Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You mean after their tanks rolled into Egypt? Ya know, I'd have more respect for you if ya just said, "Yeah, we attacked Egypt! So what!"
You mean after their tanks rolled into Egypt? Ya know, I'd have more respect for you if ya just said, "Yeah, we attacked Egypt! So what!"
fathomjournal.org
According to Israel, not the UN. You can't have it both ways. You're trying to burn the candle at both ends towards the m
According to Israel, not the UN. You can't have it both ways. You're trying to burn the candle at both ends towards the middle.
www.bicom.org.uk
Even if I did that, it still does not justify Israeli tanks rolling into Egypt.Obviously reading comprehension isn't what you excel in. I'd have more respect for you if you admitted that Nasser deliberately blocked Israel's right to INTERNATIONAL WATERS and admitted his goal was Israel's destruction BEFORE the tanks rolled in1967 | Nasser’s Antisemitic War Against Israel
Matthias Kuntzel is the author of the award-winning book Jihad and Jew-Hatred: Islamism, Nazism and the Roots of 9/11. In this essay in intellectual history he argues that the main cause of both Nasse...
That link does not disprove anything I've said.19 May 1967 â UN peacekeeping force to leave Sinai - BICOM
To mark the 50th anniversary of the Six-Day War BICOM is taking you back in time with a selection of policy briefings as if they were written 50 years ago to the day. BICOM is tweeting British newspaper reports from 1967 @BritainIsrael and live tweeting Lt. Yael Dayan’s war diary @YaelDayan67 –...
Wrong again...... ASSHOLE
Yes it does; MORON . The U. N “ peacekeepers “ were in the Sinai where they were Supposed to beThat link does not disprove anything I've said.
They weren't in Israel. Because the Israelis wouldn't let them in.
I don't know who. All I know is that it is not Israel.
You’re right…. It was perfectly OK for Nasser to Block Israel’s right to International Waters and brag to the entire world his goal was Israel’s destruction. Another Pro Pal ASSHOLEEven if I did that, it still does not justify Israeli tanks rolling into Egypt.
You mean after their tanks rolled into Egypt? Ya know, I'd have more respect for you if ya just said, "Yeah, we attacked Egypt! So what!"
And they were supposed to also be in Israel checking their water supply.Yes it does; MORON . The U. N “ peacekeepers “ were in the Sinai where they were Supposed to be
The MORON is still claiming it’s Israel’s fault because Israel wouldn’t “ let them in” They WEREN’T supposed to be in IsraelUNEF I withdrawal (16 May - 17 June 1967) - SecGen report, addenda, corrigendum - Question of Palestine
DOCUMENTS A/6730 AND ADD.1-3 Report of the Secretary-General on the withdrawal of the United Nations Emergency Force ______________________________________________________________________ DOCUMENT A/6730 1/ [Original text: English] [26 June 1967] 1. This special report is submitted in accordance...www.un.org
DURR
Thread please. You’re a LIARAnd they were supposed to also be in Israel checking their water supply.
What does that have to do with Nasser closing Israel’s right to INTERNATIONAL WATERS and bragging his goal was Israel’s destruction??
You are right, I am an asshole.You’re right…. It was perfectly OK for Nasser to Block Israel’s right to International Waters and brag to the entire world his goal was Israel’s destruction. Another Pro Pal ASSHOLE
Nothing. I was just commenting on the Peacekeepers overall mission.Thread please. You’re a LIAR
Thanks for admitting your post is meaninglessNothing. I was just commenting on the Peacekeepers overall mission.
You would rather lie to yourself, than deal with the truth. I will give you a $1000 if you can show me one post of mine where I said, "destroy Israel". Just one!
www.usmessageboard.com
Nice try but the 67 War was not about “ Occupation “ Try educating yourself and tell us why Abbas rejected Olmert’s offerSince Israel is the occupational force, the first move is theirs.
Fire intensified
Not to me.Thanks for admitting your post is meaningless
Do you have ADD? I said where did I say that? Do Palestinians have a right to exist without interference from Israel?The Hamas Charter
The Israelis have a right to exist without interference from the Palestinians Since Israel is the occupational force, the first move is theirs.
You have to CLICK THE LINK - USMB does a shitty job of linking posts.
Now, will you be using a credit card or PayPal to pay up?
Israel didn't withdraw. They still control 80% of everything that comes in and out of the area. That's not a withdrawal. Come talk to me when Gazans can fish without getting shot at.Nice try but the 67 War was not about “ Occupation “ Try educating yourself and tell us why Abbas rejected Olmert’s offer
BTW, when Israel withdrew from Gaza in 2005 the Rocket
