Penelope
Diamond Member
- Jul 15, 2014
- 60,265
- 15,791
- 2,210
Wtf are you talking about? Carter was never a CIA member and there is nothing about him actively cooperating with CIA during or after Trump's campaign.
so uninformed
He might be a CIA member, but we will never know. Its all irrelevant, the Russia Investigation was warranted and unbias.
Facts- (per the report)
Definitely a CIA asset
The launching was justified - from there - all evidence shows "no"
A definite bias was shown, none of the people that voluntarily spoke with Horowitz were dumb enough to say - yes it was political.
A CIA asset isn't always by choice. Also no there was no bias in the investigation, and the FISA warrant , if real, was a separate issue.
-----------------------------------------------------------
There are different categories of assets, including people who:
- Willingly work for a foreign government for ideological reasons such as being against their government, but live in a country that doesn't allow political opposition. They may elect to work with a foreign power to change their own country because there are few other ways available.
- Work for monetary gain. Intelligence services often pay good wages to people in important positions that are willing to betray secrets.
- Have been blackmailed and are forced into their role.
- Do not even know they are being used (so called "useful idiots"). Assets can be loyal to their country, but may still provide a foreign agent with information through failures in information safety, such as using insecure computers or not following proper OPSEC procedures during day-to-day chatting.
- Asset (intelligence) - Wikipedia
I dismiss you.
I understand, you can't stand knowledgeable people.