critics of Israeli policy, some of which have also accused Israel of committing the crime of apartheid.
" Critics of Israeli policy say that 'a system of control' in the Israeli-occupied West Bank, including Jewish-only settlements, separate roads for Israeli and Palestinian citizens, military checkpoints, discriminatory marriage law, the West Bank barrier, use of Palestinians as cheap labour, Palestinian West Bank enclaves, inequities in infrastructure, legal rights, and access to land and resources between Palestinians and Israeli residents in the Israeli-occupied territories resembles some aspects of the South African apartheid regime, and that elements of Israel's occupation constitute forms of colonialism and of apartheid, which are contrary to international law."
Israel and the apartheid analogy - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
I know anyone can edit Wiki; however, many Jews much smarter than I am have also figured that one out. Your patience and tact have opened my eyes too. It's clear that there are "believers" on both sides that will never tolerate the "other" on "their" land.
If you have a clue about where a solution starts, I'm all ears.