Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Just because some shitty law didn’t work doesn’t mean the problem can’t be solved or improved. Look up Yangs plan with Liberty dollars. Maybe some out of the box thinking can take us in the right directionI don’t know if it will work, haven’t even heard plans debated yet. But nothing changes if you do nothing
Yang had some interesting thoughts with Liberty dollars
You cannot stop this problem. With the last reform, they gave maximums for campaign contributions. So people formed PACs which have no maximum. At least if a candidate created a false ad, it can be disputed. Thanks to campaign contribution reform, these PACs can run the most phony ads they want, and they are protected by their constitutional right of free speech. All the money that used to go to the candidate or party are now being funneled to the PACs. What was accomplished?
We could make it illegal for any representative to accept any money, but how would the less interested public get informed about the candidates? We here on USMB would because this is our passion. But polls show that in these swing states, if people knew of the corruption of Hunter, Joe, and China, they would have never voted for him. How are they unaware of these events? They don't take the time to study politics as we do here and other forums.
I see no reason for that. Do you?Yes Papa John’s did save consumers $$ and Walmart also saves consumers money. And outsourcing to China saves consumers a ton of money as well. Do you want to address the topic now?They decided they liked paying $12 for a pizza instead of $20. And papa John’s can work on lower margins
Because they have buying power. Rinse and repeat.
Papa John's saved consumers $8 a pizza?
Damn those rapacious robber barons!!!!
Yes Papa John’s did save consumers $$ and Walmart also saves consumers money.
There ought to be a law against providing goods and services more efficiently, eh?
Did you really miss the point that bad or are you just trolling?I see no reason for that. Do you?Yes Papa John’s did save consumers $$ and Walmart also saves consumers money. And outsourcing to China saves consumers a ton of money as well. Do you want to address the topic now?They decided they liked paying $12 for a pizza instead of $20. And papa John’s can work on lower margins
Because they have buying power. Rinse and repeat.
Papa John's saved consumers $8 a pizza?
Damn those rapacious robber barons!!!!
Yes Papa John’s did save consumers $$ and Walmart also saves consumers money.
There ought to be a law against providing goods and services more efficiently, eh?
You're the one complaining about it, not me.
Did Trump break any laws with his Foundation or University?If you read your own link, none of it goes to Trump personally. The closest they get is it can be used for travel and related expenses to his political goals. The rest goes to the RNC which is common with leftover political donations, or his PAC. It's against the law for Trump to financially benefit personally.
Did you really miss the point that bad or are you just trolling?I see no reason for that. Do you?Yes Papa John’s did save consumers $$ and Walmart also saves consumers money. And outsourcing to China saves consumers a ton of money as well. Do you want to address the topic now?They decided they liked paying $12 for a pizza instead of $20. And papa John’s can work on lower margins
Because they have buying power. Rinse and repeat.
Papa John's saved consumers $8 a pizza?
Damn those rapacious robber barons!!!!
Yes Papa John’s did save consumers $$ and Walmart also saves consumers money.
There ought to be a law against providing goods and services more efficiently, eh?
You're the one complaining about it, not me.
A system that consolidates wealth in fewer and fewer hands with each passing generations based on the specious belief that an "invisible hand" magically produces a perfectly just distribution of income is nefarious, at least.I don't see nefarious motives, I see built-in motives as part of the designed system.
A system that consolidates wealth in fewer and fewer hands with each passing generations based on the specious belief that an "invisible hand" magically produces a perfectly just distribution of income is nefarious, at least.I don't see nefarious motives, I see built-in motives as part of the designed system.
Should government redistribute a portion of Bezos's gains in wealth over the course of the pandemic to those who've lost their jobs?What's going on? A pandemic. Hmm, what resources are at my disposal to mitigate the risks for my family? Ahh, more online presence/shopping. Hello, Amazon, and thank you.
Should government redistribute a portion of Bezos's gains in wealth over the course of the pandemic to those who've lost their jobs?What's going on? A pandemic. Hmm, what resources are at my disposal to mitigate the risks for my family? Ahh, more online presence/shopping. Hello, Amazon, and thank you.
"Job loss has also been more acute among certain demographic groups.
"Overall, 25% of U.S. adults say they or someone in their household was laid off or lost their job because of the coronavirus outbreak, with 15% saying this happened to them personally.
"Young adults (ages 18 to 29) and lower-income adults are among the most likely to say this has occurred in their household."
Economic Fallout From COVID-19 Continues To Hit Lower-Income Americans the Hardest
Should government redistribute a portion of Bezos's gains in wealth over the course of the pandemic to those who've lost their jobs?
A system that consolidates wealth in fewer and fewer hands with each passing generations based on the specious belief that an "invisible hand" magically produces a perfectly just distribution of income is nefarious, at least.
A system that consolidates wealth in fewer and fewer hands with each passing generations based on the specious belief that an "invisible hand" magically produces a perfectly just distribution of income is nefarious, at least.I don't see nefarious motives, I see built-in motives as part of the designed system.
Upset? No I’m not expressing emotion. I’m trying to have a discussion about the economic effects of what’s happening in our society as fewer people collect the majority of our nations wealth. You don’t seem to want to have that discussion.Did you really miss the point that bad or are you just trolling?I see no reason for that. Do you?Yes Papa John’s did save consumers $$ and Walmart also saves consumers money. And outsourcing to China saves consumers a ton of money as well. Do you want to address the topic now?They decided they liked paying $12 for a pizza instead of $20. And papa John’s can work on lower margins
Because they have buying power. Rinse and repeat.
Papa John's saved consumers $8 a pizza?
Damn those rapacious robber barons!!!!
Yes Papa John’s did save consumers $$ and Walmart also saves consumers money.
There ought to be a law against providing goods and services more efficiently, eh?
You're the one complaining about it, not me.
You're upset that the more efficient chain is putting mom & pop out of business.
I’m trying to have a discussion about the economic effects of what’s happening in our society as fewer people collect the majority of our nations wealth.
As far as the 650 millionaires who have seen their fortunes expand by more than a trillion dollars since the pandemic began, they may believe safety awaits in New Zealand, surrounded by legions of private guns.I sometimes wonder if the ultra wealthy elite understand where this leads. They are forcing millions of Americans into desperation. This likely leads to violence and they might be the target.
Haha. “Nah, China can suck it.” Do I need to repeat the points you’ve been making to me to show your hypocrisy or do you finally get the point?I’m trying to have a discussion about the economic effects of what’s happening in our society as fewer people collect the majority of our nations wealth.
Collect? You make it sound so passive. So one-sided.
Nah, China can suck it.
Haha. “Nah, China can suck it.” Do I need to repeat the points you’ve been making to me to show your hypocrisy or do you finally get the point?I’m trying to have a discussion about the economic effects of what’s happening in our society as fewer people collect the majority of our nations wealth.
Collect? You make it sound so passive. So one-sided.
Nah, China can suck it.
Collect is just a word that describes exactly what is happening. Would you feel better if I said “earn”? I’m really not interested in word games so use whatever you want
TrollYou too brainwashed and stupid to talk to really. Much laterThanks for the brainwash, PavlovYou want freedom from free stuff that every other modern country has
Only morons think this stuff is free.
I'm happy to point out your idiocy.
And the whiney twat runs away.
When you tell me something I don't know or that isn't ridiculously stupid, I'll tell you.it's the only freedom we have that other countries don't period they don't because mainly we made them make it illegal.do you have any argument except stupid personal insults? I don't think so. Brainwashed functional moron LOL.....Maybe for the richest. we have a higher standard of living because of the amazing natural resources we have. More freedom my butt. Except for pot these days...Of course that is highly theoretical and long in the future period on the other hand why are we the only modern country without a living wage healthcare daycare pa for the richest maybe. Idiotid parental leave keep college and training great infrastructure and vacations, and ID card to end illegal immigration, and mainly taxing the rich enough to invest in America and Americans again? Thanks GOP and silly dupes like you. The inequality and crap upward mobility has gone too far.How would you classify dividend income?Bottom line is there is no such thing as unearned income unless you have a rich relative in your family die off and leave you a bunch of money. All other income is earned
The Incredibly Unproductive Shareholder
"It’s fashionable these days to fret about the high level of CEO pay and its seeming disconnection from individual or corporate performance.
"But to cast CEOs as the paragons of greed simply distracts attention from today’s real business parasites: shareholders."
Despite their enormous power, shareholders are the sole group exempt from the requirement to be productive.
Wah.....owners are mean......now give us what you own....DURR
We prefer more freedom and a higher standard of living.
At least you are getting your pot, by your posts it seems you are getting way too much pot.
Why argue with stupid? That is what you are, you are a partisan ass kisser, you can’t phantom any Democrat not doing the right thing. That is just plain moronic, idiotic and the mind of a simpleton. Any point made you lie or change the story to fit your agenda. I despise trying to deal with you duped, unthinking, dishonest dummies. Take care pothead. BTW, dumbo, Canada and several other countries you can legally smoke pot, dumb ass.
