The killer did not use an AR-15...he used a Sig....

Yes..it does..you morons want to ban a whole class of guns...because you hate them.

Banning them would not have changed anything that happened in that club...he would have used pistols like the Virginia Tech shooter did and that guy murdered 32 people with one handgun........

So this rifle is unimportant to this shooting...and the fact that Americans own this rifle in vast numbers...3,750,000 of them, probably closer to 5,000,000 ....and 1 was used to kill people........

3,750,000 to 1......and you think it is rational to ban them.....


And you expect us to trust you to deal honestly in any discussion of gun laws....
who said i want to ban them?

i want to restrict the sale. i want people to be evaluated before they're purchased. the ar-15 (and the sig) are designed to kill people. they aren't self defense weapons, they aren't hunting weapons (although some will hunt with them)

they are people killers. we need to make sure that crazy people aren't buying them.

and here's the thing - mass shooters choose these rifles for a reason.

The problem is people like you that say "we need to make sure crazy people aren't buying them" are the same ones that want to make the determination as to what defines someone as crazy.
You're included. There, now are you cool with stopping nut balls from getting guns under an agreed definition?


Those ho are adjudicated mentally ill can already be stopped from buying these guns...there...are you satisfied..what you say you want already exists...funny, but you still want more.....don't you?

So, if a court doesn't say someone is crazy, they aren't crazy? Not even Jihadist who haven't seen a judge?
What are you going to do about all the undiagnosed nuts?
 
We have the beginnings of the exact government that the Second Amendment was designed to defend us from.
 
there is no civilian lawful purpose for this military grade weapon...

sig_sauer_mcx_f.jpg

SIG SAUER developed the MCX rifle for America’s special forces.


While the SIG SAUER MCX kinda looks like a standard AR-15, there’s one major difference: it’s gas piston operated. Buffer and gas tube? Gone. SIG’s replaced them with a short stroke gas piston and a compact recoil system contained completely within the upper receiver. To provide the force necessary to stop the bolt carrier’s rearward movement and return it to battery after each round, the MCX features a pair of recoil springs directly attached to the bolt carrier. Because the recoil springs are housed where an AR-15’s charging handle would normally sit the charging handle has been moved slightly higher than normal on the receiver.

When you run a suppressed rifle the added back pressure from the silencer creates additional force to the bolt carrier, which makes the rifle cycle faster. That’s not good; it can become uncontrollable and cause excessive wear on the operating bits. The MCX has an adjustable gas system that changes the amount of gas being sent to the piston, controlling the cycle rate. The system’s equipped with a gas regulator that the shooter can adjust on the fly.

[NB: There are currently two MCX version on the market. The first (sold through Cabela’s) uses a self-regulating gas system that vents super-heated gas directly into the air to control the pressure. The latest and now official version uses a closed system manually adjusted from “suppressed” to “unsuppressed.” The official word from SIG SAUER: the adjustable gas system was done on request, but they settled on the manual system to make the civilian MCX be as close as possible to the military MCX.]

Gun Review: SIG SAUER MCX - The Truth About Guns


silencers are big out here

why bother the neighbors when you are knocking off coyotes at 3 in the morning

"why bother the neighbors when you are knocking off coyotes(Or homosexuals) at 3 in the morning".

stop your projecting just because you hate gays

doesnt mean anyone else does

What makes you think I "hate gays"? Too early for a joke? Gays are obviously confused. It isn't my fault any of this happened. If you can't look at it without freaking out and irrationally blaming everyone in sight maybe you need to back off of it for a few days until you can think more clearly.


stop projecting your hatred for gays onto others
 
there is no civilian lawful purpose for this military grade weapon...

sig_sauer_mcx_f.jpg

SIG SAUER developed the MCX rifle for America’s special forces.


While the SIG SAUER MCX kinda looks like a standard AR-15, there’s one major difference: it’s gas piston operated. Buffer and gas tube? Gone. SIG’s replaced them with a short stroke gas piston and a compact recoil system contained completely within the upper receiver. To provide the force necessary to stop the bolt carrier’s rearward movement and return it to battery after each round, the MCX features a pair of recoil springs directly attached to the bolt carrier. Because the recoil springs are housed where an AR-15’s charging handle would normally sit the charging handle has been moved slightly higher than normal on the receiver.

When you run a suppressed rifle the added back pressure from the silencer creates additional force to the bolt carrier, which makes the rifle cycle faster. That’s not good; it can become uncontrollable and cause excessive wear on the operating bits. The MCX has an adjustable gas system that changes the amount of gas being sent to the piston, controlling the cycle rate. The system’s equipped with a gas regulator that the shooter can adjust on the fly.

[NB: There are currently two MCX version on the market. The first (sold through Cabela’s) uses a self-regulating gas system that vents super-heated gas directly into the air to control the pressure. The latest and now official version uses a closed system manually adjusted from “suppressed” to “unsuppressed.” The official word from SIG SAUER: the adjustable gas system was done on request, but they settled on the manual system to make the civilian MCX be as close as possible to the military MCX.]

Gun Review: SIG SAUER MCX - The Truth About Guns


silencers are big out here

why bother the neighbors when you are knocking off coyotes at 3 in the morning

"why bother the neighbors when you are knocking off coyotes(Or homosexuals) at 3 in the morning".

stop your projecting just because you hate gays

doesnt mean anyone else does

What makes you think I "hate gays"? Too early for a joke? Gays are obviously confused. It isn't my fault any of this happened. If you can't look at it without freaking out and irrationally blaming everyone in sight maybe you need to back off of it for a few days until you can think more clearly.


stop projecting your hatred for gays onto others
What a really intelligent reply.. Are you still in 6th grade? Your attempt to converse is just about at that level.

immutable-truth-head-up-ass-buried-rectal-cranial-inversion-politics-1314793503.jpg
 
yep.......hammers got it wrong.....

NARRATIVE FAIL: Orlando Islamic Terrorist Did NOT Use An AR-15

The rifle used by the Islamist terrorist in Orlando was instead a Sig Sauer MCX carbine, a modular, multi-caliber (able to swap to different calibers, including 5.56 NATO, 300 BLK, and 7.62×39) rifle system that sometimes utilizes STANAG magazines common to more than 60 different firearms, but otherwise has no major parts that interface with AR-15s in any way, shape or form.
Who gives a shit? It was an assault weapon. You get the drift.
 
This whole thread is STUPID.

EVERY media outlet was reporting the same thing "AR15 STYLE WEAPON" They never said AR15 specifically. Not even MSNBC said that. Primarily because they were reporting what witnesses reported and 99% of civilians think every black scary semi automatic rifle is an AR15, since that's what they see on TV and in movies.

Even Fox News reported "AR15 STYLE WEAPON"

You fucking morons will argue about anything.
 
yep.......hammers got it wrong.....

NARRATIVE FAIL: Orlando Islamic Terrorist Did NOT Use An AR-15

The rifle used by the Islamist terrorist in Orlando was instead a Sig Sauer MCX carbine, a modular, multi-caliber (able to swap to different calibers, including 5.56 NATO, 300 BLK, and 7.62×39) rifle system that sometimes utilizes STANAG magazines common to more than 60 different firearms, but otherwise has no major parts that interface with AR-15s in any way, shape or form.
Who gives a shit? It was an assault weapon. You get the drift.


No....you obviously don't.....the guy could have done the exact same thing with a pistol.....Virginia Tech shooter murdered 32 people with a pistol....the rifle didn't matter.
 
yep.......hammers got it wrong.....

NARRATIVE FAIL: Orlando Islamic Terrorist Did NOT Use An AR-15

The rifle used by the Islamist terrorist in Orlando was instead a Sig Sauer MCX carbine, a modular, multi-caliber (able to swap to different calibers, including 5.56 NATO, 300 BLK, and 7.62×39) rifle system that sometimes utilizes STANAG magazines common to more than 60 different firearms, but otherwise has no major parts that interface with AR-15s in any way, shape or form.
Who gives a shit? It was an assault weapon. You get the drift.


No....you obviously don't.....the guy could have done the exact same thing with a pistol.....Virginia Tech shooter murdered 32 people with a pistol....the rifle didn't matter.
I'd love to see you discuss this with all the experts who have been on news show after news show explaining the difference between the two gun types and the damage they do. I'll give your argument back to you--fine, if the pistol can work "as well," what's your beef with giving up the assault rifles?
 
yep.......hammers got it wrong.....

NARRATIVE FAIL: Orlando Islamic Terrorist Did NOT Use An AR-15

The rifle used by the Islamist terrorist in Orlando was instead a Sig Sauer MCX carbine, a modular, multi-caliber (able to swap to different calibers, including 5.56 NATO, 300 BLK, and 7.62×39) rifle system that sometimes utilizes STANAG magazines common to more than 60 different firearms, but otherwise has no major parts that interface with AR-15s in any way, shape or form.
Who gives a shit? It was an assault weapon. You get the drift.
Do you even know what an Assault weapon is?
Because it has a clip that carries over 30 rounds is that what makes it an Assault weapon?
Because it has a pistol grip does that mean it is an Assault weapon?
Because it looks like an M-16/M-4 does that mean it is an Assault weapon?
AR-15, is a single shot, semi automatic loading rifle, not selective fire assault weapon. That means you have to pull the trigger for each round to come out. Oh my it is soo scary, save me, Obama from the evil guns..
As typical of a stupid liberal(redundant statement)you have no clue about Assault weapons.

Assault rifle - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 
yep.......hammers got it wrong.....

NARRATIVE FAIL: Orlando Islamic Terrorist Did NOT Use An AR-15

The rifle used by the Islamist terrorist in Orlando was instead a Sig Sauer MCX carbine, a modular, multi-caliber (able to swap to different calibers, including 5.56 NATO, 300 BLK, and 7.62×39) rifle system that sometimes utilizes STANAG magazines common to more than 60 different firearms, but otherwise has no major parts that interface with AR-15s in any way, shape or form.
Who gives a shit? It was an assault weapon. You get the drift.


No....you obviously don't.....the guy could have done the exact same thing with a pistol.....Virginia Tech shooter murdered 32 people with a pistol....the rifle didn't matter.
I'd love to see you discuss this with all the experts who have been on news show after news show explaining the difference between the two gun types and the damage they do. I'll give your argument back to you--fine, if the pistol can work "as well," what's your beef with giving up the assault rifles?
I was in the military Old Fart, and know exactly the difference between an M-16 and an AR-15, now go cry to Obama and tell him to take my gun away, that way you can come steal all my stuff.
 
yep.......hammers got it wrong.....

NARRATIVE FAIL: Orlando Islamic Terrorist Did NOT Use An AR-15

The rifle used by the Islamist terrorist in Orlando was instead a Sig Sauer MCX carbine, a modular, multi-caliber (able to swap to different calibers, including 5.56 NATO, 300 BLK, and 7.62×39) rifle system that sometimes utilizes STANAG magazines common to more than 60 different firearms, but otherwise has no major parts that interface with AR-15s in any way, shape or form.
Who gives a shit? It was an assault weapon. You get the drift.


No....you obviously don't.....the guy could have done the exact same thing with a pistol.....Virginia Tech shooter murdered 32 people with a pistol....the rifle didn't matter.
I'd love to see you discuss this with all the experts who have been on news show after news show explaining the difference between the two gun types and the damage they do. I'll give your argument back to you--fine, if the pistol can work "as well," what's your beef with giving up the assault rifles?


Because they are not a problem. According to some sources there are 8 million alleged "Assualt" rifles in the country...about 5 million AR-15s.....and only 1 of them was used to commit those murders.

so 5,000,000 to 1.......and Americans use them all the time for sport, hunting, self defense and collecting...

and since pistols can do the exact same amount of killing.....you won't stop at this rifle.....you will wait for the next mass shooting.....with a pistol...and then say...yep, those pistols have to go to...no one needs a pistol designed to kill so many people....and only the military and police should have high capacity pistols....

And the dance will start again.....

There is no reason to get rid of AR-15s or any other assault style rifle...

The United STates....8,000,000 rifles.... 50 deaths...

FRance...0, rifles.... 140 deaths with fully automatic rifles which are completely banned and illegal in FRance.

See the issue?
 
This whole thread is STUPID.

EVERY media outlet was reporting the same thing "AR15 STYLE WEAPON" They never said AR15 specifically. Not even MSNBC said that. Primarily because they were reporting what witnesses reported and 99% of civilians think every black scary semi automatic rifle is an AR15, since that's what they see on TV and in movies.

Even Fox News reported "AR15 STYLE WEAPON"

You fucking morons will argue about anything.
AR-15 isn't an Assault Rifle, it is very hard for a liberal to understand this.
 
This whole thread is STUPID.

EVERY media outlet was reporting the same thing "AR15 STYLE WEAPON" They never said AR15 specifically. Not even MSNBC said that. Primarily because they were reporting what witnesses reported and 99% of civilians think every black scary semi automatic rifle is an AR15, since that's what they see on TV and in movies.

Even Fox News reported "AR15 STYLE WEAPON"

You fucking morons will argue about anything.
AR-15 isn't an Assault Rifle, it is very hard for a liberal to understand this.
No it isn't an assault rifle, but it is an assault weapon as defined by Congress. Those are two distinct classifications.
 
yep.......hammers got it wrong.....

NARRATIVE FAIL: Orlando Islamic Terrorist Did NOT Use An AR-15

The rifle used by the Islamist terrorist in Orlando was instead a Sig Sauer MCX carbine, a modular, multi-caliber (able to swap to different calibers, including 5.56 NATO, 300 BLK, and 7.62×39) rifle system that sometimes utilizes STANAG magazines common to more than 60 different firearms, but otherwise has no major parts that interface with AR-15s in any way, shape or form.
Who gives a shit? It was an assault weapon. You get the drift.


No....you obviously don't.....the guy could have done the exact same thing with a pistol.....Virginia Tech shooter murdered 32 people with a pistol....the rifle didn't matter.
I'd love to see you discuss this with all the experts who have been on news show after news show explaining the difference between the two gun types and the damage they do. I'll give your argument back to you--fine, if the pistol can work "as well," what's your beef with giving up the assault rifles?

My beef is that your argument boils down to

"more red cars are involved in DUI than any other color, so obviously to battle DUIs we must ban red cars"

or more to the point

"obviously since Muslims commit the most terror acts if we threw all the Muslims out, that would almost eliminate acts of terror"

Well yes, in both cases the proposed action WOULD achieve the desired result, BUT dang those old pesky freedoms.
 
yep.......hammers got it wrong.....

NARRATIVE FAIL: Orlando Islamic Terrorist Did NOT Use An AR-15

The rifle used by the Islamist terrorist in Orlando was instead a Sig Sauer MCX carbine, a modular, multi-caliber (able to swap to different calibers, including 5.56 NATO, 300 BLK, and 7.62×39) rifle system that sometimes utilizes STANAG magazines common to more than 60 different firearms, but otherwise has no major parts that interface with AR-15s in any way, shape or form.
Who gives a shit? It was an assault weapon. You get the drift.
Do you even know what an Assault weapon is?
Because it has a clip that carries over 30 rounds is that what makes it an Assault weapon?
Because it has a pistol grip does that mean it is an Assault weapon?
Because it looks like an M-16/M-4 does that mean it is an Assault weapon?
AR-15, is a single shot, semi automatic loading rifle, not selective fire assault weapon. That means you have to pull the trigger for each round to come out. Oh my it is soo scary, save me, Obama from the evil guns..
As typical of a stupid liberal(redundant statement)you have no clue about Assault weapons.

Assault rifle - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia



For God's sakes, learn what the fuck you are talking about.

Assault weapon is a legal term
Assault rifle is a military term

An AR 15 (and similar weapons) IS an assault weapon , it is NOT an assault rifle.

You can argue all day long about whether assault weapons should be illegal, but use the correct god damned lingo.
 
there is no civilian lawful purpose for this military grade weapon...

sig_sauer_mcx_f.jpg

SIG SAUER developed the MCX rifle for America’s special forces.


While the SIG SAUER MCX kinda looks like a standard AR-15, there’s one major difference: it’s gas piston operated. Buffer and gas tube? Gone. SIG’s replaced them with a short stroke gas piston and a compact recoil system contained completely within the upper receiver. To provide the force necessary to stop the bolt carrier’s rearward movement and return it to battery after each round, the MCX features a pair of recoil springs directly attached to the bolt carrier. Because the recoil springs are housed where an AR-15’s charging handle would normally sit the charging handle has been moved slightly higher than normal on the receiver.

When you run a suppressed rifle the added back pressure from the silencer creates additional force to the bolt carrier, which makes the rifle cycle faster. That’s not good; it can become uncontrollable and cause excessive wear on the operating bits. The MCX has an adjustable gas system that changes the amount of gas being sent to the piston, controlling the cycle rate. The system’s equipped with a gas regulator that the shooter can adjust on the fly.

[NB: There are currently two MCX version on the market. The first (sold through Cabela’s) uses a self-regulating gas system that vents super-heated gas directly into the air to control the pressure. The latest and now official version uses a closed system manually adjusted from “suppressed” to “unsuppressed.” The official word from SIG SAUER: the adjustable gas system was done on request, but they settled on the manual system to make the civilian MCX be as close as possible to the military MCX.]

Gun Review: SIG SAUER MCX - The Truth About Guns






Sure there is. If I want one then I can buy one. The Founders were far more worried about an illegitimate government abusing its power than they were about an invading army thus the 2nd Amendment is about the ability of the American public to own the very same weapons that were used by the military's of the world. Including our own.

And based on the corruption in our government that is now demonstrated on a daily basis, they were correct in doing so.


You are partially correct. I have fixed your statement to actually reflect the 2nd Amendment's true intention:

""""The Founders were far more worried about an illegitimate government abusing its power than they were about an invading army thus the 2nd Amendment is about the ability of the American public to "form a well-regulated militia" in the event the newly-created government became tyrannical against its citizenry as King George III had become.

"A well regulated militia" is not private citizens acquiring military-style weapons to play with at the risk and peril of the general public.

Definition: "Militia: a military force that is raised from the civil population to supplement a regular army in an emergency.""
Google


 
Last edited:
"You can argue all day long about whether assault weapons should be illegal, but use the correct god damned lingo."

Politically correct?
 
yep.......hammers got it wrong.....

NARRATIVE FAIL: Orlando Islamic Terrorist Did NOT Use An AR-15

The rifle used by the Islamist terrorist in Orlando was instead a Sig Sauer MCX carbine, a modular, multi-caliber (able to swap to different calibers, including 5.56 NATO, 300 BLK, and 7.62×39) rifle system that sometimes utilizes STANAG magazines common to more than 60 different firearms, but otherwise has no major parts that interface with AR-15s in any way, shape or form.
Who gives a shit? It was an assault weapon. You get the drift.
Do you even know what an Assault weapon is?
Because it has a clip that carries over 30 rounds is that what makes it an Assault weapon?
Because it has a pistol grip does that mean it is an Assault weapon?
Because it looks like an M-16/M-4 does that mean it is an Assault weapon?
AR-15, is a single shot, semi automatic loading rifle, not selective fire assault weapon. That means you have to pull the trigger for each round to come out. Oh my it is soo scary, save me, Obama from the evil guns..
As typical of a stupid liberal(redundant statement)you have no clue about Assault weapons.

Assault rifle - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia



For God's sakes, learn what the fuck you are talking about.

Assault weapon is a legal term
Assault rifle is a military term

An AR 15 (and similar weapons) IS an assault weapon , it is NOT an assault rifle.

You can argue all day long about whether assault weapons should be illegal, but use the correct god damned lingo.
So you are saying that a kitchen knife, a hammer, a dunk behind the wheel is an assault weapon? Anything that can be used to assault another individual is an assault weapon? Sure when you nitpick you dictionary terms then once again, it isn't the weapon doing the harm but the liberal who is wielding that weapon.
 

Forum List

Back
Top