Indeed that is a fact. The same as guns. I have never seen a gun leap off of a table and kill someone. However, vehicles DO kill people, every year, with no one behind the wheel.
Huh....Who knew!
Navigation
Install the app
How to install the app on iOS
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
More options
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
The guy isn't White, didn't use an "Assault Rifle" and didn't use a large capacity magazine...
- Thread starter 2aguy
- Start date
Indeed that is a fact. The same as guns. I have never seen a gun leap off of a table and kill someone. However, vehicles DO kill people, every year, with no one behind the wheel.
Huh....Who knew!
2aguy
Diamond Member
- Jul 19, 2014
- 112,329
- 52,557
- 2,290
- Thread starter
- #122
Can you transport goods with a gun, can your travel by gun? No. The purpose of a gun to to harm or kill. Or, in the majority of cases, it puffs out your chest & makes you think you are some sort of tough guy.so do gunsTrucks serve a purpose. Jets serve a purpose.so are you saying that we shouldn't be able to have things if they have the potential to kill?Bazookas killed no one so lets allow everyone to have bazookas.
Do ya get it yet?
Just because assault rifles are lesas common & less commonly used to kill people dfoesd not lessen their potential killing power.
This is why you have no logic.
Everything has the potential to kill
Trucks...Oklahoma City, Nice....killed more than the worst shooting incidents....Jets.....over 3,000 in one go....
Nope.....according to bill clinton's Department of Justice, Americans use guns 1,500,000 times a year to stop violent criminal attack.......criminals use guns to murder 9,616 times last year...and 70-80% of those victims were criminals...
can you tell which number is bigger?
2aguy
Diamond Member
- Jul 19, 2014
- 112,329
- 52,557
- 2,290
- Thread starter
- #123
Trucks don't kill people. People kill people.so are you saying that we shouldn't be able to have things if they have the potential to kill?Yes.....nice comeback when you are faced with reality and perspective.......those are actual numbers...and now that you actually see them in black and white, they show how stupid your argument is....
Bazookas killed no one so lets allow everyone to have bazookas.
Do ya get it yet?
Just because assault rifles are lesas common & less commonly used to kill people dfoesd not lessen their potential killing power.
This is why you have no logic.
Everything has the potential to kill
Trucks...Oklahoma City, Nice....killed more than the worst shooting incidents....Jets.....over 3,000 in one go....
Indeed that is a fact. The same as guns. I have never seen a gun leap off of a table and kill someone. However, vehicles DO kill people, every year, with no one behind the wheel.
Huh....Who knew!
In fact....the actor who played Checkov in the new Star Trek movie was killed by his own car....it crushed him to death...with no one behind the wheel....
Skull Pilot
Diamond Member
- Nov 17, 2007
- 45,446
- 6,163
- 1,830
Can you transport goods with a gun, can your travel by gun? No. The purpose of a gun to to harm or kill. Or, in the majority of cases, it puffs out your chest & makes you think you are some sort of tough guy.so do gunsTrucks serve a purpose. Jets serve a purpose.so are you saying that we shouldn't be able to have things if they have the potential to kill?Bazookas killed no one so lets allow everyone to have bazookas.
Do ya get it yet?
Just because assault rifles are lesas common & less commonly used to kill people dfoesd not lessen their potential killing power.
This is why you have no logic.
Everything has the potential to kill
Trucks...Oklahoma City, Nice....killed more than the worst shooting incidents....Jets.....over 3,000 in one go....
only people who have no experience with guns say stupid shit like you just did.
a gun is a tool that it all it is. I regard a gun as a tool no different from a table saw, or a drill.
And if the purpose of a gun is to kill then I and millions of other gun owners have been using them wrong
RealDave
Gold Member
- Sep 28, 2016
- 26,521
- 3,565
- 290
They also ignore that the number of people killed or wounded is due that the shooter was ex military.So you're disappointed because there weren't more bullets flying around the terminal? Not enough lethal crossfire to satisfy you?An airport. Sure, there won't be any armed law enforcement people there.Six dead, more in the hospital and the fact he did not use an assault rifle is your silver lining. You care more about weapons than humans. And yet you want to be taken seriously.So....the guy isn't white, according to the left, he may have been a muslim.....he didn't use an "Assault Rifle," he didn't use a large capacity magazine, and the FBI knew about him.....the left wing anti gunners are already having a bad 2017.........
No moron...I am pointing out how stupid your anti-gun laws are......he used a gun you morons have created....through your magazine restrictions and he still killed people...
Which is exactly why we do not trust you morons...we know that a shooter can use a 9 round magazine to kill people...so once you have cemented getting rid of anything over 10 rounds, you will move on to the 10 and less round magazines....you can't be trusted and you will not stop.....
And most of all...it was a gun free zone.......except for the guy who killed people.....
You don't give a damn about people. You only admire weapons.
Again.....the police allowed 5 people to get killed because they were not at the scene when the shooting started......it was a gun free zone....and even with armed police he still managed to shoot people...because it was a gun free zone for law abiding people......until the police arrived......too late....
2aguy
Diamond Member
- Jul 19, 2014
- 112,329
- 52,557
- 2,290
- Thread starter
- #126
Can you transport goods with a gun, can your travel by gun? No. The purpose of a gun to to harm or kill. Or, in the majority of cases, it puffs out your chest & makes you think you are some sort of tough guy.so do gunsTrucks serve a purpose. Jets serve a purpose.so are you saying that we shouldn't be able to have things if they have the potential to kill?Bazookas killed no one so lets allow everyone to have bazookas.
Do ya get it yet?
Just because assault rifles are lesas common & less commonly used to kill people dfoesd not lessen their potential killing power.
This is why you have no logic.
Everything has the potential to kill
Trucks...Oklahoma City, Nice....killed more than the worst shooting incidents....Jets.....over 3,000 in one go....
You can stop violent criminals with a gun....works a lot better than politely asking them to stop shooting, raping and stabbing you.......
So you're disappointed because there weren't more bullets flying around the terminal? Not enough lethal crossfire to satisfy you?An airport. Sure, there won't be any armed law enforcement people there.Six dead, more in the hospital and the fact he did not use an assault rifle is your silver lining. You care more about weapons than humans. And yet you want to be taken seriously.So....the guy isn't white, according to the left, he may have been a muslim.....he didn't use an "Assault Rifle," he didn't use a large capacity magazine, and the FBI knew about him.....the left wing anti gunners are already having a bad 2017.........
No moron...I am pointing out how stupid your anti-gun laws are......he used a gun you morons have created....through your magazine restrictions and he still killed people...
Which is exactly why we do not trust you morons...we know that a shooter can use a 9 round magazine to kill people...so once you have cemented getting rid of anything over 10 rounds, you will move on to the 10 and less round magazines....you can't be trusted and you will not stop.....
And most of all...it was a gun free zone.......except for the guy who killed people.....
You don't give a damn about people. You only admire weapons.
Again.....the police allowed 5 people to get killed because they were not at the scene when the shooting started......it was a gun free zone....and even with armed police he still managed to shoot people...because it was a gun free zone for law abiding people......until the police arrived......too late....
No, we're disappointed that the laws you are all so proud of only allow evil doers to have guns. Back in the 1970's had the idiot done what he did in Ft. Lauderdale in Nevada where we are far more gun owner friendly he would have been able to shoot only a couple of people before he was ventilated into submission. You all WANT a culture of victimhood. You seem to love it when innocent people are harmed.
Why is that?
2aguy
Diamond Member
- Jul 19, 2014
- 112,329
- 52,557
- 2,290
- Thread starter
- #128
They also ignore that the number of people killed or wounded is due that the shooter was ex military.So you're disappointed because there weren't more bullets flying around the terminal? Not enough lethal crossfire to satisfy you?An airport. Sure, there won't be any armed law enforcement people there.Six dead, more in the hospital and the fact he did not use an assault rifle is your silver lining. You care more about weapons than humans. And yet you want to be taken seriously.
No moron...I am pointing out how stupid your anti-gun laws are......he used a gun you morons have created....through your magazine restrictions and he still killed people...
Which is exactly why we do not trust you morons...we know that a shooter can use a 9 round magazine to kill people...so once you have cemented getting rid of anything over 10 rounds, you will move on to the 10 and less round magazines....you can't be trusted and you will not stop.....
And most of all...it was a gun free zone.......except for the guy who killed people.....
You don't give a damn about people. You only admire weapons.
Again.....the police allowed 5 people to get killed because they were not at the scene when the shooting started......it was a gun free zone....and even with armed police he still managed to shoot people...because it was a gun free zone for law abiding people......until the police arrived......too late....
Of the 9,616 murders committed in 2015......almost all of them were by people who were not, and could not serve in the military.....
They also ignore that the number of people killed or wounded is due that the shooter was ex military.So you're disappointed because there weren't more bullets flying around the terminal? Not enough lethal crossfire to satisfy you?An airport. Sure, there won't be any armed law enforcement people there.Six dead, more in the hospital and the fact he did not use an assault rifle is your silver lining. You care more about weapons than humans. And yet you want to be taken seriously.
No moron...I am pointing out how stupid your anti-gun laws are......he used a gun you morons have created....through your magazine restrictions and he still killed people...
Which is exactly why we do not trust you morons...we know that a shooter can use a 9 round magazine to kill people...so once you have cemented getting rid of anything over 10 rounds, you will move on to the 10 and less round magazines....you can't be trusted and you will not stop.....
And most of all...it was a gun free zone.......except for the guy who killed people.....
You don't give a damn about people. You only admire weapons.
Again.....the police allowed 5 people to get killed because they were not at the scene when the shooting started......it was a gun free zone....and even with armed police he still managed to shoot people...because it was a gun free zone for law abiding people......until the police arrived......too late....
Nope. It was because no one else was armed silly boy. It's pretty easy to shoot a lot of people when they are all crammed into a small space and they can't defend themselves thanks to the bullshit laws you have put in place. My gosh but you're a stupid clown.
2aguy
Diamond Member
- Jul 19, 2014
- 112,329
- 52,557
- 2,290
- Thread starter
- #130
So you're disappointed because there weren't more bullets flying around the terminal? Not enough lethal crossfire to satisfy you?An airport. Sure, there won't be any armed law enforcement people there.Six dead, more in the hospital and the fact he did not use an assault rifle is your silver lining. You care more about weapons than humans. And yet you want to be taken seriously.
No moron...I am pointing out how stupid your anti-gun laws are......he used a gun you morons have created....through your magazine restrictions and he still killed people...
Which is exactly why we do not trust you morons...we know that a shooter can use a 9 round magazine to kill people...so once you have cemented getting rid of anything over 10 rounds, you will move on to the 10 and less round magazines....you can't be trusted and you will not stop.....
And most of all...it was a gun free zone.......except for the guy who killed people.....
You don't give a damn about people. You only admire weapons.
Again.....the police allowed 5 people to get killed because they were not at the scene when the shooting started......it was a gun free zone....and even with armed police he still managed to shoot people...because it was a gun free zone for law abiding people......until the police arrived......too late....
No, we're disappointed that the laws you are all so proud of only allow evil doers to have guns. Back in the 1970's had the idiot done what he did in Ft. Lauderdale in Nevada where we are far more gun owner friendly he would have been able to shoot only a couple of people before he was ventilated into submission. You all WANT a culture of victimhood. You seem to love it when innocent people are harmed.
Why is that?
They don't like people.....want population control....
2aguy
Diamond Member
- Jul 19, 2014
- 112,329
- 52,557
- 2,290
- Thread starter
- #131
They also ignore that the number of people killed or wounded is due that the shooter was ex military.So you're disappointed because there weren't more bullets flying around the terminal? Not enough lethal crossfire to satisfy you?An airport. Sure, there won't be any armed law enforcement people there.Six dead, more in the hospital and the fact he did not use an assault rifle is your silver lining. You care more about weapons than humans. And yet you want to be taken seriously.
No moron...I am pointing out how stupid your anti-gun laws are......he used a gun you morons have created....through your magazine restrictions and he still killed people...
Which is exactly why we do not trust you morons...we know that a shooter can use a 9 round magazine to kill people...so once you have cemented getting rid of anything over 10 rounds, you will move on to the 10 and less round magazines....you can't be trusted and you will not stop.....
And most of all...it was a gun free zone.......except for the guy who killed people.....
You don't give a damn about people. You only admire weapons.
Again.....the police allowed 5 people to get killed because they were not at the scene when the shooting started......it was a gun free zone....and even with armed police he still managed to shoot people...because it was a gun free zone for law abiding people......until the police arrived......too late....
I have been waiting for a reason to post this again...thanks,
This is what guns are for....stopping evil people....
Self defense with a gun:
Self defense with a gun......40 years of actual research...first is the name of the group that conducted the research, then the year, then the number of defensive gun uses and finally wether the research contained police or military defensive gun uses....
A quick guide to the studies and the numbers.....the full lay out of what was studied by each study is in the links....
GunCite-Gun Control-How Often Are Guns Used in Self-Defense
GunCite Frequency of Defensive Gun Use in Previous Surveys
Field...1976....3,052,717 ( no cops, military)
DMIa 1978...2,141,512 ( no cops, military)
L.A. TIMES...1994...3,609,68 ( no cops, military)
Kleck......1994...2.5 million ( no cops, military)
Obama's CDC....2013....500,000--3million
--------------------
Bordua...1977...1,414,544
DMIb...1978...1,098,409 ( no cops, military)
Hart...1981...1.797,461 ( no cops, military)
Mauser...1990...1,487,342 ( no cops, military)
Gallup...1993...1,621,377 ( no cops, military)
DEPT. OF JUSTICE...1994...1.5 million ( the bill clinton study)
Journal of Quantitative Criminology--- 989,883 times per year."
(Based on survey data from a 2000 study published in the Journal of Quantitative Criminology,[17] U.S. civilians use guns to defend themselves and others from crime at least 989,883 times per year.[18])
Paper: "Measuring Civilian Defensive Firearm Use: A Methodological Experiment." By David McDowall and others. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, March 2000. Measuring Civilian Defensive Firearm Use: A Methodological Experiment - Springer
-------------------------------------------
Ohio...1982...771,043
Gallup...1991...777,152
Tarrance... 1994... 764,036 (no cops, military)
Lawerence Southwich Jr. 400,000 fewer violent crimes and at least 800,000 violent crimes deterred..
*****************************************
If you take the studies from that Kleck cites in his paper, 16 of them....and you only average the ones that exclude military and police shootings..the average becomes 2 million...I use those studies because I have the details on them...and they are still 10 studies (including Kleck's)....
RealDave
Gold Member
- Sep 28, 2016
- 26,521
- 3,565
- 290
Can you transport goods with a gun, can your travel by gun? No. The purpose of a gun to to harm or kill. Or, in the majority of cases, it puffs out your chest & makes you think you are some sort of tough guy.so do gunsTrucks serve a purpose. Jets serve a purpose.so are you saying that we shouldn't be able to have things if they have the potential to kill?
Everything has the potential to kill
Trucks...Oklahoma City, Nice....killed more than the worst shooting incidents....Jets.....over 3,000 in one go....
only people who have no experience with guns say stupid shit like you just did.
a gun is a tool that it all it is. I regard a gun as a tool no different from a table saw, or a drill.
And if the purpose of a gun is to kill then I and millions of other gun owners have been using them wrong
You are right. Carpenters typically have a piston on their tool belt. Grab by the barrel & you can pound nails & that front sight works as a flat head screw driver.
Guns are designed to kill or harm. Yes you can target shoot or hunt but you don't need a assault type rifle to do that.
2aguy
Diamond Member
- Jul 19, 2014
- 112,329
- 52,557
- 2,290
- Thread starter
- #133
Can you transport goods with a gun, can your travel by gun? No. The purpose of a gun to to harm or kill. Or, in the majority of cases, it puffs out your chest & makes you think you are some sort of tough guy.so do gunsTrucks serve a purpose. Jets serve a purpose.Trucks...Oklahoma City, Nice....killed more than the worst shooting incidents....Jets.....over 3,000 in one go....
only people who have no experience with guns say stupid shit like you just did.
a gun is a tool that it all it is. I regard a gun as a tool no different from a table saw, or a drill.
And if the purpose of a gun is to kill then I and millions of other gun owners have been using them wrong
You are right. Carpenters typically have a piston on their tool belt. Grab by the barrel & you can pound nails & that front sight works as a flat head screw driver.
Guns are designed to kill or harm. Yes you can target shoot or hunt but you don't need a assault type rifle to do that.
You need a rifle with a magazine for self defense...especially if you own a store in a democrat voting district when democrats decide to riot...
2aguy
Diamond Member
- Jul 19, 2014
- 112,329
- 52,557
- 2,290
- Thread starter
- #134
Can you transport goods with a gun, can your travel by gun? No. The purpose of a gun to to harm or kill. Or, in the majority of cases, it puffs out your chest & makes you think you are some sort of tough guy.so do gunsTrucks serve a purpose. Jets serve a purpose.Trucks...Oklahoma City, Nice....killed more than the worst shooting incidents....Jets.....over 3,000 in one go....
only people who have no experience with guns say stupid shit like you just did.
a gun is a tool that it all it is. I regard a gun as a tool no different from a table saw, or a drill.
And if the purpose of a gun is to kill then I and millions of other gun owners have been using them wrong
You are right. Carpenters typically have a piston on their tool belt. Grab by the barrel & you can pound nails & that front sight works as a flat head screw driver.
Guns are designed to kill or harm. Yes you can target shoot or hunt but you don't need a assault type rifle to do that.
You don't need a computer to post silly stuff on the internet...only the police, military and government really need computers..right?
Nosmo King
Gold Member
The gun loving culture believes in the hero gunslinger. The fact of a concealed carry permit does not guarantee skilled marksmanship. More bullets flying around is not a solution anymore than gasoline can extinguish fires.So you're disappointed because there weren't more bullets flying around the terminal? Not enough lethal crossfire to satisfy you?An airport. Sure, there won't be any armed law enforcement people there.Six dead, more in the hospital and the fact he did not use an assault rifle is your silver lining. You care more about weapons than humans. And yet you want to be taken seriously.
No moron...I am pointing out how stupid your anti-gun laws are......he used a gun you morons have created....through your magazine restrictions and he still killed people...
Which is exactly why we do not trust you morons...we know that a shooter can use a 9 round magazine to kill people...so once you have cemented getting rid of anything over 10 rounds, you will move on to the 10 and less round magazines....you can't be trusted and you will not stop.....
And most of all...it was a gun free zone.......except for the guy who killed people.....
You don't give a damn about people. You only admire weapons.
Again.....the police allowed 5 people to get killed because they were not at the scene when the shooting started......it was a gun free zone....and even with armed police he still managed to shoot people...because it was a gun free zone for law abiding people......until the police arrived......too late....
No, we're disappointed that the laws you are all so proud of only allow evil doers to have guns. Back in the 1970's had the idiot done what he did in Ft. Lauderdale in Nevada where we are far more gun owner friendly he would have been able to shoot only a couple of people before he was ventilated into submission. You all WANT a culture of victimhood. You seem to love it when innocent people are harmed.
Why is that?
The mere presence of guns does not guarantee an absence of gun violence. When Reagan was shot, he was surrounded by armed security personnel, yet he and three others took bullets that day.
Dirty Harry is a cinematic character. Mrs. Smith and her .38 in the handbag ain't Dirty Harry.
You seem to want to expand the violent gun culture in spite of the obvious dangers. Why?
RealDave
Gold Member
- Sep 28, 2016
- 26,521
- 3,565
- 290
Most ofthose studies are bullshit. What is considered a deterred crime? They call up a person & ask some question, they have a bullshit story &then they write it down.They also ignore that the number of people killed or wounded is due that the shooter was ex military.So you're disappointed because there weren't more bullets flying around the terminal? Not enough lethal crossfire to satisfy you?An airport. Sure, there won't be any armed law enforcement people there.No moron...I am pointing out how stupid your anti-gun laws are......he used a gun you morons have created....through your magazine restrictions and he still killed people...
Which is exactly why we do not trust you morons...we know that a shooter can use a 9 round magazine to kill people...so once you have cemented getting rid of anything over 10 rounds, you will move on to the 10 and less round magazines....you can't be trusted and you will not stop.....
And most of all...it was a gun free zone.......except for the guy who killed people.....
You don't give a damn about people. You only admire weapons.
Again.....the police allowed 5 people to get killed because they were not at the scene when the shooting started......it was a gun free zone....and even with armed police he still managed to shoot people...because it was a gun free zone for law abiding people......until the police arrived......too late....
I have been waiting for a reason to post this again...thanks,
This is what guns are for....stopping evil people....
Self defense with a gun:
Self defense with a gun......40 years of actual research...first is the name of the group that conducted the research, then the year, then the number of defensive gun uses and finally wether the research contained police or military defensive gun uses....
A quick guide to the studies and the numbers.....the full lay out of what was studied by each study is in the links....
GunCite-Gun Control-How Often Are Guns Used in Self-Defense
GunCite Frequency of Defensive Gun Use in Previous Surveys
Field...1976....3,052,717 ( no cops, military)
DMIa 1978...2,141,512 ( no cops, military)
L.A. TIMES...1994...3,609,68 ( no cops, military)
Kleck......1994...2.5 million ( no cops, military)
Obama's CDC....2013....500,000--3million
--------------------
Bordua...1977...1,414,544
DMIb...1978...1,098,409 ( no cops, military)
Hart...1981...1.797,461 ( no cops, military)
Mauser...1990...1,487,342 ( no cops, military)
Gallup...1993...1,621,377 ( no cops, military)
DEPT. OF JUSTICE...1994...1.5 million ( the bill clinton study)
Journal of Quantitative Criminology--- 989,883 times per year."
(Based on survey data from a 2000 study published in the Journal of Quantitative Criminology,[17] U.S. civilians use guns to defend themselves and others from crime at least 989,883 times per year.[18])
Paper: "Measuring Civilian Defensive Firearm Use: A Methodological Experiment." By David McDowall and others. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, March 2000. Measuring Civilian Defensive Firearm Use: A Methodological Experiment - Springer
-------------------------------------------
Ohio...1982...771,043
Gallup...1991...777,152
Tarrance... 1994... 764,036 (no cops, military)
Lawerence Southwich Jr. 400,000 fewer violent crimes and at least 800,000 violent crimes deterred..
*****************************************
If you take the studies from that Kleck cites in his paper, 16 of them....and you only average the ones that exclude military and police shootings..the average becomes 2 million...I use those studies because I have the details on them...and they are still 10 studies (including Kleck's)....
RealDave
Gold Member
- Sep 28, 2016
- 26,521
- 3,565
- 290
How many people have been killed by computers?Can you transport goods with a gun, can your travel by gun? No. The purpose of a gun to to harm or kill. Or, in the majority of cases, it puffs out your chest & makes you think you are some sort of tough guy.so do gunsTrucks serve a purpose. Jets serve a purpose.
only people who have no experience with guns say stupid shit like you just did.
a gun is a tool that it all it is. I regard a gun as a tool no different from a table saw, or a drill.
And if the purpose of a gun is to kill then I and millions of other gun owners have been using them wrong
You are right. Carpenters typically have a piston on their tool belt. Grab by the barrel & you can pound nails & that front sight works as a flat head screw driver.
Guns are designed to kill or harm. Yes you can target shoot or hunt but you don't need a assault type rifle to do that.
You don't need a computer to post silly stuff on the internet...only the police, military and government really need computers..right?
Skull Pilot
Diamond Member
- Nov 17, 2007
- 45,446
- 6,163
- 1,830
Tragic teen gamer dies after 'playing computer for 22 days in a row'How many people have been killed by computers?Can you transport goods with a gun, can your travel by gun? No. The purpose of a gun to to harm or kill. Or, in the majority of cases, it puffs out your chest & makes you think you are some sort of tough guy.so do guns
only people who have no experience with guns say stupid shit like you just did.
a gun is a tool that it all it is. I regard a gun as a tool no different from a table saw, or a drill.
And if the purpose of a gun is to kill then I and millions of other gun owners have been using them wrong
You are right. Carpenters typically have a piston on their tool belt. Grab by the barrel & you can pound nails & that front sight works as a flat head screw driver.
Guns are designed to kill or harm. Yes you can target shoot or hunt but you don't need a assault type rifle to do that.
You don't need a computer to post silly stuff on the internet...only the police, military and government really need computers..right?
Exploding PC Burns Man to Death
2aguy
Diamond Member
- Jul 19, 2014
- 112,329
- 52,557
- 2,290
- Thread starter
- #139
The gun loving culture believes in the hero gunslinger. The fact of a concealed carry permit does not guarantee skilled marksmanship. More bullets flying around is not a solution anymore than gasoline can extinguish fires.So you're disappointed because there weren't more bullets flying around the terminal? Not enough lethal crossfire to satisfy you?An airport. Sure, there won't be any armed law enforcement people there.No moron...I am pointing out how stupid your anti-gun laws are......he used a gun you morons have created....through your magazine restrictions and he still killed people...
Which is exactly why we do not trust you morons...we know that a shooter can use a 9 round magazine to kill people...so once you have cemented getting rid of anything over 10 rounds, you will move on to the 10 and less round magazines....you can't be trusted and you will not stop.....
And most of all...it was a gun free zone.......except for the guy who killed people.....
You don't give a damn about people. You only admire weapons.
Again.....the police allowed 5 people to get killed because they were not at the scene when the shooting started......it was a gun free zone....and even with armed police he still managed to shoot people...because it was a gun free zone for law abiding people......until the police arrived......too late....
No, we're disappointed that the laws you are all so proud of only allow evil doers to have guns. Back in the 1970's had the idiot done what he did in Ft. Lauderdale in Nevada where we are far more gun owner friendly he would have been able to shoot only a couple of people before he was ventilated into submission. You all WANT a culture of victimhood. You seem to love it when innocent people are harmed.
Why is that?
The mere presence of guns does not guarantee an absence of gun violence. When Reagan was shot, he was surrounded by armed security personnel, yet he and three others took bullets that day.
Dirty Harry is a cinematic character. Mrs. Smith and her .38 in the handbag ain't Dirty Harry.
You seem to want to expand the violent gun culture in spite of the obvious dangers. Why?
Because you don't know what you are talking about....actual, real world cases of armed citizens stopping mass shooters happen....and with very little to no training on the part of the citizen.....that is the truth.....you can't accept it....
Actually, the mere precense of a gun is often all that is needed to stop a violent criminal attack, and it the mere presence of a gun has stopped several mass shooters from shooting people.....actual, real world events.
2aguy
Diamond Member
- Jul 19, 2014
- 112,329
- 52,557
- 2,290
- Thread starter
- #140
How many people have been killed by computers?Can you transport goods with a gun, can your travel by gun? No. The purpose of a gun to to harm or kill. Or, in the majority of cases, it puffs out your chest & makes you think you are some sort of tough guy.so do guns
only people who have no experience with guns say stupid shit like you just did.
a gun is a tool that it all it is. I regard a gun as a tool no different from a table saw, or a drill.
And if the purpose of a gun is to kill then I and millions of other gun owners have been using them wrong
You are right. Carpenters typically have a piston on their tool belt. Grab by the barrel & you can pound nails & that front sight works as a flat head screw driver.
Guns are designed to kill or harm. Yes you can target shoot or hunt but you don't need a assault type rifle to do that.
You don't need a computer to post silly stuff on the internet...only the police, military and government really need computers..right?
Computers facilitate every terrorist act...including 9/11.....I see you are igoring the research on gun self defense.
Similar threads
- Replies
- 65
- Views
- 542
- Replies
- 75
- Views
- 614
- Replies
- 13
- Views
- 216
- Replies
- 30
- Views
- 293
Latest Discussions
- Replies
- 819
- Views
- 4K
Forum List
-
-
-
-
-
Political Satire 8675
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
ObamaCare 781
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Member Usernotes 485
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-