Crepitus
Diamond Member
- Mar 28, 2018
- 76,425
- 74,951
- 3,615
I already have, it's waaay back on the first page.Give us a number. What is a "fair share"?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I already have, it's waaay back on the first page.Give us a number. What is a "fair share"?
Thank you. Most people who whine about a "fair share" only mean "more", and never give any numbers at all. This we can work with. I do not believe it is morally or ethically right for the government to take more than a third of any person's earnings, no matter how much that person earns. In fact, the lower the tax rates on regular income, the more the wealthy will bring into the open as regular income. As it stands now, they hide a lot of it in stock grants, capital gains, etc. You know how it works, he gets paid $500,000 in cash which gets taxed at 37% and $15,000,000 in stocks grants, which he holds for a few years then sells at a profit that's taxed at 0 if he held it long enough.I already have, it's waaay back on the first page.
Republicans told you that and YOU believe them??????? You're even dumber than you seem.
The American worker has seen NO benefit from the Republican economy for more than 40 years.
Working people had savings and wealth before Reagan rewrote the tax code. Now they're all dependent on government handouts.
People on the left are the ones who vehemently opposed all of the free trade advocates on the right.
NAFTA was Reagan's pet project, and the final negotiations were completed and the NAFTA Agreement was signed by George H.W. Bush in October, just before the 1992 election because the Democrats were opposed to to NAFTA, just as they had opposed Nixon's Trade Agreement with China. Clinton and the Democrats insisted on better workers protections in NAFTA before Congress passed the deal and it was signed into law.
Now that these free trade agreements have resulted the off-shoring of American manufacturing, just as the Democrats predicted, and tried to stop, and American workers are in revolt, Republicans are trying to blame this all on Democrats.
Everything you posted about the economy is flat out bullshit. I was a bank manager for 9 years, and I am well versed on how business works and functions. One of my friends told me that when her multi-millionaire father was starting out, he had one of his employees pick him up and drive him to work every day, because all of his money was tied up in his business and he couldn't afford a car. He paid his men well, and they made him rich, but he paid himself last, and took less money out of the business than he paid his men, because it didn't make enough money for him to take more, starting out.
Successful corporations pay their workers first, because without them you have nothing. McDonalds is losing business, losing market share, and people are avoiding them because corporate has bled the franchise stores white for so long that the restaurants are dirty, crappy, and the staff is miserable working there because they're paid so poorly.
Walmart was forced to raise wages because shoppers reported surly miserable staff were a total turnoff. People who are struggling financially because of their employers' fiscal policies are not giving you their best. They resent having to get up to go to work every day, and it shows.
Anyone who can get a job that pays better, will do it, leaving you with those who can't get a better job.
If billionaires and mega corps were paying the same rate I am our budget problems would be solved for decades if not longer.Thank you. Most people who whine about a "fair share" only mean "more", and never give any numbers at all. This we can work with. I do not believe it is morally or ethically right for the government to take more than a third of any person's earnings, no matter how much that person earns.
It's a tax break for everyone."if they choose to"?
You mean if they can afford to.
It's a tax break for the wealthy. Always has been
No, my house and everything in it was destroyed in a tornado in 1970. The insurance company is your friend until you have a total loss. Then their goal is to minimize their payout. The house I rented and moved into was insulated with urea formaldehyde foam insulation, and I got seriously ill from living there and couldn't work for two years. So between the tornado and not working for two years, my savings were exhausted, and I ended up taking care of a friends house until I was able to recover and get back to work. Within 3 years, I was making top dollar and fending off offers from big Bay Street firms.
Not everyone can spare $5.00 a week.It's a tax break for everyone.
You can start investing with as little a $5 a week
A car is bought with money that's been taxed as well. And capitol gains are a tax shelter because of the lower rate.
If almost 70% of US GDP comes from consumers, the working class creates far more jobs than the employer/shareholder class:How many jobs does the working class create again?
Go away, dumbass. There's actually a discussion happening here.You don't know what capitol gains are, Chang.
Then why is it only now that wages are rising?
Actually, corporations should not be taxed at all, because they build it into their cost structure and the customer ends up paying for it. If you want billionaires to pay more, eliminate all loopholes and go to a tax return that can be filled out on a single sheet of paper. You made this much money (from all sources) last year, you multiply that number by a percentage (that everyone pays), and that's what you owe the government for the year. Problem solved. People can't survive on what's left after that percentage? Lower it. The government is far too big and spends far too much. Heck, use maybe three different percentages if you want, but no more than that. Of course, you're going to hurt a lot of elderly poor people who rely on low tax capital gains income, but who cares about them, right? We're going to get those billionaires.If billionaires and mega corps were paying the same rate I am our budget problems would be solved for decades if not longer.
If almost 70% of US GDP comes from consumers, the working class creates far more jobs than the employer/shareholder class:
![]()
Infographic: Consumer Spending Drives U.S. GDP Growth in Q1 2021
Bullshit.Not everyone can spare $5.00 a week.
It's a tax break that only the wealthy get any real benefits from. It's a tax break for the wealthy.
And who provides jobs for the working class?If almost 70% of US GDP comes from consumers, the working class creates far more jobs than the employer/shareholder class:
![]()
Infographic: Consumer Spending Drives U.S. GDP Growth in Q1 2021
Go away, dumbass. There's actually a discussion happening here.
Corporations earn income and should be taxed.Actually, corporations should not be taxed at all, because they build it into their cost structure and the customer ends up paying for it. If you want billionaires to pay more, eliminate all loopholes and go to a tax return that can be filled out on a single sheet of paper. You made this much money (from all sources) last year, you multiply that number by a percentage (that everyone pays), and that's what you owe the government for the year. Problem solved. People can't survive on what's left after that percentage? Lower it. The government is far too big and spends far too much. Heck, use maybe three different percentages if you want, but no more than that. Of course, you're going to hurt a lot of elderly poor people who rely on low tax capital gains income, but who cares about them, right? We're going to get those billionaires.
Actually, corporations should not be taxed at all, because they build it into their cost structure and the customer ends up paying for it. If you want billionaires to pay more, eliminate all loopholes and go to a tax return that can be filled out on a single sheet of paper. You made this much money (from all sources) last year, you multiply that number by a percentage (that everyone pays), and that's what you owe the government for the year. Problem solved. People can't survive on what's left after that percentage? Lower it. The government is far too big and spends far too much. Heck, use maybe three different percentages if you want, but no more than that. Of course, you're going to hurt a lot of elderly poor people who rely on low tax capital gains income, but who cares about them, right? We're going to get those billionaires.
Corporations earn income and should be taxed.
I'm 100% behind simplifying the tax code.
Unfortunately your flat tax thing isn't workable. 30% of $15,000 is a third of a poor person's income and nothing to a billionaire. Tax rates must me progressive.
The government spends too much, yes. But mostly on the wrong things. Redirecting funding is definitely needed.
Pay taxes on your money when you earn it. Retirement savings with tax deferment are a scam that makes the government more money and hurts retirees.
Edit:. I'm not out to "get" the billionaires, but they should oay at least the same percentage that I do.