Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁
I provided a link but you keep insisting on carving out pertinent portions of my post.This is a lie.I compromise,Thank you for again confirming you do not offer compromise, you demand acquiescence.
Just like I said.
So, no -actual- reason, just the talking point you were fed a few moths ago.One guy in the senate.
Thanks.
You may think that, break bad and get your hopes crushed into oblivion, Commie.
Oh, I know it. Weren't you busy yelling at the clouds or something?
Last I recall, I was challenging your commie self to break and let things play out where they may, baby boy.
Challenging me to break? Not really sure what that is or why I would be interested, Mary.
Try to take our weapons, commie leftist, you will rue the day, I bet that.
Oh, Ok. you're an idiot. I keep giving you too much credit.
I'm not interested in taking your guns away unless you have a violent criminal background, a history of mental illness or a restraining order. Any of those apply to you?
Why am I asking you this? Of course you're mental.
I provided a link but you keep insisting on carving out pertinent portions of my post.This is a lie.I compromise,Thank you for again confirming you do not offer compromise, you demand acquiescence.
Just like I said.
So, no -actual- reason, just the talking point you were fed a few moths ago.One guy in the senate.
Thanks.
You think that if 80-90% of the people agreed with you, the Republicans in the Senate would not have pressured, if not forced, McConnell to bring it to the floor?
So let me get this straight -- you not only mindlessly repeat those talking points, but you BELIEVE them"?
We're back to "no -actual- reason, just the talking point you were fed a few moths ago"
Try again..
Not that you'll admit, anyway,.I'm not interested in taking your guns away unless you have a violent criminal background, a history of mental illness or a restraining order.
Oh, I know it. Weren't you busy yelling at the clouds or something?
Last I recall, I was challenging your commie self to break and let things play out where they may, baby boy.
Challenging me to break? Not really sure what that is or why I would be interested, Mary.
Try to take our weapons, commie leftist, you will rue the day, I bet that.
Oh, Ok. you're an idiot. I keep giving you too much credit.
I'm not interested in taking your guns away unless you have a violent criminal background, a history of mental illness or a restraining order. Any of those apply to you?
No, but you're still a commie that would like to try.
Last I recall, I was challenging your commie self to break and let things play out where they may, baby boy.
Challenging me to break? Not really sure what that is or why I would be interested, Mary.
Try to take our weapons, commie leftist, you will rue the day, I bet that.
Oh, Ok. you're an idiot. I keep giving you too much credit.
I'm not interested in taking your guns away unless you have a violent criminal background, a history of mental illness or a restraining order. Any of those apply to you?
No, but you're still a commie that would like to try.
Nope. But I think as a gun owner you should know better than threatening people online. I wonder if you've ever been banned for any such behavior.
Oh, sorry - you were about to tell us why, if 80-90% of the people -actually- agree with you, you don't you have what you want now.Then what's stopping Mitch from bringing it up or a vote?I provided a link but you keep insisting on carving out pertinent portions of my post.This is a lie.I compromise,Thank you for again confirming you do not offer compromise, you demand acquiescence.
Just like I said.
So, no -actual- reason, just the talking point you were fed a few moths ago.One guy in the senate.
Thanks.
You think that if 80-90% of the people agreed with you, the Republicans in the Senate would not have pressured, if not forced, McConnell to bring it to the floor?
So let me get this straight -- you not only mindlessly repeat those talking points, but you BELIEVE them"?
We're back to "no -actual- reason, just the talking point you were fed a few moths ago"
Try again..
Challenging me to break? Not really sure what that is or why I would be interested, Mary.
Try to take our weapons, commie leftist, you will rue the day, I bet that.
Oh, Ok. you're an idiot. I keep giving you too much credit.
I'm not interested in taking your guns away unless you have a violent criminal background, a history of mental illness or a restraining order. Any of those apply to you?
No, but you're still a commie that would like to try.
Nope. But I think as a gun owner you should know better than threatening people online. I wonder if you've ever been banned for any such behavior.
I don't wonder if you're a gun-grabbing Commie faggot because I know you are.
Not that you'll admit, anyway,.I'm not interested in taking your guns away unless you have a violent criminal background, a history of mental illness or a restraining order.
You ARE, however, interesting in placing unnecessary and ineffective restrictions on his right to keep and bear arms.
Challenging me to break? Not really sure what that is or why I would be interested, Mary.
Try to take our weapons, commie leftist, you will rue the day, I bet that.
Oh, Ok. you're an idiot. I keep giving you too much credit.
I'm not interested in taking your guns away unless you have a violent criminal background, a history of mental illness or a restraining order. Any of those apply to you?
No, but you're still a commie that would like to try.
Nope. But I think as a gun owner you should know better than threatening people online. I wonder if you've ever been banned for any such behavior.
I don't wonder if you're a gun-grabbing Commie faggot because I know you are.
What threat did I make, you leftist piece of shit?
I threatened who for what wrong reason, hmm?
Try to take our weapons, commie leftist, you will rue the day, I bet that.
Oh, Ok. you're an idiot. I keep giving you too much credit.
I'm not interested in taking your guns away unless you have a violent criminal background, a history of mental illness or a restraining order. Any of those apply to you?
No, but you're still a commie that would like to try.
Nope. But I think as a gun owner you should know better than threatening people online. I wonder if you've ever been banned for any such behavior.
I don't wonder if you're a gun-grabbing Commie faggot because I know you are.
What threat did I make, you leftist piece of shit?
I threatened who for what wrong reason, hmm?
You've thrown out threats in the past. Probably had a couple of posts deleted, Mary.
You ARE, however, interesting in placing unnecessary and ineffective restrictions on his - and everyone else's - right to keep and bear arms.I am a gun owner, so no I'm not interested in banning all guns or taking any unless the owners are mentall ill or criminals.Not that you'll admit, anyway,.I'm not interested in taking your guns away unless you have a violent criminal background, a history of mental illness or a restraining order.
You ARE, however, interesting in placing unnecessary and ineffective restrictions on his right to keep and bear arms.
Oh, sorry - you were about to tell us why, if 80-90% of the people -actually- agree with you, you don't you have what you want now.Then what's stopping Mitch from bringing it up or a vote?I provided a link but you keep insisting on carving out pertinent portions of my post.This is a lie.I compromise,
So, no -actual- reason, just the talking point you were fed a few moths ago.One guy in the senate.
Thanks.
You think that if 80-90% of the people agreed with you, the Republicans in the Senate would not have pressured, if not forced, McConnell to bring it to the floor?
So let me get this straight -- you not only mindlessly repeat those talking points, but you BELIEVE them"?
We're back to "no -actual- reason, just the talking point you were fed a few moths ago"
Try again..
I mean other than that pathetic talking point you tried to regurgitate a moment ago.
Suuure.Yeah, there are several polls showing a high percentage for background checks...Oh, sorry - you were about to tell us why, if 80-90% of the people -actually- agree with you, you don't you have what you want now.Then what's stopping Mitch from bringing it up or a vote?I provided a link but you keep insisting on carving out pertinent portions of my post.This is a lie.
So, no -actual- reason, just the talking point you were fed a few moths ago.
Thanks.
You think that if 80-90% of the people agreed with you, the Republicans in the Senate would not have pressured, if not forced, McConnell to bring it to the floor?
So let me get this straight -- you not only mindlessly repeat those talking points, but you BELIEVE them"?
We're back to "no -actual- reason, just the talking point you were fed a few moths ago"
Try again..
I mean other than that pathetic talking point you tried to regurgitate a moment ago.
Oh, Ok. you're an idiot. I keep giving you too much credit.
I'm not interested in taking your guns away unless you have a violent criminal background, a history of mental illness or a restraining order. Any of those apply to you?
No, but you're still a commie that would like to try.
Nope. But I think as a gun owner you should know better than threatening people online. I wonder if you've ever been banned for any such behavior.
I don't wonder if you're a gun-grabbing Commie faggot because I know you are.
What threat did I make, you leftist piece of shit?
I threatened who for what wrong reason, hmm?
You've thrown out threats in the past. Probably had a couple of posts deleted, Mary.
That is not today, punk. I probably deleted a couple myself for being not right. What's that to your leftist gun-grabbing communist ass?
You ARE, however, interesting in placing unnecessary and ineffective restrictions on his - and everyone else's - right to keep and bear arms.I am a gun owner, so no I'm not interested in banning all guns or taking any unless the owners are mentall ill or criminals.Not that you'll admit, anyway,.I'm not interested in taking your guns away unless you have a violent criminal background, a history of mental illness or a restraining order.
You ARE, however, interesting in placing unnecessary and ineffective restrictions on his right to keep and bear arms.
Suuure.Yeah, there are several polls showing a high percentage for background checks...Oh, sorry - you were about to tell us why, if 80-90% of the people -actually- agree with you, you don't you have what you want now.Then what's stopping Mitch from bringing it up or a vote?I provided a link but you keep insisting on carving out pertinent portions of my post.
You think that if 80-90% of the people agreed with you, the Republicans in the Senate would not have pressured, if not forced, McConnell to bring it to the floor?
So let me get this straight -- you not only mindlessly repeat those talking points, but you BELIEVE them"?
We're back to "no -actual- reason, just the talking point you were fed a few moths ago"
Try again..
I mean other than that pathetic talking point you tried to regurgitate a moment ago.
Now, explain how and why, if 80-90% of the people -actually- agree with you, you don't you have what you want now
I mean other than that pathetic talking point you tried to regurgitate a moment ago.
Nothing here changes the fact you seek to place unnecessary and ineffective restrictions on his - and everyone else's - right to keep and bear arms.That's because you're an extremist incapable of compromise.You ARE, however, interesting in placing unnecessary and ineffective restrictions on his - and everyone else's - right to keep and bear arms.I am a gun owner, so no I'm not interested in banning all guns or taking any unless the owners are mentall ill or criminals.Not that you'll admit, anyway,.I'm not interested in taking your guns away unless you have a violent criminal background, a history of mental illness or a restraining order.
You ARE, however, interesting in placing unnecessary and ineffective restrictions on his right to keep and bear arms.
Why arent people made to register their guns. It would make it easier to manage.Feds order Apple and Google to turn over names in data base of gunscope app users...
Exclusive: Feds Demand Apple And Google Hand Over Names Of 10,000+ Users Of A Gun Scope App
Nothing here changes the fact you seek to place unnecessary and ineffective restrictions on his - and everyone else's - right to keep and bear arms.That's because you're an extremist incapable of compromise.You ARE, however, interesting in placing unnecessary and ineffective restrictions on his - and everyone else's - right to keep and bear arms.I am a gun owner, so no I'm not interested in banning all guns or taking any unless the owners are mentall ill or criminals.Not that you'll admit, anyway,.I'm not interested in taking your guns away unless you have a violent criminal background, a history of mental illness or a restraining order.
You ARE, however, interesting in placing unnecessary and ineffective restrictions on his right to keep and bear arms.
