Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
There is a third possibility. Perhaps the people of that age created myths to help them make sense of things they didn't understand, and over time those myths became assigned to one person who may or may not have existed.There is little wiggle room concerning Jesus. Either he was/is whom he said he was or he was crazy.
If he was not crazy and we still can't understand (or cannot accept) what he said, the problem is rather with our capacity for understanding.
Anyone claiming to believe Jesus must open up to the possibility that what seems impossible is only so because of a failure to fully understand.
This is poor hermeneutics.Luke 22 explains this very well. Jesus said--Keep on doing this in remembrance of me. It occurred on the night of the passover for a reason. It should be observed once a year on the night of the passover. At verses 29-30 it is clear. It was a special covenant only to those who would sit on thrones beside Jesus in Gods kingdom(Rev 1:6, Rev 20:6)- These are called- The little flock( Luke 12:32)= the anointed= the bride of Christ, numbered-144,000(Rev 14:3) only these are to partake under that special covenant to them. Only members of the little flock were present at that last supper(afterJudas left)--The great crowd (Rev 7:9)of other sheep(John 10:16) are not of that fold. these should go and just observe out of respect and love for Jesus and the little flock. I believe its a great sin to partake when one is not apart of that little flock.
That raises the question-Why do all the other religions claiming to be christian tell all to partake?
The evidence of "Jesus" having been alive is pretty overwhelming.There is a third possibility. Perhaps the people of that age created myths to help them make sense of things they didn't understand, and over time those myths became assigned to one person who may or may not have existed.
I will be what i will be is the correct translating of that Hebrew statement. Not- i am that i am.Ah...but the meaning is still the same. Hebrew isn't the only language that the Bible was written in. And, yes, there is I AM in Hebrew. The word אֶהְיֶה ('Ehyeh) is the first person singular imperfective form of הָיָה (hayah), 'to be', and owing to the peculiarities of Hebrew grammar means 'I am' and 'I will be'. Ehyeh in the OT and in the NT. Case closed. JW's are in outer darkness, again.
There's no difference. The quote a shared says the same. If I am, then I will be. And, if I will be, I am. The key is that he said it to Abraham and he said it to his disciples in the NT.I will be what i will be is the correct translating of that Hebrew statement. Not- i am that i am.
Twisting it doesn't make it so. I am that i am was translated in to mislead.There's no difference. The quote a shared says the same. If I am, then I will be. And, if I will be, I am. The key is that he said it to Abraham and he said it to his disciples in the NT.
You are the one doing the twisting. You aren't getting it. Whether it is I will be or I am, the same was stated in both the OT and the NT. The person who said it either one in the OT is the same person who said it in the NT. Jehovah said it in the OT and Jesus said it in the NT. Same person. Jehovah is Jesus. Live with it.Twisting it doesn't make it so. I am that i am was translated in to mislead.
Tell that to Noah...I doubt that. True followers dont get drunk-1 Cor 6:9-11
Yes, the fact that you have no idea how to interpret scripture.It is fact.
Then this is a test that any partook of “ FAILED” because we are commanded to ” Eat” only unleavened(Non Rising) bread at this time . It is a commandment for all generations including our own and since Jesus was known as the “bread of life “ as per the New Testament then eating of him or his teachings since he supposedly “ ROSE” at this time is a very big no no… Wink Wink…There is just no way to get around this simple fact if one is being truthful and not deceitful …Luke 22 explains this very well. Jesus said--Keep on doing this in remembrance of me. It occurred on the night of the passover for a reason. It should be observed once a year on the night of the passover. At verses 29-30 it is clear.
You should read the bible. You see if you had a real translation, not altered, In the OT it says--YHWH said to my Lord( Jesus)--- proving 100% he is not YHWH.You are the one doing the twisting. You aren't getting it. Whether it is I will be or I am, the same was stated in both the OT and the NT. The person who said it either one in the OT is the same person who said it in the NT. Jehovah said it in the OT and Jesus said it in the NT. Same person. Jehovah is Jesus. Live with it.
This is the fact-Luke 22:30--a covenant made to only those who will sit on thrones) =144,000=the little flock=the anointed= the bride of Christ--Not to the great crowd( Rev 7:9) of other sheep( John 10:16) who are not of that fold.Then this is a test that any partook of “ FAILED” because we are commanded to ” Eat” only unleavened(Non Rising) bread at this time . It is a commandment for all generations including our own and since Jesus was known as the “bread of life “ as per the New Testament then eating of him or his teachings since he supposedly “ ROSE” at this time is a very big no no… Wink Wink…There is just no way to get around this simple fact if one is being truthful and not deceitful …
Yet, you cannot deny the fact that Jehovah and Jesus called themselves the very same. So, your translation is incorrect. It was Elohim who said "my Lord" to Jesus. The Father talks to His Son.You should read the bible. You see if you had a real translation, not altered, In the OT it says--YHWH said to my Lord( Jesus)--- proving 100% he is not YHWH.
Scripture interprets scripture.No one can interpret scripture without being taught by the teachers whom Jesus appointed.
The most likely interpretation is someone on acid, or at least mushrooms.Only if one gets taught truth. Explain to us what the 7 headed beast with 10 horns is and the 2 horned beast of Rev 13? Using other scriptures.
